Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Analytic Philosophy of Religion" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
The Metaphysics of the Incarnation in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion
Autorzy:
Dobrzeniecki, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1603538.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-06-30
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
the Chalcedonian dogma
Christology
Analytic Philosophy of Religion
the relative identity
the Incarnation
borrowed properties
Opis:
The paper presents the latest achievements of analytic philosophers of religion in Christology. My goal is to defend the literal/metaphysical reading of the Chalcedonian dogma of the hypostatic union. Some of the contemporary Christian thinkers claim that the doctrine of Jesus Christ as both perfectly divine and perfectly human is self-contradictory (I present this point of view on the example of John Hick) and, therefore, it should be understood metaphorically. In order to defend the consistency of the conciliar theology, I refer to the work of, among others, Eleonore Stump, William Hasker, Peter Geach and Kevin Sharpe. As a result, I conclude that recent findings in analytic metaphysics provide an ontological scaffolding that explains away the objection of the incompatibility of the doctrine of the hypostatic union. In order to confirm this conclusion such metaphysical topics as properties attribution (what it means for an object to have a property), relation of identity (what it means for an object x to be identical with object y), and essentialism and kind membership (what it means for an object to belong necessarily to a kind) are scrutinized in detail.
Źródło:
Verbum Vitae; 2021, 39, 2; 571-587
1644-8561
2451-280X
Pojawia się w:
Verbum Vitae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
How is philosophy in science possible?
Autorzy:
Heller, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690864.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
philosophy in science
philosophy of science
metaphilosophy
interdisciplinary research
science and religion
analytic philosophy
Opis:
The Michael Heller’s article entitled “How is philosophy in science possible?” was originally published in Polish in 1986 (see Heller, 1986) and then translated into English by Bartosz Brożek and Aeddan Shaw and published in 2011 in the collection of essays entitled Philosophy in Science. Methods and Applications (Heller, 2011). This seminal paper has founded further growth of the ‘philosophy in science’ and become the reference point in the methodological discussions, especially in Poland. On the 40th anniversary of Philosophical Problems in Science we wanted to make this paper freely available to the international public by reprinting its English version. In this issue it is followed by two additional articles-commentaries (by Paweł Polak and Kamil Trombik).
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2019, 66; 231-249
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena trafności zarzutów przeciw ateizmowi semantycznemu Bohdana Chwedeńczuka
Evaluation of critiques against Bohdan Chwedeńczuk’s semantic atheism
Autorzy:
Remisiewicz, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/18655136.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
ateizm semantyczny
filozofia analityczna
ignostycyzm
filozofia religii
Koło Wiedeńsk
semantic atheism
analytic philosophy
ignosticism
philosophy of religion
Vienna Circle
Opis:
The article is diverse on two parts. In the first part, the author refers assumptions of Bohdan Chwedeńczuk book, “Przekonania religijne” [Religious Beliefs] that was devoted to justify the thesis according to which religious statements are meaningless. He emphasizes a role of so called Hume Requirement that was postulated as a demarcation line between meaningful and meaningless words in Chwedeńczuk argumentation chain. Next he indicates main objections against the Requirement which were considered by Chweden czuk. The second part of the article is a discussion with critiques that were emerging after publishing of “Przekonania”. Such philosophers as J. J. Jadacki, M. Przełęcki, K. Kondrat, M. Pawliszyn, W. Wolan czyk and I. Ziemin ski formulated a number of arguments against the thesis about meaninglessness of religious statements. Author shows that Jadacki, Przełęcki and Ziemin ski presented compelling arguments which cannot be undermine basing on the “Przekonania” text, thus these objections must be included if the Chweden czuk’s theory could be considered as justified. Arguments formulated by Kondrat and Wolan czyk are possible to refute and Pawliszyn’s critique is pointless.
Źródło:
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris; 2018, 41, 2; 98-125
1689-4286
Pojawia się w:
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies