Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gaius’ Institutiones" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Teodor Dydyński i legenda Gaiusa
    Teodor Dydyński and the legend of Gaius
    Autorzy:
    Czech-Jezierska, Bożena Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503591.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    Gaius
    Instytucje Gaiusa
    Theodor Dydyński
    Institutiones by Gaius
    Opis:
    The author analyses the place of Gaius in the research of Teodor Dydyński – a Polish law historian. Gaius, though not well known, became a famous Roman jurist, recognized as a great authority. His Institutiones was a complete exposition of the elements of Roman law. Dydyński thought that Gaius and his works were significant so he devoted much research to him. Dydyński translated Institutiones from Latin into Polish and published them with his own notes. He regarded Gaius as a great teacher of Roman law, he had much reverence and admiration for him, which was reflected in Dydyński’s writings. Therefore Dydyński should be seen as a scientist who created a kind of legend – the legend of Gaius.
    Źródło:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 21-32
    1231-1634
    Pojawia się w:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Gaius a działalność naukowa Jana Kantego Rzesińskiego
    Gaius and scientific activity of Jan Kanty Rzesiński
    Autorzy:
    Korporowicz, Łukasz Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/502696.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    Instytucje Gajusa
    Jan Kanty Rzesiński
    metoda badawcza
    systematyczny wykład
    Gaius’ Institutiones
    Jan Kanty Rzesińsk
    scientific method
    systematic lecture
    Opis:
    Jan Kanty Rzesiński was a nineteenth-century Polish scholar from Kraków. He never became a famous Romanist. Nevertheless, his contribution to the development of Polish studies on Gaius and his Commentaries is important. Rzesiński was the very first Polish scholar who presented the discovery of Gaius’ Commentaries to Polish society. In the academic year 1831–1832 Rzesiński lectured on Gaius at the Jagiellonian University. The lectures soon ceased, nevertheless, it was the first academic attempt to talk about Niebuhr’s discovery. In 1838 Rzesiński published a Polish translation of Gans’s Scholien zum Gajus. The translation attracted much interest among Polish legal scholars and was broadly commented on. In the latter part of the century, it became a standard point of reference for the next generation of Romanist, including Teodor Dydyński.
    Źródło:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 61-71
    1231-1634
    Pojawia się w:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Gai Institutiones według Cezarego Kunderewicza
    Gaius’ “Institutiones” by Cezary Kunderewicz
    Autorzy:
    Jakubowski, Ireneusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/956070.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    Instytucje Gaiusa
    polskie tłumaczenie
    Cezary Kunderewicz
    Institutiones by Gaius
    Polish translation
    Opis:
    In his work the author presents the process of creating the first complete Polish translation of Gaius’s Institutiones by Cezary Kunderewicz (in the 19th c. the first two books were translated into Polish by Dydyński). The translation was published by PWN in 1982 (in 2003 another Polish edition was published by Rozwadowski). The author supposes that professor Kunderewicz probably started his translation in the early 1970s. He refers to his own memories as he is now the oldest disciple of Professor Kunderewicz. The author mentions that Kunderewicz was excellently prepared for this difficult work. Several years earlier Kunderewicz translated the treatise on Roman Aqueducts written by Frontinus. The article is clearly based on memories. This is the reason why the author is quoting only one review of Kunderewicz’s translation and why he does no try to evaluate the translation. In the end the author writes also about Kunderewicz’s another translation – Polish edition of Justinian’s Institutes, which was published in 1986.
    Źródło:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 41-47
    1231-1634
    Pojawia się w:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawo spadkowe w systematyce „Instytucji” Gaiusa
    Inheritance law in the systematics of the Gaius “Institutiones”
    Autorzy:
    Świrgoń-Skok, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32407333.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    Gaius
    Instytucje Gaiusa
    prawo spadkowe
    systematyka
    spadki
    Institutiones of Gaius
    inheritance law
    systematics
    inheritance
    Opis:
    The study examines the position of inheritance in the systematics of Institutiones of Gaius and discusses the significance of such approach to inheritance law in the subsequent development of private law. In Institutiones of Gaius issues related to succession account for approximately 1/3 of the entire contents. Presentation of matters connected with inheritance comprises a larger part of the second book (G. 2, 99–289) focusing on various legal aspects of testate succession (G. 2, 100–190) and the related acquisition of material benefits at the expense of the legacy, through endowments (G. 2, 192–289); additionally, the beginning of the third book comprised rules of intestate succession (G. 3, 1–87). While analysing the specific problems associated with succession, Gaius presents them as examples of property rights acquisition under general and specific terms. Similar approach to inheritance in Rome was also adopted in Institutiones of Justinian. It was only the German Pandectists that distinguished succession law as a separate segment of law. However, the nineteenth century European civil codes in their contents and systematics make reference to the three-fold distinction of law (personae – res – actiones) introduced by Gaius in his Institutiones. For instance the Civil Code of Austria (ABGB) did not treat succession law as a separate segment of law but, following the systematics in the Institutes of Gaius, as a part of property law related to acquisition of ownership rights per universitatem. Similar approach was adopted in Napoleonic Code where matters related to succession were contained in Book Three, entitled "Of the Different Modes of Acquiring Property".
    Źródło:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 125-134
    1231-1634
    Pojawia się w:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jak „kupowali” Grecy? Kilka uwag do wywodu Gajusza poświęconego umowie kupna-sprzedaży (Gai. 3.141)
    How were Greeks “buying”? Remarks to Gaius’ commentary regarding a purchase contract (Gai. 3.141)
    Autorzy:
    Grochowski, Jacek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503123.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    kupno
    Grecja
    kontrakt
    Gajusz
    Institutiones
    Instytucje
    Homer
    Prokulianie
    Sabinianie
    purchase
    Greece
    contract
    Gaius
    Proculians
    Sabinians
    Opis:
    The article discusses the problem what an ancient trade contract was called. Did Greeks perceive it only as a barter exchange or a purchase agreement? Perhaps this difference was insignificant or irrelevant? In order to solve this mystery the author follows the footsteps of Gaius’ way of thinking, dating back to the Roman times. Although Homer cannot be considered a jurist, his texts provided Gaius with valuable input. They enabled the ancient jurist to a make well-grounded point in one of the most renown juridical discussion of ancient times between Sabinians and Proculians. The author analyzed Gaius’ text and searched for the original sense of Homer’s poetry so as to rediscover the true nature of an original trade transaction in ancient Greece.
    Źródło:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 27, 2; 33-40
    1231-1634
    Pojawia się w:
    Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies