Temat: Competition and Market Authority - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Nieskuteczny nadzór nad GetBack S.A. : Działania państwa wobec spółki zarządzającej wierzytelnościami
Ineffective Supervision of GetBack S.A. – State’s Measures with Regard to the Liability Managing Company
Autorzy:: Moser, Kamil
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2041383.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-08
Wydawca:: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
Tematy:: GetBack
obligacje korporacyjne
fundusze inwestycyjne
rynek wierzytelności
KNF
GPW
UOKiK
Ministerstwo Finansów
corporate bonds
investment funds
debt market
Polish Financial Supervision Authority
Warsaw Stock Exchange
Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
Ministry of Finance
Opis:: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli zbadała na wniosek Prezesa Rady Ministrów działania organów i instytucji państwowych wobec zarządzającej wierzytelnościami spółki GetBack S.A., której funkcjonowanie doprowadziło inwestorów do ogromnych strat finansowych. W artykule skupiono się na wydarzeniach poprzedzających moment ujawnienia jej problemów. Ułatwia to odpowiedź na pytanie, czy było możliwe uniknięcie lub ograniczenie strat nabywców obligacji spółki.
Once the financial problems of GetBack S.A. were disclosed, the value of its corpo rate bonds that had been issued and unsold exceeded PLN 2.5 billion. The company’s shareholders lost money, as they did not have reliable information on the company when they decided to invest. State institutions and bodies promptly launched nume rous checks, which disclosed various irregularities in the company’s activity. It was too late, though, to prevent the investors who acquired corporate bonds from making loses. The main objective of the NIK audit was to verify whether state bodies and in stitutions’ activities towards GetBack S.A. were legal, appropriate, effective and suf ficient to provide protection for non-experts in the finance market. Due to the broad scope of the audit, in the article some selected findings have been presented only. The activities of state bodies and institutions towards the company have been discus sed in chronological order, focusing, in the first place, on the events that preceded the time when its financial problems were disclosed. Such a presentation brings the reader closer to answer the question whether it was possible to prevent the investors who had purchased corporate bonds from loses, or to reduce those loses. In his ar ticle, the author also discusses the most important information about GetBack S.A.
Źródło:: Kontrola Państwowa; 2020, 65, 4 (393); 53-67
0452-5027
Pojawia się w:: Kontrola Państwowa
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Przesłanka interesu publicznego w działaniach Prezesa URE i Prezesa UOKiK na rynku energetycznym
Autorzy:: Elżanowski, Filip
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47389519.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-12-10
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: public interest
the President of Energy Regulatory Office
the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
regulatory authority
energy market
regulatory instruments
interes publiczny
Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów
organ regulacyjny
rynek energii
instrumenty regulacyjne
Opis:: Every action of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection [PL: Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów] must be taken in the public interest – the primary purpose of the antimonopoly regulation is to protect the business of entrepreneurs and consumers in the public interest. The President of the Energy Regulatory Office [PL: Urząd Regulacji Energetyki] is also governed by public interest activities. Under the applicable law, he is responsible for the development of competition, and one of his duties is to counteract the adverse effects of natural monopolies and balance the business of energy companies and fuel and energy consumers. In the Act on competition and consumer protection [PL: ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów], the notion of public interest is defined very generally. However, the Act on Energy Law [PL: ustawa – Prawo energetyczne] precisely specifies which elements shall be taken into account by the President of the Energy Regulatory Office each time when making a decision. A number of his activities aim to balance the business of energy security with the protection of energy companies’ business and consumers’ business, including issuing decisions on approval of tariffs. The President of the Energy Regulatory Office ensures the implementation of the public interest in this respect, and such interest cannot be understood differently by another regulatory authority under another act. Otherwise, a violation of the axiological coherence of the legal system occurs. In this particular context (in terms of the implementation of the public interest), priority should be given to the utility regulatory authority (the President of ERO) and not to the antimonopoly authority. However, in this case, we are not dealing with a contradiction of the wording of the provisions but with a potential contradiction in terms of the understanding and application of the public interest premise. Therefore, the provisions of utility acts constitute a lex specialis in this respect to the Act on competition and consumer protection – taking into account this particular approach, such contradiction does not occur. Consequently, it should be concluded that if a given action of the President of ERO (an administrative decision issuance) implemented the public interest by the Act (and was maintained in legal transactions, was not repealed, etc.), it thus excludes the possibility of taking action by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection which was based on the need to protect this public interest.
Źródło:: Studia Iuridica; 2021, 88; 78-107
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:: Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: System ochrony konkurencji w Finlandii
Competition protection in Finland
Autorzy:: Mäihäniemi, Beata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/508670.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:: prawo konkurencji
Finlandia
Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów
Sąd Gospodarczy
równe warunki konkurencji dla prywatnych i publicznych przedsiębiorstw
regulacja na temat handlu spożywczego
kartel asfaltowy
kartel nadtlenku wodoru;
nadużycie pozycji dominującej
rażące zaniżanie cen
odszkodowania z tytułu szkód będących skutkiem kartelu
Valio Oy
Cartel Damage Claims
Kemira Oyj
competition law
Finland
Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority
Market Court
equitable competitive conditions for public and private players
provision on grocery trade
asphalt cartel,
Hydrogen Peroxide cartel
abuse of dominance
predatory pricing
Opis:: Celem tego artykułu jest przybliżenie polskiemu prawnikowi, zainteresowanemu sprawami ochrony konkurencji, zasad działania fińskiego prawa konkurencji. Omówione są tutaj więc zarówno historia i obecny stan fińskiego prawa ochrony konkurencji, jak i ostatnie zmiany prawa. Artykuł przybliża także organy ochrony konkurencji działające w Finlandii, ich organizację oraz zakres obowiązków. Przybliżone są również w skrócie najbardziej dyskutowane w fińskim piśmiennictwie oraz prasie orzeczenia organów ochrony konkurencji w Finlandii.
The purpose of this article is to present the principles of Finnish competition law to Polish lawyers concerned with antitrust matters. For that reason, the paper focuses on the history and the current state of Finnish competition law, as well as on recent legal changes. It also provides an introduction to the competition authorities operating in Finland, their organization and responsibilities. Moreover, it briefly discusses these decisions and judgments of the competition authorities in Finland, which were most widely analyzed in domestic legal literature and press.
Źródło:: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny; 2014, 3, 3; 56-66
2299-5749
Pojawia się w:: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: The Monetisation of Personal Data in EU Strategies: The Hoda/Google Case
Autorzy:: Correnti, Antonella
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/53676422.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2024-06-20
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:: European Data Management
Monetisation of Personal Data
Competition and Market Authority
Opis:: In July 2022, the Competition and Market Authority opened, on Hoda s.r.l.’s recommendation, an investigation (Competition and Market Authority, 2022) against Google for its alleged abuse of its dominant position and for having hindered interoperability in sharing the data of its users with other operators. Hoda itself is a start-up, active in the intermediation of personal data through the Weople app; natural persons who register with the app delegate Hoda for the collection of their data held by other companies, which are then archived in a digital wallet. The aforementioned proceeding concluded with an undertaking, with communication dated 28th February 2023, by the Alphabet company, to develop new, automatic tools that allow network users to download and export their data from Google to a third-party app. The case leads one to reﬂect on the consequences and challenges that Europe is called upon to face in managing the phenomenon of the governance and the monetisation of personal data. The institution of data portability, to the extent that it facilitates the circulation of data and the mobility of users, offers alternative operators the possibility of exerting competitive pressure on tech giants such as Google, which assert their dominance on the creation of ecosystems based on the management of potentially unlimited quantities of data, functional to one’s business model. The topic arouses particular interest because if, on the one hand, it paves the way for the monetisation of personal data, on the other, it leads one to reﬂect, as highlighted in the past by the President of the Guarantor Authority for the protection of personal data, on the consequences in terms of a re-feudalisation of social relationships that the remuneration of consent to the treatment of one’s data would risk determining.
Źródło:: Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2024, 28, 2; 203-216
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:: Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Competition and Market Authority" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język