Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Definition of reality" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Doświadczenie religijne – problemy terminologiczne
Religious Experience – Terminological Problems
Autorzy:
Szyjewski, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640876.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-01-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
Altered states of consciousness
religious experience
numinotic experience
mystical experience
shamanic experience
trance – definition
typology
features
scale
theory
peak experience
plateau experience
M-scale
symbol
symbolization
Joachim Wach
William Stace
Rudolf Otto
Ninian Smart
sensus numinis
ultimate reality
Stany zmienionej świadomości
doświadczenie religijne
doświadczenie numinotyczne
doświadczenie mistyczne
doświadczenia (transy) szamańskie – definicje
typologia
cechy
Doświadczenia szczytowe
doświadczenia plateau
M-skala
William Stace – teoria
Rudolf Otto – sensus numinis
ostateczna rzeczywistość
symbolizacja
Opis:
The huge number of interpretations and approaches to religious experiences makes discourse in the scientific studies of religion on the scope and significance of these phenomena extremely difficult. Especially misleading is the identification of them with mystical experiences, as well as attempts to depreciate these types of experience that are alien to researchers. A possible solution is the introduction of a differentiated scale of religious experiences in which mystical experiences constitute their “climactic”, emotionally and cognitively most intensive form. Acknowledging Otto’s definition of sensus numinis, the content of the experience and its cognitive, motivational and physiological components become a problem. In this situation most promising is on the one hand the classical conception of Joachim Wach, which orders the discourse and proposes recognising research on religious experiences with one of the main disciplines of religious studies, and on the other Abraham Maslow’s concept of “peak experiences” and “plateau experiences”. Therefore, (1) religious experience is graded; (2) it is not exclusively the sense itself (sensus numinis), since it brings cognitive and volitional effects, (3) it need not have a personal character and (4) experiencing it usually leads to various, more or less successful attempts to express it, and this then happens by means of symbols and is organised in the form of myths.
Źródło:
Studia Religiologica; 2011, 44; 7-33
0137-2432
2084-4077
Pojawia się w:
Studia Religiologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Triangulation and Dealing with The Realness of Qualitative Research
Autorzy:
Konecki, Krzysztof T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138574.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Triangulation
Field research
Qualitative methods
Sociology
Ethnography
Writing of ethnography
Ethnographic description
Definition of reality
Tribal rules
Generalized other
Opis:
This paper provides a sociologists’ reflection of a sociologist on qualitative field research. Reflections will include some methodological and epistemological considerations that are connected with field work, while building the realness of the description and conclusions, i.e. constructing the quality of qualitative research. The intellectual process of doing research will be characterized by analysis of: description of investigated reality (tales of the field), analytical process, usage of commonsense research procedures (so called triangulation procedures), which are used in the field by the researcher and during analysis or writing a research report to adequately “re – present” researched reality. The three above mentioned stages of representation of reality are interwoven to create one complex intellectual process, which is called “field research”. The quality of qualitative research is the intellectual process where some procedures are used to create the accountability of research conclusions.
Źródło:
Qualitative Sociology Review; 2008, 4, 3; 7-28
1733-8077
Pojawia się w:
Qualitative Sociology Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies