Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "двойничество" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Экзистенциальное в повести Александра Чаянова "Венецианское зеркало, или Диковинные похождения стеклянного человека"
The existential in the story by A.V. Chayanov "The Venetian mirror, or outlandish adventures of glass man"
Autorzy:
Саворовская, Анна
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/950979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
мотив
неоромантизм
экзистенциализм
двойничество
антропологическая проблематика
концепт
А.В. Чаянов
Opis:
As is known, for the literature at the beginning of the XX century tend to gain interest on destiny of the person, the essence of the inner world and man’s place in the world. The article presents the results of the analysis story of Chayanov in terms of having it existential and anthropological problems, the path of solutions. Attempt to understand the passing from existential objective to existential subjective. In the story “The venetian mirror, or Outlandish adventures of glass man” happens to a split personality in the disharmonious world, the hero changes under the influence of its counterpart. During the study, special attention was paid to the role of the concept of “freedom”, “existential choice” in the story. In the article were identified and discussed the existential motifs and themes used by the writer. Holistically analyzed the expression of the philosophy of existentialism in the story of A.V. Chayanov. During the research, we came to the conclusion that the author, recreating of two worlds, split personality and character, came into the fight with the infernal double endowed demonic force, focuses on the duty of man to live beyond their fate, but of his own volition.
Źródło:
Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie; 2015, 15; 133-146
1642-557X
Pojawia się w:
Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Стихотворение Николая Гумилева «Неслышный, мелкий падал дождь…»: мотив двойничества и постижение природы зла
Autorzy:
Чевтаев, Аркадий
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2034792.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Н. Гумилев, двойничество
дихотомия добра и зла
лирический герой
лирический нарратив
символизм
Nikolai Gumilyov
the double
dichotomy of good and evil
lyrical subject
lyrical narrative
symbolism
Opis:
В статье рассматривается поэтика малоизвестного стихотворения Н. Гумилева «Неслышный, мелкий падал дождь…» (1907) в аспекте становления мотива двойничества как ключевого параметра гумилевского художественного мира. В основе данного поэтиче- ского текста находится нарративная репрезентация встречи лирического героя с персонажем- убийцей, предстающим в качестве двойнической ипостаси субъектного «я». Анализ стихот- ворения показывает, что ценностное узнавание страдальческого бытия демонического пришельца оказывается актом постижения онтологической природы зла, которое в созна- нии лирического героя обретает статус равновесной добру бытийной константы. Формули- руется вывод о том, что познание инфернальной стороны универсума посредством актуали- зации мотива двойничества в гумилевском творчестве мыслится необходимым процессом обретения духовного опыта, синтезирующего «светлые» (положительные) и «темные» (от- рицательные) аспекта бытия. Соответственно, представленное в данном тексте соприкос- новение лирического «я» с преступно-демоническим двойником демонстрирует принципы формирования окказиональной мифопоэтики Н. Гумилева, основанной на конвергенции онтологических антиномий.
The article discusses the poetics of a little-known poem, “Neslyshnyi, melkyi padal dozhd’…” [‘It was quiet and drizzling…’] (1907), in terms of the formation of the motif of the double as a key parameter of Nikolai Gumilyov’s artistic world. This text was not published during the poet’s lifetime and is known from an autograph in a letter to Valery Bryusov. Gumilyov’s refraining from publishing this poem could have had various causes, but the author of the paper attributes it to two factors. The first one is that it would have been difficult to embed this text in the conceptual logic of the cross-cutting “plots” of either Romanticheskiye tsvety [‘Romantic Flowers’] (1908) or Zhemchuga [‘Pearls’] (1910), i. e. poetic books the creation of which is chronologically close to the time of writing this poem. The second is the fact that “Neslyshnyi, melkyi padal dozhd’…” explicitly affirms the demonic principle in the human “self ” as an axiological constant, explicating the adherence to the “diabolical” poetics of early Russian symbolism, which Gumilyov had been trying to creatively rethink since 1907. However, despite the author’s neglect, the poem merits close attention, since it shows fundamentally important aspects of Gumilyov’s artistic conception. This poetic text is based on a narrative representation of the meeting between the lyrical subject and the character of a killer, who appears as his double, an alter ego of “the self ”. The analysis of the poem shows that recognizing the value of the painful existence of the demonic stranger is an act of comprehending the ontological nature of evil, which in the consciousness of the lyrical “I” acquires the status of something equivalent to the good of the existential constant. In the structure of this text the motif of the double, which goes back to the poetic practice of the romanticism and of the Russian symbolism, is realised on the story-plot level by dividing the human soul into two hypostases, the “light” and the “dark” one, the meeting of which becomes for the lyrical subject an initiation into the essence of another world. The author formulates the conclusion that getting to know the infernal side of the universe, here through the actualisation of the motif of the double, was in Gumilyov’s writing conceived as a necessary process of gaining spiritual experience that would synthesise the “light” (positive) and the “dark” (negative) aspects of being. Accordingly, the lyrical “I”’s encounter with his criminal- -demonic double presented in the discussed poem reveals the principles of formation of Gumilyov’s occasional mythopoetics based on the convergence of ontological antinomies.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica; 2021, 14; 81-95
1427-9681
2353-4834
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies