Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Wowerka, Arkadiusz" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Siedziba rzeczywista spółki jako łącznik unijnego prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
    A Company’s Real Seat as the Connecting Factor in the EU Private International Law
    Autorzy:
    Wowerka, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151088.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-06-19
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    companies
    private international law of the UE
    determination of the applicable law
    law applicable to companies
    torts
    contractual obligations and insolvency of the company
    jurisdiction
    real seat as connecting factor
    Opis:
    The real seat is a recognised, although expressed in different terms, connecting factor of the EU international private law, relating to companies in they different legal relations. Under the regulations unifying particular areas of this law, relevant form the point of view of cross-border operations of companies, the real seat is the connecting factor determining the applicable law in the field of contractual and non-contractual obligations, and the company’s bankruptcy. Furthermore, it deretmines the jurusdiction for insolvency proceedings against the company, and i salso a jurisdictional connecting factor for general civil and commercial matters. The real seat connecting factor may also constitute a connecting factor determining the law applicable to company, accectable under the EU freedom of establishement.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 28; 109-129
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Transgraniczne przekształcenia (zmiana formy prawnej) spółek w prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym — zagadnienia wybrane
    Cross-border Conversion (a Change of a Legal form) of Companies in Private International Law — Selected Issues
    Autorzy:
    Wowerka, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20753608.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    spółki prawa handlowego
    prawo prywatne międzynarodowe
    transgraniczne przekształcenia
    prawo właściwe
    zakres zastosowania prawa właściwego
    companies
    private international law
    cross-border conversions
    applicable law
    scope of application of the applicable law
    Opis:
    This paper delas with the selected issues of cross-border conversions of companies in private international law. Conversion is one of the forms of transformations of companies. The basic form of cross-border transformations mostly used by companies are mergers. However, as evidenced in particular by the judgment of the Court of Justice in the case of Polbud, also the change of the legal form is an institution of interest and present in the practice of cross-border activities of companies. In the foreground are the conflict of laws issues arising under private international law, in particular the question of the law applicable to the cross-border change of the company’s legal form. In order to answer this question, a definition of a conversion under the private international law has been provided. A cross-border conversion of a company must be distinguished from a cross-border transfer of the seat of the company as a connecting factor, as they are two completely different operations governed by different conflict-of-law rules of private international law. In the case of Polbud, there are serious doubts as to whether there was a cross-border conversion or cross-border transfer of the company’s seat. The law applicable to cross-border conversions is determined on the basis of the principle of combination or unification of the personal statutes of the state of the exit form and the state of the intended form of the company. Under this principle, however, the application of both legal systems is problematic. Useful guidelines are provided by the model expressed in art. 86c in connection with art. 86q of the directive on certain aspects of company law. The scope of application of the law applicable to cross-border conversions is determined by both leges societatis in question. Cross-border conversion operations also arise qualification problems related to issues such as the protection of creditors, minority shareholders and employees. The harmonized substantive provisions of the directive on certain aspects of company law make it easier to carry out cross-border conversions in the European dimension. The existence of such harmonized norms removes the barriers resulting from the applicable substantive law based on various principles and rules and makes the conflict-of-law issues then practically of secondary importance.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 57-78
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Obce przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 18 października 2016 r. w sprawie C-135/15 Republika Grecji przeciwko Grigoriosowi Nikiforidisowi
    Third countries’ overriding mandatory rules
    Autorzy:
    Wowerka, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782432.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    conflict of law rules relating to contractual obligations
    Article 9 (3) Rome I Regulation
    foreign overriding mandatory provisions
    substantive law level consideration as a matter of fact
    Opis:
    This commentary examines the judgement of the CJEU of 18 October 2016 in case C-135/15 Republik Griechenland v. Grigorios Nikiforidis. The judgement in question concerns the issue of treatment of foreign overriding mandatory provisions under the Article 9(3) of Regulation No 593/2008. This topic is the subject to a great deal of controversy and academic discussion. The ECJ concluded that the mentioned provision must be interpreted as precluding overriding mandatory provisions other than those of the State of the forum or of the State where the obligations arising out of the contract have to be or have been performed from being applied, as legal rules, by the court of the forum, but as not precluding it from taking such other overriding mandatory provisions into account as matters of fact in so far as this is provided for by the national law that is applicable to the contract pursuant to the Regulation. This interpretation is not affected by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down in Article 4(3) TEU. In this respect the judgement of CJEU brings significant clarification on the question, whether a court of the forum can have regard to foreign overriding mandatory provisions, which do not belong to the legal system of the country of performance of the contract on the level of the applicable substantive law. However, there are still questions arising under Article 9(3) of Rome I Regulation, which need to be clarified.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 91-106
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Cross-border Transfer of a Seat, Cross-border Conversion or the Coming into Existence of a New Company? Doubts Against the Background of the Court of Justice’s Judgment in C-106/16 Polbud – Wykonawstwo Sp. z o.o
    Autorzy:
    Majkowska-Szulc, Sylwia
    Wowerka, Arkadiusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706731.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    cross-border transfer of seat
    cross-border conversion of company
    mobility of companies
    EU freedom of establishment
    conflict-of-laws
    statutory seat
    real seat
    registered office
    Opis:
    This article focuses on mobility of companies in the European Union in the light of the Court of Justice’s judgment in the C-106/16 Polbud – Wykonawstwo sp. z o.o. case. The Court of Justice has once again interpreted the treaty provisions relating to the EU freedom of establishment in the context of cross-border conversion of companies. The in-depth analysis of the case from the substantive law perspective as well as from the conflict-of-law perspective has raised some doubts with regard to the background of the judgment. Therefore, the article assesses whether the cross-border transfer of a seat took place in the Polbud case or the cross-border conversion, or possibly a new company has come into existence. Most of the analysis is aimed at exposing the risks related to the companies’ mobility under the rules adopted in the Polbud judgment, in particular in the absence of respective European and national regulation.
    Źródło:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 275-289
    0554-498X
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Yearbook of International Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies