Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "European Constitutional Courts" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Wpływ europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka na interpretację praw podstawowych w RFN
    Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on the interpretation of fundamental rights in the Federal Republic of Germany
    Autorzy:
    Bainczyk, Magdalena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/505226.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
    Tematy:
    prawa podstawowe
    Federalny Trybunał Konstytucyjny RFN
    europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka
    europejska wspólnota sądów konstytucyjnych
    fundamental rights
    German Constitutional Court
    European Convention on Human Rights
    European Constitutional Courts
    Opis:
    Zasada poszanowania praw człowieka należy do podstawowych wartości integracji europejskiej. Jednakże stosowanie standardów ochrony praw człowieka, wywodzonych z europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka (EKPC) oraz z orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, wciąż napotyka na ograniczenia w państwach europejskich. Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu są podstawy prawne stosowania EKPC w niemieckim systemie prawnym, w szczególności art. 1 ust. 2 Ustawy Zasadniczej RFN, ale przede wszystkim orzecznictwo Federalnego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego RFN dotyczącego tego zagadnienia.
    In the process of European integration human rights protection has become one of the most prominent values. Nevertheless, the application of standards derived from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and from case law of the European Court on Human Rights still meets some obstacles at a national level. This article examines the legal nature of the foundation for the application of ECHR in Germany, especially Art. 1 para. 2 of the German Basic Law, but mostly focuses on the application of ECHR from the point of view of the German Constitutional Court.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2017, 4; 35-51
    1733-2680
    2451-0610
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Constitutional Courts and the Implementation of EU Directives: A Comparative Analysis
    Autorzy:
    Kustra-Rogatka, Aleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706915.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    constitutional courts
    judicial review
    EU law
    European integration
    EU directives
    Opis:
    This article concerns constitutional problems related to the implementation of EU directives seen from both the legal and comparative perspectives. The directives are a source of law which share a number of characteristic features that significantly affect and determine the specificity of Member States’ constitutional review of the directives as well as the legal acts that implement them. The review of the constitutionality of EU directives is carried out in accordance with the provisions of national implementing acts. Member States’ constitutional courts adopt two basic positions in this respect. The first position (adopted by, inter alia, the French Constitutional Council and German Federal Constitutional Court) is based on the assumption of a partial “constitutional immunity” of the act implementing the directive, which results in only a partial control of the constitutionality of the implementing acts, i.e. the acts of national law implementing such directives. The second position, (adopted, explicitly or implicitly by, inter alia, the Austrian Federal Constitutional Court, Czech Constitutional Court, Polish Constitutional Court, Romanian Constitutional Court and Slovak Constitutional Court) concerns the admissibility of a full review of the implementing acts. This leads to the admissibility of an indirect review of the content of the directive if the Court examines the provision as identical in terms of content with an act of EU law. Another issue is related to the application of the EU directives as indirect yardsticks of review. The French Constitutional Council case-law on review of the proper implementation of EU directives represents the canon in this regard. Nonetheless, interesting case studies of further uses of EU directives as indirect yardsticks of review can be found in the case law of other constitutional courts, such as the Belgian Constitutional Court or Spanish Constitutional Court. The research presented in this paper is based on the comparative method. The scope of the analysis covers case law of the constitutional courts of both old and new Member States. It also includes a presentation of recent jurisprudential developments, focusing on the constitutional case-law regarding the Data Retention Directive and the Directive on Combating Terrorism.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 189-208
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Public Morality as a Legitimate Aim to Limit Rights and Freedoms in the National and International Legal Order
    Autorzy:
    Młynarska-Sobaczewska, Anna
    Kubuj, Katarzyna
    Mężykowska, Aleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2172238.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-16
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    public morality
    morals
    legitimate aim
    constitutional courts
    European Court of Human Rights
    methods of argumentation
    Opis:
    Domestic legislation and international instruments designed for the protection of human rights provide for general clauses allowing limitations of rights and freedoms, e.g. public morals. A preliminary analysis of the case-law leads to the observation that both national courts and the European Court of Human Rights, when dealing with cases concerning sensitive moral issues, introduce varied argumentation methods allowing them to avoid making direct moral judgments and relying on the legitimate aim of protecting morality. In the article the Authors analyse selected judicial rulings in which moral issues may have played an important role. The scrutiny is done in order to identify and briefly discuss some examples of ways of argumentation used in the area under discussion by domestic and international courts. The identification of the courts’ methods of reasoning enables us in turn to make a preliminary assessment of the real role that the morality plays in the interpretation of human rights standards. It also constitutes a starting point for further consideration of the impact of ideological and cultural connotations on moral judgments, and on the establishment of a common moral standard to be applied in cases in which restriction on human rights and freedoms are considered.
    Źródło:
    Contemporary Central and East European Law; 2019, 1 (133); 10-20
    0070-7325
    Pojawia się w:
    Contemporary Central and East European Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    W poszukiwaniu remedium na bezradność jednostki wobec unikania przez sądy krajowe pytań prejudycjalnych do TSUE – stanowisko ETPCz i sądów konstytucyjnych państw członkowskich
    Autorzy:
    Hubert, Bekisz,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902356.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-01-17
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    preliminary reference
    European Court of the Human Rights
    constitutional courts
    pytanie prejudycjalne
    Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
    sądy konstytucyjne
    Opis:
    Preliminary reference to the CJEU is one of the most important achievements of the EU law. In the multicentric legal system it becomes a kind of guarantee to ensure a uniform interpretation of the EU law by courts of the Member States. However, not only is preliminary ruling an aid for judges, who adjudicate cases connected with EU law, but also it might create a possibility for individuals to have their EU rights protected. Unfortunately, EU law does not predict any effective measure, which would protect individual, when a court of the Member State unlawfully refuses to make a preliminary reference. An interesting phenomenon is an attempt to fill this gap by the European Court of Human Rights and constitutional courts of the Member States (especially the German Federal Constitutional Court) in recent years. In their case law, refusing to make a preliminary reference by courts, which are obligated to do that, was qualified as a violation of the right to a fair trial (ECHR) or the right to a lawful judge (constitutional courts). The aim of this article is to consider hitherto situation and to discuss it from the perspective of Polish law.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 76; 32-63
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies