Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "D. von Hildebrand" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Ne ite ad Thomam, sed ad von Hildebrand
    Autorzy:
    Pichola, Ewa Agnieszka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075917.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    D. von Hildebrand
    scholastyka
    integryzm
    twierdza tomizmu
    Aquinas
    scholastic
    integrism
    fortress of Thomism
    Opis:
    In this paper we posit the question which seems to be the natural implication of von Hildebrand's adherence to Catholicism. Especially, when philosophy is concerned one cannot escape the issue. Hence, we gather materials which help to answer the question what was D. von Hildebrand's stance on metaphysics of St. Thomas. We attempt to show to what extend von Hildebrand was acquianted with philosophy of Aquinas, further, what was his opinion on philosophers who represented the school of Aquinas, and how did he perceive his phenomenology in confrontation with metaphysics. We also present the context of employed by von Hildebrand phrases as „fortress of Thomism” and „narrowness” of integrists. They contribute much to the overall picture. We notice that von Hildebrand kept on loving truth, the Catholic Church and especially the Latin Mass out of the attachment to the philosophical.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 271-286
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dietrich von Hildebrand’s Correction of the Teaching on the End of Catholic Marriage
    Dietricha von Hildebranda korekta nauczania o celu katolickiego małżeństwa
    Autorzy:
    Pichola, Ewa A.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078943.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    D. von Hildebrand
    cel małżeństwa
    potomstwo
    miłość
    zmiana
    purpose of marriage
    offspring
    love
    correction
    Opis:
    Dietrich von Hildebrand already at the beginning of the twentieth century published two works which contributed to the pending debate on particular aspects of Catholic marriage. The major concern of authors involved was spectrum of issues regarding love in marriage and the purpose of marriage defined as proles, fides, sacramentum. The aftermaths of that debate, according to interpreters, are reflected in a contemporary teaching on marriage, especially in its point regarding the ends of marriage. In this paper we present to how extend D. von Hildebrand developed the new stance on the purpose of marriage. He decided to speak when noticed that the traditional teaching on marriage contain flaws, or that love is neglected in teaching on marriage. In what follows we expose the following: von Hildebrand's disagreement with Aquinas, novum in von Hildebrand's writings, reception of his thought. Next, on the basis of source materials we point out that von Hildebrand employs the new word „meaning” in explaing the role of love in marriage. We show that there is a question what this word exactly would signify and how to adjust von Hildebrand's vocabulary to the Latin notions in which the teaching on marriage is formulated. In the last part we present how interpreters understand von Hildebrand's reflection. We turn to both, the early reception of his thought and to interpretations offered by contemporary authors. Our final conclusion is that voices who recognize von Hildebrand amongst influential authors on the matter are justified, and have their background in source texts.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 275-293
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dietrich von Hildebrand – Doctor Multifunctionalibus – kolejna rola Doktora Kościoła dwudziestego wieku. Recenzja: Łukasz Golec, Idee modernistyczne w filozofii i teologii w świetle pism Dietricha von Hildebranda, Lublin 2021, stron 127.
    Dietrich von Hildebrand – Doctor Multifunctionalibus – Another Appearance of the „Doctor of Church of the Twentieth Century”. Review: Łukasz Golec, Idee modernistyczne w filozofii i teologii w świetle pism Dietricha von Hildebranda [Modernist Ideas in Philosophy and Theology from the Perspective of Works of Dietrich von Hildebrand], Lublin 2021, pp. 127.
    Autorzy:
    Pichola, Ewa Agnieszka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6258958.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Dietrich von Hildebrand
    Thomas Aquinas
    philosophy
    metaphysics
    modernism
    D. von Hildebrand
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    filozofia
    metafizyka
    modernizm
    Opis:
    Fr. Łukasz Golec, a PhD student of theology at the Catholic University in Lublin, presents the problem of modernism and turns to D. von Hildebrand’s publications issued after the Second Vatican Council had been closed. Within the sources there are Polish works only, and only those who do not address the question of modernism in von Hildebrand’s thought. None of the papers on the matter published in the Thomistic Yearbook is mentioned, neither a dissertation, written in English, Ideas of Christian Modernism in Dietrich von Hildebrand’s Philosophy, defended in 2020. The book consists of the introduction, three chapters, and the conclusion. The first chapter is Genesis of Modernism and speaks of the vast spectrum of issues of modernism. Next, Dietrich von Hildebrand- Life, Activity, and Fundaments of Philosophy reconstructs main tenets of von Hildebrandian phenomenology. The third is about Philosophical-Theological Premises of Dietrich von Hildebrand which Diagnose the Crisis in the Church. In the interpretation of modernism von Hildebrand’s thought is given priority over St. Pius X’s, what is a serious flaw, as these two differ significantly in their approach to philosophy. Further, the Author avoids to show that phenomenology and metaphysics of St. Thomas differ essentially, what is also a flaw. The Author also omits to add that von Hildebrand’s words on the beauty of the Catholic liturgy addresses the Tridentine Mass. About the New one he spoke in The Devastated Vineyard: “Truly if one of the devils in C.S. Lewis’ Screwtape letters had been entrusted with the ruin of the liturgy, he could not have done it better” . This omission is misleading and disturbing. The work follows the common flaw: essential inconsistencies of von Hildebrand’s philosophy are neglected and the fact that he was a devout Catholic makes him an authority.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2022, 11; 383-390
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies