Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Armistice" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Perspectives for the Treaty Closing the Korean War
Autorzy:
Jendraszczak, Eugeniusz
Burdelski, Marceli
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2023560.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Korean armistice
East Asia politics
Korean war
region of East Asia
Opis:
The Korean Peninsula has a strategic place in East Asia. According to Korean historic sources the early beginnings of Korean statehood can be traced back many centuries before Christ. Korean history, when considering some events, has some similarities to the history of Poland. Very often Koreans, during the official meetings compare their historic struggles with ours, for example times of partitions and fi ghting against numerous occupying powers. In the past due to its geographic location, Korea had to continuously withstand the expansion of its neighbours, especially China and Japan. Particularly painful was the period of fighting against the Japanese invader at the beginning of 20th century, when after the annexation of Korea, the Japanese were imposing the policy of assimilation and were trying to completely colonize this country. It has unleashed very strong nationalist sentiments within the Korean nation.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2012, 41; 272-286
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A War Poet in Absentia: the Year 1918 in Jaroslav Hašek’s Literary Output
Autorzy:
Jean, Boutan,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/897619.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-24
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Jaroslav Hašek
Švejk
World War I
Russian Revolution
Russian civil war
Czechoslovak Legion
Armistice
fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
Soviet Union
1918
end of the war
Opis:
This article purports to give an outline of the major evolutions in Hašek’s literary output around the year 1918, a year that saw not only the end of the world war, but also, for the writer himself, the start of the Russian civil war. The Russian Revolution meant for Hašek, as he wrote in 1918, the transition from a “war between States” – or “war between Empires” – to a “war of the proletariat against capitalism”. The lack of safe information about Hašek’s biography during this short, yet crucial, period of his life does not still prevent us from retracing the repercussions of the great events of 1918 on the east front – the fall of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, the founding myth of the Czechoslovakian Legion and the beginnings of the Soviet Union – in the literary works of an author who has been taxed for being a renegade to each of the three aforementioned causes. The particular issue of Švejk’s maturation during the war may help us to put the year 1918 into a perspective with the end (though, only to some extent) of the conflicts and the beginning (however protracted) of the post-war period. Whereas the novel was about the Good Soldier’s bursting into the conflict, this article observes Hašek himself, walking out of the world war.
Źródło:
Przegląd Humanistyczny; 2019, 63(1 (464)); 81-96
0033-2194
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Humanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zagrożenia bezpieczeństwa na Półwyspie Koreańskim za rządów Kim Dzong Una
Security risks on the Korean Peninsula during the regime of Kim Jong-Un
Autorzy:
Buczek, Lech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1804882.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-11-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Koreańska Republika Ludowo-Demokratyczna
bezpieczeństwo
program ato-mowy
incydenty zbrojne
Rozejm z Panmundżomu
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
security
nuclear programme
military incidents
Korean Armistice Agreement in Panmunjom
Opis:
Ze względu na specyfikę reżimu północnokoreańskiego przyszłe wydarzenia na Półwyspie Koreańskim są trudne do przewidzenia, a niektóre z nich prowadzą do destabilizacji i negatywnie wpływają na bezpieczeństwo regionalne i globalne. Wydarzenia te można podzielić na trzy grupy: incydenty związane z północnokoreańskim programem atomowym i rakietowym; incydenty zbrojne i sytuacje, które zaogniają stosunki interkoreańskie, oraz sytuacje o charakterze międzynarodowym wpływające na bezpieczeństwo półwyspu. Artykuł stanowi chronologiczny zbiór zdarzeń, które posegregowane w powyżej przedstawionych kategoriach, mają istotny wpływ na bezpieczeństwo na Półwyspie Koreańskim. Są to wydarzenia, które miały miejsce od przejęcia władzy przez następcę Kim Dzong-Ila, jego najmłodszego syna Kim Dzong Una.
At the regional and global security level, the issue of security in the Korean Peninsula is a serious problem. After Kim Jong Un has taken power in 2011 many experts wondered whether he could consolidate the power and if any member of the state apparatus (the Workers’ Party of Korea or the army) would hold the real power in the DPRK. Recent years show that the successor of Kim Jong-il (1994-2011) is reinforcing his authority by eliminating potential political opponents and continuing his father’s policy through developing nuclear and missile programme. These actions have serious impact on the destabilization of the situation in the region. The security problem on the Korean Peninsula includes three issues. The first is the nuclear and missile programme in North Korea. The second is the threat of war between the Koreas and the possible repercussions of the conflict. Formally, since the outbreak of the Korean War (1950-1953) these countries remain at war because they have only signed an armistice agreement, and not a peace treaty. Artificially divided after the World War II, the Korean Peninsula, still struggling with the problems of the future unification of Korea, found itself in the clinch of the interests of great world powers. The third issue is that the international consequences of changing the status quo in Korea and regional consequences of reunification have significant impact on the balance of power and security in Asia.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych; 2016, 26, 1; 27-49
1507-7896
2544-5227
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Введение советско-польского перемирия в действие (октябрь-ноябрь 1920 г.)
The Implementation of the Polish-Soviet Peace Preliminaries (October–November 1920)
Autorzy:
Колихова, Карина
Матвеев, Геннадий
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27311885.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Polish-Soviet war of 1918–1921
implementation of the 1920 Armistice of Riga
antiSoviet military formations in Poland
Józef Piłsudski
Jan Dąbski
Adolph Joffe
советско-польская война 1918–1921 гг.
исполнение Рижского договора о перемирии
антисоветские формирования в Польше
Ю. Пилсудский
А.А. Иоффе
Я. Домбский
wojna polsko-sowiecka 1918–1921
implementacja ryskiego zawieszenia broni z 1920 r.
antysowieckie formacje wojskowe w Polsce
Adolf Joffe
Opis:
The article clarifies the actual date of the entry into force of the Soviet-Polish treaty on the preliminary conditions of peace and armistice of October 12, 1920. The preliminary treaty stipulated that the enactment should happen no later than November 2, and after that date, the withdrawal of Polish troops to the state border line was to begin. The parties pledged not to interfere in each other’s internal affairs and not to support organizations aimed at overthrowing the state and social system of the other party from the moment the truce was ratified under article II of the treaty. Realizing the importance of the armistice, the Ukrainian SSR, Poland and the RSFSR ratified the treaty within the agreed time frame, and it seemed that nothing prevented them from immediately starting work on the final text of the peace treaty in accordance with the agreements. However, the Soviet peace delegation that had arrived in Riga on November 3 did not find the Polish delegation there. It turned out, moreover, that the Polish army was in no hurry to leave the regions of the Ukrainian SSR and the Belorussian SSR occupied by it, and thus covered the flanks of the anti-Soviet armies of Symon Petliura, Boris Piermikin, and Stanisław Bułak-Bałachowicz which invaded Soviet territory. The protests expressed by the Soviet side yielded results only aer the Red Army had broken through the defense of the Crimea on November 9–10. On November 13, a Polish delegation finally arrived in Riga and a meeting of the heads of the Soviet and Polish delegations, Adolph Joffe and Jan Dąbski, took place, following which Poland undertook to begin the withdrawal of its troops from November 19, 1920. Its yesterday’s eastern allies retreated to Poland and were interned. The analysis of the problem shows that the armistice agreement was actually put into effect not on November 2, but on November 19, 1920, and Józef Piłsudski and the Polish military command are primarily to blame for this.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2022, 14; 194-214
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies