Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "European private international law" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Konsekwencje brexitu w dziedzinie prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
    The consequences of Brexit in private international law
    Autorzy:
    Majkowska-Szulc, Sylwia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030082.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    European Union
    withdrawal from the European Union
    art. 50 TEU
    Brexit
    EU uniform law
    European private international law
    national jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters
    mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments
    judicial cooperation between Member States
    e-Justice Portal
    Opis:
    Brexit is a unique phenomenon as no Member State has ever expressed the will to leave the European Union. Never before had the in-depth impact of a Member State withdrawal been analysed. The issue has started to be analysed after the referendum in which the British voted in favour of leaving the European Union. The topic of the potential consequences of Brexit in the field of private international law concerns, inter alia, national jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, specific procedures of EU uniform law, judicial cooperation between Member States or the functioning of the e-Justice Portal and dynamic forms. Before a given Member State withdraws from the EU, interested parties should have been informed, inter alia, of how pending proceedings will be conducted starting with the withdrawal day, what about proceedings initiated at the date of withdrawal or later on, and what about the rulings of the courts of the applicant state covered by the exequatur procedure before the withdrawal. Therefore, the primary purpose of the article is to determine the framework for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in the field of private international law. An additional aim of this paper is to better prepare natural and legal persons for the new post-Brexit reality. European integration has brought Europe peace and prosperity and enabled unprecedented cooperation in all areas of common interest. Following the withdrawal decision, the state and its citizens cease to benefit from the acquis communautaire. In fact, the United Kingdom left the European Union on 31 January 2020. As far as private international law is concerned, the United Kingdom has become a third country. Subsequently, on 1 February 2020 a transition period has started and it aims to provide more time for citizens and businesses to adapt. The negotiations on the future partnership between the EU and the UK has started in March 2020, but they were postponed due to the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union is sometimes compared to love that has passed away, but former lovers must continue to meet from time to time to manage certain common affaires. The analysis of the topic leads to the conclusion that, in fact, Brexit is a unique phenomenon that has no added value.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 138-158
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    RECOGNITION OF SURNAMES IN CZECH LEGISLATION AND JUDICATURE
    Autorzy:
    Hrnčiříková, Miluše
    Valentová, Lucia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/915819.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    recognition of surnames
    private international law
    European Union
    Czech Republic
    Opis:
    There are more thent 13 milion EU citizens livinig outside of the country of their nationality and the recognition of their legal status, incl . their names and surnames, is often essential for the maintenance of their personal and cultural identity . This article focuses on the allowed form and recognition of surnames of natural persons in the EU . This question will be examined within the Czech legal system, but the emphasis will be placed on the case-law of European courts that greatly affects and shapes this area of law in the EU member states . The regulation of surnames represents questions of the national, international and European law, as well as privat law, public law and primary and secondary Union law
    Źródło:
    Review of European and Comparative Law; 2017, 29, 2; 9-32
    2545-384X
    Pojawia się w:
    Review of European and Comparative Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Application of the Succession Regulation by German courts — Selected Issues
    Autorzy:
    Kohler, Christian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030088.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    private international law
    EU Succession Regulation
    law of German courts
    European Certificate of Succession
    Opis:
    The article discusses the impact of the EU Succession Regulation on the German system of private international law. The change came with some important differences introduced in the text of the Regulation as in comparison to previous German solutions (especially the use of the habitual residence as the main connecting factor instead of nationality), and, as a result of the number of decisions of the CJEU on the Regulation (in particular the Kubicka case).The paper presents the most important, up-to-date German case-law relating to the EU Succession Regulation. It starts with the general remarks in that regard and continues to discuss judgments covering issues of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the European Certificate of Succession. Three conclusions are drawn therefrom. First, the cases show a general willingness of the courts to cope with the fundamental changes introduced by the Regulation. In particular, the concept of “habitual residence” is applied on the basis of an autonomous interpretation by reference to the case-law of the CJEU on Regulation Brussels IIa. Second, a number of decisions make apparent that the courts are sometimes slow to accept the consequences which flow from the changes brought about by the Regulation, and which oblige to re-consider the German practice in matters of international successions. That applies in particular to the issuing of the European Certificate of Succession. Third, German courts are generally ready to initiate cooperation with the CJEU by formulating preliminary questions (three questions posed by the end of 2019).
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 27-43
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    European Court of Human Rights Case Law on Genetic Information in the Scope of International Biomedical Law
    Autorzy:
    Kwiatkowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1831451.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    genetic data protection
    the right to respect for private life
    international biomedical law
    European Court of Human Rights case law
    Opis:
    The aim of the study is to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on genetic information in the scope of international biomedical law, as expressed in the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data and the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Human Dignity in the Field of Application of Biology and Medicine. The Court held that the genetic information is protected under the law of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The model of the right to respect for private life is reflected in its shape, as the Court noted in the Van der Velden v. The Netherlands and S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom cases. It leads to the conclusion that the provision of Article 8 of the Convention provides the protection of genetic information, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. Such conclusion is in compliance with art. 12, art. 17 (b) art. 21 (c) of the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, and art. 11 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine.
    Źródło:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2020, 11; 119-137
    2450-0976
    Pojawia się w:
    Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filary (zasady) prawa autorskiego w orzecznictwie Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z lat 2016 – 2017 na tle współczesnych trendów w prawie prywatnym
    The Pillars (Principles) of Copyright in the Judicature of the Court of Justice of the European Union in 2016 and 2017 Against the Background of Contemporary Trends in Private Law
    Autorzy:
    Przybytek, Piotr
    Przybytek, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2117391.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Zamojska
    Tematy:
    copyright
    intellectual property law
    private international law
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    prawo autorskie
    prawo własności intelektualnej
    prawo prywatne międzynarodowe
    Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej
    Opis:
    Współczesne prawo autorskie musi się zmierzyć z wyzwaniami wynikłymi z dynamicznego rozwoju nowoczesnych technologii. Do zrealizowania ma cztery zadania. Po pierwsze, musi chronić przyrodzone prawo autora do własności rezultatów swojego wysiłku. Po drugie, autor zasługuje na wynagrodzenie za korzystanie z jego pracy, co z kolei stanowi zachętę do tworzenia – będącą trzecią główną zasadą nowoczesnego prawa autorskiego. I wreszcie autorów powinno się zachęcać do publikowania swoich dzieł, gdyż stymuluje to rozwój nauki i kultury. Z powyższych zasad (filarów) przynajmniej trzy pojawiają się w orzecznictwie Trybunale Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej za lata 2016/2017 – I, II i IV. Trybunał stara się przede wszystkim zagwarantować autorom stosowne wynagrodzenie. Jednak podkreśla się trudność odseparowania uprawnień majątkowych i osobistych. I rzeczywiście zaprezentowana analiza prowadzi do wniosku, iż zlewają się one. Już wcześniej podkreślano, że organy Wspólnot wniosły istotny wkład w kształtowanie wzorców ochrony prawa autorskiego będących odpowiedzią na rozkwit nowych technologii. W naszej analizie zauważalna jest tendencja zrównywania prawnego tradycyjnie produkowanych utworów z ich cyfrowymi odpowiednikami.
    Contemporary copyright law has to face a number of challenges resulting from the dynamic development of modern technologies. First, it must protect authors’ inherent right to own the results of their work. Second, authors are entitled to receive payment for the use of their works, which, in turn, creates an incentive: the third main principle of modern copyright law. Finally, authors should be encouraged to publish their works as it stimulates the development of science and culture. At least three of the above principles (pillars) appear in the judicature of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the years 2016-2017: the first, the second and the fourth. In this respect, the court’s primary objective is to ensure that authors are remunerated appropriately. However, it is also emphasised that it is difficult to separate property right from personal rights. This problem has been demonstrated in the present analysis, too. It has already been noticed that the bodies of the Communities have made a significant contribution to the shaping of copyright protection patterns in response to the flourishing of new technologies. In our analysis, there is a noticeable tendency to legally equate traditionally created works with their digital counterparts.
    Źródło:
    Facta Simonidis; 2021, 14, 1; 91-124
    1899-3109
    Pojawia się w:
    Facta Simonidis
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies