Temat: Collectivism - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Typ orientacji społecznej a sposób konstruowania własnej tożsamości przez młodych dorosłych
Autorzy:: Czyżowska, Dorota
Gurba, Ewa
Białek, Arkadiusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/637283.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:: identity style
individualism
collectivism
early adulthood
Opis:: The research investigates the relationship between an individual’s social orientation and their identity style. The identity style is understood, following Berzonsky (1989), as the manner in which important life decisions are taken, including those related to one’s identity and ways of coping with everyday problems. Having anticipated differences in ways of constructing identity, decision-making, and coping with problems, the author distinguishes three identity styles: informational, normative, and diffuse-avoidant. In turn, the research in social orientations distinguishes an individualistic and a collectivistic orientation (Reykowski, 1999). They are understood as forms of mentality connected with basic intuitions and beliefs related to the question of which type of a relation between an individual and the community is proper and just. The conducted research verifi ed the existence of sex differences in the construction of identity styles and adopted social orientation, as well as the relation between an individual’s identity style and their social orientation. Berzonsky’s revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-3) and a questionnaire for the measurement of vertical and horizontal collectivism and individualism (KIRH; Adamska, Retowski, Konarski, 2005) were used to determine an individual’s identity style and social orientation, respectively. The KIRH enabled to identify two types collectivism (vertical and horizontal) and two types of individualism. The sample consisted of 657 subjects (340 female and 317 male), between 22 and 40 years of age. The conducted analysis revealed differences between female and male subjects as regards identity styles and social orientations as well as the relation between certain identity styles and specifi c social orientations.
Źródło:: Psychologia Rozwojowa; 2012, 17, 3; 57-68
1895-6297
2084-3879
Pojawia się w:: Psychologia Rozwojowa
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Kulturowe ramy stylów radzenia sobie ze stresem. Rola indywidualizmu, kolektywizmu i afiliacyjności
Cultural frames of coping with stress styles. The role of individualism, collectivism and affiliativity
Autorzy:: Probosz, Karolina
Sobczyk, Artur
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/468142.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:: individualism
collectivism
affiliativity
coping with stress
Opis:: The purpose of this study was to test the association between individualistic, collectivistic and affiliative orientation and stress coping style. It was hypothesised that highly individualistic subjects will mainly choose change, self-blame and problem oriented styles, highly collectivistic subjects will choose emotional regulation and imitative coping style, whereas highly affiliative subjects will prefer the acting out style, defined as a tendency to express negative emotions and discuss problems with others. The Polish version of Lazarus and Folkman’s Ways of Coping Questionnaire (adapted by Łosiak) and Adamska’s Individualism, Collectivism and Affiliativity Questionnaire were used. Individualism was positively correlated with problem orientation, collectivism was positively correlated with resignation and situation accepting styles and negatively correlated with emotional regulation. The affiliative orientation was positively associated with problem orientation and imitative coping styles. The preferred coping style depends on the dominant social orientation.
Źródło:: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Psychologica; 2012, 5; 101-111
2084-5596
Pojawia się w:: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Psychologica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: „Indywidualistyczne” vs „kolektywistyczne” orientacje normatywne młodzieży akademickiej
‘Individualistic’ vs. ‘Collectivist’ Normative Orientations of University Youth
Autorzy:: Cybal-Michalska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/913156.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-09-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: individualism
collectivism
university youth
normative orientation
Opis:: In the article, the author refers to the individualism-collectivism dichotomy, which is a theoretical construct serving to explain the mutual relations of the individual and the group. It moreover provides a dimension differentiating between cultures which give the primacy to the individual over the group and those, which privilege the group over the individual. An individualistic tendency means that an individual is the subject for whom the collective is an object of action. Collectivism is the polar opposite view: the collective entity is the proper subject of the proceedings, in relation to which individuals are objects. The author of the article, acknowledging the need to recognize the quality of images and views of academic youth about a career path, invoked the structure and function of selected normative assumptions as important dimensions of the socio-cultural mentality of the individual. The research study helped grasp the ‘individualistic’ and ‘collectivist’ normative assumptions of university youth,, emerging in the course of socialization and originating in the generalization of social experience.
In the article, the author refers to the individualism-collectivism dichotomy, which is a theoretical construct serving to explain the mutual relations of the individual and the group. It moreover provides a dimension differentiating between cultures which give the primacy to the individual over the group and those, which privilege the group over the individual. An individualistic tendency means that an individual is the subject for whom the collective is an object of action. Collectivism is the polar opposite view: the collective entity is the proper subject of the proceedings, in relation to which individuals are objects. The author of the article, acknowledging the need to recognize the quality of images and views of academic youth about a career path, invoked the structure and function of selected normative assumptions as important dimensions of the socio-cultural mentality of the individual. The research study helped grasp the ‘individualistic’ and ‘collectivist’ normative assumptions of university youth, , emerging in the course of socialization and originating in the generalization of social experience.
Źródło:: Studia Edukacyjne; 2017, 45; 7-17
1233-6688
Pojawia się w:: Studia Edukacyjne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Orientacja na wartości indywidualistyczne vs. kolektywistyczne jako podstawa wyjaśniania zachowań kooperacyjnych
Orientation on Individualistic versus Collectivistic Values as the Basis for Explaining Pupils’ Cooperation
Autorzy:: Bąbka, Jarosław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2142008.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012-06-30
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej
Tematy:: indywidualizm
kolektywizm
kooperacja
individualism
collectivism
cooperation
Opis:: Changes in the contemporary world are manifested by shifting from society-oriented attitude to a more individualistic approach, from responsibility to self-accomplishment, from cooperation to freedom and competition. In view of the changes towards individualism, the problem of cooperation among junior high school students entering adulthood, so far neglected in educational studies, has been approached. The article searches for prerequisites of the relation between individualism versus collectivism and the readiness of an individual to cooperate. Individualism is related to the self-orientation, whereas collectivism means „towards others” attitude. Theoretical analyses are completed with the analysis of a section of research on treating adolescents' orientation on individualistic versus collectivistic values as a factor differentiating cooperation under task situations. It does not mean, however, that adolescents stopped appreciating collectivistic values. This tendency complies with the decisions made by other authors. The hypothesis about the difference in results concerning cooperative behaviours depending on a particular orientation, namely on individualistic and collectivitis values, has not been confirmed. At this level of the analysis there are no grounds for concluding whether the individualistic or the collectivistic orientation is more in favour of cooperation. It is probable that cooperation involves both individualistic as well as collectivistic values. It is in agreement with the views of other authors that individualism and collectivism can co-exist. The considerations in the paper are a reason for seeking possibilities of joining personal interest of an individual with pro-community cooperation, which is an important issue in terms of conceptualisation of the vision of the community as well as in terms of the undertaken educational activities for young generation.
Źródło:: Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja; 2012, 15, 2(58); 121-138
1505-8808
2450-3428
Pojawia się w:: Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Horizontal and vertical “individualism – collectivism” and values
Autorzy:: Czerniawska, Mirosława
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194823.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-12-30
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: mentality
horizontal and vertical “individualism – collectivism”
values
Opis:: The presented study compares a link between two constructs: “individualism – collectivism” and values. The first construct takes into consideration horizontal and vertical orientation (equality and hierarchy respectively) (Triandis). The description of the second construct accounts for nineteen types of values located on two bipolar dimensions: “conservatism – openness to change” and “self-transcendence – self-enhancement” (Schwartz). The question about the relation between types of values and described horizontal and vertical orientations of individualism and collectivism is posed. The sample consists of 368 students. The results show that the differentiation of mentality on the “individualism – collectivism” dimension with its horizontal and vertical orientation is linked to the differentiation of types of values on the “conservatism – openness to change”. After accounting for horizontal “individualism – collectivism” and vertical “individualism – collectivism” and their relation to the second dimension of type of values (self-transcendence – self- enhancement) the results are not consistent.
Źródło:: Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja; 2020, 18, 2; 293-309
2300-0422
Pojawia się w:: Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Horyzontalna i wertykalna postać „indywidualizmu – kolektywizmu” a wartości
Horizontal and vertical “individualism – collectivism” and values
Autorzy:: Czerniawska, Mirosława
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2194824.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-12-30
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: mentality
horizontal and vertical “individualism – collectivism”
values
Opis:: The presented study compares a link between two constructs: “individualism – collectivism” and values. The first construct takes into consideration horizontal and vertical orientation (equality and hierarchy respectively) (Triandis). The description of the second construct accounts for nineteen types of values located on two bipolar dimensions: “conservatism – openness to change” and “self-transcendence – self-enhancement” (Schwartz). The question about the relation between types of values and described horizontal and vertical orientations of individualism and collectivism is posed. The sample consists of 368 students. The results show that the differentiation of mentality on the “individualism – collectivism” dimension with its horizontal and vertical orientation is linked to the differentiation of types of values on the “conservatism – openness to change”. After accounting for horizontal “individualism – collectivism” and vertical “individualism – collectivism” and their relation to the second dimension of type of values (self-transcendence – self- enhancement) the results are not consistent.
Źródło:: Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja; 2020, 18, 2; 275-291
2300-0422
Pojawia się w:: Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Adam Smith pomylił się. To nie egoistyczne jednostki, lecz silne wspólnoty powodują szybszy rozwój ekonomiczny
Adam Smith was wrong. It is not selfish individuals who cause economic development, but strong communites
Autorzy:: Maziarz, Mariusz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/459961.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
Tematy:: wspólnotowość
przyczynowość w ekonomii
determinanty wzrostu
indywidualizm/wspólnotowość
collectivism
causality in economics
determinants of growth individualism/collectivism
Opis:: Zgodnie z dwiema najpopularniejszymi teoriami filozoficznymi poznanie relacji przyczynowej można sprowadzić do (1) zbadania mechanizmów zachodzących pomiędzy zmiennymi (jak mówią zwolennicy realizmu przyczynowego) lub (2) analizy korelacji zachodzącej pomiędzy zmiennymi (za czym opowiadają się filozofowie kontynuujący tradycję Hume’a). W badaniach zastosowano obie metody w celu odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy istnieje relacja przyczyna – skutek pomiędzy wymiarem kultury indywidualizm-wspólnotowość oraz tempem rozwoju ekonomicznego. Przeprowadzona analiza wykazała, że zorientowanie społeczeństwa na wspólnoty powoduje szybszy wzrost gospodarczy.
According to the two most popular philosophical theories of causality, there are two ways of recognizing such relations: (1) by understanding mechanisms and processes between variables (in pursuance of causal realism) or (2) by correlation analysis (because, as Hume wrote, it is impossible to cognize the causal relationship itself). I applied these two methods to answer the question - if there is a cause-and-effect relationship between one of the cultural dimensions, namely individualism-collectivism and the rate of economic growth. This study, conducted on a group of EU countries shows that more collectivistic countries develop faster.
Źródło:: Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk; 2015, 5; 388-399
2084-1426
Pojawia się w:: Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Relacje rówieśnicze w szkołach różnego szczebla; dążenie do wspólnoty czy atomizacji? - głos w dyskusji
Peer Group Relations in Schools of Diverse Levels – Towards a Community or Atomization?
Autorzy:: Bochno, Ewa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/465221.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Prognoz Polska 2000 Plus PAN
Tematy:: neotrybalizm
indywidualizm
kolektywizm
neo-tribalism
individualism
collectivism
Opis:: Wypowiedź ta zwraca uwagę na znaczenie wspólnotowości grup rówieśniczych w wychowaniu szkolnym oraz ocenia negatywnie tendencje nadmiernej rywalizacji i oceny punktowej, przeciwne kształtowaniu wspólnotowości.
This statement stresses the importance of peer group relations in school education and the condemns tendencies of excessive competition and test rankings that are contrary to forming peer group relations.
Źródło:: Przyszłość. Świat-Europa-Polska; 2013, 1; 119-125
1895-0949
Pojawia się w:: Przyszłość. Świat-Europa-Polska
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: Cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism and its perceptual and cognitive correlates in cross-cultural research
Autorzy:: Čeněk, Jiří
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/628761.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
Tematy:: individualism,collectivism, holistic thinking analytic thinking, culture
Opis:: This paper reviews the current findings on the dimension of individualism/collectivism, which might be a useful tool for the comparison of different cultures and for the investigation of the effect of culture as a psychological concept on individual mental processes. The validity and reliability of the concept of the dimension of individualism/collectivism is discussed. The related theory of analytic and holistic thinking is introduced within a framework of extensive comparative research in the field of cross-cultural psychology. Several interesting research designs on cross-cultural differences in cognition and perception are described. The empirical part contains a short report of research conducted on a sample (N=92) of Czech and Czech Vietnamese university students using a scale of horizontal and vertical individualism/collectivism (Bartoš, 2010). The results do not fully support the traditional view of individualistic Europeans and collectivistic Asians.
Źródło:: Journal of Education Culture and Society; 2015, 6, 2; 210-225
2081-1640
Pojawia się w:: Journal of Education Culture and Society
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: PROBLEM DOBRA WSPÓLNEGO
THE PROBLEM OF COMMON GOOD
Autorzy:: Landowski, Witold
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507288.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2013
Wydawca:: International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:: human nature
common good
society
individualism
collectivism
realism
Opis:: The main purpose of this article is to discuss the relation between the understanding of human being and the concept of common good. On the one hand, materialist and spriritualist concepts of man lead to the univocal understanding of bonum commune, on the other hand, dualist anthropology entails a breakdown of the unity of common good. The author reveals weak points of these approaches and undertakes an attempt of examining realist vision of man and its impact on the notion of bonum commune. He starts with analyzing the complex structure of human being, which includes the potential and actual nature of human person. Against the background of the personalist anthropology, the author concludes that the common good has not only a material or instrumental, but above all a personal dimension, which makes this good both common and non-antagonistic.
Źródło:: Studia Gilsoniana; 2013, 2; 107-128
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:: Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Collectivism" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język