Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Jan Luksemburski" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Działalność polityczna Jana Luksemburskiego w okresie buntu krakowskiego wójta Alberta i jego ocena w czeskiej historiografii.
    Autorzy:
    Antonín, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436137.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Jan Luksemburski
    wójt Albert
    Kraków w XIV w.
    Opis:
    John of Bohemia was using the title of the king of Poland since 1310. However, the events thatook place in Poland in the years 1311–1312 did not alter the main direction of his political activity. At that time, his most prominent advisor remained Archbishop of Mainz Peter of Aspelt, however, John of Bohemia was also influenced by other members of the court. He focused on ensuring stability of his power in the countries that belonged to the Bohemian crown, primarily in the Kingdom of Bohemia (coronation), Moravia (by obtaining the loyalty of the local gentry) and in the Opavian Silesia (by paying the debts of dukes of Wroclaw and Legnica: Bolesław, Henry, and Wladyslaw). This policy brought him respect in Bohemia and Moravia that was expressed by the so-called inauguration documents from 1311. A ser ious problem in the international policy of the young king of Bohemia was the activity of the Habsburgs. As the successor of Henry of Bohemia, King John had to run into debt of 40 thousand kopas of Prague groschen. It was a price for which Henry of Bohemia bought the Habsburgs’ right to the Bohemian throne in 1308. At the same time, King John established his first diplomatic contacts with the royal cour t in Hungary. He was not interested in the Polish matters until 1320s. He also did not react to the events that took place in Krakow in the years 1311–1312 and did not get involved in the Polish matters which are not mentioned in Czech sources from the first half of the 14th century (Chronicon Aula regiae; Chronicon Francisci Pragensis, etc.). In accordance with that, Czech historiography from the 20th and 21st centuries (J. Šusta, J. Spěváček, L. Bobková, J. Mezník) only treats the issue of Mayor Albert’s  rebellion marginally.
    Źródło:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2013, 13; 8-18
    2450-4475
    Pojawia się w:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Miejsce książąt opolskich w polityce Kazimierza Wielkiego względem Śląska.
    Autorzy:
    Nowakowski, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436123.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Śląsk
    księstwo opolskie
    Polska
    Jan I Luksemburski
    Kazimierz Wielki
    Opis:
    The article analyzes consecutive diplomatic and military steeeps  undertaken by Casimir the Great towards Silesia. It analyzes the attitude towards the dukes of Opole, who did not ocuppy any particular place in that policy, against the background of the whole Silesian policy of the king. A few stages can be distinguished in the king’s policy towards Silesia. Initially, the priority of his restitution programme was to restore supremacy over Gdansk Pomerania. Because of that, he tried to obtain a favourable disposition of the Luxembourgs. Thus, he either did not engage into the matters of Silesia or, as the ally of  Luxembourgs, acted from the position of power towards the dukes (1343). In this situation, prolonging the conflict with Teutonic Knights seems to have been a mistake, as it cost Casimir his influences in Silesia which were dating back to the times of  Wladyslaw the Elbow-high. It also did not bring him any major successes in the settlements with Luxembourgs which was clearly shown by the war with dukes of Glogau that took place in 1343. During the war Casimir restored supremacy over Wschowa for the price of evident deterioration of his relationships with the Luxembourgs. There are no traces that would suggest that at that time he kept in contact with the dukes, either old allays of his father (for example, Wladyslaw of Bytom) or his relative Bolek II the Small of Świdnica. All the more, he did not show any interest in the matters of the Duchy of Opole. The dukes of Silesia could start perceiving king Casimir as their ally against the Bohemian expansion in 1345. In the war with the Luxembourgs, the king did not attack the dukes of Silesia, except for those of Glogau. He established contacts with some of the dukes. Known is the agreement between Wladyslaw of Bytom and Casimir the Great that was made on 15th hFebruary 1346 in Bytom. The duke promised that he would not allow John of Bohemia and his sons or Nicholas, Duke of Opava to enter his city until permanent peace was established. Wladyslaw’s act can be evaluated as an attempt of peace mediation that did not transform into a longer cooperation with the king of Poland. The conclusion of a treaty in 1348 meant returning to the previous direction – consequent alliance with Charles IV. Casismir tried to use it again against the Teutonic Order and Brandenburg, howeever to no effect. His engagement into matters at Russia also contributed to his passivity towards Silesia. The last phase took place in the 1360s, starting from 1364 when Casimir tried to resituate forrmer treatiees based on papacy. The Polish policy towards Silesia had been already changed by the marriage with Hedwig of Sagan,  although its main reason was the king’s desire for a descendant and successor. Successes in Hungary also contributed to that change. Angevins managed to keep and expand influences in Silesia, especially among the dukes of Bytom and Opole. Apart from that, Casimir the Great was influenced by the example of the success of Charles IV who, thanks to marriage with Anna, not only obtained a favourable disposition of his former enemy, Bolko of Świdnica, but also the whole kingdom (although only after the death of the widow). Since the marriage with Hedwig, which did not bring Casimir such spectacular benefits, dukes of Silesia began to appear around the king. It seems that he realized too ;ate that strenghening bonds with the dukes of Silesia and as a result undermining  the influences of Luxembourgs was the only way to recover Silesia.
    Źródło:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2013, 13; 43-67
    2450-4475
    Pojawia się w:
    Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wizerunek Jana i Karola IV Luksemburgów w Rocznikach Jana Długosza
    Autorzy:
    Ożóg, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1954978.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    Jan Długosz
    John of Luxemburg
    Charles IV of Luxemburg
    historiography
    Kingdom of Poland
    image of the ruler
    Jan Luksemburski
    Karol IV Luksemburski
    dziejopisarstwo
    Królestwo Polskie
    wizerunek władcy
    Opis:
    Artykuł dotyczy wizerunków Jana i Karola IV Luksemburgów nakreślonych przez Jana Długosza w IX i X księdze Roczników. Szczegółowej analizie zostały poddane wszystkie zapisy krakowskiego historiografa w Rocznikach odnoszące się do obu władców. Autor dowodzi, że Długosz charakteryzował postaci Jana i Karola IV oraz ich dokonania z punktu widzenia interesów i racji politycznych Królestwa Polskiego oraz późnośredniowiecznego ideału władcy chrześcijańskiego.
    The paper deals with the images of John and Charles IV of Luxemburg as presented by Jan Długosz in Books IX and X of his Annals. All fragments in the Annals which the Cracovian historian devoted to both monarch were meticulously analysed. The author argues that Długosz characterised the figures of John and Charles IV and their achievements from the standpoint of the interests and political raison d’État of the Kingdom of Poland and the late medieval ideal of a Christian ruler.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Historyczne; 2020, 86; 75-97
    0324-8585
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Historyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Książęta śląscy w relacjach Polski z Czechami w początkowym okresie rewolucji husyckiej
    The Dukes of Silesia in Polish‑Czech relations in the Early Period of the Hussite Revolution
    Autorzy:
    Sperka, Jerzy
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106618.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-09-16
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
    Tematy:
    Jan II Żelazny
    Czech Kingdom
    Kingdom of Poland
    Silesian Dukes
    Władysław Jagiełło
    Witold
    Zygmunt Luksemburski (Sigismund of Luxemburg)
    Opis:
    From the start of his reign, Władysław Jagiełło he strove to normalize relations with the Silesian dukes, vassals of the Czech Crown, and neighbors of the Kingdom of Poland. These plans were initially disrupted by the war with Władysław Opolczyk and his nephews (1391–1396), but after it ended, relations were correct for the next two decades. Jagiełło’s wise policy towards the Silesian dukes also included his matrimonial policy, arranging marriages with representatives of the Giedyminowicz family. In the mid‑1420s, all the bordering Upper Silesian principalities were ruled by relatives of the Polish king. Despite this, the dukes of Upper Silesia remained faithful to their Czech rulers. When the Hussite Revolution broke out in Bohemia in 1419, the Silesian dukes supported Sigismund of Luxemburg, the successor of Wenceslas IV. At the same time, however, they tried to maintain proper relations with the Polish King Władysław Jagiełło, permitting – like the princes of Racibórz, Cieszyn, and Oświęcim – the Hussite legations to pass through their territories on the way to Poland and Lithuania with the offer of the crown of St. Wenceslas. The situation changed when, in September 1421 in Racibórz, Jan II Żelazny (who was married to Jagiełło’s niece Helena) imprisoned the Hussite legation sent by the Czech parliament. Despite pleas and threats from the Polish and Lithuanian sides demanding their release, the Duke of Racibórz, under great pressure, handed over the envoys to King Zygmunt. Consequently, the Silesian dukes, fearing for their principalities (at the hands of the Hussites and Poland), became closely associated with Sigismund of Luxemburg and became his allies in the conflict with Jagiełło and Witold. The culmination of these activities was that the Silesian dukes, at the beginning of 1423, joined a pact against Poland, the aim of which was its partition. However, when Sigismund of Luxemburg abruptly changed his policy and, in March 1423 in Kieżmark, concluded a treaty of friendship with King Jagiełło, the Silesian dukes realized that they had made a mistake by trusting their ruler excessively and adopting anti‑Polish rhetoric. So they took rapid steps to restore the former correct relations, apologizing to King Jagiełło and the Kingdom of Poland for their actions, a move that proved successful.
    Źródło:
    Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza; 2022, 25; 281-305
    2544-2562
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies