Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gniezno Archbishopric" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Kancelaria królewska Andegawenów i Jagiellonów jako środowisko awansu na drodze do arcybiskupstwa gnieźnieńskiego
The Royal Chancellery of the Angevins and Jagiellos As a Circle From Which to be Promoted on Ones Way to Become the Gniezno Archbishop
Autorzy:
Kuźma, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1954992.pdf
Data publikacji:
2000
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
arcybiskupstwo gnieźnieńskie
kancelaria koronna (królewska) /urzędy kancelaryjne
kariera
nominacja
promocja
Gniezno Archbishopric
Crown (King's) chancellery
Chancellery offices
nomination
promotion
Opis:
The Polish Royal Chancellery of the Angevins and Jagiellos (1370-1572), as the central institution of the King's executive power, was the basic circle in which to enter on one's State and Church career that lead, based on a loyal service to the ruler, to high State offices and Church dignities. The monarch, who, starting from the end of the 14th century, had an ever-greater influence on nominations to the bishop's position, in the sixties of the 15th century finally gained advantage over other factors competing for this capacity. His creative role in forming the composition of the Episcopate also included the highest position in the Polish Church – the Metropolitan See in Gniezno where from 1418 the Primates of Poland resided. The Gniezno Archbishop who was only second to the Monarch as far as prestige, wealth and territorial range of his power were concerned, belonged to the close elite of power in Poland at the close of the Middle Ages and at the threshold of the modern times. In the years 1374-1562 the Gniezno Archbishopric was governed by 22 dignitaries of which 18 had worked in the Crown Chancellery at one stage of their career. The later archbishops may be found at all the grades of the Chancellery career. The average time of work in the Chancellery for this group was nearly 17 years. The executive posts (those of Chancellor and Deputy Chancellor) were held by 10 people altogether, that is 55% of the Archbishops who had Chancellery experience. The average length of time of staying at such a post was a little over 9 years. The post of the Secretary was the most often held office: 12 people had held it. At least one third of the latter ones were next promoted to the office of the Great Secretary which was the third most important in the Chancellery hierarchy. The average age at which the Chancellery career was begun was 29, and the average age of promotion to the post of the Chancellor – 38. The average age of appointment to the position of Archbishop was 53 and it is not significantly different from the age of those people who had not had any Chancellery experience. The factor that accelerated promotions was education, especially studies in law crowned with obtaining a degree, accompanied by a magnate family background.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2000, 48, 2; 5-28
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konferencje biskupów XVIII wieku jako instytucja zastępująca synody prowincjonalne: część 2: obrady w sprawach państwa i zachowana po nich dokumentacja
Autorzy:
Librowski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1044179.pdf
Data publikacji:
1984
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
dokumentacja
biskup
arcybiskupstwo gnieźnieńskie
archiwum prymasów
archiwum kapituły gnieźnieńskiej
records
bishop
archbishopric of Gniezno
archive of Primates
archive of chapter of Gniezno
Źródło:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne; 1984, 48; 181-357
0518-3766
2545-3491
Pojawia się w:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konferencje biskupów XVIII wieku jako instytucja zastępująca synody prowincjonalne: część 1: obrady w sprawach Kościoła i szczątkowa po nich dokumentacja
Autorzy:
Librowski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1044203.pdf
Data publikacji:
1983
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
dokumentacja
biskup
arcybiskupstwo gnieźnieńskie
archiwum prymasów
archiwum kapituły gnieźnieńskiej
records
bishop
archbishopric of Gniezno
archive of Primates
archive of chapter of Gniezno
Źródło:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne; 1983, 47; 239-312
0518-3766
2545-3491
Pojawia się w:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O dyskursie Olszowskiego „De archiepiscopatu gnesnensi”
Autorzy:
Ryś, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690298.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Andrzej Olszowski, Archbishopric of Gniezno, Pope’s legations, Kings’ of Poland coronations
Andrzej Olszowski, arcybiskupstwo gnieźnieńskie, legacje papieskie, koronacje królów Polski
Opis:
The article presents the arguments used by Primate Andrzej Olszowski in the De archiepiscopatu Gnesnensi to justify the hierarchical superiority of the Gniezno metropolis towards bishops in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The reason for the text’s publication was a dispute between the Primate Olszowski and Andrzej Trzebicki, bishop of Cracow, who refused to give Olszowski the right to crown King Jan III Sobieski in the Wawel Cathedral. Trzebicki held that Cathedral was outside the dioceses of Gniezno. The conflict was settled by the Pope in favor of the Primate Olszowski. The published text collects materials from the Church and Archbishopric history, which justified the privilege of the priority of the Gniezno metropolis in the Commonwealth.
The article presents the arguments used by Primate Andrzej Olszowski in the De archiepiscopatu Gnesnensi to justify the hierarchical superiority of the Gniezno metropolis towards bishops in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The reason for the text’s publication was a dispute between the Primate Olszowski and Andrzej Trzebicki, bishop of Cracow, who refused to give Olszowski the right to crown King Jan III Sobieski in the Wawel Cathedral. Trzebicki held that Cathedral was outside the dioceses of Gniezno. The conflict was settled by the Pope in favor of the Primate Olszowski. The published text collects materials from the Church and Archbishopric history, which justified the privilege of the priority of the Gniezno metropolis in the Commonwealth.  
Źródło:
Prace Polonistyczne; 2018, 73; 93-103
0079-4791
Pojawia się w:
Prace Polonistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies