Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "European arrest warrant" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 20
Tytuł:
In the Pursuit of Justice: (Ab)Use of the European Arrest Warrant in the Polish Criminal Justice System
Autorzy:
Klaus, Witold
Włodarczyk-Madejska, Justyna
Wzorek, Dominik
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2019160.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
European Arrest Warrant
deportation
criminal justice
membership
Opis:
Poland is the leading country in pursuing its own citizens under the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), with the number of EAWs issued between 2005 and 2013 representing one third of the warrants issued by all EU countries (although some serious inconsistencies between Polish and Eurostat statistical data can be observed). The data show that Poland overuses this instrument by issuing EAWs in minor cases, sometimes even for petty crimes. However, even though this phenomenon is so widespread, it has attracted very little academic interest thus far. This paper fills that gap. The authors scrutinise the topic against its legal, theoretical and statistical backdrop. Based on their findings, a theoretical perspective is drawn up to consider what the term ‘justice’ actually means and which activities of the criminal justice system could be called ‘just’ and which go beyond this term. The main question to answer is: Should every crime be pursued (even a petty one) and every person face punishment – even after years have passed and a successful and law-abiding life has been building in another country? Or should some restrictions be introduced to the law to prevent the abuse of justice?
Źródło:
Central and Eastern European Migration Review; 2021, 10, 1; 95-117
2300-1682
Pojawia się w:
Central and Eastern European Migration Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Bottom-up Look at Mutual Trust and the Legal Practice of the Aranyosi Test
Autorzy:
Peristeridou, Christina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40447322.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
detention conditions
European Arrest Warrant
mutual trust
Aranyosi
Opis:
This contribution offers an insight into the legal practice of the Aranyosi test during the EAW proceedings in seven Member States, an outcome of the research conducted during the ImprovEAW Project. Only the executing judicial authorities of some Member States do trigger the test. Member States are roughly differentiated between those having facilities with usually bad or usually good detention conditions, promoting antagonistic relationships instead of equal partnership. The lack of streamlining of the communication when supplementary information is requested, the lack of common standards and approach towards guarantees lead to further misunderstandings and frustration. The findings of this research have revealed the importance of departing from a pure legal understanding of mutual trust and follow a more empirical, experiential or bottom-up concept. Mutual trust is not only a legal concept, but it underpins the legal culture of the cooperation and collegial attitudes of authorities towards one another. This expression of mutual trust remains quite undiscovered: how is miscommunication affecting mutual trust? Do judicial authorities of legal systems express collegiality to one another? How do cultural aspects and preconceived ideas regarding the quality of other legal systems influence mutual trust? Accordingly, some suggestions have been made to improve the cooperation and the establishment of rapport when supplementary information is requested. Finally, I advocate for a more neutral view towards the Aranyosi test. As opposed to considering it as a supervisory mechanism, I have explored the idea of approaching it as a risk management tool: it tackles risks created by mutual trust. Such approach helps both sides to take responsibility to avert ad hoc risks, instead of experiencing Aranyosi as a testing moment. Such approach centres the real problem, i.e. the risks created by mutual trust for individuals and it can stimulate more proactive policy-making in this regard.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 51-72
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Europejski Nakaz Aresztowania – szanse i zagrożenia
European Arrest Warrant - opportunities and threats
Autorzy:
Sobczak, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16439699.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Akademia im. Jakuba z Paradyża w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim
Tematy:
Europejski Nakaz Aresztowania
Unia Europejska
European Arrest Warrant
European Union
Opis:
The article presents legal aspects related to the introduction of the European Arrest Warrant into the European Union legislation. The author / author describes in detail the legal basis of the EAW and points to its repercussions for Poland and other EU countries.
Artykuł przybliża prawne aspekty związane z wprowadzeniem do ustawodawstwa Unii Europejskiej Europejskiego Nakazu Aresztowania. Autor/ Autorka drobiazgowo opisuje umocowanie prawne ENA oraz wskazuje na jego reperkusje dla Polski i pozostałych krajów UE.
Źródło:
Studia – konteksty pogranicza; 2021, 5; 15-46
2543-6465
Pojawia się w:
Studia – konteksty pogranicza
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The ECHR Preamble vs. the European Arrest Warrant: balancing Human Rights protection and the principle of mutual trust in EU Criminal Law?
Autorzy:
Daminova, Nasiya Ildarovna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106687.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-05-30
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
European Arrest Warrant
ECHR
CFREU
Castano
right to life
Opis:
As stated in the European Convention on Hu- man Rights Preamble, the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of greater unity between its members through the maintenance and realisation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . Nowadays, the European Union includes the majority of the ECHR signatories (27 of 47) and incorporates the key legal instrument of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, namely the European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision . Nevertheless, the possible effects of the EAWFD on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights remain understudied – despite the crucial need to properly balance the enforcement of the principle of mutual recognition and Human Rights protection in the European Union. Since the first attempts to approach the EAWFD, the Strasbourg Court preferred to find the applications inadmissible (Pianese, Monedero Angora, Stapleton) or to establish a very high threshold for establishing a Convention violation within this context (Pirozzi). It will be argued that the newly developing Strasbourg Court’s case-law on the EAWFD (Castano, Bivolaru/Moldovan, Alosa) could potentially mark a new step in the judicial dialogue be- tween two European Courts. In the Castano and Bivolaru/ Moldovan rulings, the ECtHR – for the first time – found that the EU Member States had breached their obligations under Arts . 2 ( ́right to life ́) and 3 ( ́prohibition of torture ́) ECHR within the European Arrest Warrant context (murder/traffick- ing in human beings charges). At the same time, this interpre- tation opens the floor for discussion on potential applicability of other Convention provisions (Arts . 4, 5, 8, 13) to other offences listed in Art . 2(2) of the EAWFD (such as, for instance, corruption, fraud, computer-related crime etc .). Even though the Strasbourg Court has transposed the CJEU’s benchmarks of the EAW refusals legality assessment – i .e . a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment in the requesting State (Aranyosi/Căldăra ru), the EU Member States ́ courts are now forced – de facto – to consider an additional (ECHR-based) criterion for assessing the legality of refusals to execute the European Arrest Warrants. This can arguably pose further questions upon the entry into force of Protocol No. 15 ECHR which aims at the most effective realisation of the ́subsidiarity ́ principle in the European Convention system.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2022, 49, 2; 97-131
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Lex Perković. Chorwackie problemy z implementacją europejskiego nakazu aresztowania
Lex Perković. Croatian problems with the implementation of the European arrest warrant
Autorzy:
Krysieniel, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/942339.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
„Lex Perković”
europejski nakaz aresztowania Chorwacja
European Arrest Warrant
Croatia
Opis:
Ustanowiony w 2002 r. europejski nakaz aresztowania stanowi ważne narzędzie w ściganiu sprawców przestępstw popełnionych na terenie Unii Europejskiej. Może być jednak uznany za pewną ingerencję w zasadę suwerenności państwa. Taka sytuacja miała miejsce w 2013 r. w momencie wchodzenia do UE Chorwacji, gdy tuż przed datą wstąpienia parlament zmienił prawo, bardzo ograniczając możliwość ekstradycji obywateli tego kraju do innych państw unijnych. Nieoficjalną, ale faktyczną przyczyną podjęcia takiej decyzji była chęć ochrony byłego wysokiego rangą przedstawiciela jugosłowiańskich służb specjalnych, Josipa Perkovicia, oskarżonego o udział w zabójstwie chorwackiego dysydenta w RFN w 1983 r. Ten ryzykowny krok chorwackich władz doprowadził do poważnego kryzysu w relacjach z rządem niemieckim i Komisją Europejską, w tym nawet do groźby wstrzymania funduszy unijnych. Doczekał się nawet osobnego potraktowania w literaturze przedmiotu (lex Perković, chorw. slučaj Perković). Podstawowym celem artykułu jest przedstawienie i omówienie wydarzeń o charakterze politycznym, towarzyszącym temu przypadkowi, jak i przeanalizowanie kroków prawnych, podejmowanych przez wszystkie zainteresowane strony.
The European arrest warrant established in 2002 is an important tool in prosecuting perpetrators of crimes committed within the European Union. It can, however, be considered as some interference in state sovereignty. Such a situation took place in 2013 when Croatia joined the EU. Just before the date of accession the parliament changed the law, significantly limiting the possibility of extraditing the citizens of that country to the other EU countries. The unofficial, but actual reason for this decision was the desire to protect the former high-rank representative of the Yugoslavian secret services, Josip Perkovic, accused of participating in the assassination of a Croatian dissident in Germany in 1983. This risky step by the Croatian authorities has led to a serious crisis in relations with the German government and the European Commission, including the threat of EU funds being withheld. He even got a separate treatment in the literature on the subject (lex Perković, Croat slučaj Perković). The main purpose of the article is to present and discuss political events that accompany this case, as well as to analyze legal steps taken by all interested parties.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 4 (50); 33-46
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Detention Pending Execution of the European Arrest Warrant – Dutch and Polish Experience. Some Reflection from the Human Rights Perspective
Autorzy:
Glerum, Vincent
Wąsek-Wiaderek, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40451056.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
European Arrest Warrant
detention pending surrende
Article 5 ECHR
executing judicial authority
Opis:
This article focuses on detention pending surrender, i.e. detention of the requested person in the executing Member State on the basis of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). It defines the scope of application of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights to such detention and analyses the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on time limits of keeping the requested person in detention in the executing MS as well as on the notion of “the executing judicial authority” entitled to decide on detention pending surrender. Both issues are explored with reference to national law and practice of the Netherlands and Poland. The article provides the answer to the question whether national provisions which limit the duration of detention pending surrender properly reflect the normative content of the framework decision on the EAW. The answer to this question is given with due regard to the standard of protection of the requested person stemming from Article 5 § 1 ECHR and Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Furthermore, the analyses focus on Dutch and Polish provisions concerning the authority entitled to decide on detention pending surrender and their compliance with the CJEU’s jurisprudence on the notion of “the executing judicial authority.” Recognising that detention is the basic measure for ensuring the effectiveness of surrender, we try to define the limits of its use in the EAW procedure, stemming from the requirements of protection of human rights.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 89-124
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
EAW: Next Steps, Will Pandora’s Box Be Opened?
Autorzy:
Glerum, Vincent
Kijlstra, Hans
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40451425.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
FD 2002/584/JHA
European Arrest Warrant
proportionality
effective judicial protection
coherence
Opis:
The authors advocate operational improvement of the European Arrest Warrant system. When applying the judicial cooperation instruments concerning criminal matters, more attention should be devoted to the requirements of proportionality, effective judicial protection, and coherence. The power to issue an EAW should be more circumscribed whereas executing authorities should be allowed more flexibility in the decision making process as far as the execution of an EAW is concerned. The authors conclude by sketching amendments to the legal and practical framework and the efforts required to implement them as well as by addressing the issue of political feasibility.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 125-145
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The execution of European Arrest Warrants issued by Polish courts in the context of the CJEU Rule of Law case law
Autorzy:
Saganek, Przemysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143033.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Court of Justice of the European Union
European Arrest Warrant
EAW
Polska
rule of law
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2020, 40; 275-295
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wiek nieletnich a możliwość ich przekazywania na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z 23 stycznia 2018 r. w sprawie C 367/16 – Piotrowski
The age of minors and the possibility of transferring them under a European Arrest Warrant. Gloss to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 23 January 2018 in the case C 367/16 – Piotrowski
Autorzy:
Kobes, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498919.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Tematy:
nieletni
europejski nakaz aresztowania
granice wiekowe odpowiedzialności karnej
juvenile
European Arrest Warrant
age of criminal responsibility
Opis:
Glosa dotyczy niewielkiego w swojej skali, ale istotnego problemu zasad poszanowania praw nieletnich pociąganych od odpowiedzialności karnej. Ściślej rzecz ujmując, chodzi o odpowiedź na pytanie, w jakim zakresie sądy wykonujące europejski nakaz aresztowania są zobowiązane do analizy przesłanek odmowy wykonania nakazu z uwagi na brak wieku pozwalającego na pociągnięcie nieletniego do odpowiedzialności karnej? Czy badając granice wiekowe odpowiedzialności karnej, sądy muszą również uwzględnić indywidualne cechy nieletniego, charakter i okoliczności popełnionego czynu?
The gloss concerns a small but significant problem of the principles of respecting juvenile rights within the criminal law context. More specifically, the question is to what extent are the courts executing the European Arrest Warrant obliged to analyze the grounds for refusing to execute the order because of an innappropriate age of a minor for bringing them to criminal responsibility. In the proces of examining the age limits of criminal responsibility, do the courts have to take into account the individual characteristics of the minor and the nature and circumstances of the offense?
Źródło:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda; 2019, 2, 2(4); 369-376
2657-7984
2657-800X
Pojawia się w:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Consequences of introducing the possibility of imposing an irreducible life sentence into the criminal code with regard to extradition and the execution of the european arrest warrant
Autorzy:
Tyburcy, Tomasz
Rogoziński, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25806661.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uczelnia Łazarskiego. Oficyna Wydawnicza
Tematy:
life imprisonment
life imprisonment without parole
parole
conditional release
prohibition of conditional release
European arrest warrant
extradition
Opis:
The Act of 7 July 2022, amending the Act – Criminal Code and certain other acts, introduced the possibility of imposing a sentence of life imprisonment without parole into the Criminal Code. The legislator provided for two grounds for the optional imposition of an irreducible life imprisonment sentence. The first (Article 77 § 3 of the Criminal Code) is based on formal grounds: a previous conviction for a specific type of crime (against life and health, freedom, sexual freedom, public security, or of a terrorist nature) to life imprisonment or imprisonment for a term of not less than 20 years. The second ground (Article 77 § 4 of the Criminal Code) operates on a substantive condition: the nature and circumstances of the act and the personal characteristics of the perpetrator indicate that the perpetrator’s remaining at liberty would pose a permanent danger to the life, health, freedom, or sexual freedom of others. This article posits that the provisions of Article 77 § 3 and 4 of the Criminal Code are incompatible with Article 3 of the ECHR, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. As a result of the introduction of this type of punishment in Polish law, we may unfortunately realistically expect other states to refuse to hand over individuals prosecuted for crimes punishable by such punishment or those already sentenced to such punishment.
Źródło:
Ius Novum; 2023, 17, 4 ENG; 91-107
1897-5577
Pojawia się w:
Ius Novum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 20

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies