Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Herodot" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11
Tytuł:
Reportaż podróżniczy w czasach antycznych i współczesnych, czyli śladami Herodota i Kapuścińskiego
Travel reportage in Ancient and modern times, In the footsteps of Herodotus and Kapuscinski
Autorzy:
Gryksa, Edyta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20434587.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-05-29
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
reportaż podróżniczy
Herodot
Kapuściński
travel reportage
Opis:
The aim of the article is to compare the reporter’s skills of Herodotus – the father of history – and Ryszard Kapuściński – the legend of world literature. The main emphasis is placed on issues related to the oral tradition of the acquired messages, literary workshop, travel metaphor and a brief description of the Histories and The Journeys with Herodotus.
Źródło:
Colloquia Litteraria; 2022, 33, 2; 53-72
1896-3455
Pojawia się w:
Colloquia Litteraria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływy orientalne na myśl polityczną starożytnej Grecji
Oriental influences on ancient Greek political thought
Autorzy:
Ceglarska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621815.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Grecja, Herodot, Persja, wolność polityczna, despotyzm.
Greece, Herodotus, Persia, political freedom, despotism.
Opis:
The aim of the paper is to present the influence of western culture on the political thought of ancient Greece. The first example presented is the world of Homer and the emerging differences between Greeks and Trojans. The work then turns to Herodotus, who clearly indicated the differences between the Greeks and the Persian-barbarians. The Greco- Persian conflict, described by Herodotus more universally as a conflict between East and West, is primarily a conflict of two different regimes. It clarifies the different values that guided the two sides, causing significant differences in the political sphere. The empha- sis, in the wake of Herodotus, is on conflict between the free poleis and eastern despotic monarchy. The paper shows how relations with eastern culture influenced the formation of internal political awareness and political thought in ancient Greece.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2016, 15, 2; 233-247
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Herodotus and Greek Settlements in the Lower Dniester Region
Herodot i osadnictwo greckie nad dolnym Dniestrem
Autorzy:
Mielczarek, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1036048.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-22
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Herodotus, Lower Dniester region, Greek settlements, the Scythians
Herodot, dolne Naddniestrze, osadnictwo grecki, Scytowie
Opis:
Osadnictwo greckie w dolnym biegu rzeki Dniestr w źródłach antycznych opisane jest bardzo skromnie. Wczesną, bardzo ogólną informacje podał Herodot. Dalsze uwagi Herodota w pierwszej kolejności odnoszą się do Scytów. Dużą uwagę poświęcił on na historię scytyjskiego króla Skylesa, i jego szczególne związki z Olbią. Skyles, w świetle znalezisk monetarnych związany mógł być również z Nikonion.
An evidence of Greek settlement on the Lower Dniester region presented by written sources is very scanty. As the first should be treated Herodotus text. In reality Herodotus was more interested in the Scythian activity than in Greek one. Attention Herodotus directed to the history of king Scyles and his special relations with Olbia In the light of monetary evidence Scyles could be connected also with Nikonion.
Źródło:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia; 2020, 66; 143-148
0065-0986
2451-0300
Pojawia się w:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historiē by Herodotus of Halicarnassus – theoretical issues
Dzieje Herodota Z Halikarnasu – zagadnienia teoretyczne
Autorzy:
Wieżel, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1882795.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Herodot
Dzieje
pisarstwo historyczne
narracja naturalna
dialog
fabularyzacja
Herodotus
Histories
historical writing
natural narrative
dialogue
emplotment
Opis:
Artykuł obecny stanowi garść refleksji natury metodologicznej nad narracją w Dziejach Herodota, której podstawowym substratem jest opis świata widzianego z perspektywy doświadczenia tego, kto opowiada, tj. Herodota oraz narratywizowanego przez niego doświadczenia świadków, z którymi sam przeprowadzał wywiad dotyczący przedstawionych zdarzeń historycznych. W związku z tym traktuje się tutaj Dzieje przede wszystkim jako pewien szczególny rodzaj narracji (narrative), którą stanowi, oparta na indywidualnym doświadczeniu (personal experience) Historyka oraz jego oralnych źródeł, opowieść o konflikcie grecko-barbarzyńskim ujęta w szereg krótszych opowiadań opartych na strukturze epizodycznej. Opowiadania te Historyk scala na zasadzie, którą określa się jako „fabularyzację” (White 1973), czyli opisanie faktów historycznych jako składników specyficznego rodzaju struktur fabularnych. Metodą analizy Dziejów będzie w tym ujęciu narratologia naturalna (Fludernik 1996) dysponująca siatką pojęć dostosowanych do badania tekstów pseudo-oralnych, do których Dzieje niewątpliwie należą.
Besides its historical values which imply a certain “accuracy” in presenting historical events and people, it is also possible to stipulate in Herodotus’ Histories these fragments which belong only to the domain of fiction, a genre literature whose basic substratum consists primarily in the description of the world seen through the eyes of the narrator-witness (histōr). In case of Histories, it is difficult to explicitly define how much of it is history and how much is literature. Nevertheless, it is certain that Histories are a special kind of storytelling, which, as shown by a closer analysis, is based on a personal and vicarious experience of the historian and his oral sources that cover several dozens of years of conflict between the East and the West, intertwined with historical, geographical and ethnological descriptions of Greek and barbaric tribes. In such a context the paper will focus on presenting a twofold nature of Herodotean discourse, revealing, on the one hand, the “rising” of the oral history from the sheer activity of dialoguing with people about the recent past, reconstructed on the basis of its formal and cognitive structure (Fludernik 1996), and, on the other hand, the technique of emplotment (White 1973) used by Herodotus to make the story reportable and tellable within the realm of an epic convention which was vivid and influenced the Archaic and Classical Greek literary texts of his times.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2015, 63, 3; 43-52
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O Herodotowej narracji w świetle oralności
On Herodotus’ Narration in the Light of Orality
Autorzy:
Wieżel, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1944395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Herodot z Halikarnasu
Dzieje
narracja
literatura oralna
kompozycja oralna
Herodotus of Halicarnassus
Histories
narration
oral literature
oral composition
Opis:
This paper consists of four parts. The first one provides a short commentary on the oral tradition of the Histories, and the second, third, and fourth parts focus on the analysis of some passages of Herodotus’ work in view of his oral discourse. Consequently, the following categories of Herodotus’ poetics are discussed: the compositional structure of the work, the mutual relations of its components, i.e. plots, episodes etc. and the narrator’s construction. The last part contains a brief recapitulation of the results in several points:— Herodotus shapes the events and heroes in his History in view of the figures provided by oral literature, i.e. he confers on them a heroic dimension that intends them be remembered and honoured. This is especially so in the parts that are strictly stories. Herodotus here plays the role of a third-person narrator. His narration is more discrete, allusive, and dramatised through which he wishes to reach a broader audience that is accustomed to rapsodic competitions and theatrical performances popular in those days;—The narration of the Histories is based on the episodic structure composed of a series of brief stories linked with one another by means of sentences. These sentences trace the direction of the story, and this in turn orientate the story-teller and listener to a more complete reception of the verbal message;—The narration of the Histories additionally contains stereotypical thematic lines, together with a schematic structure of plots and a typological image of figures. This enables their multiple usage in the process of oral and spontaneous presentation of parts of the work.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2009, 57, 3; 87-115
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Mądry doradca”. Analiza strukturalno-genetyczna wątku fabularnego w Dziejach Herodota
“The Wise Adviser”. The Structural and Genetic Analysis of the Narrative Plot in the Histories of Herodotus
Autorzy:
Domańska, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2127736.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Herodot z Halikarnasu
Dzieje
fabuła
wątek
struktura
narracja
kompozycja oralna
Herodotus of Halicarnassus
Histories
plot
structure
narrative
oral composition
Opis:
The article consists of three parts: the first which illustrates the particular structure of the plot stated in the title, the second which explains the origin of the structure of the plot and the third which summarizes the whole content. In the first part, after analyzing 26 examples of the plot taken from Herodotus’ Histories, it is possible to sketch the structural pattern of “the wise adviser” plot. It depicts the so-called patterns of history that are executed in the characters and events within the narrative. Moreover, those patterns are characteristic of the Herodotean narrative as such. They can bring to mind the technique of “ring-composition” discerned in the Homeric poems the Iliad and the Odyssey and also in the Histories of Herodotus. The second part of the article concentrates on the origin of the structure of “the wise adviser” plot. That is, it attempts to give the answer on the question of how and why the plot was moulded the way it was. This problem is explained by the Havelock’s “oral rules” applied to the oral work and composition and also by the Ong’s “memory rules”. On their basis it is allowed to name the Herodotean narrative as the “oral narrative” that meets the expectations of the oral communication in the strict narrative genre. The third part summarizes the preceding parts and draws some conclusions.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2007, 54-55, 3; 213-223
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Living with the Rules: Gender and the Rule of Law in Herodotus’ Histories
Autorzy:
Helen, Tank,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-21
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
rule of law
Herodotus
history
law/nomos
gender
legal pluralism
rządy prawa
Herodot
historia
prawo
płeć
pluralizm prawny
Opis:
What does “the rule of law” mean to an ancient historian, Herodotus? This paper uses modern legal theories and a sociological model to consider how he presents the concept in his Histories. The author takes a novel approach in that she considers the rule of law from a gender perspective. She argues that law is as much about social and cultural rules, which involve women as much as men, as it is about institutional practices which exclude women and reinforce an ideology of female inferiority. She also shows that the rule of law is a powerful normative ideal which Herodotus uses to interrogate power. The author uses the theoretical model of law developed by the English legal scholar HLA Hart, who argues that rules have a social as well as a legal dimension (the “internal” view of law), that is, how rules are perceived by community members, and how normative behaviours are enforced by that community. She also uses the work of a legal anthropologist, Leopold Pospίčil, and feminist legal theory, to argue for a wider definition of the rule of law than that used by most contemporary scholars. She uses three case studies to show that the rule of law is a powerful force in the Histories precisely because it combines external coercive force, internal rule of conduct and normative ideal.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 80; 389-403
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kilka przykładów metafizycznej przyczynowości konfliktów zbrojnych w Dziejach Herodota z Halikarnasu
Some Insights into the Metaphysical Causation of the Warfare within the Herodotean Histories
Autorzy:
Domańska, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1953976.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Herodot z Halikarnasu
Dzieje
wojna
przyczyna
człowiek
bóstwo
przeznaczenie
kara
Herodotus of Halicarnassus
Histories
warfare
cause
human
divinity
fate
retribution
Opis:
Human and divine spheres of activity continuously alternate each other within the pages of the Herodotean Histories – they take the shape of a constant struggle between the two “world ends”. This struggle materializes in the lot of particular characters like Croesus’ or Xerxes’ rise and fall, when the kings try in vain to stand up to supernatural powers, which have already prepared their own blueprint of the earthly history. Furthermore, it materializes in the figure of wise adviser, who becomes as if the embodiment of human attempts to free oneself from the dim dictatorship of the jealous deity. Finally, it is revealed in the very moment of making crucial decisions. Dreams and oracles, as they appeare, serve the role of specific devices in the hands of divine and also the most approachable way for human discovery of the fated future. The consistent theology within Histories does not exist at all. Herodotus’ conviction (given expressis verbis or put in the mouth of his characters) about the existence of fate, ruling even the gods, about divine retribution – τίσις – or about the jealousy of the deities – φϑόνος, are ingrained into the religious thinking of Herodotus’ time. For he belonged, even by virtue of his pedigree, to the world of religious conservatism, comparable to that of Aeschylus, Sophocles, or other Greek thinkers of the Vth-century Hellade.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2004, 52, 3; 109-129
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Idea pokornego uniżenia w antycznej myśli greckiej
The idea of the humble lowliness in the ancient Greek thought
Autorzy:
Szram, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613477.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
cnota
idea umiaru
postawa słusznej dumy
pokora
pycha
literatura starożytnej Grecji
Solon
Herodot
Platon
Arystoteles
Teofrast
Plutarch
virtue
idea of moderation
attitude of just pride
humility
pride
ancient Greek literature
Plato
Aristotle
Theophrastus
Opis:
Even though the ancient Greeks did not recognize humility as a virtue, in the later Christian sense, their literature (Solon, Hesiod, Herodotus, Euripides) and philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Theophrastus, stoics, Plutarch, Plotinus) contains some elements of the idea of the humble lowliness. Pride – considered as the greatest vice – was not contrasted with humility, but with the attitude of just pride arising from a based on the principle of moderation sense of finding oneself sufficient and confident in one’s own capabilities. This virtue – which can be defined as a sense of self-worth – was reserved for those capable of ethical courage, the morally strong. The attitude that Christianity considered as the virtue of humility was associated in antiquity with modesty, which was the equivalent of a just pride, referring to the weak people, unfit to accomplish great deeds, or with shyness, fear or cowardice.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2013, 60; 405-415
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Τὰ Ὅπλα Τῶν Γεφυρέων Of The Persian War: Herodotus On The Banishment Of The Barbarians Out Of Europe And The Issue Of The Completeness Of The First „The Histories”
Τὰ Ὅπλα Τῶν Γεφυρέων Wojny perskiej: Herodot o wygnaniu barbarzyńców z Europy i kwestia kompletności pierwszych „Dziejów”
Autorzy:
Sinitsyn, Aleksandr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/584902.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Herodotus, Athens, boundaries, bridges, Aeschylus, hybris/arrogance, the Persian Wars, temples, “Herodotean questions”, the last chapter of The Histories (Hdt. 9.121 and 122)
Herodot, Ateny, granice, mosty Ajschylos, wojny perskie, świątynie, ‘pytania Hero-dota”, ostatni rozdział Dziejów (Hdt. 9.121 i 122)
Opis:
W artykule poddano dyskusji problem zawartości dzieła Herodota. Zadano pytanie, w jakim stopniu „Ojcu historii” udało się wypełnić zamierzenia. Pojawił się problem, czy dzieło Herodota dotarło do naszych czasów w całości? Analizując problem ostatniej partii dzieła, .Autor pracy zwraca uwagę na fragment Herodota IX.121, w którym odniesiono się do kwestii przekroczenia granic Europy przez Barbarzyńców.
The article discusses the principal “Herodotean question” of the completeness of the work done by the historian. How well did Herodotus manage to accomplish his design? Should we regard his work in the form it has reached us as complete and integral? Or does it end abruptly at the events of 479/8 BC, despite “the Father of History” having planned to continue his account of the Greek-Persian wars? Over the last century and a half, pluralism in the views the researchers on the issue of the completeness of Herodotus’ work has emerged. The author ventures some observations on the finale of the The Histories and draws our attention to the passage Hdt. 9.121 in which Herodotus emphasizes the fact that the barbarians transgressing the geographical boundaries of Europe had been punished: the cables of the bridges which the Persians had used to tie Asia and Europe were taken to Hellas by the victors. According to the author, the historian’s testimony τὰ ὅπλα τῶν γεφυρέων ὡς ἀναθήσοντες ἐς τὰ ἱρά symbolizes the end of the war against the Barbarian, hence, the accomplishment of Herodotus’ design – the completion of the account of “great and marvellous deeds done by Greeks and foreigners and especially the reason why they warred against each other”.
Źródło:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia; 2019, 65; 83-124
0065-0986
2451-0300
Pojawia się w:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The ‘Archeology’ of historiography as a rhetorical agon. On the juxtaposition of hellenic writers in the Epistula ad Pompeium by Dionysius of Halicarnassus
„Archeologia” historiografii jako retoryczna gra. O porównaniu greckich autorów w „Liście do Pompeiusza” Dinizjosa z Halikarnasu
Autorzy:
Sinitsyn, Aleksandr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2033826.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-28
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Dionysius of Halicarnassus
“A Letter to Pompeius”
historiography
rhetoric
early Greek historians Hellanicus
Charon
Herodotus
Thucydides
Xenophon
Philistus
Theopompus
style
syngraphers
Plato
philosophy
ancient Greek orators Lysias
Demosthenes
literary criticism
polylogue
agon
influence
Dionizjos z Halikarnasu
„List do Pompeiusza”
historiografia
retoryka
wcześni historycy greccy – Hellanikos
Herodot
Tukidydes
Ksenofont
Filistos
Teopompos
oratorzy
Lysias
Demostenes
krytyka literacka
Opis:
Dionysius of Halicarnassus in his short theoretical treatise entitled “A Letter to Pompeius” (Epistula ad Pompeium) presents an exciting discussion on rhetoric mastership and scholarship written in an epistolary genre. The treatise begins with critical remarks Dionysius once addressed to Plato. The author admits to his addressee (Cn. Pompeius Geminus) that he is enchanted by Plato’s dialogues. From the trio of Greek speech-makers who are recognized as the most brilliant in this respect – Isocrates, Plato, and Demosthenes (such was Dionysius’s selection) – the Halicarnassean rhetorician deliberately dwells on Plato (Lysias, Isocrates, Demosthenes and other Greek orators are the subject of his other aesthetic works). Embarking on a wider discussion, Dionysius repeatedly points out that these studies are always aimed at establishing the truth. The longest chapter, 3 compares works of the first Greek historians and the mastery of their style. Dionysius points out the rivalry of the many masters of the genre, but the main characters of the chapter are Herodotus and Thucydides. The “father of history” (Dionysius’ contemporary and paragon) surpasses the Athenian historian on all counts examined by the author. This article examines συγγραφεύς / συγγραφεῖς or συγγραφή occurring in the Pomp. by Dionysius of Halicarnassus. The rhetorician, when referring to Herodotus, Thucydides (ch. 3), Theopompus (ch. 6), Hellanicus, Charon (3.7) and the Greek historians en masse (6.7), calls them “syngraphers”. Dionysius uses the word συγγραφή only as applied to historical works of Theopompus of Chios (6.2, 3, 6). The article also draws upon the Halicarnassian philologist’s other works in which he mentions syngraphers-historians, who are set off against poets and orators. Dionysius regards the words συγγραφεύς, ὁ ἱστορικός, ἱστοριογράφος as equivalent and interchangeable. In this work, Dionysius examines different styles of ancient writers. Here, by examining the works by the authors of the 5th and 4th centuries BC (written three to four centuries before his time) he seems to be performing a peculiar experiment of theoretical “archaeology”. But the rhetoric and philological “archaeological” study conducted by Dionysius of Halicarnassus reveals not only his scholarly interest in the analysis of works of the writers of the past, but also his focus on the present – both in literary and cultural aspects. Plato is under the influence of Thucydides, but Thucydides is inferior to Herodotus, Herodotus produces works that surpass those of Charon and Hellanicus, while Theopompus is superior in style to Demosthenes himself and surpasses Isocrates – the “most brilliant” rhetoricians of the past. By presenting this gallery of names, Dionysius shows comparison as agon – of styles, genres, authors, their subject matters, intensive narrative, and he himself contends with the writers of the past. Seeing mastery of rhetoric as a peculiar agon stretching over centuries and across the agon of rhetoricians, philosophers and historiographers, Dionysius identifies the circle of best writers, and himself joins it. He claims that in the scholarly rhetoric “the truth is dearer still” and establishes the criteria to judge the classic writers. And the critic realizes that he will be judged according to the same (his own) criteria
Dionizjos z Halikarnasu w teoretycznym traktacie zatytułowanym „List do Pompejusza” zawarł dyskusję na temat retorycznego mistrzostwa i nauki. Traktat rozpoczynają krytyczne uwagi Dionizjosa, adresowane do Platona. Autor przyznaje jednak, iż jest zachwycony dziełami Platona. Pośród trzech greckich mówców, uznawanych za najwybitniejszych – Izokratesa, Platona, Demostenesa – Dionizjos z Halikarnasu celowo studiuje Platona. Prowadzi szeroką dyskusję. Dionizjos wielokrotnie podkreśla, że wskazani autorzy mają na celu ustalenie prawdy. Najdłuższy rozdział oznaczony jako 3, dotyczy historyków greckich i stylu ich prac. Dionizjos zauważa rywalizacje mistrzów, ale głównymi bohaterami rozdziału stali się Herodot i Tukidydes. Dinozjos zauważa, że „ojciec historii” przewyższa ateńskiego historyka. Prezentowany artykuł dotyczy użycia słowa συγγγραφεύς. Słowa tego retor użył w odniesieniu do Herodota, Tukidydesa, Hellanikosa i innych historyków. Dionizjos wskazuje na styl autorów, tematykę ich prac.
Źródło:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia; 2021, 67; 89-115
0065-0986
2451-0300
Pojawia się w:
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies