Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Hayek" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15
Tytuł:
Prawo spontanicznego porządku – Friedricha A. Hayeka koncepcja regulacji
Law of spontaneous order – Hayekian concept of regulation
Autorzy:
Firlej, Mikołaj
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/531627.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej – Sekcja Polska IVR
Tematy:
Friedrich A. Hayek
regulacja porządku
regulacja wolności
społeczna inżynieria
regulation of order
regulation of liberty
social industry
Opis:
In the article three general questions were posed as a means of presenting explorative issue: (1) Law as regulation of an order; (2) Law as regulation of a liberty; (3) Controversy of social industry in law. In order to realize the issue thus outlined in the first section it has been shown two different and opposites kinds of orders in widely understanding term ‘sociology of law’ as well as Hayekian criticism of Descartes rationality. The structure of exogenous and endogenous orders has been carefully analysed in relation to their ancient equivalents: taxis and nomos. Special attention has been given to make an explanation of Hayekian understanding of legal frameworks connected with the process of organization and division of power. It has been outlined the rule of law in political system of Austrian economist (concept of demarchy) and his principal arguments for legislature and problem of ‘good regulation’. In the second part of thesis it has been shown a widely connection between spontaneous order and both liberty and the process of progression. In this section the strive was to present mostly values and good points in Hayekian conception, but there is also a critical part concerning both unsymmetrical constraint of freedom and symmetrical. In the third part of this thesis it has been shown the historical background of Hayekian research connected with the controversy of social industry in law. Referring to the intellectual dispute between Spencer’s organicism and Durkheim’s paternalistic conception Hayek has divided between law and law-making (legislation) and he has proved that law is only a spontaneous order notwithstanding good legislation means rules of harmonization and maintenance this kind of abstract social structure. Hayek’s concept of law is in accordance with philosophical, sociological, economical and political research of the general and popular nowadays problem with the new paternalism.36-50
In the article three general questions were posed as a means of presenting explorative issue: (1) Law as regulation of an order; (2) Law as regulation of a liberty; (3) Controversy of social industry in law. In order to realize the issue thus outlined in the first section it has been shown two different and opposites kinds of orders in widely understanding term ‘sociology of law’ as well as Hayekian criticism of Descartes rationality. The structure of exogenous and endogenous orders has been carefully analysed in relation to their ancient equivalents: taxis and nomos. Special attention has been given to make an explanation of Hayekian understanding of legal frameworks connected with the process of organization and division of power. It has been outlined the rule of law in political system of Austrian economist (concept of demarchy) and his principal arguments for legislature and problem of ‘good regulation’. In the second part of thesis it has been shown a widely connection between spontaneous order and both liberty and the process of progression. In this section the strive was to present mostly values and good points in Hayekian conception, but there is also a critical part concerning both unsymmetrical constraint of freedom and symmetrical. In the third part of this thesis it has been shown the historical background of Hayekian research connected with the controversy of social industry in law. Referring to the intellectual dispute between Spencer’s organicism and Durkheim’s paternalistic conception Hayek has divided between law and law-making (legislation) and he has proved that law is only a spontaneous order notwithstanding good legislation means rules of harmonization and maintenance this kind of abstract social structure. Hayek’s concept of law is in accordance with philosophical, sociological, economical and political research of the general and popular nowadays problem with the new paternalism.
Źródło:
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej; 2012, 2(5); 36-50
2082-3304
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Austrians-in-the-World. Conversations and Debates About Planning And Development
Autorzy:
Friedmann, John
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/623893.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-06-06
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
planning theory
Hoselitz
Hayek
Schumpeter
Mannheim
Buber
Wittgenstein
Popper
Feyerabend
Polanyi
Opis:
John Friedmann has taught at MIT, the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, UCLA, the University of Melbourne, the National University of Taiwan, and is currently an Honorary Professor in the School of Community and Regional Planning at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. Throughout his life, he has been an advisor to governments in Brazil, Venezuela, Chile, Mozambique, and China where he was appointed Honorary Foreign Advisor to the China Academy of Planning and Urban Design.
Źródło:
European Spatial Research and Policy; 2014, 21, 1
1231-1952
1896-1525
Pojawia się w:
European Spatial Research and Policy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Strukturalistyczna teoria zatrudniania Edmunda Phelpsa
Edmund Phelps’ Structuralist Theory of Employment
Autorzy:
Godłów-Legiędź, Janina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/574365.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008-09-30
Wydawca:
Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie. Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych
Tematy:
structuralist theory of employment
Phillips curve
natural rate of unemployment
Say’s Law
capitalism
Edmund Phelps
John M. Keynes
Friedrich A. Hayek
Opis:
The paper evaluates the contribution of Nobel Prize-winning American economist Edmund Phelps to the development of contemporary economics. The author analyzes Phelps’ structuralist theory of employment and compares his views with the ideas of other acclaimed economists such as Milton Friedman, John M. Keynes, and Friedrich A. Hayek. Godłów-Legiędź looks at Phelps’ achievements in the context of the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences’ decision to grant him a Nobel Prize, and describes Phelps’ position on some key dilemmas of 20th century economics. According to Godłów-Legiędź, the assessment of Phelps’ achievements offered by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences is in fact incomplete, because it overlooks his structuralist theory of employment. Phelps, who calls himself a structuralist, considers this theory of employment to be his most important contribution to macroeconomics, Godłów-Legiędź notes. Phelps’ achievements cannot be viewed exclusively in terms of the link between inflation and unemployment, she says. It is necessary to consider the economist’s focus on what he described as “endogenizing the natural rate of unemployment,” an approach that reveals the differences between Phelps’ theory and those of Keynes and his followers as well as the monetarists and neoclassicists. Defining the natural rate of unemployment as a function of real demand and supply, Phelps referred to the 1930s dispute between Keynes and Hayek that involved the classicist and Austrian interpretations of key economic relationships. Phelps’ unorthodox approach is reflected not only by his theory and attitude to neoclassical economics, Godłów-Legiędź says, but also by his assessment of European and American capitalism and his belief about the need for fundamental changes in economic and social policies.
Źródło:
Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics; 2008, 226, 9; 1-18
2300-5238
Pojawia się w:
Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Hayek, common law i teoria spontanicznego porządku – problemy Hayekowskiej analizy angloamerykańskiej kultury prawnej
Hayek, common law and the theory of spontaneous order – some problems with Hayek’s analysis of the Anglo-American legal tradition
Autorzy:
Gogłoza, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621923.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
F. A. Hayek, ład emergentny, common law, ewolucyjna teoria prawa, policentryzm.
F. A. Hayek, theory of spontaneous order, common law, evolutionary theory of law, polycentrism.
Opis:
The theory of spontaneous order is widely regarded as one of the most important con- tributions of F.A. Hayek to the development of social sciences. Hayek’s main example of an emergent order is the classical (Medieval and Early Modern) common law. In his account, common law is not only a result of spontaneous evolution but also the main source of the unusual amount of freedom the early modern Englishman enjoyed com- pared to his European counterparts. In this paper I discuss some problems with Hayek’s analysis of the historical development of common law. In particular I criticize his claim that classical common law was based around precedents, and stress the surprising – given his economic views – lack of appreciation for the role competition between dif- ferent courts played in the development of English law up until the nineteenth century. In conclusion I argue that polycentric legal order is the proper foundation for Hayek’s “constitution of liberty”.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2016, 15, 2; 169-192
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Granice wyjaśnienia naukowego, część II
Limits of scientific explanation (II)
Autorzy:
Gorazda, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690548.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
philosophy of science
scientific explanation
model theory
philosophy of mind
F. A. von Hayek
Opis:
The second part of the text is intended to deal with the anti-naturalistic argument of F.A. Hayek. To present it comprehensively, however, his theory of mind has to be outlined first. According to Hayek, the way in which we perceive the world is entirely grounded in the biological construction of our neural order and thus, from this perspective, he seems to be a naturalist. He excludes any non-natural properties of our cognition like e.g. transcendental free will. However, a closer look at the functioning of our biological apparatus of perception divulges certain inherent and internal restrictions. First of all, we notice that the neural order (biological construction of neurons) is in fact a very complex apparatus of classification and discrimination of sensory impulses. Impulses may come from reality which is outer to the neural order as well as from the inside. The apparatus of classification and discrimination of sensory impulses is not stable, but permanently dynamic. An unstoppable attack of sensations and relevant responses of the system creates new classification rules (neural connections) and demolishes those which have been inactive for a longer time. A system of those rules, existing in a particular time unit, forms a model of reality which imperfectly corresponds to the existing, transcendent reality. The final argument for anti-naturalism which is elucidated in the text is Hayek’s idea of what is explanation and where lie its limits. This idea can be reduced to the following quotation: “…any apparatus of classification must possess a structure of a higher degree of complexity that is possessed by an object which it classifies.” In other words: if our cognitive system is an “apparatus of classification”, and if an explanation means modeling, and if a complete explanation requires the explanation of the apparatus itself, then a complete explanation is not possible at all, as the apparatus, which has a certain level of complexity, cannot upgrade this level in order to explain itself. Hayek’s reasoning is generally approved yet it is emphasized, however, that it rests on very strong assumptions which are identified and named at the end of the text.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2013, 52; 53-106
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Instytucje nieformalne w teorii F.A. Hayeka
Informal institutions in F.A. Hayek’s theory
Autorzy:
Gruszewska, Ewa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/434677.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
F.A. Hayek’s theory
informal institutions
spontaneous order
Opis:
The concept of individualism, freedom, or economic order in F.A. Hayek’s theory, contains references to rules shaping people’s behavior. The author believes that every person has the right to follow his own rules. The rules are created in a spontaneous way and are not planned by anyone. Those institutions that, in terms of F.A. Hayek determine the existence and duration of societies, became the subject of considerations undertaken in this publication. The purpose of this article is to identify the informal institutions in theories announced by the Nobel Laureate. According to F.A. Hayek, there are socially valuable features that take the form of patterns and traditions shaping human behavior. Regularity appearing in actions of individuals, which is not always a direct result of a conscious action, often allows to make predictions of their behavior. The rules often forbid people to do what their instincts demand from them, they require a gradual change in people’s natural or instinctive reactions to other members of the community. This must be seen as a renunciation to the community. Individuals must submit to the operation of these social rules that are difficult to understand without special analysis. The ability to adapt determines the possibility of a society development. There is no individual able to possess the knowledge of all potentially possible situations to create an adequate system of behavior procedures. This is only possible with the help of other members of the society. As a result of “applying” their use, a type of a spontaneous order is formed. This forms the basis for developing adopted institutions. The kind of a sanction that upholds the rules, can be identified – it is the responsibility that goes beyond rules enforced by law. The purpose of the legal system is to maintain order formed spontaneously thus enabling to gain objectives by individuals. Hayek saw that in the long term, the new social rules are becoming more and more general, cease to be applicable to specific situations, but become abstract and more flexible. Spontaneous rule creation and change processes, their adaptation to changing realities cannot be replaced by an organized, purposeful order. This is due to the inability to obtain sufficient information about a variety of human behaviors and hence inability to create rules that would apply to such behavior. Creating the institutional order is a continuous process of trials and errors, a continuous experimentation of society with the rules. Hayek pointed out the barriers in shaping the institutional order and thus the social development. Their source can be non-compliance of adopted formal and informal evolutionary rules. Such a barrier affects the worse cooperation between the society members, reduces the benefits from economic activity, increases the business risk, makes the acquisition and processing of relevant information more difficult, and leads to informative chaos. Only cementing the adopted rules within rooted informal rules would allow their harmonized and effective impact on society.
Źródło:
Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu; 2013, 4 (25); 166-178
2080-5977
Pojawia się w:
Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wymiar antropologii filozoficznej w liberalnych ujęciach teorii racjonalnego wyboru
Autorzy:
Hordecki, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2200466.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
rational choice theory
public choice theory
liberalism
Adam Smith
James Madison
Joseph Schumpeter
Karl Raimund Popper
Friedrich August von Hayek
James Buchanan
Gordon Tullock
teoria racjonalnego wyboru
teoria wyboru publicznego
liberalizm
Opis:
One of the aims of this paper was to characterize liberal theories of rational choice which emerged in XX century, especially theory of public choice. It ought to be noticed that such a task was realized many times by many authors. Due to this fact the text is devoted mostly to review the positions presented by the leading representatives of the intellectual circle mentioned above. Especially the shortages of their philosophical anthropology were pointed out. Moreover, the critique of the linguistic dimension of the rational choice theory was proposed. It was also shown that their endeavours of grounding their works in a long lasting tradition is profoundly disputable.
Źródło:
Themis Polska Nova; 2017, 1(12); 125-157
2084-4522
Pojawia się w:
Themis Polska Nova
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Austriacka szkoła ekonomii i jej przedstawiciele
The Austrian School of Economics and its Representatives
Autorzy:
Janik, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/30145465.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
szkoła austriackia
liberalizm gospodarczy
Ludwig von Mises
Friedrich von Hayek
monetarny cykl koniunkturalny
teoria aktywności
subiektywizm
krytyka państwa opiekuńczego
Austrian school
economic liberalism
monetary business cycle
activity theory
subjectivism
criticism of the welfare state
Opis:
Szkoła austriacka przeżywała okresy świetności oraz zastoju. Pierwsza fala ekonomistów austriackich, takich jak C. Menger, F. Wieser, E. Böhm-Bawerk zdobyła tak duże uznanie, iż większość jej założeń zostało praktycznie wcielonych do głównego nurtu. Następne pokolenie, czyli F. von Hayek oraz L. von Mises, również cieszyło się dużym uznaniem wśród ekonomistów, jednak większość ich życia przypadła na okres, kiedy niesłychaną popularność zdobywały teorie J.M. Keynesa, wskazując łatwą drogę wyjścia z kryzysu lat 1929-1935, będącego rzekomo kryzysem gospodarki kapitalistycznej, tak propagowanej przez Hayeka czy Misesa. Szkoła austriacka odzyskała swą renomę w latach siedemdziesiątych dwudziestego wieku, kiedy najbardziej rozwinięte gospodarki świata zostały dotknięte przez największy kryzys gospodarczy od lat trzydziestych. Kryzys ten polegał na jednoczesnym występowaniu wysokiej inflacji oraz bezrobocia, tj. stagflacji. W teorii Keynesa zjawisko to nie miało wytłumaczenia. Również w latach siedemdziesiątych Nagrodą Nobla z ekonomii wyróżniony został Hayek, co spowodowało wzrost zainteresowania szkołą austriacką. W tym samym czasie ogromną pracę dla rozwoju i popularyzacji szkoły austriackiej wykonali działający na amerykańskich uniwersytetach naukowcy: I. M. Kirzner oraz M. Rothbard.
The Austrian school of economics experienced both its heyday and stagnation. The first wave of Austrian economists, such as C. Menger, F. von Wieser, E. von Böhm-Bawerk was so widely recognized that most of its assumptions were practically incorporated into the mainstream. The next generation, that is F. von Hayek and L. von Mises, also enjoyed universal recognition among economists, however, most of their lifetimes fell on the period when J. M. Keynes’ theories became immensely popular, as they showed an easy way to overcome the crisis of 1929-1935 that was allegedly a crisis of the capitalist economy, the economy so much promoted by Hayek or Mises. The Austrian school regained its renown in the 1970s, when the world’s most developed economies were affected by the greatest economic crisis since the 1930s. The crisis consisted in simultaneous occurrence of a high inflation and unemployment, that is stagflation. In Keynes’ theory this phenomenon was not explained. It was also in the 1970s that Hayek was awarded the Nobel prize, which aroused interest in the Austrian school. At the same time I. M. Kirzner and M. Rothbard who worked in American universities did great work to develop and promote the Austrian school.
Źródło:
Roczniki Ekonomii i Zarządzania; 2014, 6, 2; 43-75
2081-1837
2544-5197
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Ekonomii i Zarządzania
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Liberalna krytyka instrumentalizmu prawnego
Liberal Criticism of Legal Intrumentalism
Autorzy:
Kaczmarczyk, Hubert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1807561.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-11-15
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
liberalizm
Hayek
instrumentalizm prawny
demokracja
sprawiedliwość społeczna
liberalism
legal instrumentalism
democracy
social justice
Opis:
The article presents criticism of instrumental use of law in order to achieve the assumed social goal, such as redistribution of revenue, social justice or “improvement” of market economy. The use of law for such purpose poses a threat to freedom of an individual. Instead of providing a guarantee of freedom, law becomes its greatest enemy. The reason for such problems lies, among others, in wrongly understood sovereignty of people and democratic rule of majority. Hayek points to the fact that there are numerous tensions holding between democracy and liberalism, and that democracy can quite easily turn into dictatorship of the majority without appropriate protection.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych; 2009, 19, 1; 99-122
1507-7896
2544-5227
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On subjectivity and objectivity in the social sciences
Autorzy:
Kutáš, Michal
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2141290.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Tematy:
objectivity
subjectivity
intersubjectivity
social sciences
Popper
Hayek
Opis:
In this paper we try to answer the question in what sense social sciences are subjective and in what sense they are objective. We examine only some aspects of this problem. First, we address the question of intersubjectivity, mainly with the ideas of philosopher K. R. Popper. We proceed by proposing the following working definition of objectivity: we understand objective facts as true propositions, the truth of which are independent from a particular observer. We ask whether facts of social sciences are objective in this sense. Then we examine some possible objections to proposed claims and also some aspects of subjectivity of social sciences. We are concerned with the following issues: distribution, imperfection and inconsistency of concrete human knowledge, importance of human purposes, beliefs and opinions and of relations between people or relations of people to things in social sciences. Regarding these problems we are dealing mainly with the work of F. A. Hayek. We also try to show that claims we made about objectivity and subjectivity of social sciences are not contrary to each other.
Źródło:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2011, 1(6); 85-98
1898-8431
Pojawia się w:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Is the ‘Human Action’ in Human Action Human Action? Mises, Hayek, and Aristotle on ‘Capitalism’ and Human Flourishing
Autorzy:
Morgan, Jason
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507582.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Mises
Hayek
Aristotle
Aquinas
Human Action
praxeology
Constitution of Liberty
virtue
economics
Opis:
Ludwig von Mises’s Human Action is a seminal work of Austrian economics. It sets forth Mises’s theory of the acting person and lays the groundwork for a liberal economic order. But is the “human action” which Mises describes in Human Action really human action? Mises, as well as his colleague Friedrich von Hayek, posits a liberal society in which telos and metaphysics can be elided from human interactions, but such conceptions of the human person are greatly different from the more robust, and humane, anthropologies of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. In this paper, I compare and contrast the visions of the human person found in Mises, Hayek, Aristotle, and St. Thomas, arguing that the truly human vision of human action found in the latter two thinkers’ works provides a much sounder basis for human material flourishing (“capitalism”).
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 4; 857-884
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uwagi o manipulowaniu znaczeniami słów
Autorzy:
Polanowska-Sygulska, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943890.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
isaiah Berlin
Friedrich a. Hayek
Leszek Kołakowski
charles l. stevenson
distorted notions
persuasive defnitions
toleration
feedom
Opis:
On manipulating the meaning of words: the strategy of distorting the meaning of concepts in order to redirect people’s attitudes has been put in practice by ideologists and politicians for years. the paper focuses on the refections of selected thinkers and men of letters on this phenomenon. intellectual contributions of isaiah Berlin, Friedrich a. Hayek, leszek Kołakowski and charles l. stevenson on the one hand, and the considerations of george orwell, aldous Huxley, ayn Rand, sławomir mrożek and małgorzata musierowicz on the other hand are analysed. some recent incarnations of the tactics of perverting the meaning of words in recent political discourse in poland are critically examined. special attention is given to the manipulating the meaning of “paedophilia” in the context of the nationwide discussion on child sexual abuse in the catholic church. it is concluded that the dishonourable practice of verbal misrepresentation used under communism is at work again, this time in even more sophisticated form.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2019, 9, 1; 103-122
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wolny rynek a porządek konkurencyjny. Dwie koncepcje ładu społeczno-gospodarczego
Free Market and Competitive Order. Two Concepts of Socio-Economic Policy
Autorzy:
Szulczewski, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/469166.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
wolny rynek ordoliberalizm
neoliberalizm
F. A. von Hayek
W. Eucken
free market
ordoliberalism
neoliberalism
F.A. von Hayek
Opis:
W artykule przeprowadzono krytykę neoliberalnego pojęcia wolnego rynku. Dokonano tego na podstawie krytycznych opinii na temat kategorii: wolnej przedsiębiorczości i gospodarki wolnorynkowej jakie wyrażali F. A. von Hayek i W. Eucken w latach 1945–1950. Obaj przedstawiciele nowego liberalizmu byli przekonani, że wolność na rynku zapewniona jest dzięki panowaniu na nim porządku konkurencyjnego. Ten porządek z kolei jest strzeżony przez państwo.
The article presents a critique of neo-liberal free market ideas. This was done based on the representation of critical opinion on of ideas: free enterprise and a free market economy that F.A Hayek presented in the years 1945–1950 and W. Eucken in the years 1946–1950. Two representatives of the new liberalism were convinced that freedom in the market creates order competitive. This order is guarded by the state.
Źródło:
Prakseologia; 2015, 157/2; 95-117
0079-4872
Pojawia się w:
Prakseologia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O filozofii politycznej Friedricha Augusta von Hayeka w świetle badań nad efektywnością ekonomiczną common law
About Friedrich August von Hayek’s political philosophy in light of research on the economic efficiency of common law
Autorzy:
Załuski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/685860.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
efektywność ekonomiczna
common law
ewolucja kulturowa
Hayek
Law and Economics
economic efficiency
cultural evolution
Opis:
The goal of this paper is to evaluate Friedrich August von Hayek’s political philosophy through the prism of the research on the economic efficiency of common law conducted within Law and Economics. One of the assumptions of Hayek’s political philosophy was the thesis about the optimizing character of cultural evolution. According to this thesis legal rules which have arisen spontaneously are economically efficient and thereby do not need to be corrected by the legislator. This thesis was thoroughly analysed by the Law and Economics scholars (notabene not inspired directly by Hayek’s philosophy), and these analyses are critically discussed in this paper. The results of these analyses are not unambiguous; nonetheless, they seem to undermine Hayek’s assumption about the optimizing character of cultural evolution. This fact affects the assessment of Hayek’s normative postulates; in particular, it justifies scepticism towards his critique of legislative activity.
Celem artykułu jest ocena filozofii politycznej Friedricha Augusta von Hayeka przez pryzmat badań nad efektywnością ekonomiczną common law. Jednym z założeń filozofii politycznej Hayeka jest teza o optymalizacyjnym charakterze ewolucji kulturowej. Zgodnie z tą tezą reguły prawne powstałe spontanicznie są ekonomicznie efektywne, nie wymagają więc istotnych korekt ze strony ustawodawcy. Teza ta została poddana dokładnym analizom przez badaczy z nurtu Law and Economics (notabene nie inspirowanych bezpośrednio filozofią Hayeka), których wyniki zostały krytycznie omówione w niniejszym artykule. Konkluzje tych analiz nie są jednoznaczne, niemniej jednak wydają się podważać założenie Hayeka o optymalizacyjnym charakterze ewolucji kulturowej. Rzutuje to w istotny sposób na ocenę postulatów normatywnych Hayeka; w szczególności, uzasadnia sceptycyzm wobec jego krytyki aktywności legislacyjnej.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica; 2017, 78
0208-6069
2450-2782
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies