Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Karta Wenecka a realizacja postanowień Konwencji w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku – o pojęciu autentyczności
A Venice Charter and the implementation of the provisions of the UNESCO Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972 – on authenticity
Autorzy:
Lipska, Dąbrówka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536347.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Karta Wenecka
światowe dziedzictwo
UNESCO
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego
i naturalnego z 1972 roku
autentyczność
rekonstrukcja
Venice Charter
world heritage
Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972
authenticity
reconstruction
Opis:
This article is devoted to the analysis of links between the Venice Charter and the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972, along with the presentation of evolution of certain ideas exemplified by the term of authenticity, which constitutes one of the foundations of the Venice Charter. Some issues, currently well recognised, which constitute the basis of a modern conservation doctrine, are included in the very Venice Charter. Over years, they became reinforced in the international community’s awareness, which directly reflects the contents of the World Heritage Convention and its execution – starting from the term “heritage of mankind” found in the Charter and popularised by the Convention, through the establishment of ICOMOS, which became an advisory organisation to the World Heritage Committee, to the concept of authenticity and respect to historic substance. A historic substance is the basic carrier of the outstanding universal value of World Heritage Sites. However, the meaning of authenticity of the substance has changed within the last forty years. One of the most significant phases in this process, which influenced, among others, the UNESCO World Heritage List, was the adoption of the Nara Document concerning authenticity (1994), broadening and supplementing the provisions of the Venice Charter mainly in the context of authenticity. However, a high degree of arbitrariness in interpreting international doctrinal documents, resulting from their universal character, has led to blurring of importance of values underlying the World Heritage Convention, valuing intangible values over tangible ones, which derives from the Venice Charter. The concept of authenticity, although linked to the provisions of the Venice Charter, began to be defined only in Operating Guidelines to the execution of the World Heritage Convention. Since 1976 it has evolved, reflecting changes in attitude towards heritage. In this article the process has been illustrated by three entries to the World Heritage List: a historical centre of Warsaw, an Old Bridge within the Old Town in Mostar and a historical and archaeological complex in Bolgar.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 185-197
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dziedzictwo kulturalne i jego ochrona w kontekście infrastruktury krytycznej
Cultural Heritage and Its Protection in the Context of Critical Infrastructure
Autorzy:
Nowakowski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1807030.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-01-03
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturalne
dobra kultury zagrożone zniszczeniem
infrastruktura krytyczna
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturalnego
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego
cultural heritage
cultural goods at risk of damage
critical infrastructure
protection of cultural heritage
Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage
Opis:
W artykule podjęto temat dziedzictwa kulturalnego i jego ochrony. W pierwszym rzędzie zdefiniowano pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturalnego. Następnie odniesiono się do problemu dóbr kultury zagrożonych zniszczeniem, ujmując dziedzictwo kulturalne w kontekście infrastruktury krytycznej. Na koniec omówiono kwestię ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego. Leitmotivem artykułu są uwagi zawarte w ONZ-owskiej Konwencji w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego.
The subject matter of the paper is cultural heritage and its protection. At the beginning, the author defines the notion of cultural heritage. Afterwards, the problem of cultural goods at risk of damage is taken up, and cultural heritage is set in the context of critical infrastructure. Finally, the issue of protection of cultural heritage is discussed. The leitmotiv of the paper are remarks included in the United Nations Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage.
Źródło:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze; 2018, 9, 4; 41-51
2082-8578
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego i jego znaczenie dla działań polskiej administracji publicznej wobec integracji europekskiej
The Concept of Cultural Heritage and Its Significance for Polish Public Administration in View of European Integration
Autorzy:
Dobosz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535342.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego
dziedzictwo kulturowe
dziedzictwo kulturalne
dziedzictwo narodowe
ochrona dóbr kultury
aspekt prawny ochrony dóbr kultury / dziedzictwa kulturalnego
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego w Unii Europejskiej
„Wspólne dziedzictwo kulturowe"
system prawny Rady Europy
Europejska konwencja kulturalna
Europejska konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa archeologicznego
Konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa architektonicznego
traktat między Rzecząpospolitą Polską a Republiką Federalną Niemiec
traktat o dobrym sąsiedztwie i przyjaznej współpracy
prawodawstwo UNESCO
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego
Konferencja Generalna Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych dla Wychowania, Nauki i Kultury
Komitet Dziedzictwa Światowego
Opis:
In his reflections on international and European legal norms referring to the protection of cultural heritage in Poland the author presented select international bilateral conventions (involving the Republic of Poland and West Germany) as well as international European Council conventions which unfortunately do not encompass Poland; they include the Convention about the protection of architectural heritage (1985) which Poland did not ratify. European Community legislation is discussed against the background of the Treaty on the establishment of the European Community and the “Association Convention” embracing Poland and the European Community together with its member states. The proposed analysis pertains to UNESCO legislation whose norms are binding for Poland upon the basis of signed and ratified international conventions. The author outlined the backdrop of constitutional expressions pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage, and examined the relations between the concepts of “national” and “European (joint) cultural heritage” .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 121-141
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe w świetle ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego
Intangible cultural heritage in the light of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions
Autorzy:
Ratajski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538459.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
UNESCO
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2003 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego z 2005 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku
Program UNESCO Pamięć Świata
społeczność lokalna
tożsamość
dziedzictwo materialne
zrównoważony rozwój
kultura
dialog pokoju
dialog kultur
różnorodność wyrazu kulturowego
lista reprezentatywna niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego ludzkości
lista światowego dziedzictwa
polityka kulturalna
polityka rozwojowa
kultura narodowa
kultura lokalna
dobra kultury
przemysły kultury
Milenijne Cele Rozwoju ONZ
prawa człowieka
Opis:
The article refers to two UNESCO conventions adopted by Poland in recent years: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003 and the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005. On one hand, comparing the content of these documents allows better understanding of the keynote of the concept of safeguarding intangible national heritage applied by UNESCO, and, on the other hand, this guiding principle shows the long distance covered while shaping the vision of cultural heritage over forty years from the establishment of the Convention on Safeguarding the Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972. To complete the picture, UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” Programme of 1992, concerning safeguarding the documentary heritage, including the digital heritage, must be mentioned. These documents capture the diverse landscape of human cultural heritage, being complementary to each other. They are permeated by the principles of the protection and promotion of the heritage to varying degrees: equality, diversity, equivalency, share in the sustainable development, importance of an individual creator, and also an important role of the local community in this process. They indicate the evolution of the development conditions based on the cultural awareness, sense of identity, formed in the process of gradual identification of one’s own tangible and intangible heritage. They emphasize the possibility of a significant participation of culture in development. The Preamble to the Convention from 2005 contains provisions which formulate principles in a clear way, and also shed light on understanding other UNESCO conventions and programmes, especially on the particularly important Convention from 2003. The principle of non-evaluation, which applies to making new entries on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, so difficult to understand in the light of the experience related to the application of the criteria for making new entries on the World Heritage List, in accordance with the Convention on Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage from 1972, gains importance in the perspective of “cultural diversity forming a common heritage of humanity” and being “a mainspring for sustainable development for communities, peoples and nations”. The Convention emphasizes the importance of culture for social cohesion; developmental role of exchanges and interactions between cultures based on freedom of thought, expression and information, as well as diversity of media; the importance of linguistic diversity; the importance of vitality of cultures, including for persons who belong to minorities and indigenous people, as “manifested in their freedom to create, disseminate and distribute their traditional, cultural expressions and to have access thereto, so as to benefit them for their own development”. These statements give special meaning to the main thoughts of the Convention of 2003, which indicates the fundamental importance of the local community and individual carriers in ensuring vitality of the intangible heritage as a basic condition for its protection. Hence the differences in determination of goods added to the lists established on the basis of the Convention of 1972 and of 2003. In the first case, the dominating principle is the principle of selection of the most outstanding works in a given field, based on the methodology determined by specialists using the criteria of European historical and aesthetic tradition. In the case of the Convention of 2003, there was a clear evolution towards the recognition of the values of cultural phenomena rooted in the local context, proving, first of all, the diversity and authenticity of these phenomena, with their significance in creating the culture for the local community and as a manifestation of their identity, and, with the use of tools for the protection of these phenomena/ elements, may participate in the dialogue of cultures on the national and global scale. The process of the implementation of the Convention gives a huge chance to prepare a methodology consistent with the assumptions of the Convention of 2003, by means of activities that aim at creating the national register of the intangible heritage, and thus recognize, disseminate and maintain the richness of intangible culture in Poland which, as a result of a well conducted cultural policy consistent with the principles of the Convention of 2005, should be present in the developmental processes of our country in a creative manner.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 5-18
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies