Temat: Epistemic Vigilance - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Relevance Theory, Epistemic Vigilance and Social Slogans
Autorzy:: Dybko, Klaudia
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/889000.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: Relevance Theory
slogans
Epistemic Vigilance
billboards
Opis:: The article contains an analysis and conclusions concerning the meaning of contemporary social slogans in the light of Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance Theory (1995) and the socalled Epistemic Vigilance discussed amongst others by Mascaro and Sperber (2009). The text begins with a presentation of the state of art of the contemporary research of slogans commonly existing in the social, economic and political spheres of life of modern societies. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of selected social slogans originating from billboards of the most popular social campaigns emphasising the innovative character of research and the significance of new theories in linguistic practice. The conclusion states the role of Epistemic Vigilance in comprehension of the often deceptive character of advertising campaigns.
Źródło:: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies; 2012, 21/2; 31-42
0860-5734
Pojawia się w:: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance
Autorzy:: Padilla Cruz, Manuel
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/620942.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: misunderstanding
processing strategy
confirmation bias
epistemic vigilance
hermeneutical vigilance
Opis:: Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors’ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance.
Źródło:: Research in Language; 2017, 15, 1; 11-36
1731-7533
Pojawia się w:: Research in Language
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja