Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Court of Human Rights" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie poselskiego projektu ustawy o zasadach wykonywania orzeczeń Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Legal opinion on the Deputies’ Bill on the Rules of Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2195382.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitution
human rights
bill
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
In the opinion of the author certain provisions of the proposed bill raise constitutional doubts or may cause constitutional reservations, inter alia, in the light of the principle of specificity of law, the principle of separation of powers, the scope of the subject matter of parliamentary rules of regulation. Furthermore, insofar as the bill relates to the payment of compensation and redress, it appears to be burdened with a constitutional defect of the nature of the so-called legislative omission. The author of the opinion points out that the bill also lacks a number of solutions concerning the payment of compensation and redress.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 2(70); 193-201
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dopuszczalność wydalania ciężko chorych cudzoziemców a zakaz nieludzkiego traktowania na podstawie art. 3 EKPC w świetle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Permissibility of expulsion of seriously ill aliens and prohibition of inhuamn treatment under Article 3 of the ECHR in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Wojnowska-Radzińska, Julia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543109.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
alien
European Court of Human Rights
inhuman treatment
Opis:
The article provides an analysis of the legal aspects of expulsion of an alien suffering from a serious physical or mental illness to a country where treatment options for this illness are less accessible than those available in the country of residence (particularly in the case of HIV/AIDS, HCV, various forms of cancer, etc.). The article indicates the legal basis under European law (especially Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights on the prohibition of inhuman treatment), and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights relating to this issue. The author emphasizes that the ECHR has adopted a very restrictive approach concerning the expulsion of seriously ill non-nationals, and the national courts of States parties to the ECHR must ensure protection against expulsion to foreigners.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 20-39
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Między sacrum a profanum: relacje wolności religijnej i wolności sztuki w orzecznictwie ETPCz
Between sacrum and profanum: the relationship of religious freedom and the freedom of art in the jurisprudence of the ECHR
Autorzy:
Banaś, Hanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684727.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
human rights
freedom of religion
freedom of art
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
Formerly, art was closely connected to religion. Nowadays, art is such a far-reaching, controversial phenomenon, that the recipient no longer knows what he is looking at. Religion (as an aim) is a great example. It applies to the most intimate sphere of the individual’s life and it is difficult to legally regulate this issue. There is no definition of art, nor of religion, which is sufficiently precise to be a basis for judgments. The European Court of Human Rights has partly dealt with this matter in its judgments but this is still not enough to solve the problem.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2015, 5; 69-84
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Historical Situations” in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
Autorzy:
Kaminski, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706650.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
EUROPEAN CONVENTION
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
THE CONVENTION
THE COURT
Opis:
This Article investigates how the European Court of Human Rights becomes competent to make decisions in cases concerning (or taking roots in) 'historical situations' preceding the ratification of the European Convention by a given Member State or even the enactment of the Convention. 'Historical situations' refer to events that occurred in the period of Second World War or shortly thereafter. In all such cases, the preliminary question arises whether the Court is competent temporally (ratione temporis) to deal with the application. This group of cases concerned usually allegations touching upon the right to life and the right to property. The Court had to decide if the allegation in question related to a temporally closed event (making the Court not competent) or rather to a continuous violation (where the Court could adjudicate). A specific set of legal questions arose vis-a-vis the right to life, first of all that of the autonomy of the procedural obligation to conduct an efficient investigation. The Strasbourg case law did not provide a clear answer. However, following two crucial judgements rendered by the Grand Chamber, the Court has established an interesting legal framework. Article analyses also two other situations having a historical dimension: bringing to justice those accused of war crimes or other crimes under international law (in light of the alleged conflict with the principle of nullum crimes sine lege) and pursuing authors of pro-Nazi statements or speech denying the reality of Nazi atrocities.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2010, 30; 9-60
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recent judgements of the General Court and the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic in inspection matters – Landmark Decisions or Wasted Opportunities to Solve Problem?
Autorzy:
Blažo, Ondrej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530211.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
envelope procedure
European Convention of Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
inspections
Slovakia
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2013, 6(8); 261-280
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Corruption and Human Rights in the Case Law of Inter-American Human Rights Treaty Bodies
Autorzy:
Lis, Edyta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158264.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-15
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
corruption
human rights
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Opis:
The first attempts to combat corruption date back to ancient times and had mainly moral connotation. Despite being an old phenomena, nowadays it takes new shapes and becomes a more common feature of social life, especially in the Latin America region. Corruption is a complex, and multidimensional phenomenon that negatively impacts human rights on many levels. Therefore, serious effort have long been made at global, regional and state levels to combat corruption. The United Nations and regional organizations have adopted numerous non-binding and binding documents with a view to stifling this phenomenon but none of them refer to the issue of impact of corruption on human rights. But it should be stressed that it is very hard to establish a link between corruption and human rights violations. Some efforts has been made by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IAComHR). This article considers whether and how the IACHR and the IAComHR establish the link between corruption and violation of human rights in the inter-American system. It also determines which groups of people are, according the IACHR and the IAComHR, particularly affected by corruption, what measures should be taken to protect those exposed to acts of corruption, what obligations are incumbent on States with a view to preventing, combating and eradicating corruption.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2022, 51, 4; 149-180
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Katyń Massacre before the European Court of Human Rights: A Personal Account
Autorzy:
Kamiński, Ireneusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706836.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
The author of this article, the lead lawyer for the applicants in the case relating to the 1940 Katyń massacre (Janowiec and Others v. Russia), provides a personal account of the case that was heard twice by the European Court of Human Rights, first as a chamber of seven judges and then in its Grand Chamber formation. The case concerned the key question of whether the Strasbourg Court is competent to adjudicate on the effectiveness of a domestic investigation when the triggering act (killing) precedes the ratification date of the European Convention on Human Rights. For the first time in its entire history, the Strasbourg Court examined whether its competence could be based on the “need to ensure the respect for the Convention’s founding values”, one prong of the test elaborated in the Silih judgment in 2009. The critical assessment of the Grand Chamber’s Katyń judgment offered in this article is based on two considerations: what the Court omitted (the applicants’ arguments referring to the relevant international law practice) and what the Court finally elaborated as its understanding of the two tests establishing the Court’s competence ratione temporis (the “genuine connection” test and “Convention values” test).
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 205-226
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Challenges Related to the Increase of Religious Diversity in the Light of the Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Hucał, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015915.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
the European Court of Human Rights
religious diversity
religious symbol
proselytism
Opis:
European states responded in different ways to tensions related to the increase in religious diversity, and the restrictions introduced were considered appropriate when they resulted from public security and the need to protect others, especially if the state presented a credible justification. On this occasion, the case-law of the ECHR developed two key concepts for the determination of the presence of religious symbols in public places: a powerful external symbol and an essentially passive symbol. An important achievement of the Tribunal is also the introduction of the concept of “improper proselytism.” Certainly, a further increase in religious diversity in Europe may lead to new areas of controversy, which will then be assessed by the ECHR. However, the existing instruments used by the Court, such as the idea of the Convention as a living document, the theory of the margin of appreciation or the analysis of the existence of the European consensus, enable it to develop its interpretation in this regard.
Źródło:
Ecumeny and Law; 2021, 9, 2; 125-139
2353-4877
2391-4327
Pojawia się w:
Ecumeny and Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The European Court of Human Rights on Nazi and Soviet Past in Central and Eastern Europe
Autorzy:
Gliszczyńska–Grabias, Aleksandra
Baranowska, Grażyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/594414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
ECtHR
European Court of Human Rights
ECHR
European Convention on Human Rights
memory laws
Opis:
The article demonstrates how references to Nazi and Soviet past are perceived and evaluated by the European Court of Human Rights. Individual cases concerning Holocaust and Nazism, which the Court has examined so far, are compared here to judgments rendered with regard to Communist regime. The article proves that the Court treats more leniently state interference with freedom of expression when memory about Nazism and Holocaust is protected than when a post–Communist state wants to preserve a critical memory about the regime. The authors of the article agree with the attitude of the Court which offers a wide margin of appreciation to states restrictively treating references to Nazism and Holocaust, including comparisons to the Holocaust, Nazism or fascism used as rhetorical devices. At the same time they postulate that other totalitarian systems should be treated by the Court equally.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2016, 45; 117-129
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Law-Secured Narratives of the Past in Poland in Light of International Human Rights Law Standards
Autorzy:
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra
Baranowska, Grażyna
Wójcik, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706672.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
laws affecting historical memory
memory laws
human rights law
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
Given the whole spectrum of doubts and controversies that arise in discussions about laws affecting historical memory (and their subcategory of memory laws), the question of assessing them in the context of international standards of human rights protection – and in particular the European system of human rights protection – is often overlooked. Thus this article focuses on the implications and conditions for introducing memory laws in light of international human rights standards using selected examples of various types of recently-adopted Polish memory laws as case studies. The authors begin with a brief description of the phenomenon of memory laws and the most signifcant threats that they pose to the protection of international human rights standards. The following sections analyse selected Polish laws affecting historical memory vis-à-vis these standards. The analysis covers non-binding declaratory laws affecting historical memory, and acts that include criminal law sanctions. The article attempts to sketch the circumstances linking laws affecting historical memory with the human rights protection standards, including those entailed both in binding treaties and other instruments of international law.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 59-72
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The exposition of religious and cultural symbols according to the political European system. The case Lautsi versus Italy at the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Galantini, Luca
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640573.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, Religious Symbols, Case of Lautsi versus Italy
Opis:
On 3rd November 2009 the European Court of Human Rights in Strasburg ruled that Italy had to remove crucifi xes from school classrooms, thereby supporting the application submitted by Soile Lautsi Albertin, an Italian citizen of Finnish origin, “in the name of the principle of state secularism.” The above decision sparked an uproar and criticism which reverberated throughout entire Europe. On 30th June 2010, an appeal against this ruling, inspired by an ideological vision of religious freedom, had been discussed by Italian government lawyers before the Grand Chambre of the Court of Justice in Strasbourg. The Appeal judgment cancelled the first verdict and recognized the Italian Government’s reasons and rights to display crucifixes in public schools. It was concluded that the first judgment didn’t take into consideration the social and public role of religion, especially the Christian one, in the process of building a civil society and a public law system and promoted religious indifferentism which stands in contradiction with the entire history, culture and rights of the Italian people and the peoples of Europe.
Źródło:
Prace Historyczne; 2013, 140, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:
Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
How Could It Go So Wrong? Reformatio in Peius before the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in the case Janowiec and Others v. Russia (or Polish Collective Memory Deceived in Strasbourg)
Autorzy:
Sanz-Caballero, Susana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706824.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
During Perestroika, Russian authorities admitted publicly that, during Stalinism, a single order led to the extrajudicial execution of 26,000 Polish nationals (in what became known as the “Katyń forest massacre”). In 1990 Russia commenced criminal investigations, but they were discontinued and results were classified as secret in 2004. Following years of silence under communism, families of the victims demanded information from the Russian authorities, without results. The ECHR entered into force in Russia in 1998. This article analyzes the case Janowiec and Others v. Russia, brought before the Strasbourg Court by the relatives of the victims of the Katyń massacre. The applicants maintained that Russia violated the ECHR by discontinuing the investigation and failing to account for the fate of prisoners. In their opinion, Article 2 (right to life), and Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment) had been violated. This article compares the reasoning of the Court in the Chamber (2012) and Grand Chamber (2013) rulings. The latter produced a reformatio in peius with respect to the applicants’ interests. Grand Chamber ruled it had no competence either over the atrocity or over the subsequent improper treatment by Russian authorities. With this verdict, it deprived the applicants of the only claim upon which the Chamber had earlier ruled in their favour.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 259-278
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Do the “Underlying Values” of the European Convention on Human Rights Begin in 1950?
Autorzy:
Schabas, William
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706941.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
Prior to its ruling in Janowiec and Others v. Russia, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights had recognised a “humanitarian exception” to the general rule by which the procedural obligations imposed by articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention only arise if the substantive violation of the Convention occurs after the entry into force of the Convention for the respondent State. In Janowiec, the Court was invited to apply this “humanitarian exception” to one of the great unpunished atrocities perpetrated on European soil in the past century. The Court declined to do so, mechanistically imposing its own temporal limitation on the “humanitarian exception” by which the substantive violation of the right to life and the prohibition of ill treatment must take place after the adoption of the Convention on 4 November 1950. The essay concludes that this limitation is questionable, that the reasoning behind it is dubious, and that the result is a regrettable confirmation of a situation of impunity.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 247-258
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Janowiec and Others v. Russia: A Long History of Justice Delayed Turned into a Permanent Case of Justice Denied
Autorzy:
Citroni, Gabriella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706674.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on whether Russia is responsible for human rights violations in relation to the Katyń massacre. Two of the major issues that had to be dealt with were the Court’s competence ratione temporis to assess the violation of the procedural obligations related to the right to life, and whether the applicants could be considered victims of inhumane treatment because of the failure of Russian authorities to provide information on the fate and whereabouts of their relatives. If the first judgment issued by the Chamber on 16 April 2012 was criticized because of its restrictive approach, the one issued by the Grand Chamber on 21 October 2013 took an even more controversial turn. The reasoning of the Court does not seem to be particularly sound and the outcome is a denial of justice. The comparison with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in similar cases makes this all the more evident, suggesting that the application of different interpretative criteria would have been possible.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 279-294
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia: Relinquishment of Jurisdiction in Favour of the Court of History
Autorzy:
Kozheurov, Yaroslav
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706762.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Katyn, war crime, NKVD, Janowiec
Opis:
In the Janowiec and Others v. Russia case, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), trying to find its way between the Scylla of humanitarian ideals and the Charybdis of State sovereignty, demonstrated its unwillingness to deal in detail with the black pages of Europe’s past, handing this right over to historians. The article first draws parallels between temporary jurisdiction of the Inter-American Courts of Human Rights and the ECtHR. Both of them found ways to overcome the non-retroactivity principle, but by using different techniques. Secondly the article analyzes how the presumption of death became the factor severing the link between the substantive and procedural limbs of violation of the right to life, turning the latter aspect into a detachable autonomous obligation. Finally, the author of the article expresses his regrets that the Court and the applicants missed the chance to develop the “right to the truth”, using, inter alia, the potential of Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 227-246
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Legal Obligations of Poland Regarding the Restitution of Private Property Taken during World War II and by the Communist Regime in Light of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Mężykowska, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706640.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
communism
European Court of Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights
nationalization
restitution of private property
Opis:
The Polish Government’s proposal, submitted in autumn 2017, for a comprehensive reprivatisation bill revived the international discussion on the scope of Polish authorities’ obligations to return property taken during World War II and subsequently by the communist regime. However, many inaccurate and incorrect statements are cited in the discussions, e.g. the argument that the duty of the Polish authorities to carry out restitution is embedded in the European Convention on Human Rights and its Protocol No. 1. This article challenges that claim and analyses the jurisprudence of the Convention’s judicial oversight bodies in cases raising issues of restitution of property taken over in Poland before the accession to both of the above-mentioned international agreements. In the article I argue that there is no legal basis for claiming that there exists a legal obligation upon the Polish State stemming directly from international law – in particular human rights law – to return the property and that the only possibly successful legal claims in this regard are those that can already be derived from the provisions of the Polish law applicable to these kinds of cases. In its latest rulings, issued in 2017–2019, the European Court of Human Rights determined the scope of responsibility incumbent on Polish authorities in this respect.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2019, 39; 111-134
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Limits of Rights and Freedoms - The Limits of Power
Autorzy:
Wyrzykowski, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43356294.pdf
Data publikacji:
1999-12-31
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
public order
Court of Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights
human rights
constitution
rights and freedoms of citzisens
Źródło:
Droit Polonais Contemporain; 1999, 121-124; 27-37
0070-7325
Pojawia się w:
Droit Polonais Contemporain
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia konstytucyjna w sprawie poselskiego projektu ustawy o zasadach wykonywania orzeczeń Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka (wątki prawnomiędzynarodowe)
Constitutional opinion regarding Deputies’ Bill on Rules of Executing Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (international law aspects)
Autorzy:
Mik, Cezary
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2196822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
convention
human rights
draft law
obligation to execute judgments
European Court of Human Rights
Council of Europe
Opis:
The author acknowledges the necessity for a comprehensive regulation of the implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Polish law. However, he remains critical towards the bill in question. He considers the solutions concerning the concept of implementing judgments to be defective. The author also indicates errors related to the proposed manner of implementing judgments, in particular to the problem of issue of individual and general measures, the so-called just satisfaction, as well as to determining the scope of executive duties of the state.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 3(71); 149-169
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rights of parties to an impartial court in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Prawa stron do bezstronnego sądu w świetle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Autorzy:
Kubas, Sabina
Hurova, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1748277.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-13
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
prawa człowieka
sąd
orzecznictwo
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
human rights
court
case law
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
Prawa człowieka to wolności, środki ochrony oraz świadczenia, których respektowania właśnie jako praw, zgodnie ze współcześnie akceptowanymi wolnościami, wszyscy ludzie powinni móc domagać się od społeczeństwa, w którym żyją (Encyclopedia… 1985: p. 502). Zaufanie społeczne do władzy sądowniczej zależy od wielu czynników. Jednym z nich jest bezstronność sędziów, rozumiana najogólniej jako niekierowanie się uprzedzeniami wobec stron i uczestników postępowania oraz brak zainteresowania w sprawie. Fundamentalne znaczenie tej wartości w sprawowaniu wymiaru sprawiedliwości sprawia, że prawo określa jej szczegółowe gwarancje, takie jak m.in. zasady wyznaczania składów orzekających, jawność postępowania, obowiązek uzasadnienia rozstrzygnięcia, a także możliwość wyłączenia sędziego od udziału w postępowaniu ze względu na wątpliwości co do jego bezstronności. Celem artykułu jest wskazanie, że zdolność dochodzenia praw jest najważniejszym aspektem praw człowieka. Prawa te to nie tylko szczytne ideały czy aspiracje, lecz także usprawnienia stanowiące podstawę roszczeń. Przeprowadzone w artykule analizy potwierdzają to założenie.
Human rights are freedoms, means of protection and benefits, which, when recognized as rights, in accordance with contemporary freedoms, all people should be able to demand from the society in which they live (Encyclopedia… 1985: p. 502). Public confidence in the judiciary depends on many factors. One of them is judicial impartiality, generally understood as not being guided by prejudices against parties and participants in the proceedings and lack of interest in the case. The fundamental importance of this value in the administration of justice means that the law defines its specific guarantees, such as rules for determining adjudication panels, open proceedings, obligation to justify a decision, as well as the possibility of excluding a judge from participating in proceedings due to doubts as to his impartiality. The aim of the article is to indicate that the ability to assert rights is the most important aspect of human rights. These rights are not only lofty ideals or aspirations, but also the improvements underlying the claims. This is proved by outcomes of the analysis presented in this article.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2020, 4; 51-60
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Więzienia CIA w Polsce i manipulacje wokół nich
Autorzy:
Składanowski, Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2011135.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
prisons
CIA
Polska
Al-Kaida
European Court of Human Rights
The European Convention on Human Rights
Opis:
The analysis of the materials show that the CIA prisons, where the members of Al-Kaida were kept and interrogated, were founded in Poland in 2002 when the country was governed by SLD. The PiS politicians who were in the following government knew about the fact but did not want to reveal it to the public. The party of PO which has been governing the country since 2007 has not solved the problem yet. European Court Of Human Rights held in its verdict of 24 July 2014 that there had been the CIA prisons in our country. According to that verdict Poland violated the European Convention on Human Rights and its ban on torture. Poland has not solved the problem, prolonging the investigation 15 times. It is extended until 11 April 2015. On 23 October 2014 our country appealed to European Court of Human Rights to hear the case again.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie; 2015, 20; 49-86
1643-6911
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Nullum Crimen Sine Lege Principle in the European Convention of Human Rights: The Actual Scope of Guarantees
Autorzy:
Rychlewska, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ECHR
ECtHR
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
nullum crimen sine lege
Opis:
The principle of nullum crimen sine lege expresses an old idea that only the law can prescribe a particular act as punishable. It is commonly understood as a requirement of sufficient definiteness of an offence, in particular – of a statutory description of an offence before it has been committed (lex scripta, lex praevia), and of clarity and precision in criminal provisions so as to enable an individual to conform with them (lex certa), as well as their strict interpretation (lex stricta). Nowadays the principle is an internationally recognized human right to foreseeable criminalization, guaranteed by, inter alia, Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the European Court of Human Rights seems to formulate two slightly different requirements on its basis, namely that the application of criminal law must be foreseeable for an individual and coherent with the “essence of an offence”. One may question whether this can serve as an adequate “shield” from arbitrariness on the part of State authorities. Nevertheless, the core aim of such a flexible approach is not to promote legal security for potential perpetrators, but to achieve better protection of human rights in general.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2016, 36; 163-186
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Crimea and Liability of Russia and Ukraine under the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Cwicinskaja, Natalia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684859.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Crimea
Ukraine
the Russian Federation
European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the liability of Russia and Ukraine regarding Crimea under the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights. The author analyzes pending and possible prospective cases originating from the conflict around Crimea between Ukraine and Russia. Due to the inconsistency in case law of the EC-tHR it is difficult to clearly determine what state will be considered responsible for the violation of the rights of residents of Crimea resulting from the Convention. In author’s opinion the ECtHR could determine that the Russian Federation may be held respon-sible, as well as Ukraine. However, as it seems, the liability of Ukraine will be limited to the positive obligations under the ECHR.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2019, 9; 85-100
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Memory Laws or Memory Loss? Europe in Search of Its Historical Identity through the National and International Law
Autorzy:
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706863.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ECHR
ECtHR
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
genocide
Holocaust
memory law
Polska
Opis:
This article provides an overview of “memory laws” in Europe, reflecting upon what may be called the “asymmetry” of such laws. It then looks at the special case of Poland and its troubled experience with memory laws; it considers the question of whether, in the eyes of the law – genocide, and in particular the Holocaust – is so “special” that its public denials warrant legal intervention. It also looks at the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and its (not necessarily coherent) “doctrine” on memory laws and their consistency, or otherwise, with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (and in particular with freedom of expression as laid down in Art. 10). The article concludes by asserting that even if we take the law as an indicator of European public memory, there is no consensus on the past, except perhaps for the special case of the Holocaust. The main challenge lies in determining whether memory laws, defined by some as social engineering and the imposition of “imperative” versions of memory, are consistent with the principles inherent in open, democratic and free societies in Europe. This challenge remains unmet.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 161-186
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Patterns of Democracy in the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Ninatti, Stefania
Arcari, Maurizio
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706909.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
CJEU
democracy
European Union
Court of Justice of the European Union
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
This article attempts to discover the key elements of the democratic principle, as described by the judges sitting in Luxembourg and Strasbourg, whose case law reveals the underlying idea of democracy at the supranational level. Until recently the debate on democracy was limited to the national level. But things are changing, and this article shows the gradual emergence of a process led by supranational courts, in which the application of the democratic principle finds multiple grades and variations. In this way the supranational/international courts have opened a new chapter in the process of constitutionalization of international law.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 171-192
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Principal grounds of Catholic and other religions in recent legal proceedings in Lithuania
Autorzy:
Sprindziunas, Andrius
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1372515.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-09-08
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
religion
Christian symbols
public morals
freedom of expression
Lithuanian courts
European Court of Human Rights
Źródło:
Prawo Kanoniczne; 2018, 61, 3; 185-193
2353-8104
Pojawia się w:
Prawo Kanoniczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Free Speech Today
Autorzy:
QC, Lord Lester of Herne Hill
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706685.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
freedom of speech, human right, European Court of Human Rights, ECHR, European Convention on Human Rights, defamation, hate speech
Opis:
The article is an amended version of the Marek Nowicki Memorial Lecture presented at Warsaw University in 2014. It discusses the contemporary meaning of the right to free expression, concentrating on the basic principles of free speech as well as the limits of the right. In this context, the article pays special attention to British, Polish and European practice (particularly with respect to cases that are relevant for Poland). The specific topics tackled by the author include: free speech and the problem of criminalization of certain acts (e.g. the offence of defamation of public officials), hate speech, freedom of expression and the right of an individual to protect his or her good reputation (including the issue of libel laws), freedom of expression and the right to privacy (including the right to prior restraint on publication), free speech and internet, and the right to privacy versus national security.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 129-144
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Chilling Effect” in the Judicial Decisions of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal as an Example of a Legal Transplant
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2010003.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-03-10
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Constitutional law
comparative law
legal transplant
Polish Constitutional Tribunal
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The paper is dedicated to describing the way of reception by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of the “chilling effect”, i.e. an institution related to such activities of public authorities that form an indirect act of deterrence regarding the execution of constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, esp. the freedom of expression. The discussed concept has originated in judicial decisions of the US Supreme Court and has spread into many contemporary legal systems, including jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Although it is evident that the Tribunal “took over” that concept from the ECHR, it in fact developed its own, unfortunately internally inconsistent, understanding of the chilling effect. Four different ways of application of chilling effect may be noticed in judicial decisions of the Polish CT, while only two of them reflect the perception of this institution by the US Supreme Court and the ECHR.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2022, 48, 1; 209-234
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Public Morality as a Legitimate Aim to Limit Rights and Freedoms in the National and International Legal Order
Autorzy:
Młynarska-Sobaczewska, Anna
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Mężykowska, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2172238.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-16
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
public morality
morals
legitimate aim
constitutional courts
European Court of Human Rights
methods of argumentation
Opis:
Domestic legislation and international instruments designed for the protection of human rights provide for general clauses allowing limitations of rights and freedoms, e.g. public morals. A preliminary analysis of the case-law leads to the observation that both national courts and the European Court of Human Rights, when dealing with cases concerning sensitive moral issues, introduce varied argumentation methods allowing them to avoid making direct moral judgments and relying on the legitimate aim of protecting morality. In the article the Authors analyse selected judicial rulings in which moral issues may have played an important role. The scrutiny is done in order to identify and briefly discuss some examples of ways of argumentation used in the area under discussion by domestic and international courts. The identification of the courts’ methods of reasoning enables us in turn to make a preliminary assessment of the real role that the morality plays in the interpretation of human rights standards. It also constitutes a starting point for further consideration of the impact of ideological and cultural connotations on moral judgments, and on the establishment of a common moral standard to be applied in cases in which restriction on human rights and freedoms are considered.
Źródło:
Contemporary Central and East European Law; 2019, 1 (133); 10-20
0070-7325
Pojawia się w:
Contemporary Central and East European Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rethinking Conscientious Objection to Mandatory Vaccination
Autorzy:
Tucak, Ivana
Berdica, Josip
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43539285.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
justice
European Court of Human Rights
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
conscientious objection
Opis:
Among the member states of the Council of Europe, there is a consensus on the importance of vaccination as a successful and effective preventive health intervention. Every state aims to achieve herd immunity, i.e., a high vaccination rate of the population that will prevent the circulation of contagious diseases in the population and thus protect those who cannot be vaccinated due to age or poor health. However, despite the general recognition of the importance of vaccination, there is no consensus on a “single model” of how best to achieve the goals of mass immunization. Countries have different public health policies, so while the vaccination policy of some members of the Council of Europe is limited to a recommendation, others have made vaccination compulsory. Today, there are many opponents of vaccination and those who are hesitant. This paper will focus on those who refuse to be vaccinated based on a moral understanding of how to act in certain circumstances. The paper will explore whether countries imposing mandatory vaccination, with financial or other sanctions imposed in the case of non-compliance, should recognize the right to conscientious objection. This includes the right of adults to refuse vaccination, and respecting the religious and philosophical beliefs of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. The article consists of two main parts. The first part will explore the legal-theoretical and legal-philosophical dimensions of the relationship between justice and conscience, with special emphasis on the interpretation of this relationship provided by the American political philosopher John Rawls. The second part of the paper will examine the issue of compulsory vaccination and conscientious objection through the prism of the rights provided for in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.  
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2024, 57, 2; 269-292
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Can States Withhold Information about Alleged Human Rights Abuses on National Security Grounds? Some Remarks on the ECtHr Judgments of Al-Nashiri v. Poland and Husayn (Abu-Zubaydah) v. Poland
Autorzy:
Carpanelli, Elena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/960338.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights
secret files
national security
right to the truth
duty of cooperation
Opis:
The judgments delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Nashiri v. Poland and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland highlight the potential tension that may arise between states’ broad reliance on national security grounds to withhold disclosure of secret files and compliance with their obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. The present article examines the above-mentioned judgments, focusing, in particular, on how (and to what extent) the withholding of secret information may infringe on the right to the truth and, as far as proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights are concerned, the state’s duty to cooperate with it.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 217-234
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
European Standard for the Protection of Patients’ Lives
Autorzy:
Kwiatkowski, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28674459.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
human rights law
case-law of the European Court of Human Rights
European standard for the protection of patients’ lives
Opis:
The aim of the study it to reconstruct the European standard for the protection of patients’ lives in its substantive and procedural aspects. In the case-law of the bodies of the system of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the scope of the state authorities’ substantive and procedural obligation to protect the right to life in the health care system was defined for the first time by the European Commission of Human Rights in the decision of 22 May 1995 in Mehmet Işıltan v. Turkey, and then repeated in the case-law of the reformed Court in the decision on the admissibility in Powell v. United Kingdom. The study of the European standard for the protection of patients’ lives traces its history, from Mehmet Işıltan v. Turkey and Powell v. United Kingdom; through developments of the meaning of its substantive limb, as illustrated by Mehmet and Bekir Senturk v. Turkey, Asiye Genc v. Turkey, Aydogdu v. Turkey, and Elena Cojocaru v. Romania; to developments of the meaning of its procedural limb, as exemplified by Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy, Wojciech Byrzykowski v. Poland, Šilih v. Slovenia, and Gray v. Germany; and finally covers the Court’s attempt to sum up its previous approach to the European standard for the protection of patients’ lives, as expressed in the case of Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2022, 14; 119-137
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as an International Treaty and a Source of Individual Rights
Autorzy:
Gadkowski, Aleksander
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2027869.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
human rights law
international protection of human rights
fundamental rights
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to present the legal nature of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as a special treaty under international human rights law. The article focuses on the twofold nature of the Convention. First, it presents the Convention as an international treaty, and thus as a source of specific obligations of states-parties. Second, it presents the Convention as the source of fundamental individual human rights. The article also discusses the role of ECtHR case law in the context of fundamental individual human rights.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2021, 13; 77-96
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona praw nabytych w orzecznictwie ETPCz w kontekście uprawnień emerytalno- rentowych
The protection of acquired rights in the European Court of Human Rights with the view of pension rights
Autorzy:
Петр Сергеевич, Корниенко
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/550550.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu i Przedsiębiorczości w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim
Tematy:
prawa nabyte
ochrona praw nabytych
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
acquired rights
protection of acquired rights
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy decyzji sądowych związanych z nabytymi prawami. Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka wykazał w swoich orzeczeniach, iż nabyte prawa są własnością i są tym samym chronione przez Pierwszy Protokół Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Decyzją fundamentalną była sprawa Moskal vs Polska, gdzie sąd przyznał ochronę. Następstwem tej decyzji była poprawka w prawie polskim. Obecnie Węgry są stroną w procesie sądowym. Wszystkie decyzje powinny byc przykładem, jak Ukraina powinna chronić prawo zarówno na poziomie wykonawczym, jak i na poziomie sądowniczym.
The article concern the juridical decisions related to the acquired rights. The European Court Human Rigths proved in its decisions, that acquired pension rights are property, and therefore are protected under First Protocol for European Convention of Human Rights. The cornerstone decision was Moskal vs. Poland, where Court granted protection. Aftermath of its decision was the amending of state law in Poland. Nowadays Hungary are the party in case pending before the Court. All of the decisions should be the example how the Ukraina state should protect the rights both in the level of acting the rights and later on the court chamber
Źródło:
Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis. Sectio A, Nauki Humanistyczne, Społeczne i Techniczne; 2013, 1; 51-64
2300-1739
Pojawia się w:
Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis. Sectio A, Nauki Humanistyczne, Społeczne i Techniczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasada humanitaryzmu w krajowych i międzynarodowych standardach prawa penitencjarnego Krzysztof
Zasada humanitaryzmu w krajowych i międzynarodowych standardach prawa penitencjarnego Krzysztof Chmielewski, Maciej Pająk
Autorzy:
Chmielewski, Krzysztof
Pająk, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684733.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
humanity
European Court of Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights
prisoners’ rights
dignity
Polish Constitution
Polish criminal code
penitentiary law
Opis:
This paper points out the most important international and internal acts which refer to prisoners’ rights in the context of the principle of humanity. The first part describes the Polish situation with regards to constitutional principles of human dignity and freedom from unfair treatment. The second part focuses on international standards, and is divided into two groups: UN standards and European standards. This leads to the conclusions contained in the third section about respecting these articles in contemporary Polish penitentiary law and prisons.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2015, 5; 55-68
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Walka z terroryzmem a prawa człowieka - Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka wobec zagrożeń XXI wieku
Human rights and the fight against terrorism. European Court of Human Rights in the 21st century
Autorzy:
Kłopocki, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/499482.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
prawa człowieka
terroryzm
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
zakaz tortur
human rights
terrorism
the European Court of Human Rights
prohibition of torture
Opis:
11 września 2001 r. miał miejsce największy w historii atak terrorystyczny, a właściwie seria czterech ataków dokonanych na terytorium Stanów Zjednoczonych za pomocą uprowadzonych samolotów pasażerskich. Sprawcami okazali się przedstawiciele organizacji terrorystycznej Al-Ka’ida, dowodzonej przez saudyjczyka Osamę bin Ladena. W zamachach zginęły łącznie 2973 osoby, a 26 do dziś uznaje się za zaginione. Od tego momentu zaczęła się najnowsza historia walki z międzynarodowym terroryzmem, w szczególności z terroryzmem islamskim, która doprowadziła do zaprzepaszczenia pół wieku walki o prawa człowieka. Po atakach na World Trade Center i Pentagon CIA i wywiad wojskowy dostały rozkaz wyszkolenia nowej generacji oficerów śledczych, których zadaniem miało być uzyskanie informacji od pojmanych na bliskim wschodzie członków organizacji terrorystycznych, którzy – jak sądzono – z uwagi na przekonania religijne, polityczne czy ideologiczne nie będą zeznawać przy zastosowaniu dotychczas znanych technik. W tym celu służby przygotowały specjalny program, a w jego ramach stosowały „rozszerzone metody przesłuchania” (tortury). W tym trwającym kilka lat procederze uczestniczyli europejscy sojusznicy Stanów Zjednoczonych, m.in. Polska, Litwa i Rumunia, będące członkami Rady Europy i sygnatariuszami Konwencji. Konsekwencją tych wydarzeń były skargi złożone do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka przez Abd Al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al Nashiri’ego oraz Zayn Al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn’a (Abu Zubaydah). Orzeczenie w sprawie tych wniosków stanowi podsumowanie działalności amerykańskich oraz europejskich służb wywiadowczych w latach 2001-2011. W artykule przedstawiono najnowszą historię walki z islamskim terroryzmem, podsumowując jej konsekwencje oraz przytaczając tezy sformułowane przez Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, w szczególności w orzeczeniu w sprawie ze skarg Al Nashiri’ego i Abu Zubaydah, próbując znaleźć odpowiedź na pytanie, jak walczyć z terroryzmem w XXI wieku, nie łamiąc praw człowieka.
On September 11th, 2001, the biggest terrorist attack so far was carried out, which consisted of a series of four coordinated attacks using hijacked passenger planes on the territory of the United States. The attacks were carried out by the terrorist group al-Qaeda led by Saudi Osama bin Laden. The total of 2,973 people were killed in the terrorist attacks and 26 were declared missing. Since then, the recent war on international terrorism has begun, in particular Islamic terrorism which led to the destruction of 50-year-old history of the fight for human rights protection. After the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Central Intelligence Agency and military intelligence were ordered to train a new generation of investigators whose job was to obtain the most important information from the members of the terrorist organizations captured in the Middle East who, because of the ideology, religion or politics, would not have testified under the use of the techniques applied previously. Therefore, CIA set up the high-value detainees program that allowed for using the so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, i.e. torture. During these few years the European allies of the United States, such as Poland, Lithuania and Romania, being the members of the Council of Europe and the signatories of the Convention, participated in this procedure. The consequences of the above were the cases brought before the European Court of Human Rights by Zayn Al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn (aka Abu Zubaydah) and Abd Al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al Nashiri. The judgment thereto constitutes a summary of operations of both American and European intelligence services between 2001 and 2011. In the article, the author recalls the recent history of the so-called war with Islamic terror, summarizes its consequences and cities the theses of the European Court of Human Rights from the above-mentioned judgment regarding the cases of Al Nashiri and Abu Zubaydah, while trying to find the answer to the question on how to fight terrorism in the 21st century without violating human rights.
Źródło:
Zeszyt Studencki Kół Naukowych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UAM; 2015, 5; 133-150
2299-2774
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyt Studencki Kół Naukowych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UAM
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie dobra wspólnego w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
The Concept Of The Common Good In The Work Of The European Court Of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Jarczak, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/449366.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomiczno-Humanistyczna w Bielsku-Białej
Tematy:
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
orzecznictwo
dobro wspólne
European Court of Human Rights
case law
common good
Opis:
Przedmiotem niniejszym opracowaniu są kwestie orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw człowieka w zakresie zagadnienia dobra wspólnego. Przedstawione zostały wybrane przez autora wyroki Trybunału, w których Trybunał definiuje pojęcie dobra wspólnego. W celu zobrazowania specyfiki orzecznictwa Trybunału, zostały przedstawione podstawowe zasady funkcjonowania Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka.
The subject of this study is the issues of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the matter of the common good. The judgments of the Tribunal selected by the author were presented, in which the Tribunal defines the concept of the common good. In order to illustrate the specificity of the Court’s jurisprudence, the basic principles of the functioning of the European Court of Human Rights were presented.
Źródło:
Polonia Journal; 2018, 7; 241-257
2083-3121
Pojawia się w:
Polonia Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odwołania do literatury pięknej w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Literary references in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Maroń, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/692816.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights
fiction
legal argumentation
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
literatura piękna
argumentacja prawnicza
Opis:
The article discusses the practice of invoking literary works in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The quantitative analysis of the case law allowed for the formulation of some conclusions. Firstly, literary references appear exclusively in dissents and concurrences, not in the Court’s judgments themselves. Secondly, the phenomenon of citing fiction in the ECtHR’s case law is neither common nor marginal. Thirdly, in the last two decades there has been a marked intensification in the use of literary references by the Court’s judges. Fourthly, the willingness to cite works of fiction in the dissent or concurrence is essentially independent of the judge’s nationality, sex or country of origin. Fifthly, literature is one of many extra-legal sources quoted in the ECtHR’s case law, among those such as philosophy, movies or music.
W artykule omówiono praktykę posługiwania się odwołaniami do literatury pięknej w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Kwantytatywne studium orzecznictwa pozwoliło na sformułowanie kilku wniosków. Po pierwsze, beletrystyczne odniesienia pojawiają się nie w uzasadnieniach wyroków Trybunału, a wyłącznie w zdaniach odrębnych i zbieżnych do tych wyroków. Po drugie, praktyka posiłkowania się utworami literackimi w orzecznictwie strasburskim jakkolwiek nie jest powszechna, to zarazem nie ma też charakteru sporadycznego. Po trzecie, w ostatnich dwóch dekadach sędziowie Trybunału co raz częściej przywołują dzieła literatury pięknej. Po czwarte, gotowość posłużenia się literackim odniesieniem jest zasadniczo niezależna od narodowości i płci sędziego oraz typu kultury prawnej właściwej dla jego kraju pochodzenia. Po piąte, literatura piękna to jedno z wielu źródeł pozaprawnych wykorzystywanych przez sędziów Trybunału w zdaniach odrębnych i zbieżnych, obok np. filozofii, kinematografii czy muzyki.
Źródło:
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; 2019, 81, 2; 67-82
0035-9629
2543-9170
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Born to Polish same-sex parents – a case study. A human rights perspective on birth certificate transcriptions
Autorzy:
Mendecka, Karolina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1595905.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
best interest of the child
birth certificate transcript
European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence
same-sex parenthood
Opis:
This article is a case study regarding the recent Supreme Administrative Court in Poland (the SAC) resolution. The Court found that a transcription of a foreign birth certificate, in which two people of the same sex are registered as parents, is not allowed under the Polish law and is contrary to ordre public. This paper focuses primarily on two aspects regarding the resolution. First, it is addressed whether the best interest of the child principle was given due consideration. Second, it is analysed whether the possible discriminatory treatment on the grounds of sexual orientation of the parents was adequately examined, with particular reference to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (the ECtHR). This paper is divided into four parts. The background information pertaining to the issues at stake as well as the case itself are addressed in Part 1. Part 2 briefly summarises the SAC resolution and the verdict. Part 3 concentrates on deconstructing the best interest principle as an international and national standard. In Part 4 the ECtHR case-law is examined in order to provide a human rights perspective on the matter. This article concentrates on providing the perspective of a child and on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, as it is a well-recognised international law-applying body that raises the threshold and quality of respecting human rights in the European continent. The final summarises the paper and presents the conclusions. It is going to be demonstrated that in light of the ECtHR jurisprudence, the SAC failed to adequately analyse that a difference in treatment of same-sex parents in comparison to other unmarried couples is reasonable, pursues a legitimate aim and that the treatment is proportional. Moreover, it will be argued that the SAC unsuccessfully demonstrated why primacy had been granted to the interest of the state and public order, instead of that of a child. The main goal of this paper is to highlight the importance of endorsing the child’s perspective and the compelling need to carefully consider the child’s best interest – in each and every case that involves their fate. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, the research is based on the evaluation of the universal human rights documents relevant to the topic, as well as the analysis of the ECtHR jurisprudence related to the subject.
Źródło:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2020, 32, 4; 33-49
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawo do wolności w świetle orzeczenia Trybunału w Strasburgu w sprawie Julii Tymoszenko oraz Jurija Łucenki przeciwko Ukrainie
The right to freedom in light of jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in cases of Yuliya Tymoshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko against Ukraine
Autorzy:
Szwarc, Karolina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/506395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
the European Court of Human Rights
Yuliya Tymoshenko
Yuriy Lutsenko
Ukraine
article 5 the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Opis:
In 2012 and 2013 the European Court of Human Rights announced two verdicts, dealing with important cases in Ukraine. They both concerned the leading Ukrainian politicians, that is Yuliya Tymoshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko. Y. Tymoshenko is the leader of the Batkivshchyna political party and of Yulia Tymoshenko’s Bloc. From 18 December 2007 to 3 March 2010, she held the position of Prime Minister of Ukraine. Y. Lutsenko, during the period from 18 December 2007 to 29 January 2010 was Minister of the Interior and the leader of the opposition party Narodna Samooborona. They were accused of abuse of power during their terms in office. The circumstances of the two cases are similar. Both applicants argued that their arrest and detention had been politically motivated and unlawful. In light of the cooperation between Ukraine and the EU, as well as the advancement as a democratic state, these judgements are very important. Significantly, the local and international observers concluded that their conviction was an element of political play. The Court ruled that the Ukrainian authorities violated the article 5 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 2; 103-112
1733-2680
2451-0610
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Targeted Killings (Drone strikes) and the European Convention on Human Rights
Autorzy:
Bodnar, Adam
Pacho, Irmina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ECHR
ECtHR
European Convention on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
human rights
drone
targeted killing
international law
Council of Europe
warfare
Opis:
More and more Member States of the Council of Europe are becoming interested in drone technology. Currently, a number of them either possess or wish to obtain unmanned aerial vehicles equipped with missiles. Due to the increased number of targeted killing operations committed with the use of drones by countries such as the United States or Israel, there is a probability that Member States might also use them for such operations, especially if their forces will be subject to joint command. Although the issue of targeted killings with the use of drones has not yet been subject to the scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights, there are two main reasons why this may change in the near future. First, the Court has already ruled on the extraterritorial applicability of the European Convention on Human Rights, and second, the Convention places strict limits on any attempts to carry out targeted killings and leaves only a limited space for their use, even in the context of warfare. In this article we assess whether the Member States of the Council of Europe might be ever justified under the European Convention on Human Rights to carry out targeted killing operations using drones.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 189-208
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Compulsory Vaccination and Fundamental Human Rights in the World of Work
Przymusowe szczepienie a podstawowe prawa człowieka w świecie pracy
Autorzy:
Hungler, Sara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31348285.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
COVID-19
human rights
employees
European Court of Human Rights
Hungarian legislation
prawa człowieka
pracownicy
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
ustawodawstwo węgierskie
Opis:
During the COVID-19 epidemiological emergency, several countries adopted regulations which have affected the world of work. The impact of these measures on workers and other employees has been the subject of numerous studies. Among the legislation, there are some that apply to specific occupational groups, such as healthcare workers, and others that apply more generally to a broad section of society. What they have in common is that they restrict the fundamental rights of workers to an extent that justifies a thorough human rights and constitutional rights analysis. The aim of this paper is to analyse the issue of compulsory vaccination by focusing primarily on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and attempt to interpret it in relation to the domestic regulation of the COVID-19 pandemic. The second part of the paper is a case study based on the Hungarian legislation, which was adopted recently.
W trakcie stanu epidemii COVID-19 kilka państw przyjęło uregulowania mające wpływ na świat pracy. Oddziaływanie tych rozwiązań na pracowników i inne osoby zatrudnione stało się przedmiotem licznych opracowań. Wśród aktów prawnych jest kilka dotyczących szczególnych grup zawodowych, jak np. pracownicy służby zdrowia, ale są też akty prawne mające zastosowanie ogólnie do społeczeństwa. Ich elementem wspólnym jest to, że ograniczają podstawowe prawa pracownicze w stopniu uzasadniającym gruntowną analizę w zakresie praw człowieka i praw konstytucyjnych. Celem artykułu jest przeanalizowanie kwestii przymusowych szczepień w oparciu głównie o orzecznictwo Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka i próba jego interpretacji w odniesieniu do krajowych przepisów dotyczących pandemii COVID-19. Druga część artykułu to studium przypadku oparte na ostatnio przyjętym ustawodawstwie węgierskim.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia; 2022, 31, 1; 63-77
1731-6375
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Independence of the Judges of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Krukowska-Siembida, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/618819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights
judge
independence
electoral procedure
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
sędzia
niezależność
procedura wyboru
Opis:
The authority and credibility of the European Court of Human Rights depend on the independence of its judges. The aim of this article is to present the analysis of the criteria of office, the electoral procedure, the terms of office, as well as privileges and immunities of the ECtHR judges.
Niezależność i bezstronność sędziów Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka jest niezwykle istotna w kontekście autorytetu i prawidłowego funkcjonowania samego Trybunału. Celem artykułu jest przybliżenie obecnego statusu prawnego sędziów ETPC. Szczególnej analizie zostały poddane wymogi sprawowania urzędu, procedura wyboru oraz gwarancje niezależności i bezstronności sędziów (przywileje i immunitety).
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia; 2018, 27, 4
1731-6375
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Religious instruction in Polish public schools in light of universal and European standards
Autorzy:
Kasiński, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1595981.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
religious education
public education
freedom of conscience and religion
ideological neutrality of public authorities
UN Human Rights Committee
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The study is devoted to the analysis of legal regulations at a national level (Poland), the jurisprudence (case-law) of the Constitutional Tribunal and the practices of central and local government in matters related to public education, as perceived from the point of view of universal and European standards protecting freedom of conscience and religion. The author justifies the claim that the standards set by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in this field are fundamentally different from the standards established in the case-law of the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights. This leads to tolerance of repeated violation of the principle of ideological impartiality of public authorities. The principle, declared in Article 25 (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland1, is violated both by state-level legislation pertaining to the sphere of religion, and by biased practices of educational administration. What is particularly abnormal is the inertia of public authorities that are obliged to supervise religious education and/or instruction, and their indifference to the unlawful activities of the entity interested in ideological domination over the education sector. The author expresses the conviction that a fundamental change of the approach of the Polish legislator should take place, especially as regards the role and tasks of state entities in protecting freedom of conscience and religion in the educational activities of public schools. This would guarantee the philosophical and religious neutrality of education in state schools.
Źródło:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2019, 27, 3; 79-98
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Religious instruction in Polish public schools in light of universal and European standards
Autorzy:
Kasiński, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1596002.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
religious education
public education
freedom of conscience and religion
ideological neutrality of public authorities
UN Human Rights Committee
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The study is devoted to the analysis of legal regulations at a national level (Poland), the jurisprudence (case-law) of the Constitutional Tribunal and the practices of central and local government in matters related to public education, as perceived from the point of view of universal and European standards protecting freedom of conscience and religion. The author justifies the claim that the standards set by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in this field are fundamentally different from the standards established in the case-law of the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights. This leads to tolerance of repeated violation of the principle of ideological impartiality of public authorities. The principle, declared in Article 25 (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland,1 is violated both by state-level legislation pertaining to the sphere of religion, and by biased practices of educational administration. What is particularly abnormal is the inertia of public authorities that are obliged to supervise religious education and/or instruction, and their indifference to the unlawful activities of the entity interested in ideological domination over the education sector. The author expresses the conviction that a fundamental change of the approach of the Polish legislator should take place, especially as regards the role and tasks of state entities in protecting freedom of conscience and religion in the educational activities of public schools. This would guarantee the philosophical and religious neutrality of education in state schools.
Źródło:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2019, 27, 3; 81-100
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona praw podatników w świetle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w Strasburgu
Protection of Taxpayer Rights in the Light of the Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Mudrecki, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1963181.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
prawa podatnika
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
orzecznictwo ETPCz
Taxpayer rights
European Court of Human Rights
judicial decisions of the ECHR
Opis:
Jednym z najbardziej skutecznym systemów ochrony praw człowieka jest system zawarty w Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Europejski Trybunału Praw Człowieka do 2010 r. jedynie w nielicznych wypadach zajmował się sprawami podatkowymi, ponieważ co do zasady wykluczał tę kategorię spraw spod swojej jurysdykcji w dziedzinie ochrony praw podatnika. Zawsze jednak sprawy te były kwalifikowane – stosownie do wymogów art. 6 EKPCz – jako sprawy karne, bądź cywilne (majątkowe). Znacząca zmiana w podejściu ETPCz do spraw z elementem podatkowym nastąpiła od 2011 r. Ze względu na ochronę prawa własności zawartą w Protokole nr 1 ETPCz przyznał podatnikom ochronę związaną ze zwrotem podatku od wartości dodanej w sytuacji, gdy podatnik po swojej stronie wywiązał się z obowiązków ewidencyjnych. Przyjęta linia orzecznictwa ma charakter dominujący, ale aby uznać ją za utrwaloną, potrzebna jest większa niż dotychczas liczba orzeczeń ETPCz. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że zmienione orzecznictwo ETPCz może wywierać istotny wpływ na orzecznictwo sądów administracyjnych w Polsce.
One of the most effective systems of protection of human rights is the system defined in the European Convention of Human Rights. Until 2010, the European Court of Human Rights had rarely handled tax cases because, in principle, it excluded this category of cases from its jurisdiction in the field of the protection of taxpayer rights. Such cases had always been qualified – in accordance to the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights – as criminal or civil (property-related) cases. A major change in the ECHR’s approach to cases featuring tax-related aspects occurred in 2011. Given the protection of the right to property as set out in Protocol No. 1, the ECHR ranted taxpayers protection related to the return of value added tax in situations in which the taxpayer fulfilled their record-keeping obligations. The adopted trend in the issued decisions is seen to be dominant, but to be considered grounded, a greater number of ECHR judicial decisions than at present is needed. There is no doubt that the new tendency in the judicial decisions issued by the ECHR may have a major impact on the decisions issued by administrative courts in Poland.
Źródło:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem; 2020, 12, 1; 132-148
2080-1084
2450-7938
Pojawia się w:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ECHR: TOWARDS A CONVENTIONAL RIGHT TO “LEGAL RECOGNITION” OF SAME-SEX UNIONS?
Autorzy:
Puppinck, Gregor
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/664336.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
European Court of Human Rights
same-sex couples
family life
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
związki jednopłciowe
życie rodzinne
Opis:
Artykuł ukazuje ewolucję orzecznictwa ETPCz w zakresie wykładni artykułu 8 Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Autor koncentruje się na zmianie, jaka następowała w sposobie kwalifikowania praktyk homoseksualnych, których penalizacja była początkowo akceptowana przez Trybunał, by później przyznać im ochronę jako aspektowi życia prywatnego, aż do uznania ich za element pozwalający kwalifikować relacje dwóch osób tej samej płci za życie rodzinne. W tym kontekście, w świetle ostatnich wypowiedzi orzeczniczych, Autor stawia tezę, że Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka zmierza do wykreowania na gruncie Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka prawa do instytucjonalizacji związku jednopłciowego, jako wynikającego z art. 8 Konwencji.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze; 2015, 15, 4
2353-8139
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka na porządek prawny państw-stron Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka a koncepcja marginesu oceny. Analiza ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawie Hirst przeciwko W
The impact of the European Court of Human Rights on the legal order of the High Contracting Parties of the European Convention on Human Rights and the doctrine of the margin of appreciaiton. Analysis with particular regard to the judgment of the European
Autorzy:
Ciżyńska-Pałosz, Angelika Dominika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1026497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-05
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka
margines oceny
European Court of Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights
margin of appreciation
Opis:
W artykule podjęto próbę odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy w XXI w. działalność Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka (ETPC) stanowi zagrożenie dla suwerenności państw podlegających jego jurysdykcji, czy może wpływa pozytywnie na system prawa, wymiar sprawiedliwości i funkcjonowanie tych państw. Rozważania oparto m.in. na ocenie legitymizacji ETPC, analizie skutków orzeczeń ETPC dla państw-stron Konwencji, a także charakterystyce doktryny marginesu oceny. Ważną część opracowania stanowi również analiza wyroku ETPC w sprawie Hirst przeciwko Zjednoczonemu Królestwu (2) w kontekście słuszności argumentacji ETPC i reakcji Zjednoczonego Królestwa na to orzeczenie.
The article attempts to answer the question whether in the 21st century the activities of the ECtHR pose a threat to the sovereignty of states under its jurisdiction, ornwhether it positively affects their legal systems, judiciaries and overall functioning. The considerations were based, among others, on the assessment of the legitimacy of the ECtHR, analysis of the effects of ECtHR judgments on the High Contracting Parties of the Convention, as well as the description of the margin of appreciation. An important part of the study is also the analysis of the ECtHR’s judgment in the Hirst v. United Kingdom (2) case in the context of the validity of ECtHR’s arguments and UK’s reaction to this judgment.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny; 2020, 1; 7-28
1898-2166
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Termination of Pregnancy as the Subject of Proceedings Against Poland before the European Court of Human Rights
Terminacja ciąży jako przedmiot postępowań przeciwko Polsce przed Europejskim Trybunałem Praw Człowieka
Autorzy:
Michalczuk-Wlizło, Marta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27177715.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
prawa reprodukcyjne
terminacja ciąży
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Polska
reproductive rights
termination of pregnancy
the European Court of Human Rights
Polska
Opis:
In Poland, women in need of termination of pregnancy are exposed, through the practice of application of law, to systemic abuse by public authorities and sometimes institutional abuse by healthcare providers. This results in the search for institutions outside of Poland to protect their reproductive rights. Therefore, it seems reasonable to draw attention to the multifaceted nature of the rationale that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has indicated in its judgments on the legal and factual state of legal abortion in Poland. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the manifestations, indicated by the ECtHR, of Poland’s violations of the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in matters relating to the termination of pregnancy. An analysis of the content of the judgments of the ECtHR and other source texts is used in this paper as the primary research method.
Kobiety potrzebujące terminacji ciąży w Polsce narażane są, poprzez praktykę stosowania obowiązujących przepisów prawnych, na nadużycia systemowe ze strony władz publicznych oraz niekiedy instytucjonalne, ze strony podmiotów opieki zdrowotnej. Skutkuje to poszukiwaniem, innych niż krajowe, instytucji ochrony ich praw reprodukcyjnych. Dlatego też wydaje się zasadnym zwrócenie uwagi na wieloaspektowość przesłanek, na jakie wskazywał Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, orzekając o stanie prawnym i faktycznym legalnej aborcji w Polsce. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest próba syntezy wskazanych przez Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka przejawów naruszeń przez Polskę regulacji Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności w zakresie spraw dotyczących przerywania ciąży. Jako podstawowa metoda badawcza wykorzystana zostanie analiza treści orzeczeń ETPCZ oraz innych tekstów źródłowych.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2023, 6(76); 389-401
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Percepcja zagrożeń terrorystycznych w Polsce oraz w Wielkiej Brytanii w XXI wieku na tle analizy orzecznictwa sądów i trybunałów
Perception of Terrorism in Poland and Great Britain in the 21st Century Against the Background of Court and Tribunal Decisions
Autorzy:
Golędzinowski, Cezary
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2139697.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-08-03
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej
Tematy:
terroryzm
prawa człowieka
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
percepcja społeczna
Wielka Brytania
terrorism
human rights
European Court of Human Rights
social perceptions
United Kingdom
Opis:
Przedmiotem artykułu jest ocena danych statystycznych dotyczących działalności operacyjnej brytyjskich i polskich służb specjalnych na tle percepcji zagrożeń terrorystycznych oraz aktualnego orzecznictwa sądów i trybunałów. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie społecznie ważnego problemu, jakim jest korelacja pomiędzy percepcją zagrożeń terrorystycznych przez obywateli a ich świadomością o stopniu naruszania praw i wolności człowieka oraz obywatela w imię walki z terroryzmem. Jako  główne metody badawcze zastosowane w pracy  należy wskazać metodę dogmatyczno-prawną oraz analizę danych statystycznych. Wnioskiem z przeprowadzonych badań jest zaobserwowanie zmian w postrzeganiu zagrożeń terrorystycznych, które wynikają w znacznym stopniu z problemu kryzysu migracyjnego oraz z doświadczeń danego państwa w zakresie przeprowadzenia zamachów terrorystycznych na ich terytorium. Artykuł, na podstawie analizy orzecznictwa krajowego oraz międzynarodowego, wskazuje na konieczność dalszego rozwoju badań nad ograniczaniem praw i wolności jednostki w celu zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa.
The subject of the article is the assessment of statistical data on the operational activity of British and Polish secret services against the background of perception of terrorist threats and current case law of courts and tribunals. The purpose of the article is to present a socially important problem, which is the correlation between the perception of terrorist threats by citizens and their awareness of the degree of violation of human and civil rights and freedoms in the name of combating terrorism. The main research methods used in this work include the dogmatic and legal methods and statistical data analysis. The conclusions of the conducted research are observations of changes in the perception of terrorist threats, which result to a large extent from the problem of the migration crisis and from the experience of a given country in carrying out terrorist attacks on their territory. The article, through the analysis of domestic and international case law, indicates the need for further development of research on limiting the rights and freedoms of the individual in order to ensure security.
Źródło:
Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego; 2020, 14, 1; 239-255
1896-8848
2450-3436
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Brutalizacja wypowiedzi politycznej w Europie”? Uwagi nad wyrokiem Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawie Ziembiński przeciwko Polsce (2), 2016
Autorzy:
Wacławczyk, Wiesław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2200462.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
the European Court of Human Rights
freedom of speech
political speech
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
wolność słowa
wypowiedź polityczna
Opis:
The text examines standards of freedom of speech stipulated by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. The focus is on political expression, which deserves the greatest scope of protection according to Western norms determined by the jurisprudence of the mentioned court and the Supreme Court of the United States. In this connection, the latter has significantly influenced the case-law of the former. The text under discussion analyses the problem from the perspective of the case of Ziembiński versus Poland (2), 2016.
Źródło:
Themis Polska Nova; 2017, 1(12); 49-63
2084-4522
Pojawia się w:
Themis Polska Nova
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies