Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Wagner, Daniel C." wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    On Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian Method Part II Induction and Reduction as Aristotelian Induction (ἐπαγωγή) and Division (διαίρεσις)
    Autorzy:
    Wagner, Daniel C.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2016005.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Karol Wojtyła
    method
    induction
    reduction
    Aristotle
    definition
    division
    person
    act
    philosophical anthropology
    Opis:
    This is the second of a two-part study treating Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian methodology. Having presented Aristotle’s method of induction (ἐπαγωγή/epagoge) and analysis (ἀνάλῠσις/analusis) or division (διαίρεσις/diairesis) in Part I, Part II discloses the logical form and force of Wojtyła’s method of induction and reduction as Aristotelian induction and division. Looking primarily to the introduction to The Acting Person, it is shown that Wojtyła utilizes the logical forms of reductio ad impossibile and reasoning on the hypothesis of the end, or effect-cause reasoning, which is special to the life sciences and the power-object model of definition as set down by Aristotle. By use of this Aristotelian methodology, Wojtyła obtains definitive knowledge of the human person that is necessary and undeniable: he discloses the εἶδος (eidos) or species of the person in the Aristotelian, Thomistic, and Phenomenological sense of the term.
    Źródło:
    Philosophy and Canon Law; 2021, 7, 2; 1-27
    2450-4955
    2451-2141
    Pojawia się w:
    Philosophy and Canon Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Penitential Method as Phenomenological: The Penitential Epoche
    Autorzy:
    Wagner, Daniel C.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507452.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-09
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Thomism
    phenomenology
    Thomistic personalism
    Edmund Husserl
    realism
    idealism
    epoche
    consciousness
    conscience
    penitence
    penance
    contrition
    will
    sin
    belief
    truth
    knowledge
    grace
    noesis-noema
    boulesis-boulema
    virtue
    Opis:
    Synthesizing Thomism and phenomenology, this paper compares the kind of reflective thinking and willing that goes on in penitential acts to Edmund Husserl’s method of the phenomenological εποχή (epoche). Analyzing penance up through the act of contrition, it first shows it to have three primary acts: (1) the examination of conscience, (2) the reordering of the will and (3) the resolve not to sin again in regret. After presenting this Thomistic conception of contrition in detail, it then focuses on the essence of Husserl’s εποχή as a method intended to “suspend” certain beliefs in order to discover the truth about knowledge. In conclusion, it shows that a particular form of the εποχή—a penitential εποχή—must be employed in these three penitential acts so that a disposition of grace may be made present in the penitent.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2018, 7, 3; 487-518
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    On Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian Method in The Acting Person: Induction and Reduction as Aristotelian Induction (ἐπαγωγή) and Division (διαίρεσις) (Part I)
    Autorzy:
    Wagner, Daniel C.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1622363.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-07-23
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Karol Wojtyła
    method
    induction
    reduction
    Aristotle
    definition
    division
    person
    act
    philosophical anthropology
    Opis:
    This is the first of a two-part study treating Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian methodology. The study shows that Wojtyła’s inductive and reductive methodology is identical with the Aristotelian method of proceeding from what is better-known to us in experience (ἐμπειρία/empeiria) to what is better-known to nature by way of induction (ἐπαγωγή/epagoge) and analysis (ἀνάλῠσις/analusis) or division (διαίρεσις/diairesis). By a rigorous presentation of this Aristotelian methodology here in Part I, the logical form and force of Wojtyła’s method is properly disclosed and appreciated in Part II. Wojtyła’s method utilizes the logical forms of reductio ad impossibile and reasoning on the hypothesis of the end, or effect-cause reasoning, which is special to the life sciences and the power-object model of definition. By this methodology, Wojtyła obtains definitive knowledge of the human person that is necessary and undeniable: he discloses the εἶδος (eidos) or species of the person in the Aristotelian, Thomistic, and Phenomenological sense of the term.
    Źródło:
    Philosophy and Canon Law; 2021, 7, 1; 1-42
    2450-4955
    2451-2141
    Pojawia się w:
    Philosophy and Canon Law
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Disputatio on the Distinction between the Human Person and Other Animals: the Human Person as Gardener
    Autorzy:
    Savino, Damien Marie
    Wagner, Daniel C.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138115.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-09-26
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    human uniqueness
    gardening
    person
    personalism
    philosophical anthropology
    philosophical biology
    thomas Aquinas
    Aristotle
    human intelligence
    animal intelligence
    cognition
    epistemology
    metaphysics
    philosophy of language
    evolutionary biology
    ecology
    logic
    ethics
    disputatio
    Opis:
    While the catholic intellectual tradition upholds the uniqueness of humans, much contemporary scientific research has come to the opposing conclusion that humans are not significantly different from other animals. to engage in robust dialogue around the question of human uniqueness, we utilize Aquinas’s model of disputatio to focus on an attribute of human beings that is unexplored in the literature – namely, the human capacity to garden – and address five scientific and philosophical objections to our position that the capacity to garden makes humans distinct. engaging with various branches of science, we demonstrate that human capacities and modes of gardening are not only incrementally different, but also fundamentally different in kind, from those of nonhuman creatures. Philosophically, we utilize the power-object model of division and Aristotle’s categorization of knowledge to express the difference in kind between human beings and other animals. these responses allow us to set aside each major objection.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2022, 11, 3; 471-530
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies