Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "International Court of Justice" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25
Tytuł:
The doctrine of implied powers of international organizations in the case law of international tribunals
Autorzy:
Gadkowski, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684946.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Implied powers
UN Charter
international organizations
International Court of Justice
Permanent Court of International Justice
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the contribution of international tribunals to the development of the doctrine of implied powers of international organizations. The author discusses the case law and the position presented by the PCIJ and the ICJ regarding the powers of international organizations. He points to the basis for implication of powers of international organizations and the limitation of such implication and presents a noticeable evolution of the tribunals view on the issue of implied powers.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2016, 6; 45-59
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
State Immunity or State Impunity? Human Rights and State Immunity Revisited in the ICJ’s Judgment on the Case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of a State
Autorzy:
Gerlich, Olga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962350.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
International Court of Justice
state immunity
human rights
Opis:
The paper aims to comment on the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 2nd February 2012 in the case of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State between Germany and Italy from the perspective of the problem of jurisdictional immunity. In its decision concerning compensation for atrocities suffered by Italian citizens during World War  II granted by Italian courts against the German State as well as the execution of the analogical decisions of Greek courts, the International Court of Justice upheld the immunity of the German State. The compensation sought by the plaintiffs in the national proceedings was to redress massacres on the civil population, deportations and forced labour. In its decision the Court analyzed the exception proposed by Italy in three strands which, according to the Respondent, cumulatively would result in an exception to the rule of state immunity. Firstly, the acts giving rise to the Italian claims constituted grave violations of humanitarian law; secondly, the rules of law violated constitute peremptory norms of international law; thirdly, no other form of redress was available rendering the exercise of jurisdiction by the Italian court to be a measure of a last resort for the victims.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2013, 2; 185-194
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Book review: Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford: 2013
Autorzy:
Krzan, Bartlomiej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706884.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
book review
PCIJ
ICJ
International Court of Justice
international law
Opis:
Review of a book: Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford: 2013
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 313-317
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v Serbia and Beyond
Autorzy:
Forlati, Serena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706756.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
genocide
responsibility to protect
ICJ
International Court of Justice
Opis:
This article assesses the impact of legal rules aimed at preventing genocide. The specific features of the legal obligation to prevent genocide are analyzed in light of the current debate on the “responsibility to protect” and the ICJ’s stance on the issue in Bosnia v Serbia. While the content of positive obligations such as the one under discussion is usually elaborated through the case law of judicial or quasi-judicial bodies, the ICJ refrained from doing so, stating that only manifest breaches of the obligation to prevent genocide give rise to international responsibility. The author seeks an explanation for the reasons underlying such an approach, and tries to identify other ways in which legal standards in the field of genocide prevention could be developed.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2011, 31; 189-205
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Środki tymczasowe w sporze między Ukrainą a Federacją Rosyjską dotyczącym zarzutów popełnienia zbrodni ludobójstwa a kwestia jurysdykcji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości
Provisional measures in the dispute between Ukraine and the Russian Federation over allegations of the crime of genocide and the question of the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
Autorzy:
Kamiński, Tomasz
Kobielski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2192757.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Ukraine
Russian Federation
International Court of Justice
genocide
provisional measures
Opis:
The authors discuss the legal measures taken by Ukraine in connection with the invasion of the Russian Federation. One such measure was a request to the International Court of Justice in the Hague to oblige Russia to halt hostilities. The ICJ issued an order on provisional measures to secure the protection of Ukrainian rights in the course of the proceedings. In this paper, the authors analyze these measures, their embedding in the current jurisdiction of the ICJ and relevant legal bases.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 2(74); 9-48
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Limitations to the Implied Powers of International Organizations
Autorzy:
Gadkowski, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28673516.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
international organizations
implied powers
implication of powers
International Court of Justice
Court of Justice of the European Union
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the main aspects of limitations to the implied powers of international organizations. The author discusses the most important case law and the position on this topic presented, in particular, by the International Court of Justice. He points to the most salient categories in the catalogue of the limits of implied powers of international organizations.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2022, 14; 103-118
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Basis for the Implication of Powers of International Organizations
Autorzy:
Gadkowski, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1831453.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
International organizations
International Court of Justice
Permanent Court of Intrenational Justice
Court of Justice of the European Union
powers of international organizations
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the basis of the implication of powers of international organizations. This topic is not only of great interest and import from the point of view of the theory of international organizaizations, but also from that of the practice of international organizations, particularly important institutions of international cooperation. The author discusses the nature of the basis for such implication before then examining the implication of powers within the context of international organizations’ expressly granted powers.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2020, 11; 69-80
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
International and Municipal Law before the World Court: One or Two Legal Orders?
Autorzy:
Tomka, Peter
Howley, Jessica
Proulx, Vincent-Joël
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706919.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
International Court of Justice
Permanent Court of International Justice
international courts
international tribunals
international law
domestic law
monism
dualism
judicial interpretation
sources
evidence
Opis:
This article provides an overview of the approach taken by the International Court of Justice and its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice, to questions of municipal law. Beginning with an outline of the theoretical framework, it discusses the conventional position that domestic law is a factual issue for the Court, before considering the ways in which the two Courts have utilised municipal law. It also considers to what extent the Court employs domestic law in ascertaining international legal rules.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 11-46
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: Hopes, Disappointments and Its Relevance to Crimea
Autorzy:
Värk, René
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706830.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
annexation
Crimea
declaration of independence
ICJ
International Court of Justice
Kosovo
Russian Federation
Ukraine
Opis:
The international community anxiously awaited delivery of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Kosovo’s declaration of independence, hoping it would clarify the controversial right of self-determination and the right of secession. Although it was hailed by many as a confirmation of both rights, the advisory opinion was disappointing regarding that part of the analysis which was based on general international law. The ICJ interpreted the question posed in a very narrow and formalistic way. It concluded that declarations of independence (not their consequences) are not in violation of international law, but it did not rule that they are in accordance with international law, as was requested in the posed question. The ICJ refused to examine whether there is a positive entitlement to secession under international law. Although Kosovo and its supporters claimed that the case of Kosovo is unique and will not set a precedent, Russia used the case of Kosovo and the advisory opinion to justify the so-called referendum in Crimea and the subsequent incorporation of Crimea into Russia. However, the situation in Crimea is only superficially comparable to Kosovo and the advisory opinion gives little or no support in the case of Crimea.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 115-131
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Original Sin Reaffirmed: The Nicaragua Judgement’s Impact on the Notion of Armed Attack as the Most Grave Form of the Use of Force
Autorzy:
Kowalski, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706871.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
aggression
armed attack
ICJ
International Court of Justice
jus ad bellum
Nicaragua
use of force
Opis:
This article is referenced to the thirtieth anniversary of the ICJ’s Nicaragua judgement on the merits of 1986. It acknowledges the significance of this much-debated judgement for the modern international law on the use of force (jus ad bellum). However the text focuses on one aspect of the judgement only, i.e. the definition of the notion of “armed attack” as the most grave form of the use of force. The impact of the judgement in this respect is critically analysed. It is argued that the introduction to the UN Charter text of undefined notions of the use of force, aggression, and armed attack may be labelled as the “original sin” of contemporary jus ad bellum, as it results in conceptual obscurity. It is also claimed that the ICJ reaffirmed this original sin in its Nicaragua judgement because it explicitly argued for the notion of “armed attack” as the most grave form of the use of armed force and, in consequence, distinguished it from the other, lesser forms of the use of force, while failing to introduce any sort of clarity in the conceptual ambiguity of jus ad bellum. The article also offers some remarks de lege ferenda and suggests abandoning the gravity criterion, which would require abandoning the well-established judicial and doctrinal interpretation approaches to jus ad bellum.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2016, 36; 37-50
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Judicial Review of Security Council Decisions – A Modern Vision of the Administration of Justice?
Autorzy:
Richter, Dagmar
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706707.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Security Council
judicial review
denial of justice
judicial self-restraint
jurisdiction
International Court of Justice
principle of loyalty
UN
administration of justice
international law
Opis:
The Security Council’s new activism, particularly in the field of “individualized sanctions”, gives impetus to the debate on whether, and to what extent, the most powerful organ of the UN should be subject to judicial review. This article analyses and categorizes the various strategies already employed in international courts, such as, e.g., “denial of justice”, incidental control, full review of implementing acts, the “as-long-as” rule, and various instruments of judicial self-restraint. The author suggests that “jurisdiction”, understood as encompassing the procedural aspects of the problem, should be regarded as a “door-opener” to judicial review. As regards its substantive dimension, the existence of primary responsibilities on both sides (the Security Council and the judiciary) should be taken into consideration. The author demonstrates that the principle of loyalty and cooperation means, on the one hand, respect by the Security Council for judicial review from inside of the UN system, and on the other hand, respect for Security Council prerogatives from external courts. Taking into account the evolution of a duty of loyal cooperation between different systems within the global legal order, and in expectation that the ICJ will defend the international rule of law, we may speak of a “modern vision of the administration of justice.”
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 271-297
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Krzysztof Skubiszewski and the Right to Self-determination: Past and Future
Autorzy:
Hilpold, Peter
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706595.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Chagos Islands
East Timor
human rights
ICJ
International Court of Justice
self-determination
Skubiszewski
in memoriam
Opis:
In 1995, Professor Krzysztof Skubiszewski added a Dissenting Opinion to the East Timor Judgment, wherein the ICJ declined jurisdiction in a proceeding started by Portugal against Australia for its having concluded the East Timor Gap treaty with Indonesia, in blatant violation of the East Timorese’s right to self-determination. Ad-hoc Judge Skubiszewski posited that the Court should have accepted jurisdiction and he presented a series of convincing arguments for this proposition. In 2019 the ICJ rendered an Opinion in the Chagos Islands case. The fact that the ICJ accepted jurisdiction in this case demonstrates that an impressive development has taken place since 1995, one whereby many of Professor Skubiszewski’s requests have been implemented. At the same time however, the Chagos Opinion is not fully satisfying as it neglects, to a considerable extent, the human rights issue. This contribution shows that Skubiszewski’s Dissenting Opinion would have provided guidance also for these questions and that it remains as topical today as it was in 1995.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2019, 39; 21-35
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Three different actions against Myanmar for genocidal acts and crimes against humanity including deportation
Trzy różne działania przeciwko Myanmar za ludobójstwa i zbrodnie przeciwko ludzkości, w tym deportacje
Autorzy:
Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Tematy:
jurysdykcja uniwersalna
tymczasowe środki zabezpieczające
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
universal jurisdiction
interim provisional measures
International Criminal Court
International Court of Justice
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy trzech różnych rodzajów czynności prawnych przed trzema różnymi sądami, czyli przed Międzynarodowym Trybunałem Sprawiedliwości w Hadze, przed krajowym sądem w Buenos Aires (Argentyna) i przed Międzynarodowym Trybunałem Karnym w Hadze. W sprawie toczącej się przed MTS, Gambia wystąpiła przeciwko Myanmar (Birma) o zarządzenie tymczasowych środków zabezpieczających, aby zapobiec dalszemu popełnianiu zbrodni ludobójstwa; w drugiej sprawie, pozew został złożony przez Birmańską Organizację Rohingya UK (BROUK) w argentyńskim sądzie federalnym w Buenos Aires przeciwko przywódcy Myanmaru Aung San Suu Kyi (laureatce pokojowej nagroda Nobla), byłemu prezydentowi Thein Sein, byłemu prezydentowi Htin Kyaw, obecnemu prezydentowi Birmy Win Myint, a także generałowi Min Aung Hlaing, naczelnemu dowódcy sił zbrojnych Birmy. W trzeciej sprawie, prokurator ograniczyła swoje dochodzenie do przestępstw o charakterze transgranicznym, ponieważ Bangladesz jest państwem-stroną Statutu Rzymskiego. Dotyczą one głównie zbrodni przeciwko ludzkości, w tym deportacji. W dniu 14 listopada 2019 r. Sędziowie III Izby Przygotowawczej Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego przychylnie przyjęli wniosek prokuratora o przeprowadzenie dochodzenia w sprawie w Bangladeszu/Myanmar, w sprawie domniemanych przestępstw podlegających jurysdykcji MTK. W pierwszej i drugiej sprawie, zarówno MTS w Hadze jak i sąd federalny Argentyny w Buenos Aires, nie wydały do końca grudnia 2019 r. zarządzeń i wyroków.
The paper concerns three different legal actions before three different judicial authorities, namely the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), a national court in Buenos Aires (Argentina) and the International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC). In the first case before the ICJ Gambia brought a case against Myanmar (Burma) as a member of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation requesting, among others, the authorization of interim measures to prevent the commission of further crimes of genocide. In the second case the lawsuit was initiated by the Burmese Organization Rohingya UK (BROUK) and filed with an Argentinian federal court in Buenos Aires against Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi (Recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize!), former President Thein Sein, former President Htin Kyaw, current President of Burma Win Myint, and General Min Aung Hlaing, Supreme Commander of the Burmese Armed Forces. In the third case before the ICC, the Prosecutor limited her investigation to cross-border crimes insofar as Bangladesh is a State Party to the Rome Statute. The charges concern crimes against humanity, including deportation. On 14 November 2019, the Judges of the Third Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court authorized the Prosecutor’s request to investigate the case in the Bangladesh/Myanmar situation regarding alleged crimes within the jurisdiction of the ICC. In the first and second cases, both the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the federal court of Argentina in Buenos Aires, have not yet issued their orders and judgments.
Źródło:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda; 2019, 2, 2(4); 360-368
2657-7984
2657-800X
Pojawia się w:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uses and Underuses of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination at the International Court of Justice
Autorzy:
Balcerzak, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706933.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
International Court of Justice
Committee on the elimination of Racial Discrimination
provisional measures
human rights
Opis:
As many as three international disputes containing allegations of infringement of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) have been brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), thus contributing to the number of cases allowing the Court to pronounce itself on the international human rights law. Even though none of the cases invoking violations of ICERD has been (yet) adjudicated on the merits, they have already provided an opportunity to clarify (at least in part) the compromissory clause enshrined in Art. 22 of ICERD, as well as to tackle some other issues related to provisional measures ordered by the Court. This article discusses the ICJ’s approaches to the application of ICERD in the three above-mentioned cases, while posing the question whether indeed the 1965 Convention can be useful as a tool for settling inter-state disputes. The author claims that ICERD and the broad definition of “racial discrimination” set out in its Art. 1 constitute cornerstones for the international protection of human rights, though the recourse to the procedures provided in Art. 22 of ICERD – vital as they are – should not necessarily be perceived as a better alternative to the inter-state procedures and the functions exercised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD).
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 11-27
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie sporu prawnego w prawie międzynarodowym : uwagi na tle sprawy Wysp Marshalla przeciwko niektórym potęgom jądrowym
Legal disputes in international law : some remarks on cases brought by the Marshall Islands against certain nuclear weapons states
Autorzy:
Kałduński, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/485539.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Instytut Europeistyki
Tematy:
spór prawny
subiektywizm
obiektywizm
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
dopuszczalność roszczeń rozbrojenie jądrowe
legal dispute
subjectivism and objectivism International Court of Justice admissibility of claims
nuclear disarmament
Opis:
This articles considers the concept of legal disputes in international law. On 5 October 2016, the International Court of Justice delivered judgments in three cases brought by the Marshall Islands against certain nuclear weapons States (against India, Pakistan and the United Kingdom). In all three of them, the Court decided that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the case as the application was inadmissible due to the absence of legal dispute between the States. To put it short, for the first time in the history of the ICJ there has been no legal dispute about nuclear weapons between the Marshall Islands and the respective Respondents. With the large support of non-governmental organizations, the Marshall Islands instituted proceedings against the nuclear powers (the applications were admitted only against the above three States) for the alleged non-compliance with the treaty and customary obligation to pursue in good fait, and to bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament and cessation of the nuclear arm race. The Court made significant pronouncements on legal dispute which require careful examination. In particular, the narrow majority in this case developed an additional subjective criterion of the "awareness" of the Respondents regarding the claims of the Applicant, underlining a surprising and unwanted move towards increasing formalism and subjectivism of the International Court. Paragraph 41 of the judgment (UK) states: "a dispute exists when it is demonstrated, on the basis of the evidence, that the respondent was aware, or could not have been unaware, that its views were 'positively opposed' by the applicant". This article discusses legal and political disputes as well as the concept of justiciability of disputes. It further considers the reasoning of the Court with particular regard to the awareness criterion introduced by the Court. It is submitted that the new awareness criterion is not only at variance with the established jurisprudence of the Court, but also undermines the obligation of the Court to rely on objective conditions and facts and compromises judicial economy and sound administration of justice. One may wonder whether the ICJ introduced deliberately the awareness criterion in order to remove from the list a case which was highly political and might have discouraged the great powers from the optional clause system and the international adjudication as a whole.
Źródło:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego; 2017, 15; 7-28
1730-4504
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies