Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Alois Riegl" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Historic Gardens as Places of Conflicting Values
    Autorzy:
    Salwa, Mateusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781167.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Gardens
    restoration
    Alois Riegl
    ecology
    value conflict
    history of art
    Opis:
    The aim of the article is to present historical gardens as phenomena inevitably pervaded by an ongoing clash of values. The conflict stems from the twofold character of gardens where art (or in broader terms: culture) and nature are combined, which results in a tension between the tendency to remain static and durable that human culture seeks, and the changeability and dynamics that are inherent in nature. This conflict can be characterized by referring to a theory proposed by Austrian art historian Alois Riegl, one of the founders of modern monument restoration theory who identified three types of values associated with monuments: historical value, age value, and present-day values. What is more, one can assume that gardens can be treated as particular tokens of landscape. Thus, the conflict of values within a garden may be seen as a more limited example of the same clash going on at the more general level oflandscape. The argument is illustrated by a short case study of the recent debate over the restoration of the historic Krasinski Garden in Warsaw, Poland.
    Źródło:
    Ethics in Progress; 2014, 5, 1; 96-112
    2084-9257
    Pojawia się w:
    Ethics in Progress
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    TEORIA ZABYTKU ALOISA RIEGLA
    THE THEORY OF THE HISTORICAL MONUMENT ACCORDING TO ALOIS RIEGEL (1903-2003)
    Autorzy:
    Szmygin, Bogusław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535458.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2003
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Alois Riegl
    teoria „woli artystycznej”” (Kunstwollen)
    „Nowoczesny kult zabytków”
    rieglowska koncepcja zabytku
    zabytki sztuki i zabytki historii
    wartość artystyczna i wartość historyczna zabytku
    wartość starożytnicza
    klasyfikacja zabytków
    Opis:
    The year 2003 marked the hundredth anniversary of the appearance of Alois Riegel’s The Modern Cult of Monuments. Its Essence and Origin, a presentation of a holistic conception of the historical monument and the conservation doctrine. Moreover, the author analysed historical values and showed the changes to which they succumb due to conservation (the transformation of the historical monument). A. Riegel was an all-sidedly trained and experienced museum expert, as well as an historian and theoretician of art who did not turn his attention to the conservation of historical monuments until the end of his life. Consequently, his theory of the monument was complex and well-embedded in praxis. The views expounded by A. Riegel became the basis of twentieth-century conservation theory, preserved their topical nature for almost a whole century, and constituted the foundation for the Charter of Venice. Only the last decades undermined the Riegelian conception of the historical monument; nonetheless, in view of the absence of suitable theoretical foundations Riegel’s conception continues to hold an important position in the conservation of monuments.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 3-4; 148-153
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O polskiej szkole odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
    ON THE POLISH SCHOOL OF THE CONSERVATION AND OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
    Autorzy:
    Zachwatowicz, Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538808.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1981
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    polska szkoła odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
    ochrona dóbr kultury w Polsce
    przykłady zniszczeń i deprecjacji zabytków kultury polskiej
    Viollet-le-Duc
    konserwacja zabytków w krajach Europy
    Alois Riegl
    teoria Riegla
    zasada „konserwować - nie restaurować”
    Alfred Lauterbach
    Opis:
    The author considers a substantiation of the term „Polish conservation school” and describes stages of the development of the concept of conservation in Poland from the 18th century. He gives examples o f intentional damages and depreciation o f Polish historic monuments during annexations and also o f initiatives taken by conservators and historians. At that time one could see various trends to emerge in conservation methods displaying features of school, to mention only Viollet-le-Duc in France and A. Riegel in Austria. The methods met also a vivid response in Poland, which can be seen in the reconstruction o f the cathedral at Włocławek and of the Cloth Hall in Cracow. Of particular importance were the ideas o f A. Riegel, who showed moderation and tried to find compromise solutions. Such a rational restraint in establishing the direction of monuments conservation adjusted to the conditions and fate of historic monuments in Poland displayed, already at that time, features o f the Polish school favouring, first and foremost, care for a proper form and durability o f monuments o f the national culture and not ambitions o f architectural creativity. In 1918, after the regaining o f independence by Poland conservation services were established and the law on the protection of monuments was enforced in 1928. The definition o f a monument covered all kinds o f human activity and was not time-restricted. It was also then that works on the rebuilding o f monuments destroyed during the war were undertaken, with the main emphasis put to restore the splendour o f royal castles in Warsaw and in Cracow. The operative principle was „to preserve and not to restore” , although the majority o f European projects consisted in restoration. The Conservation Congress in Athens (1931) recommended to avoid the reproduction of destroyed monuments but it did not repudiate the process totally in view o f some inevitable events. The period of People’s Poland II came to an end in 1938 with the statement made by A. Lauterbach, a Polish art historian, who said that the fate o f Polish monuments during the war of 1914—1918 made it impossible to apply the principle „to preserve and not to restore” in its pure form and that restoration and even reproduction o f monuments was a must. After the World War II this statement assumed the form of a concrete work programme (the execution o f old town complexes in, i.a., Warsaw, Gdańsk, Poznań). In the opinion of renowned historians o f architecture (R. Pane) and theoreticians of conservation (W. Frodl) the rebuilding o f monuments in Poland after 1945 was an exceptional and political task. According to the author o f this article, because o f its exceptionality and particular conditions in which monuments were rebuilt, one can hardly talk about „the Polish school o f conservation” , as this is not a doctrine but an exception. A similar method was also used by the French to reconstruct the destroyed town o f Saint Malo. Polish monuments conservation boasts a long tradition of great efforts put into their protection, restoration and reconstruction. One could mention at this point (1) comprehensive studies accompanied by broad inventory works and monographic elaborations, (2) training o f personnel in various fields o f monuments conservation, (3) works on the revival of historic town centres, (4) the establishment in 1950 of the State Enterprise for Conservation of Art, and (5) permanent and active participation o f Polish representatives in international works (e.g. in ICOMOS). The author concludes that each school is linked with a definite philosophical doctrine which the Poles have not created but only applied the methods o f monuments conservation necessary in a given situation.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 1-2; 4-10
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    KOMPROMIS I METODA – WYBRANE ASPEKTY TEORII KONSERWATORSKICH ALOISA RIEGLA I CESARE BRANDIEGO
    THE EXPROPRIATION OF HISTORICAL IMMOVABLES
    Autorzy:
    Krawczyk, Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536294.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    teoria a praktyka konserwatorska
    Alois Riegl
    Cesare Brandi
    światowa myśl konserwatorska
    poglądy Aloisa Riegla
    poglądy Cesare Brandiego
    zamierzone i niezamierzone znaki pamięci
    pomniki zamierzone i niezamierzone
    znak pamięci
    wartości upamiętniające
    wartość historyczna
    wartość dawności
    pomniki dawności
    wartość ważna dla teraźniejszości
    Nowoczesny kult pomników
    Der moderne Denkmalkultus
    Teoria restauracji
    Teoria del restauro
    dwubiegunowość odbioru dzieła sztuki
    instancja estetyczna oraz instancja historyczna
    restauracja aktywna
    restauracja prewencyjna
    konserwacja
    Opis:
    The expropriation of historical immovables for the sake of the State Treasury is a special legal instrument used in the name of collective interest and concern for the national heritage. The expropriation of immovables consists of the deprivation or limitation of ownership rights, the right of perpetual usage or other rights concerning immovables. Intervention into the right of ownership of historical immovables, which involves expropriation, should be realised in accordance with the binding law. The legal foundations for expropriation can be found in three types of regulations: the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, statutes and international public and European law. Decisions pertaining to a temporary seizure of historical immovables and expropriation have been divided between two organs of public administration: the voivodeship conservator of historical monuments and the starosta, with the former acting as the advisory and motionfiling organ, while the starosta conducts the expropriation procedure and makes decisions about the expropriation of the immovables. The expropriation of historical immovables conceived as legal institution, which is to guarantee the preservation of historical monuments by the state, is both correct and regular. Its application, however, calls for the observation of administrative procedures, which considerably increase the time of the procedure. As a consequence, it causes a considerable delay of conservation undertakings aimed at saving the original historical substance. In view of the fact that expropriation usually relates to the most damaged and neglected monuments, chances for the preservation of even the smallest fragment of the original are often slight, and the institution of expropriation, whose purpose is to salvage historical monuments, could contribute to a rapidly progressing and irreversible reduction of the original historical substance. The conservation milieu, mindful of scientific accomplishments and the postulates of the charter for the protection of historical monuments, strives at a preservation of the original historical substance as little altered as possible. It seems more correct, therefore, to opt for a less radical path – to persuade the owner to agree to conservation or sale. Expropriation, envisaged as a form of legal coercion, should be applied in exceptional cases, when the repertoire of other possibilities has been exhausted. On the other hand, it should not be avoided, keeping in mind the fact that historical monuments are supposed to survive not only for the sake of our generation, and that their protection, perceived as a public goal, justifies expropriation.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 2; 64-74
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies