Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19
Tytuł:
A literature review of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodologies
Autorzy:
Kokoç, Melda
Ersöz, Süleyman
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2100434.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Tematy:
multi-criteria decision-making
review
interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set
MCDM
MADM
Opis:
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is one of the most popular problems handled by researchers in the literature. Since the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set (IVIFS) theory generates as realistic as possible evaluation of linguistic expressions, researchers have been expanding traditional MCDM methods to the IVIF environment, especially in the last decade. This study provides a literature review of the relevant articles from several academic databases on applications of IVIF-MCDM methods. The review of 131 publications addresses specific research questions. To understand the research publication trend, this review offers a visual analysis that examines the studies from different perspectives, such as application areas, IVIF-MCDM methods, citations, most relevant journals, and validation methods. One of the most remarkable results of the literature review is that most publications in this field are published in SCIE indexed journals. Another noteworthy issue is that China is the country that produces the most articles in this field. In addition, English journals are mostly selected for the publication of articles. While it is seen that the investment selection problem is chosen mostly as the application area, the TOPSIS method is preferred mostly in the applications. This study stands out as the most comprehensive one that compiles publications containing extended traditional MCDM methods for IVIF sets. This review will be an important reference for future researchers and decision-makers involved in advancing MCDM methods considering vagueness and ambiguity.
Źródło:
Operations Research and Decisions; 2021, 31, 4; 89--116
2081-8858
2391-6060
Pojawia się w:
Operations Research and Decisions
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A MCDM approach with fuzzy AHP method for occupational accidents on board
Autorzy:
Özdemir, Ü
Altinpinar, I.
Demirel, F. B.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/116385.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Morski w Gdyni. Wydział Nawigacyjny
Tematy:
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
fuzzy AHP
occupational accidents
safety at sea
Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (FMCDM)
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
on-board accidents
MCDM model
Opis:
Occupational accidents on board criteria determining is a challenging procedure in shipping industry as the ideal safety ship management strategy depends on many factors involving in shipping transportation There are many legislations, agreements and practices to obtain series of security measures in order to ensure safety and security of seafarers. Causes of on-board occupational accidents need to be evaluated in a correct manner to regulate more functional practices and also to lower the on-board accident rates. However, causes of on-board accidents can be extremely complex. Therefore, scientific methods should be used to evaluate the causes and to determine the measures to be taken. The evaluation of the parameters is of great importance for the future of the maritime sector and in terms of development. In this study, factors have been identified that lead to seafarers? occupational accidents on board and we tried to present alternative solutions which can be applied on this issue. Severity of the reasons that led to the accidents and their relationships with each other are identified to be able to sort through the alternative solutions with a model using the fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method approach. Results of the study revealed that the most important criteria for the occupational accidents on board criteria selection are respectively; human factors, lack of management, ship-borne troubles, cargo troubles and environmental factors.
Źródło:
TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation; 2018, 12, 1; 93-98
2083-6473
2083-6481
Pojawia się w:
TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A modified HEART – 4M method with TOPSIS for analyzing indonesia collision accidents
Autorzy:
Bowo, L. P.
Prilana, R. E.
Furusho, M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1841582.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Morski w Gdyni. Wydział Nawigacyjny
Tematy:
human reliability assessment
multi-criteria decision making
MCDM
error producing condition
EPC
HEART - 4M
EPC - 4M
human error probability
HEP
Opis:
Human error is recognized as the most common factor that causes maritime accidents. The human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART) is a human reliability assessment (HRA) that has been widely applied in various industries. Furthermore, the HEART – 4M method has been proposed to assess maritime accidents. The HEART – 4M method can clearly define the relationship between man, machine, media, and management factors and the human error. However, the calculation process to determine the weight of every selected error-producing condition (EPC) suffers from the uncertainty of the assessor's estimation in practical applications, which may affect the objectivity of its result. In this study, a modification of the HEART – 4M method with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed. TOPSIS is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tool. This study aims to develop the HEART – 4M method to make it more comprehensive and objective when assessing maritime accidents. First, the parameter of the generic task is determined as in the conventional HEART method. Second, the causal factors are converted to the suitable EPC – 4M, and there are four classification factors for the 38 standard EPCs, which are divided into man, machine, media, and management factors. Third, the TOPSIS is applied to handle the problems of interdependencies and interaction among EPC – 4M and the uncertainty that exists in the assessor´s judgment. The proportion effect of each EPC – 4M is determined through TOPSIS by considering the correlation among EPC – 4M. Finally, thirteen collision data obtained from the National Transportation and Safety Committee of Indonesia are assessed to apply the proposed method.
Źródło:
TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation; 2020, 14, 3; 751-759
2083-6473
2083-6481
Pojawia się w:
TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Analiza porównawcza metod wielokryterialnych w ocenie audiencji serwisów internetowych
Comparative analysis of selected multi-criteria method in the evaluation of the audience of websites
Autorzy:
Szarafińska, Marta
Fabisiak, Luiza
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/453941.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki
Tematy:
audiencja (oglądalność) serwisów internetowych
metody wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji
AHP
TOPSIS
audience of internet services
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Opis:
W artykule podjęto problem związany z oceną oraz określeniem właściwego metodycznego podejścia do wyboru metod w audiencji serwisów internetowych. Jako podstawę do zdefiniowania zbioru kryteriów posłużono się danymi wydobytymi bezpośrednio ze stron internetowych. Klasyfikację serwisów dokonano ze względu na największą oglądalność (audiencję), która została potwierdzona badaniami internetowymi. Podłoże metodyczne oceny stanowi zastosowanie metod wielokryterialnych w kontekście przedstawionych problemów. Dla zweryfikowania poprawności otrzymanych wyników wykorzystano metodę AHP oraz TOPSIS, jednocześnie wskazując na komplementarności powyższych rozwiązań. Uniwersalność metody AHP została potwierdzona poprzez wykorzystanie obliczeń wektorów preferencji oraz wartości funkcji użyteczności, które kolejno dały podstawę do weryfikacji wyników oceny z zastosowaniem metody Topsis. Całość kończą wnioski z przeprowadzonych badań.
The paper is focuses on a proper methodical appraisal to selection of method in internet services audience. The set of presented criteria has been evaluate from the internet source directly. The classification of alternative was executed as regard on the largest ratings, which was confirmed on internet investigations. The problem of estimate the websites utility is complex because of the quantity as well as the incomparable of criteria collection. Methodical appraisal is the use of multi- criteria analyses methods in context of introduced problems. To verifying the results of estimate the method of AHP and Topsis was used, showing the complementariness of above mentioned solutions at once. Behind the assistance of pairwise comparison method has been defining the individual preference and utility of selected criterion which has been perform in further evaluation. Conclusion from the research conducted ends the study.
Źródło:
Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych; 2010, 11, 2; 232-241
2082-792X
Pojawia się w:
Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods for the assessment of optimal SVC location
Autorzy:
Aydin, Faruk
Gümüş, Bilal
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2173650.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Borda count method
FACTS
MCDM
optimal location
PSAT
voltage stability
flexible alternating current transmission system
power system analysis toolbox
multi criteria decision making
metoda liczenia Bordy
podejmowanie decyzji wielokryterialnej
lokalizacja optymalna
stabilność napięcia
elastyczne systemy przesyłowe prądu przemiennego
narzędzia do analizy systemu zasilania
Opis:
The goal of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is to select the most appropriate of the alternatives by evaluating many conflicting criteria together. MCDM methods are widely available in the literature and have been used in various energy problems. The key problems studied in electrical power systems in recent years have included voltage instability and voltage collapse. Different flexible alternating current transmission systems (FACTS) equipment has been used for this purpose for decades, increasing voltage stability while enhancing system efficiency, reliability and quality of supply, and offering environmental benefits. Finding the best locations for these devices in terms of voltage stability in actual electrical networks poses a serious problem. Many criteria should be considered when determining the most suitable location for the controller. The aim of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of MCDM techniques to be used for optimal location of a static VAR compensator (SVC) device in terms of voltage stability. The ideal location can be determined by means of sorting according to priority criteria. The proposed approach was carried out using the Power System Analysis Toolbox (PSAT) in MATLAB in the IEEE 14-bus test system. Using ten different MCDM methods, the most appropriate locations were compared among themselves and a single ranking list was obtained, integrated with the Borda count method, which is a data fusion technique. The application results showed that the methods used are consistent among themselves. It was revealed that the integrated model was an appropriate method that could be used for optimal location selection, providing reliable and satisfactory results to power system planners.
Źródło:
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences; 2022, 70, 2; art. no. e140555
0239-7528
Pojawia się w:
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Comparison of domestic logistics performances of Turkey and European Union countries in 2018 with an integrated model
Porównanie krajowej działalności logistycznej w Turcji oraz krajach Unii Europejskiej w 2018 w stosunku do zintegrowanego modelu
Autorzy:
Senir, Gül
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1835504.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
Tematy:
Logistics Performance Index (LPI)
Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
CRITIC
COPRA
wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji (MCDM)
COPRAS
Opis:
The Logistics Performance Index (LPI), created by the World Bank, is a benchmark tool used to determine the threats and opportunities faced by countries in their logistics performances and to improve their performances. Countries aim to increase their LPI scores and rank higher on the LPI list while developing their strategies. Methods: In this study, it was aimed to compare the domestic logistics performances of Turkey and the European Union countries with an integrated model using the domestic logistics performance index data for 2018, which was recently published by the World Bank. In this direction, firstly, the importance levels of the criteria were determined with the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercritera Correlation) method, and then, using the importance levels of the criteria, the countries were ranked according to the domestic logistics performance score with the COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) method. Results: As a result of the CRITIC method, the most important criterion in the ranking according to the importance levels of the criteria was “without physical examination”, which is the sub-criterion of the customs clearance period, while the Netherlands was the country with the best performance in the ranking performed by the COPRAS method, using the importance levels of the criteria determined by the CRITIC method. Conclusions: The study differs from current studies in the literature in that it is the first study to perform a domestic logistic performance comparison using CRITIC and COPRAS methods with an integrated model. The results of the current study can be compared with the results obtained by using different integrated models and different data in the studies to be conducted.
Wskaźnik Logistics Performance Index (LPI), utworzony prze Bank Światowy, służy do benchmarkingu w określaniu zagrożeń i możliwości dla krajów w ich działalności logistycznej oraz dla działań w celu poprawy tej działalności. Państwa dążą do poprawy wartości swojego wskaźnika LPI poprzez ciągła poprawę swojej strategii działania. Metody: Celem pracy jest porównanie wskaźników krajowej działalności logistycznej Turcji oraz krajów Unii Europejskiej ze zintegrowanym modelem w oparciu dane za 2018 rok, opublikowane niedawno przez Bank Światowy. W tym celu wpierw określono ważność poszczególnych kryteriów przy pomocy metody CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercritera Correlation), a następnie utworzono ranking krajów dotyczących ich działalności logistycznej przy użyciu metody COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment). Wyniki: Używając metodę CRITIC, ustalono, że najważniejszym kryterium w ranking było kryterium „bez badania fizycznego”, które jest podkryterium w okresie odpraw celnych. Holandia umiejscowiła się na pierwszym miejscu rankingu stworzonego przy użyciu metody COPRAS. Wnioski: Prezentowana praca różni się od prac obecnie publikowanych użyciem metody porównawczej, wykorzystującej metody CRITIC oraz COPRAS w odniesienie do zintegrowanego modelu. Jednak otrzymane wyniku mogą być porównywane z wynikami uzyskanymi przy zastosowaniu innych modeli zintegrowanych oraz na podstawie innego zestawu danych.
Źródło:
LogForum; 2021, 17, 2; 193-204
1734-459X
Pojawia się w:
LogForum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Decision-Making Process Development for Industry 4.0 Transformation
Autorzy:
Sajjad, Ahmad
Ahmad, Wasim
Hussain, Sulman
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2201777.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Inżynierów i Techników Mechaników Polskich
Tematy:
analytical hierarchy process
AHP
technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution
TOPSIS
operational flexibility
Industry 4.0
multi-criteria decision making
MCDM
Opis:
Development of design characteristics based dynamic decision support framework is presented in the current study, to facilitate the decision makers in the transformation of system in the industry 4.0 paradigm. The model development is designed for a robust decision-making approach to integrating human and machine knowledge to adopt smart technologies and system design. The system is based on prioritization of the industry 4.0 design principles and characteristics including flexibility, self-adaptability, self-reconfigurability, context awareness, decision autonomy, and real-time capabilities. It has been revealed from an industrial field study, the companies facing difficulty to transform the system, and systematics approach needed to overcome the challenge. A decision support process has been developed as an integrated approach to embedding human knowledge. The developed process has been validated using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, the results depict the operational flexibility, has been most crucial transformation characteristics prioritized using the Analytical Hierarchical Process. The developed process has the capability to help the system development and estimate the factors involved in the transformation.
Źródło:
Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal; 2022, 16, 3; 1--11
2299-8624
Pojawia się w:
Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluating the Social Sustainability Criteria of Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing Industries: A Role of BWM in MCDM
Ocena kryteriów zrównoważoności społecznej w zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw w przemyśle wytwórczym: rola BWM w MCDM
Autorzy:
Khokhar, Maryam
Hou, Yumei
Rafique, Muhammad Asim
Iqbal, Wasim
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/371679.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Człowiek i Środowisko PAN
Tematy:
Supply Chain Social sustainability (SCSS)
Best Worst Method (BWM)
Multi-Criteria Decision-making Method (MCDM)
Manufacturing Industries
łańcuch dostaw społecznej zrównoważoności (SCSS)
najlepsza/najgorsza metoda (BWM)
metoda podejmowania decyzji na podstawie wielu kryteriów
przemysł wytwórczy
Opis:
Supply chain management firms are gradually pressurized to incorporate social sustainability practices to address social issues. Though, the researchers emphasized on different dimensions of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), i.e., social, environmental and economic but fewer considered the social aspect of sustainability. The purpose of this research is to take into account the social dimension of sustainability into manufacturing industries. The social dimension of sustainability as compared to other sustainable, has severe adverse impact across supply chains. In order to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of social sustainability in supply chain management, a sample of 53 practitioners of Pakistani manufacturing companies has been selected to prioritize and evaluate the SCSS criteria by applying a decision-making multi-criteria method called the best worst method (BWM). The criteria of the study are ranked according to their average weight achieved through BWM. The criterion employment practices has been chosen as the most significant criterion while cultural values criterion is considered as least important. The results of this study are helpful for industry managers, practitioners and decision-makers to take the decisions for the implementation of social criteria to enhance the social sustainability that lead to sustainable development.
Firmy zarządzające łańcuchem dostaw są poddawane presji, aby wprowadzić praktyki zrównoważonego rozwoju społecznego w celu rozwiązania problemów społecznych. Chociaż naukowcy zwracają uwagę na różne wymiary zrównoważonego zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw (SSCM), tj. społeczny, środowiskowy i ekonomiczny, jednak należy zauważyć, że w najmniejszym stopniu dyskutowane są aspekty społeczne. Celem tych badań jest uwzględnienie społecznego wymiaru zrównoważonego rozwoju w przemyśle wytwórczym. Społeczny wymiar zrównoważoności, w porównaniu z innymi, ma poważny negatywny wpływ na łańcuchy dostaw. W celu wykazania możliwości zastosowania i efektywności zrównoważoności społecznej w zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw, wybrano próbę 53 praktyków z pakistańskich firm produkcyjnych w celu ustalenia priorytetów i oceny kryteriów SCSS poprzez zastosowanie wielokryterialnej metody decyzyjnej zwanej najlepszą/najgorszą metodą (BWM). Kryteria badania są uszeregowane według ich średniej wagi osiągniętej w BWM. Kryterium dotyczące zatrudnienia zostało wybrane jako najistotniejsze, natomiast kryterium wartości kulturowych jest uważane za najmniej ważne. Wyniki tego badania są pomocne dla menedżerów branży, praktyków i decydentów w podejmowaniu decyzji dotyczących wdrażania kryteriów społecznych w celu zwiększenia zrównoważości społecznej, która prowadzi do zrównoważonego rozwoju.
Źródło:
Problemy Ekorozwoju; 2020, 15, 2; 185-194
1895-6912
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Links between crime and economic development: EU classification
Autorzy:
Remeikienė, Rita
Ligita, Gasparėnienė
Fedajev, Aleksandra
Raistenskis, Evaldas
Krivins, Anatolijs
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22443129.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
Tematy:
crime
economic development
growth
EU
multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
Promethee method
Entropy method
Opis:
Research background: Although some authors propose that economic growth should reduce crime rates as wider opportunities to earn money in a legal way diminish the incentives to commit illegal activities and lead to rising costs of the latter, the results of many studies indicate that an increase in crime rates is also possible under the conditions of economic growth. There are also differing views on the relationship between various economic indicators and crime rates as well as the nature of the relationship between the above-mentioned phenomena in the long and short run. Purpose of the article: After classifying the EU member states by their crime and economic indicators, the main objective of the article is to assess the relationship between the crime and economic development and identify the causes of this relationship. Methods: Systematic and comparative literature analysis, the Promethee and Entropy methods, Spearman?s correlation coefficient. Findings & value added: The Promethee method, together with the Entropy method, were used to estimate the weights of the EU member states with respect to their crime and economic development indicators. The most pronounced differences were recorded in Portugal, Spain, and the Slovak Republic. The rankings estimated for the EU member states revealed that although economic situation affects crime rate, it can also be affected by the differences in cultural and political development. Scientific novelty lies in complementing the theory of the shadow economy with the results showing that compared to other crimes, corruption has the greatest weight when examining the relationship between economic development and crime. The practical significance of the research lies in classifying the EU member states into 4 groups with consideration of the relationship between crime and economic development, which may help public authorities to devise the target measures for the effective fight against crime given the nature of the relationship between crime and economic development.
Źródło:
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy; 2022, 17, 4; 909-938
1689-765X
2353-3293
Pojawia się w:
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Material Selection of Collapsible Pot Hauler and Finite Element Analysis Simulation Applied to the Selected Material
Autorzy:
Surya Hadi Saputra, Rahmad
Iskandar, Budhi Hascaryo
Kurniawati, Vita Rumanti
Desrial, Desrial
Purbayanto, Ari
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2201910.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Inżynierów i Techników Mechaników Polskich
Tematy:
materials selection
multi-criteria decision making
MCDM
finite element analysis
FEA
Opis:
The current collapsible pot hauler uses a wooden frame, thus making much space in the working area of the fishing boat and also at this time challenging to find the best quality wood at this time. In this study, the wood material would replace by metal; the selection of the proper material is critically needed. A suitable material means the applied material has to deal with environmental conditions. Finding the appropriate material applied to the collapsible pot hauler; can be determined using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach. After selecting the proper material, the collapsible pot hauler simulates the material stress using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulation. The material for the new model of collapsible pot hauler was selected using the WSM method. The material with the highest rank (selected) is AISI 304, with a preference value of 3.58. The static strength simulation using the FEA method utilizing Solidworks Software shows that the yield strength value is still below the material properties, which a maximum value is 200. MPa, the material safety factor is the minimum value above one, which is 1.24 on the line spool plate shafts. It means that the material AISI 304 is safe to be applied to the collapsible pot hauler.
Źródło:
Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal; 2023, 17, 2; 289--298
2299-8624
Pojawia się w:
Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multi-criteria Decision Making Using Hybrid methods for Supplier Selection in the Clothing Industry
Autorzy:
Lahdhiri, Mourad
Babay, Amel
Jmali, Mohamed
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171958.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Instytut Biopolimerów i Włókien Chemicznych
Tematy:
multi-criteria decision-making
MCDM
supplier selection
AHP-TOPSIS
AHP-WPM
AHP-WSM
apparel supply chain
Opis:
Supplier selection and evaluation are among the most critical issues in supply chain management, affecting companies’ performance because of the important role of suppliers in the chain’s profitability. For this reason, it is important for companies to have an objective methodology to evaluate and choose an appropriate supplier based on convenient criteria in a competitive market. Determination of a convenient supplier selection is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In the literature, several applications of the MCDM methods for supplier evaluation and selection can be found; however, research studies in the clothing industry are still limited. Indeed, apparel supply chain managers have to consider their supplier-related decisions to reduce risks affecting the company’s performance. This study aims to fill this gap by providing apparel manufacturers with different hybrid models for selecting the best supplier. According to a literature review and questionnaire conducted, the main criteria related to supplier selection were identified and determined. Then, the analytic hierarchy process method was performed to determine the criteria’s weights, and then suppliers were ranked using hybrid multicriteria decision-making models (AHP-TOPSIS, AHP-WSM, and AHP-WPM) to select the suitable one in the apparel chain. This research methodology can be considered useful for apparel companies and other industries.
Źródło:
Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe; 2022, 2 (151); 23--34
1230-3666
2300-7354
Pojawia się w:
Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Optimising rig design for sailing yachts with Evolutionary Multi-objective Algorithm
Autorzy:
Pawłusik, Mikołaj
Szłapczyński, Rafał
Karczewski, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1573832.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Politechnika Gdańska. Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej i Okrętownictwa
Tematy:
sailing yacht rig optimization
Bermuda sloop
Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA)
Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Opis:
The paper presents a framework for optimising a sailing yacht rig using Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms and for filtering obtained solutions by means of a Multi-criteria Decision Making method. A Bermuda sloop with discontinuous rig is taken under consideration as a model rig configuration. It has been decomposed into its elements and described by a set of control parameters to form a responsive model which can be used for optimisation purposes. Considering the contradictory nature of real optimisation objectives, a multi-objective approach has been chosen to address this issue. Once the optimisation process is over, a Multi-criteria Decision Making method based on a w-dominance relation is applied for filtering out the most interesting solutions from the obtained Pareto set. The proposed method has been implemented, and selected results are provided and discussed.
Źródło:
Polish Maritime Research; 2020, 4; 36-49
1233-2585
Pojawia się w:
Polish Maritime Research
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Optimum site selection for oil spill response center in the Marmara Sea using the AHP-TOPSIS method
Autorzy:
Koseoglu, B.
Buber, M.
Toz, A. C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/205446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
oil spill
MCDM
multi-criteria decision-making
Marmara Sea
AHP-TOPSIS
Response Center
Opis:
The aim of this study is to determine the optimum location for an oil spill response center in the Marmara Sea. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for the order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method as the most preferred multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique were used. The results reveal that the LOC criterion and PRA sub-criterion have the highest effects on the optimal location selection of the oil spill response center. According to the results, the most suitable location for the oil spill response center in the region is Izmit Bay Entrance. This location has been proposed for the response headquarters to manage the whole operation with the assistance of auxiliary installations in the area. In this study, only technical and operational variables are taken into account, but political and administrative criteria are excluded.
Źródło:
Archives of Environmental Protection; 2018, 44, 4; 38-49
2083-4772
2083-4810
Pojawia się w:
Archives of Environmental Protection
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prioritizing Key Business Actions of an Indian Automobile Industry Using Efficient Interpretive Ranking Process (eIRP)
Autorzy:
Kumar, Sumit
Gupta, Pardeep
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2023984.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Multi Criteria Decision Making
MCDM
system flexibility
SAP-LAP
eIRP
business excellence
cost management
Opis:
Management processes in an organization involve decision-making based on many criteria (MCDM), and in this process ranking of variables plays a vital role. This paper presents the analysis of key business issues of an Indian automotive organization using an efficient interpretive ranking (eIRP) approach. This paper integrates the Situation-Actor-Process (SAP) and Learning-Action-Performance (LAP) framework of the organization with eIRP. It evaluates the ranking of actions to be carried out in an organization with respect to performance parameters. The study highlights the area where the organization should focus on achieving desired business excellence. From the analysis, it is revealed that the top-ranked suggested action for the organization is the adoption of energy policy as a core business policy followed by technology management, maintenance management, and the use of information technology for cost management. This case study is one of the few that uses the SAP-LAP framework for ranking the actors and actions of the organization using the eIRP approach, to make MCDM an easy task.
Źródło:
Management and Production Engineering Review; 2021, 13, 3; 74-83
2080-8208
2082-1344
Pojawia się w:
Management and Production Engineering Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rozpoznanie typów strategii rozwojowych gmin z wykorzystaniem wielokryterialnych metod podejmowania decyzji
Multi-criteria decision-making as a tool for distinguishing types of developmental strategies in communes
Autorzy:
Łuczak, Aleksandra
Wysocki, Feliks
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/414716.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Instytut Ameryk i Europy. Centrum Europejskich Studiów Regionalnych i Lokalnych (EUROREG)
Tematy:
wielokryterialne metody podejmowania decyzji (MCDM)
analityczny proces hierarchiczny (AHP)
analiza SWOT
strategie rozwoju
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
SWOT
analysis
developmental strategies
Opis:
Przedstawione podejście do rozpoznania typów strategii rozwojowych gmin z wykorzystaniem wielokryterialnych metod podejmowania decyzji jest kompleksową procedurą, która może być użyteczna w programowaniu rozwoju, szczególnie przy ocenie słabych i mocnych stron jednostek administracyjnych oraz szans i zagrożeń pojawiających się w ich otoczeniu. Ma ona przewagę nad metodami klasycznymi (opisowymi) ze względu na możliwość kwantyfikowania ważności czynników analizy SWOT, a więc elementów o charakterze zarówno jakościowym, jak i ilościowym. Może też być pomocna przy identyfikacji typów strategii rozwojowych realizowanych przez jednostki administracyjne. Proponowane podejście zastosowano do ustalenia pozycji strategicznej gmin powiatu międzyrzeckiego.
The approach the authors use in order to distinguish types of developmental strategies of communes, based on the multi-criteria decision-making tool, is a complex procedure that can be useful in development programming, and in particular in assessing strengths and weaknesses of administrative units, as well as the opportunities and threats in their environment. Unlike the classic (descriptive) methods, the procedure allows the researcher to quantify the importance of the SWOT analysis factors, i.e. both qualitative and quantitative elements. It can be a useful instrument in identifying types of developmental strategies of administrative units. In the present article, the approach has been used to determine the strategic position of the communes in the Miedzyrzecki poviat.
Źródło:
Studia Regionalne i Lokalne; 2013, 2(52); 95-110
1509-4995
Pojawia się w:
Studia Regionalne i Lokalne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies