Temat: Katalog Zabytków Sztuki - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Nagroda Polskiej Akademii Nauk za Katalog Zabytków Sztuki
Autorzy:: Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535348.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1964
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: nagroda im. Aleksandra Brücknera
„Katalog Zabytków Sztuki w Polsce”
inwentaryzacja zabytków
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 1964, 1; 58-59
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Aby z dawnego bytu wartości utrwalić i upowszechnić…
To preserve and disseminate values from the former existence…
Autorzy:: Konopka, Marek
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537124.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Spis zabytków architektury i budownictwa
Katalog zabytków sztuki
ewidencja zabytków
KOBiDZ
Opis:: The Centre for Documentation of Monuments (CDM) was created at the end of 1961 and at the beginning of 1962. Currently it functions under the name “National Heritage Board of Poland”. The axis around which the system of protection of historical monuments in the People’s Republic of Poland was built was the register of monuments set up after the regaining of independence in 1918 and continued in the Law on the protection of cultural property and on museums that was passed in 1962. The establishment of CDM is strictly connected with political changes (the “thaw”) that happened after October 1956. The restoration, conservation and organisation of museums was entrusted after the war to the central institution named the General Directorate for Museums and Protection of Monuments, which was headed by Stanisław Lorentz and Prof. Jan Zachwatowicz (General Conservator of Monuments). At the end of the 1950s, museums and protection of monuments were managed centrally by the Ministry of Culture of Art and its subordinated entity – the Administration of Museums and Monument Protection (AMMP) (the counterpart of a department), the head of which was doc. dr Kazimierz Malinowski, an art historian. In years 1958-1960, works were undertaken in AMMP to create a list of monuments of architecture and art on the “green card” form. In 1962, after a new law was passed, the state took over responsibility for the condition of monuments, and the monument was defined as a cultural property entered into the register. The prepared list resulted in the classification of collected materials and the division of monuments into five groups, where the highest classes were subject to protection and the lowest classes were left without care on the state level. K. Malinowski was the originator of the idea to establish a new institution – the Centre for Documentation of Monuments, whose main collection consisted of documentary materials gathered in the Ministry of Culture and, primarily, cards of the list of monuments, which encompassed 35,000 items. Thus, at the beginning CDM became an “external” department of AMMP. The regulations specified the existence of five departments: non-movable monuments, movable monuments, museum exhibits, archives and the library and issuing of AMMP’s publications. This activity began with the Ochrona zabytków quarterly. The department of non-movable monuments dealt with objects of architecture and historic buildings. The idea to prepare a register of movable monuments required the scope of such a project to be determined. The museology department prepared the Muzealnictwo annual. Within 10 years of its existence, CDM gained the status of a central institution collecting documentation concerning the protection of monuments and museology and became an unofficial publishing house. Issued in one volume in 1964, the list of monuments of architecture was published in 17 journals in division into voivodeships existing at that time. In the 1970s, monument protection was becoming an instrument of „historical policy” again. The title of the General Conservator of Monuments was restored. The criteria of “selection of monuments” applied in the list, which completely ignored objects from the 2nd half of the 19th century and the 20th century, traditional wooden buildings – characteristic elements of the cultural landscape of Poland, monuments of industry and technology, historic cemeteries and archaeological sites were questioned during the discussion published in Ochrona zabytków. In 1975 the function of Director of CDM was taken over by Prof. Wojciech Kalinowski, an architect and a town planner, who prepared a new conception of the institution and undertaken the idea of preparation of a full list and record of monuments. From 1975 new models of records and instructions for their implementation began to be developed, resulting in the preparation of the “white card” of monuments of architecture, the address list and the three-level system supplemented with a historical study. The preparation of the register of historic parks, gardens and cemeteries was started, too. The last link of the system became the register of archaeological sites (KESA card). New forms and instructions were published in 1981. Glossaries necessary for the proper description of monuments were being prepared for all specialistic fields. It was also at that time that Spotkania z zabytkami – the first and only magazine about popular science in the Eastern Bloc countries – began to be released. The emphasising of the importance of the monument in the context of cultural landscape became more intense in the 1980s. These discussions made it possible to prepare amendments to the 1962 Law. At the time of political transformations in 1989, the State Monument Protection Service managed by the General Conservator of Monuments was established. On the voivodeship level, SMPSs were formed by offices of voivodeship conservators of monuments. One of the authorities exercising the protection of cultural property was the Director of CDM, who performed the following tasks: support of SMPSs, keeping of the central record of monuments and co-ordination of SMPS units in this respect, development of the rules of documentation of monuments, preparation of the substantive basis for the conservator’s policy of protection of the cultural environment. In the amendment to the law, the care of monuments was entrusted to their users. In 1990 CDM gained a new statute and new role: it was transformed from the institution keeping the register of monuments into the institution supporting the office of the General Conservator of Monuments on the one hand and voivodeship conservators of monuments in historical regions of the country on the other hand. This purpose was to be served by regional centres – divisions of CDM forming interdisciplinary teams of specialists. At the beginning of the 1990s, the Centre and its divisions were computerised. As a result of changes introduced in 1990, the Centre became a content base of state administration in the field of heritage protection (at the time of its establishment, i.e. in 1962, CDM employed 6 persons, and by 1991 this number rose to 160, including 100 persons in 12 regional divisions). However, the new law on the protection and care of monuments adopted in 2003 changed the cultural heritage protection system once again. In 2002, CDM was merged with the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape, which had dealt with the subject area of cultural landscape until then, and its name was changed to the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments. In 2011, the National Heritage Board of Poland was established.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 9-34
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Ewidencja zabytków ruchomych w Polsce : stan, potrzeby, perspektywy
INVENTAIRE DES RICHESSES D’ART MOBILIÈRES ENPOLOGNE. ÉTAT, BESOINS, VISÉES
Autorzy:: Krzyżanowski, Lech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535292.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1968
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: inwentaryzacja zabytków
katalog zabytków sztuki
ewidencja zabytków ruchomych
mała karta zabytków ruchomych
karta ewidencji zabytku
Opis:: Lliinventaire des richesses d’a r t mobilières réalisé par les services de la Conservation des monuments historiques constitue l’objet du présent article. Cet in ventaire est réalisé indépendamment de la publication permanente „Catalogue des (Monuments d’A rt en Pologne” (Institut de l’A rt Polonais près l’Académie des Sciences à Varsovie). 'Les informations contenues dans le „Catalogue” susmentionné, malgré leur valeur réelle, ne peuvent forcément suffire aux besoins des services de conservation tels que: Office des Musées et de la Protection des Monuments près du Ministère de la Culture et des Arts, conservateurs des voïevodies e t conservateurs des grands centres urbains. Pour cette raison les travaux d ’enregistrement ont été entrepris. L’enregistrement dés richesses d’a rt mobilières initié en 1948 sur des fiches spéciales n ’apporta point les résultats escomptés. Parmi les causes de cet insuccès il faut mentionner le manque de personnel pouvant réaliser ce travail, le manque de dispositifs appropriés et surtout la nécessité de diriger tout l’effort en premier lieu pour sauvegarder les monuments d’architecture tombant en ruine ou endommagés au cours des hostilités. En 1961, l ’Office des Musées et de la Protection des Monuments près du Ministère de la Culture et des Arts en trep rit de nouveau d’établir l’inventaire des richesses d ’art mobilières en Pologne. Un nouveau modèle de fiche fu t élaboré. Dûment remplie cette fiche présenterait un matériel d’information substentiel, nécessaire aussi bien pour l’entreprise des tra vaux de conservation que pour les recherches scientifiques dans le domaine de l’histoire de l’art. La fiche de l’inventaire actuellement en vigueur pour les biens culturels meubles contient les rubriques suivantes: 1. Définition de l’objet. 2. Matériel et technique. 3. Style. 4. Origines. 5. Auteur, école, atelier. 6. Dimensions: hauteur, largeur, longueur. 7. Nombre. 8. Historique. 9. Description de l’objet, signatures, inscriptions, photographie 6X9 (il est admis et même indiqué d’avoir d’autres photographies annexées). 10. Sources e t bibliographie. 11. Localité, district, commune, voïevodie. 12. Lieu de dépôt. '13. Propriétaire et son adresse actuelle. 14. Moyens d’y accéder (par ex. où se trouve la clef du magasin, etc.). 15. Date d’enregistrement et no. de l’inventaire. 16. Actes. 17. Iconographie et négatifs phothographiques. 18. Etat de conservation et besoins de conservation, date et nom de la personne qui (l’inscrit sur le fichier. 19. Les interventions des conservateurs effectuées, durée, exécuteur. 20. Remarques. 21. Nom et prénom de la personne qui étab lit la fiche. 22. Date du contrôle et nom du contrôleur. L’enregistrement concerne tous les biens culturels meubles se trouvant en dehors des collections e t des musées. On a donné une large portée à la notion du bien culturel meuble — outre les objets historiques types elle concerne non seulement les peintures murales et les stucs mais aussi les parquets, les détails architecturaux sculptés, les portails, etc. Chaque fiche est remplie en deux exemplaires dont l’un reste dans le fichier du Conservateur de la voïevodie ou de la ville. L’autre fiche est envoyée au Dossier Central des biens culturels meubles au Centre de Documentation des Monuments Historiques à Varsovie. Les travaux d’enregistrement continuent. Le contrôle de leur réalisation incombe non seulement aux o rganismes te rrito riau x du service de conservation mais aussi au Centre de Documentation des Monuments Historiques. Le Centre exerce ce contrôle su r place, et il rédige des opinions concernant le m a térie l qui lui est envoyé. Il influe également su r le choix des travailleurs qui s ’occupent de l’enregisitreiment sur place. Les frais de cette en trep rise sont couverts en principe par l’Office des Musées e t de la Protection des Monuments. Les Conservateurs te rrito riau x prennent à leur charge 30% de ces frais. Ju sq u ’à la fin de l’année 1967 on a établi 77.000 fiches du répertoire ce qui ne répond pas au nombre des richesses d’art mobilières car pour les oeuvres identiques (par. ex. complet de chaises, des lampadaires, etc.) on établit une seule fiche en ma rq u an t dans la rubrique correspondante le nombre des oeuvres considérées. En 11969 les travaux dans la plupart des voïevodies seront terminés ce qui perme ttra d ’accélérer les trav au x concernant les terrains pour lesquels des Catalogues de Monuments Historiques ont été déjà élaborés. L ’on a droit de supposer qu’en 1971—72 le répertoire se ra réalisé et alors le Dossier Central des richesses d’a rt mobilières comptera 120 à 130.090 fiches dans son fichier. Au cours des travaux d’enregistrement on procède à la première classification des monuments rép a rtis selon 3 catégories — les oeuvres pouvant rep ré sen te r l’a rt polonais su r le plan mondial, les oeuvres d’importance nationale e t les oeuvres ayant une valeur locale. Pour le groupe III (valeur locale) Гоп ne remplit que partiellement la fiche notamment les rubrique s no. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 18, 21. Les fiches remplies de cette façon constituent ce qu’on appelle des „cartes d’adresse” et demandent un trav a il limité donc sont beaucoup moins chères à rédiger. Dans la dernière phase des trav au x d’enregistrement sur le territoire de chaque voïevodie une commission de spécialistes est créée. Elle effectue le contrôle des fiches et elle propose des suggestions de classement selon les 3 catégories susmentionnées en accord avec le Conservateur de voïevodie soit de la ville. Lorsque le répe rtoire concernant la majorité des voïevodies sera terminé, une Commission de Classement Centrale sera créée, groupant les spécialistes les plus éminents de diverses disciplines de l'histoire de l’art. Ils procéderont au classement des biens culturels dans chaque domaine (en particulier — orfèvrerie, mobilier, tissus, etc.). Ainsi se ra établi un relevé des biens culturels de la plus haute valeur dans un domaine donné, sur tout le territoire de notre pays. Déjà au jourd’hui, on établit un dossier spécial, séparé, concernant les oeuvres d’orfèvrerie et les orfèvres, au Centre de la Documentation des Monuments H istoriques. Le fait d’avoir un dossier des richesses d’a rt mobilières à leu r portée permet aux services de conservation de délivrer des attestations légales indiquant que lé dit objet a été reconnu comme bien culturel. Ce dossier constitue aussi la base de l’élaboration des plans de conservation des monuments historiques et de ce fa it il réalise les motions essentielles du Service de Conservation. Le Dossier Central des richesses d’art mobilières permet de rédiger une publication d’inventaire s des objets, dont se chargera bientôt le Centre de Documentation des Monuments Historiques. En 1968 un programme de ce genre de publication sera créé et après avoir été soumis à la discussion des organismes intéressés, il sera publié dans la „Protection des Monuments”.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 1968, 2; 45-49
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Europejskie kolokwium w sprawie inwentarzy zabytków sztuki
Autorzy:: Kalinowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536056.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1981
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: europejskie kolokwium w sprawie inwentarzy zabytków sztuki
europejskie inwentarze zabytków sztuki
Katalog Zabytków Sztuki w Polsce
inwentaryzacja i ewidencja zabytków w Europie
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 3-4; 229
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Na czterdziestolecie Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków
THE FORTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CENTRE FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:: Guttmejer, Karol
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539463.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2002
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
historia ODZ
działalność ODZ
dzieje ODZ
Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce
zadania ODZ
muzealnictwo
Opis:: The art o f conservation is activity. The history o f art is cognition. Jan Białostock The author of this motto, an outstanding historian of art, wrote: “Activity should strive towards the attainment o f targets, the transformation o f the existing state o f things, and the realisation o f a state o f things recognised as more valuable” (my emphasis — K. G.). At the time, his article produced a lively discussion among conservators. After all, conservation also denotes cognition, since in the course of widely comprehended conservation undertakings we expand our knowledge about the examined subject regardless whether the researcher is a historian of art, a historian of architecture, a conservator or an archeologist. Indubitably, Jan Białostocki was correct in maintaining that the art of conservation is an activity, one of whose symptoms is the documentation of historical monuments. The ruling which established the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments (ODZ) begins with the declaration: “In order to render the inventories o f historical monuments more efficient for a rational plan o f their reconstruction and conservation, the following is ordained: §1. The ‘Centre for the Documentation o f Historical Documents’, known as the Centre, has been established on 1 January 1962. §2. The tasks o f the Centre include conducting a central register and auxiliary documentation for mobile and immobile monuments”1. Today, the word “reconstruction” may give rise to certain reservations, but at the time traces of war-time devastation were still fresh. The tasks succinctly defined in the ruling issued by the M inister were enormous. Both their realisation and the accomplishments of the Centre have been already presented in “Ochrona Zabytków” upon the occasion of two jubilees: the tenth and twenty fifth anniversary3. In the course of forty years, those tasks underwent certain transformations, predominantly involving their considerable expansion. The image of the activity p u rsued by the Centre is composed basically of the achievements of its departments, whose work is discussed in more detail in further articles. The text presented below plays the role of a sui generis introduction. * * The term “documentation” in the name of our institution signifies, according to Słownik Języka Polskiego (Dictionary of the Polish Language), “a collection o f documents justifying something, source material, evidence”. Further on we read: “scientific documentation: the collection, preparation and dissemination o f selected information (...) for the purpose o f practical application”4. What is the purpose of a documentation collection, namely hundreds of thousands of index cards gathered in the past and still amassed by the Centre? Whom does the archive as well as the hundreds of professional publications issued by the Centre and its specialist library serve? The Centre acts as a fundamental base for the Minister of Culture — the General Conservator of Historical M onuments and voivodeship conservators, especially after the reorganisation of the services in 1991 and the ensuing liquidation of voivodeship Bureaus for the Documentation of Historical Monuments. The documentation created and coordinated by the Centre comprises a foundation for identifying national cultural legacy. This is the material which assists every conservator in formulating his own opinion while deciding to include a certain object into the register (or to delete it). This is also the material which serves a historian embarking on research into gentry m anor houses or old organs in Polish churches. The authors of Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce (Catalogue o f Art Monuments in Poland), issued by the Polish Academy of Sciences, start their work on each consecutive volume with becoming acquainted with our files. Just as the cultural landscape is not an enclosed reservation, documentation is by no means a closed archival complex but remains supplemented and brought up to date. Conservation methods have changed in the course of several past decades as has the approach to numerous groups of historical monuments; hence the transformation and expansion of the Centre’s tasks. The core of the Centre is composed of three prime research departments: Architecture and Town Planning, Art and Crafts (formerly — Mobile Historical Monuments) and Archaeology. Without them our present-day knowledge about cultural legacy in Poland simply could not exist. Their presentation speaks for itself. The Centre contains also several other essential departments which deserve to be briefly mentioned. The Department of Museum Studies gathers, prepares and renders available knowledge about Polish museums. Museum registers, information about collections, as well as scientific, exhibition and publication activity are systematically brought up to date and published in the form of a synthetic guide to Polish museums. The Department also issues the periodical “Muzealnictwo”, which presents data and historical and research material associated with museums. The Department of Archival Material and Scientific Collections possesses sets of assorted origin, i. a. the legacies of various researchers, such as the Łopaciński Folios, the Glinka Folios, and the Ciołek Folios, with material pertaining to the historical and conservation aspect of numerous monuments. The Photographic Collection, which is part of the Department, constitutes a unique resource of negatives and positive copies, many of which refer to non-extant monuments. Co-operation with the Department of Publications initiated the publication of source material found in museums, libraries and archives, indispensable for research conducted by historians of art and conservators — archival catalogues of architectural drawings, plans and measurements (mainly eighteenth- and nineteenth- century) or projects by architects celebrated in the past and esteemed up to this day. Researchers attach great importance to those volumes, without which their work would be greatly hampered. At the time of their publication during the 1970s and 1980s, the scientific and editorial assets of the catalogues placed them at a level equal to that of analogous West European works. Already at that time, we were on par with the leading representatives of Europe. The ministerial ruling which established the Centre included an entry about specialist publications. For forty years, the Department of Publications systematically issues several periodicals and series. The scale of this undertaking is illustrated by the three volumes of a bibliography entitled: Wydawnictwa Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie (Publications o f the Centre for the Documentation o f Historical Monuments in Warsaw) — (for the years 1962-1965, 19661984 and 1984-1994) containing more than 6 400 bibliographical items! Not only the number of the publications is impressive. The overall accomplishments of the Department include several series and up to twenty books simply indispensable for the workshop of the historian of art and the conservator. More than a hundred volumes of the renowned Library of Museum Studies and the Protection of Historical Monuments (BMiOZ) appeared in series A, В and C, embracing diverse topics — from a compendium of legal regulations concerning the protection of cultural legacy and material from conservation conferences, to a series of terminological dictionaries, for example, on goldsmithery, fabrics and defensive architecture, or “Informator Archeologiczny”. The output includes also publications about the technological aspects of the conservation of monuments of painting, stone, metal, leather, paper and fabrics — a venture unique not only on a domestic scale. At present, the Library, which accompanies the Centre from its very beginning, i. e. from 1962, is composed of more than 60 000 volumes of books and periodicals. In time, the profile of the collections, originally more valuable for an historian of art and a researcher interested in museum studies, evolved to wards specialisation. Today, the Centre is the only Polish institution with a book collection on the inventories and documentation of historical monuments as well as a wide gamut of conservation problems, both theoretical and practical. Acquisitions and international exchange enabled the Library, which constantly co -o p erates with 80 Polish and foreign institutions, to possess many foreign specialist periodicals. Auction purchases make it possible to supplement the collections with valuable historical publications required for conservation work and studies. A database of the book collection is being created in Mikro CDS ISIS since 1993, and includes a particularly valuable base of articles from about sixty Polish periodicals. The conservation activity pursued by the Centre encompasses the organisation of various conferences and courses intent on training workers of Conservation Offices and Bureaus for the Documentation of Historical Monuments about the proper execution and conducting of registers. Other tasks include numerous conservation opinions prepared by the Team of Experts on Architecture, Town Planning and the Cultural Landscape (part of ODZ since 1993) for the General Conservator of Historical Monuments and voivodeship conservators. A separate chapter in the history of the Centre was the establishment in 1991-1992 of twelve regional departments — Regional Centres for Studies and the Protection of the Cultural Environment — in accordance with a new ODZ statute confirmed by the Ministry of Culture and Art in 1990. Their creation was one of the prime elements of the reorganisation of conservation services conducted at the time. The foundation of those branches, located in the historical regions of the country, preceded the administrative division of Poland, carried out in 1998; today, they exist in almost all voivodeships. The appearance of the Regional Centres was envisaged as a sui generis compensation for the liquidation of the Bureaus for the Documentation of Historical Monuments; at the same time, the Centres were entrusted with much more ambitious tasks. The examination of the cultural environment was to be conducted on a higher level and render knowledge more systematic; with time, it was to generate a complete synthesis of knowledge about the Polish cultural landscape. Regional Centres co-operate with conservation offices and the local government or self-government administration, i. a. while preparing conservation directives and opinions as well as studies concerning cultural heritage, thus filling the gap which emerged after the closure of the Bureaus for the Documentation of Historical Monuments and the dissolution of numerous outposts of the State Enterprise Ateliers for the Conservation of Historical Monuments (PP PKZ). The Centres inherited copious and valuable archives of the documentation, studies and research conducted by the Enterprise, which, for all practical purposes, ceased existing at the beginning of the 1990s; today, they are the lawful guardians of the collections. The activity of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments would be impossible without close co-operation with voivodeship conservators of historical monuments, best acquainted with current requirements and engaged in adapting the programme of the documentation of cultural legacy to local conditions. For years, the Centre assisted (and should continue doing so!) in co-creating and coordinating research and documentation programmes which, to a considerable degree, it also finances. These efforts made it possible to produce well-prepared registers of, for example, historical rural architecture or musical instruments, and furthered the progress achieved by the Archeological Photograph of Poland. The Centre also helped to train the personnel of voivodeship Bureaus for the Documentation of Historical Monuments — today non-existent — for the preparation of frequently challenging documentation. For this purpose, the Centre organised scientific conferences and training courses as well as excursions intended for students and employees of conservation services. It is worth remembering that the State Service for the Protection of Historical Monuments, created in 1991, was staffed by the employees of the dissolved Bureaus, who today comprise the basic core of conservation services. The preparation and realisation of various tasks could not have been accomplished w ithout the collaboration of scholars and academic environments. The Centre initiated and organised numerous interdisciplinary scientific sessions devoted to research methods, and in particular to conservation requirements. Such co-operation involved also PP PKZ. The outcome of those sessions included, as a rule, publications issued in the above mentioned Library of Museum Studies and the Protection of Historical Monuments. For the past four decades ODZ experienced considerable transformations. It began as the employer of eight staff members working in the Primate’s Palace in Senatorska Street. In 1970, a house in 35 Brzozowa Street was specially reconstructed for its purposes; today, it remains a symbol of our institution, strongly enrooted in the consciousness of Polish conservators. Rapidly growing documentation tasks and the increased efforts of the Centre were the reason why already at the end of the 1970s the existing offices proved to be cramped. At the end of the 1980s they were used by almost thirty persons, and the conditions in which the latter were compelled to work appear to be inconceivable. For many years, Director Prof. Wojciech Kalinowski endeavoured to obtain more spacious facilities. A solution of sorts was the adaptation in 1979 of a devastated railway station of the Warsaw-Vienna line in Grodzisk Mazowiecki. The building, which already during the nineteenth century no longer fulfilled its original function, was to act as a storehouse for the more rarely used collections, a suggestion which appeared to be controversial considering the work p e rformed by the institution. The repair of the railway station proved to be extremely time-consuming. In February 1991, Marek Konopka, the new Director of ODZ, finally transferred the majority of the Departments to a new seat in 6 Ujazdowskie Avenue, thanks to the support of Izabella Cywińska, the Minister of Culture and Art, and Tadeusz Zielniewicz, the General Conservator of Historical Monuments. The Departments of Museum Studies and Publications remained in Mazowiecka Street. Subsequently, the repaired railway station in Grodzisk Mazowiecki became a refuge for the enormous archive of several Warsaw departments of PP PKZ, frequently used by researchers from the whole country. The rank of the Centre stems from tasks extremely aptly defined at its very outset; their realisation, however, is entrusted to consecutive directors. The creator of the institution was Professor Dr. Kazimierz Malinowski (ODZ Director in 1962-1966), the then Director of the Board of Museums and the Protection of Historical Monuments in the Ministry of Culture and Art and the co-author of the statute about the protection of cultural property (1962). Prof. Malinowski, whose person has been undeservedly forgotten by Polish conservators, outlined the structure and tasks of Centre, and the framework constructed by him constituted the basis of documentation in Polish conservation. He was also the initiator and organiser of pioneering conferences on the technological aspects of the conservation of art works, and contributed to a rapprochement between three academic conservation centres: Kraków, Warsaw and Toruń. Subsequently, for several years, Prof. Malinowski’s programme was continued by Director Maria Charytańska, who also devised its new version (head of ODZ in 1966-1974). This period witnessed the inauguration of photographic aerial documentation of old towns and the amassment of a collection of monographic studies dealing with Polish cities. Furthermore, the Centre embarked upon a computer version of the collections of the Department of Mobile Historical Monuments. The achievements of Director Charytańska included the reconstruction of the house in Brzozowa Street for the main seat of the institution. Prof. Dr. Wojciech Kalinowski, engineer and architect (ODZ Director in 1975-1989) symbolised further intensive development: the initiation of the fundamental programme of registering architectural monuments, expanded by including buildings from the second half of the nineteenth century and the twentieth century, and the introduction of a new, more extensive index card. The Department of Mobile Monuments initiated specialist documentation of church organs, musical instruments and goldsmithery; at the same time, it continued the pioneering programme of creating a computer database for the index card collection. The Department of Archaeology was established in 1978. In 1990-1995, the post of Director was held by Marek Konopka, followed by Dr. Robert Kunkel, an architect (to the beginning of 2001) and Michał Urbanowski (since 2001). It is simply impossible to mention here all the initiatives and activities of the particular directors. The attainments of the Centre would have been impossible without the co-operation of its employees, who comprise a small but significant group of people co-creating the Centre’s overall image. Throughout the past decades the staff included authorities who remain universally recognised up to this very day. Forty years of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments have yielded an enormous output, which we shall present in greater detail in a further part of this publication. I started my text by citing Prof. Jan Bialostocki’s view about „activity aiming at the realisation o f a state o f things recognised as more valuable” (ars auro gemmisque prior)-, in our case, such activity denotes the expansion of knowledge about cultural legacy in Poland. I believe that today it would be possible to convince Prof. Białostocki that conservation also denotes cognition, to a considerable degree achieved owing to the documentation of historical monuments. * * * Originally, the publication marking the jubilee of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments was to be presented in a different form. In the spring of last year, we planned to issue a special commemorative book to celebrate the fortieth anniversary of the Centre. Nonetheless, the economic situation made it impossible to finance such a publication, and a synthetic history of the four decades of our institution could not appear. This means that an “unofficial” history of the Centre and its workers, brimming with anecdotes and descriptions of the once popular scientific excursions had to be omitted; we were left with a presentation of the accomplishments of particular departments which, as in the case of previous jubilees, shall be discussed in “Ochrona Zabytków”. In the course of the last twelve years, our country has experienced great historical changes which exerted an impact also on the condition of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments. Political and social events — be they better or worse — almost always directly affect our institution. Today, conservators are witnessing the influx of a generation whose members do not always ascribe the same significance to historical monuments and cultural legacy as we did some ten or twenty five years ago. Paradoxically, liberation from a totalitarian system did not bring about transformations of the protection of cultural legacy as prominent as those for which we longed prior to 1989. This is the reason why it is necessary to recount our achievements, both the ones dating from the difficult years of the past, and those originating from present- day reality. Karol Guttmejer Director of the Team for Regional Studies of Warsaw and Mazowia
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 4-13
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: "Architektura XIX i XX wieku" - sesja naukowa w Krakowie
Autorzy:: Chrzanowski, Tadeusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535832.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1976
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: sesja naukowa w Krakowie 1975
„Architektura XIX i XX wieku”
Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 2; 141-143
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Problemy inwentaryzacji zabytków w dużych zespołach miejskich na przykładzie "Katalogu zabytków miasta Krakowa"
PROBLEMS OF CATALOGUING HISTORIC MONUMENTS IN BIG TOWN COMPLEXES ON THE EXAMPLE OF ’’THE CATALOGUE OF CRACOW’S HISTORIC MONUMENTS
Autorzy:: Rejduch-Samkowa, Izabela
Samek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536785.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1982
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: ewidencja dzieł sztuki
inwentaryzacja zabytków w dużych zespołach miejskich
„Katalog zabytków miasta Krakowa”
dzieje inwentaryzacji zabytków miasta Krakowa
Katalog Zabytków Sztuki w Polsce
Pracownia Inwentaryzacji Zabytków m. Krakowa
instrukcja inwentaryzacyjna
Opis:: On the example of works on ’’The Catalogue of Cracow’s Historic Monuments”, describing a few hundred monuments of architecture and several thousand works of painting, sculpture and artistic craftmanship, the au thors present problems of the cataloguing of monuments in big town complexes. Assuming th a t the cataloguing is to cover structures put up before World War II Cracow has now several thousand buildings of historic interest th a t represent different periods. The idea to catalogue monuments arose in Cracow already in the 18th century (first publications appeared about 1900). More comprehensive studies were undertaken only after 1945 and were included into the works on ’’The Catalogue of Arct Monuments in Poland”, prepared by the Institute of the Polish Art attached to the Polish Academy of Sciences. In 1973 a special institution for works on the cataloguing was established, namely the Team (at present th e Workshop) for th e Cataloguing of Historic Monuments of the Town of Cracow, headed by Jan Jamek and emploing 5 permanent workers and about 20 co-workers. Their task is to carry out field works according to the ir specialization, e.g. miniature codices in libraries are prepared by a rt historians engaged in this problem. The cataloguing of Cracow’s historic monuments has been done in nearly 70 per cent. The works carried out so fa r have brought a number of discoveries — out of 1,000 photographs published in one p a rt of ’’The Catalogue” almost 800 represent the works th a t have not been known before. A fu rth e r efficient p rogress of the works depends on the training of a sufficient number of specialists, i.e. a rt historians who would recognize and date various objects from different epochs according to the instructions on cataloguing. It is expected th a t works on the cataloguing of Cracow’s historic monuments should be completed in 15-years time, while editorial works will last about 20 years. The whole of ’’The Catalogue of Cracow’s Monuments” ’will consist of 12 parts (altogether 40 books) containing 3,000 pages of the te x t and 12—15 thousand photographs. It will be an important material for a rt historians, architects conservators, and what is most important, it will offer a full possibility to undertake works on thematic catalogues (e.g. of gold works, already being prepared). A vast number of treatises and articles arising as the effect of the works on cataloques prompts the establishment of a specific department for studies on the art of C ra cow biassed in favour of the works on the a rt of the microregion.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 1-2; 52-58
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Z DZIEJÓW EWIDENCJONOWANIA ZABYTKOWYCH PARKÓW I OGRODÓW W POLSCE
FROM THE HISTORY OF INVENTORIES OF HISTORICAL PARKS AND GARDENS IN POLAND
Autorzy:: Wildner-Nurek, Iwona
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539367.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2007
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: PARKS & GARDENS INVENTORIES (POLAND)
ewidencjonowanie zabytkowych parków
zabytkowe ogrody
ogrody w Polsce
metody konserwacji ogrodów
inwentaryzacja zabytków
Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce
karty zielone
Opis:: The diverse history of Polish gardens is centuries old. The great variety of forms, composition principles and purposes constitutes an important chapter in the history of Polish art and assigns the Polish garden a high rank in the European art of gardening. What is the reason for the need and necessity of recording historical gardens and other monuments? Registers as such are not the ultimate targets, but remain rather a means or an instrument intended for scientific or practical application. Without them it would be impossible to create a scholarly and exhaustive synthesis dealing with the history of art, including the art of gardening. Inventories of historical monuments in Poland date back to the eighteenth century (the initiative of Rev. Ksawery Zubowski), but after the loss of state independence Polish society grew increasingly aware of the historical and national value of its monuments. Official decisions led to records and first inventory regulations. Unfortunately, they did not relate to historical parks and gardens. The progress of a movement intent on the protection of historical monuments finally recognised garden premises as monuments which, in time, were included in inventories (the Central Office for Art Monument Inventories was established in 1929). Larger-scale inventories of Polish monuments of the art of gardening were conducted in the interwar period by Franciszek Krzywda-Polkowski, Oskar Sosnowski and Gerard Ciolek (Warsaw University of Technology). During the 1950s and 1960s similar inventories were entrusted to the Ministry of Culture and Art. At the same time, work at the Warsaw University of Technology was continued by Gerard Ciolek, and subsequently Witold Plapis and Longin Majdecki. Similar research on Polish gardens was pursued at the Cracow University of Technology by Tadeusz Tolwinski and Zygmunt Novak. Janusz Bogdanowski acted as the heir of their accomplishments and resumed this particular trend of research. Inventories of historical gardens initiated in 1975 are carried out up to this day. The task consists of listing all parks and gardens, including relics, regardless of pertinent information or the degree of conservation. In this manner, inventories are to reflect the actual state of the preservation of all park and garden premises across the country.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 3; 87-105
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: Marek Łuczak Policja w walce o zabytki. Zbiór zagadnień z przeciwdziałania przestępczości przeciwko zabytkom. Katalog zabytków i dzieł sztuki utraconych z województwa zachodniopomorskiego, Szczecin 2011, s. 368
Autorzy:: Trzciński, Maciej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539639.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: przestępczość przeciwko zabytkom
katalog zabytków i dzieł sztuki utraconych
prawo własności znalezionych zabytków
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 179-181
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Dział Architektury i Urbanistyki
Autorzy:: Wendlandt, Juliusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535990.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2002
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ODZ
działalność ODZ
historia ODZ
Dział Architektury i Urbanistyki
struktura organizacyjna ODZ
centralna ewidencja zabytków
Spis zabytków architektury i budownictwa
Księga adresowa zabytków architektury i budownictwa
Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 14-24
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 11.

Tytuł:: Dwór szlachecki w Niegowici – historia, problemy konserwatorskie
Manor house in Niegowić – history, restoration problems
Autorzy:: Szlezynger, Piotr S.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536012.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2010
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: Niegowić
dwór szlachecki
Atlas zabytków architektury
Katalog Zabytków Sztuki
założenie dworskie
rabacja chłopska
polski dwór szlachecki
konkurs na projekt nowego dworu
styl francuskiego baroku
rejestr zabytków województwa małopolskiego
kultura ziemiańska
architektura dworu szlacheckiego
Bogdan Treter
Opis:: Niegowić village in Lesser Poland – existing from Middle Ages, with rich history, belonged to well-known lines: Ligęzas, Niewiarowskis, Lubowieckis, and in 19th, to Boene and Włodkowie. The manor, erected in the 1st half of the 18th century, was rebuilt in mid-19th century. In 1913, a concept was formulated of demolition of the manor and construction of a new, bigger, and more splendid building in its place. In 1913, the then owner of the property Jan Zdzisław Włodek organised and financed the competition for construction of the new manor. The completion – in line with the results of the competition, was interrupted by the outbreak of the World War I. The client returned to the idea 10 years after its ending, and did not take into account the competition results. He ordered the design to Bogdan Treter who has not participated in the competition, an architect, and monuments restorer at the same time. The project was implemented in 1927-28. The manor and property were seized in 1945 by the State Treasury, and a police station, a school, flats, etc. were located at it, which contributed to its devastation. After the purchase, in 2004, of a very devastated building and remnants of the park, the present owner – an architect by profession, undertook design and renovation works, personally supervising them.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 45-60
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki