Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Court of Human Rights" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 155
Tytuł:
The Limits of Rights and Freedoms - The Limits of Power
Autorzy:
Wyrzykowski, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43356294.pdf
Data publikacji:
1999-12-31
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
public order
Court of Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights
human rights
constitution
rights and freedoms of citzisens
Źródło:
Droit Polonais Contemporain; 1999, 121-124; 27-37
0070-7325
Pojawia się w:
Droit Polonais Contemporain
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Historical Situations” in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
Autorzy:
Kaminski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706650.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
EUROPEAN CONVENTION
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
THE CONVENTION
THE COURT
Opis:
This Article investigates how the European Court of Human Rights becomes competent to make decisions in cases concerning (or taking roots in) 'historical situations' preceding the ratification of the European Convention by a given Member State or even the enactment of the Convention. 'Historical situations' refer to events that occurred in the period of Second World War or shortly thereafter. In all such cases, the preliminary question arises whether the Court is competent temporally (ratione temporis) to deal with the application. This group of cases concerned usually allegations touching upon the right to life and the right to property. The Court had to decide if the allegation in question related to a temporally closed event (making the Court not competent) or rather to a continuous violation (where the Court could adjudicate). A specific set of legal questions arose vis-a-vis the right to life, first of all that of the autonomy of the procedural obligation to conduct an efficient investigation. The Strasbourg case law did not provide a clear answer. However, following two crucial judgements rendered by the Grand Chamber, the Court has established an interesting legal framework. Article analyses also two other situations having a historical dimension: bringing to justice those accused of war crimes or other crimes under international law (in light of the alleged conflict with the principle of nullum crimes sine lege) and pursuing authors of pro-Nazi statements or speech denying the reality of Nazi atrocities.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2010, 30; 9-60
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Francuski zakaz noszenia symboli religijnych w szkołach publicznych przed ETPC. Kontrowersje, uwagi, oceny
The French ban on wearing religious symbols in state schools before the ECHR. The controversy, comments and evaluations
Autorzy:
Falski, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1912741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
freedom of religion
law on religion
religious freedom
church and state (France)
European Court of Human Rights
France
freedom of conscience and religion
relations between the state and churches
religious symbols
school
związki wyznaniowe
wolność sumienia i wyznania
wolność religijna
prawo wyznaniowe
kościoły i inne związki wyznaniowe
szkoła
Francja
burka
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Opis:
Artykuł stanowi próbę podsumowania i oceny francuskiej ustawy, regulującej w oparciu o zasadę laickości noszenie symboli lub ubiorów uzewnętrzniających przynależność religijną w szkołach, gimnazjach i liceach publicznych, z perspektywy ponad 7 lat obowiązywania. Analiza opiera się na wnioskach płynących z praktyki administracyjnej, orzeczniczej, a także uwag doktryny. Szczególnie interesujące, rozszerzające kontekst problemu, jest orzecznictwo Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Organ ten uznaje laicki model państwa za idealną okoliczność, umożliwiającą korzystanie na równych zasadach z pełnej wolności wyznania. Kwestie dotyczące laickości są we Francji wciąż żywotne, aktualne i dyskutowane, rządząca partia UMP (Union pour un Mouvement Populaire) zainicjowała w marcu 2011 wielką batalię o laickość. Fakt, że po drugiej stronie barykady znajduje się bardzo liczna mniejszość muzułmańska, nadaje temu konfliktowi, w którym kwestia noszenia chust jest na czołowym miejscu, cywilizacyjny wymiar.
The article attempts to re-examine and evaluate the French secularism-driven law on conspicuous symbols or clothing manifesting religious affiliation in state elementary, junior and high schools after more than 7 years since it became effective. The analysis is based on the conclusions from the administrative practice, case law and comments made in the doctrine. Of particular interest, and at the same time broadening the context of the problem, is the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. This body considers the secular model of the state as an ideal circumstance, permitting the exercise of full religious freedom in the conditions of equality. The issues of secularism in France are invariably vital, relevant and debated; the ruling party UMP (Union pour un Mouvement Populaire) launched a new pro-secularism campaign in March 2011. The fact that the other side of the barricade is lined by a large Muslim minority makes this conflict, with its scarf ban issue being the top sticking point, raise to become a civilization clash.
Źródło:
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego; 2011, 14; 79-109
2081-8882
2544-3003
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ekstraterytorialne stosowanie Europejskiej Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Orzeczenie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawie Al-Skeini
The scope of extraterritorial obligations in the European Convention on Human Rights. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Al- -Skeini case
Autorzy:
Wasiński, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/596822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności
Prawo WE
Orzecznictwo Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Convention for Protection of Human Rights
European Community law
European Court of Human Rights Judgements
Opis:
The presence of the European states’ armed forces abroad entails some important legal issues concerning the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Under art. 1 the states parties „shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction” the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention. The article presents the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence in this respect and briefly restates fundamental tenets of personal and spatial models of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Against this background the recent, much anticipated judgment in Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom is presented. The reasoning of the Court in the leading case is elaborated within the context of states’s positive obligations arising out of effective control over area outside the Convention legal space.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2012, LXXXVI (86); 157-172
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Respect for privacy from the Strasbourg perspective
Autorzy:
Danaj, Lorenc
Prifti, Aleks
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035840.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Academicus. International Scientific Journal publishing house
Tematy:
ECHR
international law
human rights
right for privacy
European Court of Strasbourg
the right to respect
personal information
personal identity
integrity
Opis:
Following a general overview of the EHCR case of law and some of its distinctive features, this article focuses on explaining the meaning of ‘privacy’, and guaranteed as a fundamental right in light of Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, using as illustrations the verdicts of some cases judged by the institutions of Strasbourg. Certain paragraphs of the article address a series of issues, which according to the Court-referring to the images created by the Convention-cover a range , within which any individual may freely follow the development of their personality. The article also raises some questions, which the ECHR has often fully answered,or at least, indirectly implied. The author elaborates also on limits of privacy as foreseen by paragraph 2 of Article8, as well as on some obligations that the Convention assigns to its contracting State-Parties.
Źródło:
Academicus International Scientific Journal; 2012, 05; 108-118
2079-3715
2309-1088
Pojawia się w:
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Targeted Killings (Drone strikes) and the European Convention on Human Rights
Autorzy:
Bodnar, Adam
Pacho, Irmina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ECHR
ECtHR
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
human rights
drone
targeted killing
international law
Council of Europe
warfare
Opis:
More and more Member States of the Council of Europe are becoming interested in drone technology. Currently, a number of them either possess or wish to obtain unmanned aerial vehicles equipped with missiles. Due to the increased number of targeted killing operations committed with the use of drones by countries such as the United States or Israel, there is a probability that Member States might also use them for such operations, especially if their forces will be subject to joint command. Although the issue of targeted killings with the use of drones has not yet been subject to the scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights, there are two main reasons why this may change in the near future. First, the Court has already ruled on the extraterritorial applicability of the European Convention on Human Rights, and second, the Convention places strict limits on any attempts to carry out targeted killings and leaves only a limited space for their use, even in the context of warfare. In this article we assess whether the Member States of the Council of Europe might be ever justified under the European Convention on Human Rights to carry out targeted killing operations using drones.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 189-208
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona praw nabytych w orzecznictwie ETPCz w kontekście uprawnień emerytalno- rentowych
The protection of acquired rights in the European Court of Human Rights with the view of pension rights
Autorzy:
Петр Сергеевич, Корниенко
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/550550.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu i Przedsiębiorczości w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim
Tematy:
prawa nabyte
ochrona praw nabytych
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
acquired rights
protection of acquired rights
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy decyzji sądowych związanych z nabytymi prawami. Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka wykazał w swoich orzeczeniach, iż nabyte prawa są własnością i są tym samym chronione przez Pierwszy Protokół Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Decyzją fundamentalną była sprawa Moskal vs Polska, gdzie sąd przyznał ochronę. Następstwem tej decyzji była poprawka w prawie polskim. Obecnie Węgry są stroną w procesie sądowym. Wszystkie decyzje powinny byc przykładem, jak Ukraina powinna chronić prawo zarówno na poziomie wykonawczym, jak i na poziomie sądowniczym.
The article concern the juridical decisions related to the acquired rights. The European Court Human Rigths proved in its decisions, that acquired pension rights are property, and therefore are protected under First Protocol for European Convention of Human Rights. The cornerstone decision was Moskal vs. Poland, where Court granted protection. Aftermath of its decision was the amending of state law in Poland. Nowadays Hungary are the party in case pending before the Court. All of the decisions should be the example how the Ukraina state should protect the rights both in the level of acting the rights and later on the court chamber
Źródło:
Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis. Sectio A, Nauki Humanistyczne, Społeczne i Techniczne; 2013, 1; 51-64
2300-1739
Pojawia się w:
Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis. Sectio A, Nauki Humanistyczne, Społeczne i Techniczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawo do wolności w świetle orzeczenia Trybunału w Strasburgu w sprawie Julii Tymoszenko oraz Jurija Łucenki przeciwko Ukrainie
The right to freedom in light of jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in cases of Yuliya Tymoshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko against Ukraine
Autorzy:
Szwarc, Karolina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/506395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
the European Court of Human Rights
Yuliya Tymoshenko
Yuriy Lutsenko
Ukraine
article 5 the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Opis:
In 2012 and 2013 the European Court of Human Rights announced two verdicts, dealing with important cases in Ukraine. They both concerned the leading Ukrainian politicians, that is Yuliya Tymoshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko. Y. Tymoshenko is the leader of the Batkivshchyna political party and of Yulia Tymoshenko’s Bloc. From 18 December 2007 to 3 March 2010, she held the position of Prime Minister of Ukraine. Y. Lutsenko, during the period from 18 December 2007 to 29 January 2010 was Minister of the Interior and the leader of the opposition party Narodna Samooborona. They were accused of abuse of power during their terms in office. The circumstances of the two cases are similar. Both applicants argued that their arrest and detention had been politically motivated and unlawful. In light of the cooperation between Ukraine and the EU, as well as the advancement as a democratic state, these judgements are very important. Significantly, the local and international observers concluded that their conviction was an element of political play. The Court ruled that the Ukrainian authorities violated the article 5 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 2; 103-112
1733-2680
2451-0610
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recent judgements of the General Court and the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic in inspection matters – Landmark Decisions or Wasted Opportunities to Solve Problem?
Autorzy:
Blažo, Ondrej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530211.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
envelope procedure
European Convention of Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
inspections
Slovakia
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2013, 6(8); 261-280
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
State Immunity or State Impunity? Human Rights and State Immunity Revisited in the ICJ’s Judgment on the Case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of a State
Autorzy:
Gerlich, Olga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962350.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
International Court of Justice
state immunity
human rights
Opis:
The paper aims to comment on the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 2nd February 2012 in the case of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State between Germany and Italy from the perspective of the problem of jurisdictional immunity. In its decision concerning compensation for atrocities suffered by Italian citizens during World War  II granted by Italian courts against the German State as well as the execution of the analogical decisions of Greek courts, the International Court of Justice upheld the immunity of the German State. The compensation sought by the plaintiffs in the national proceedings was to redress massacres on the civil population, deportations and forced labour. In its decision the Court analyzed the exception proposed by Italy in three strands which, according to the Respondent, cumulatively would result in an exception to the rule of state immunity. Firstly, the acts giving rise to the Italian claims constituted grave violations of humanitarian law; secondly, the rules of law violated constitute peremptory norms of international law; thirdly, no other form of redress was available rendering the exercise of jurisdiction by the Italian court to be a measure of a last resort for the victims.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2013, 2; 185-194
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosowanie Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności przez organy władzy publicznej Republiki Federalnej Niemiec. Studium przypadku
Application of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the German state bodies. A case study
Autorzy:
Bainczyk, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/505254.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
The German Federal Constitutional Court
national jurisdiction
Opis:
The order of the Second Senate of the German Federal Constitutional Court (the FCCt) of 14 October 2004 is a good example for a functioning of European legal community in an interpretation by German courts. Analyzing of effects of the European Court on Human Rights’ (the ECHR) decision in the Görgülü case on application of law by the state bodies, the FCCt emphasizes an openness of the German legal order towards the European law but parallel forms some legal restrictions on it, as it also does in European Union cases. On one hand in the German legal system, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in the interpretation of the ECHR has the status of a federal statute, and it must be taken into account in the interpretation of domestic law, including fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees. The authorities and courts of the Federal Republic of Germany are therefore obliged, under certain conditions, to take account of the Convention as interpreted by the ECHR in making their decisions. On the other hand this commitment takes effect only within the democratic and constitutional system of the Basic Law. The standard of protection of basic rights guaranteed by the Basic Law forms an important part of this constitutional system. What is more the state bodies must take into consideration effects of the ECHR’s decision on the national legal system. It means that taking into account decisions of the ECHR is possible only within the scope of the applicable law of procedure and the state bodies must evaluate decision’s effects, in particular in family law, the law concerning aliens, and also in the law on the protection of personality. It is worth to mention that an influence of the Görgülü case may be seen also in German legislation. In 2006 the German Code of Civil Procedure was changed. According to the section 580 of the above mentioned Code an action for retrial of the case may be brought: 8. Where the European Court of Human Rights has established that the Convention or its protocols have been violated, and where the judgment is based on this violation.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 2; 25-43
1733-2680
2451-0610
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The exposition of religious and cultural symbols according to the political European system. The case Lautsi versus Italy at the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Galantini, Luca
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640573.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, Religious Symbols, Case of Lautsi versus Italy
Opis:
On 3rd November 2009 the European Court of Human Rights in Strasburg ruled that Italy had to remove crucifi xes from school classrooms, thereby supporting the application submitted by Soile Lautsi Albertin, an Italian citizen of Finnish origin, “in the name of the principle of state secularism.” The above decision sparked an uproar and criticism which reverberated throughout entire Europe. On 30th June 2010, an appeal against this ruling, inspired by an ideological vision of religious freedom, had been discussed by Italian government lawyers before the Grand Chambre of the Court of Justice in Strasbourg. The Appeal judgment cancelled the first verdict and recognized the Italian Government’s reasons and rights to display crucifixes in public schools. It was concluded that the first judgment didn’t take into consideration the social and public role of religion, especially the Christian one, in the process of building a civil society and a public law system and promoted religious indifferentism which stands in contradiction with the entire history, culture and rights of the Italian people and the peoples of Europe.
Źródło:
Prace Historyczne; 2013, 140, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:
Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Błędne uzasadnienie orzeczenia (art. 184 p.p.s.a.) a prawo do sądu
Autorzy:
Zaorski, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788198.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-09-04
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
błędne uzasadnienie orzeczenia
prawo do sądu
prawa człowieka
błąd
postępowanie sądowoadministracyjne
Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny
erroneous justification of the judgement
right to fair trial
human rights
error
administrative proceeding
Supreme Administrative Court
Opis:
The Supreme Administrative Court shall dismiss the cassation appeal if the challenged decision despite the erroneous reasoning corresponds to the right (art. 184 in fi ne p.p.s.a.). In an article in the context of this provision is presented right to fair trial (as a rule of law and the individual’s right). The author concludes that the wording of the provision does not affect right to fair trial. In his opinion, for thesis of compliance art. 184 in fi ne p.p.s.a. with right to fair trail speaks one of the basic elements making up this right. This element is a guarantee for hear the case without undue delay (in a reasonable time). At the same time the author notes that the application of that provision in certain situations may violate the right to a fair trial. In the article this problem illustrated judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court. The author shows how the Supreme Administrative Court shall give reasons for its decisions, so as not to violate the right to fair trail.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2014, 4 (200); 173-187
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brak obowiązku uzasadnienia i uzasadnienie skrócone a prawo do sądu
Autorzy:
Rzucidło-Grochowska, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788200.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-09-04
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
obowiązek uzasadnienia
uzasadnienie skrócone
prawo do sądu
prawa człowieka
orzecznictwo
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
justifying a judgement
shortened justification
right to fair trial
right to access to the court
human rights
judicial decisions
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The right to fair trial and access to the court is interpreted by European Court of Human Rights in a wide manner. Amongst these rulings, there are numerous judicial opinions, where ECHR addesses the problem of giving grounds for judicial decisions (not mention explicitly in the Convention). Out of that reason we may say that there is possible to notice special element of the general right to due process – right to obtain grounds for judicial decisions. This particular right has many aspects and – at least at the first glance – seems to impose the duty to prepare justifications without exceptions. In practice the situation is yet quite different. ECHR approves some limitations of this duty, that migh arise from different sources. In other words, shortened justifications and lack of the duty to justify may be, under some conditions, compliant with standards set forth by the Convention. The clou of this matter is proportionalization of the justifying process, as well as considering of arguments pro and contra fulfilling maximum standard. Sometimes it is therefore possible that guaranteeing the right to fair trial may be overcome by another values (like promptness of receiving a decision, better governance of judges‘ time and effort, etc.). Considering this issue in a wider perspective, we, hence, cannot try to maximalize one aspects of a standard because, if it may cause obstacles in meeting another elements slocated within it the other rights’ domain.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2014, 4 (200); 61-71
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Do the “Underlying Values” of the European Convention on Human Rights Begin in 1950?
Autorzy:
Schabas, William
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706941.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
Prior to its ruling in Janowiec and Others v. Russia, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights had recognised a “humanitarian exception” to the general rule by which the procedural obligations imposed by articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention only arise if the substantive violation of the Convention occurs after the entry into force of the Convention for the respondent State. In Janowiec, the Court was invited to apply this “humanitarian exception” to one of the great unpunished atrocities perpetrated on European soil in the past century. The Court declined to do so, mechanistically imposing its own temporal limitation on the “humanitarian exception” by which the substantive violation of the right to life and the prohibition of ill treatment must take place after the adoption of the Convention on 4 November 1950. The essay concludes that this limitation is questionable, that the reasoning behind it is dubious, and that the result is a regrettable confirmation of a situation of impunity.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 247-258
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 155

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies