- Tytuł:
- Access to Documents in Antitrust Litigation – EU and Croatian Perspective
- Autorzy:
- Butorac Malnar, Vlatka
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530371.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2015-12-31
- Wydawca:
- Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
- Tematy:
-
EU Damages Directive
private enforcement
cartels
antitrust litigation
access to documents
access to file
evidence in antitrust litigation - Opis:
- The paper analyses access to documents in cartel-based damages cases from the EU and Croatian perspective. It considers all relevant EU and Croatian legislation and case-law primarily focusing on the expected impact of the newly enacted Damages Directive. It is argued that the new rules on access to documents provided by the Directive will not necessarily have a significant impact on damages proceedings following cartel decisions issued by the Commission. This is due to the introduction of an absolute ban on the disclosure of leniency statements and settlement submissions via a ‘maximum harmonization’ rule. This conclusion is drawn from statistic figures showing that EU cartel enforcement rests solely on the leniency and settlement procedures. With that in mind, it is concluded that the Directive’s general, permissive rules on access to documents (other than leniency and settlement procedures) will not be applicable in most damages cases following the cartel infringement decision issued by the Commission. However, it is also observed that the Damages Directive’s new rules on access to documents may have the opposite impact on private enforcement in cases following infringement decisions issued by National Competition Authorities (NCAs) which do not rely as much on leniency in their fight against cartels as the Commission. The Directive’s general rule on access to documents will apply in jurisdictions such as Croatia, where all of its cartel decisions so far have been reached within the regular procedure. It is argued that the general access rule, coupled with other rules strengthening the position of claimants in antitrust damages proceedings, might actually be beneficial for both public and private enforcement in such jurisdictions.
- Źródło:
-
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2015, 8(12); 127-160
1689-9024
2545-0115 - Pojawia się w:
- Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł