Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Szuba, Mateusz" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Osoby duchowne w otoczeniu i czynnościach prawnych księcia gdańskiego Warcisława II
Clergy in the State of Warcisław II, Duke of Gdańsk (1266–1269/1270)
Autorzy:
Szuba, Mateusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1997204.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
Opis:
The above paper deals with the clergy in the state of Warcisław II, Duke of Gdańsk and East‑Pomerania between 1266 and 1269/70. The careers of representatives of this class are reconstructed by collecting and verifying source information and the extensive discussions of earlier historians. Four clergymen from Gdańsk, 2 from Słupsk, and Michael priest of “Saulyn” have been authenticated, but it is not certain that the last two places actually belonged to Warcisław’s state. The main conclusion of this research is that during the reign of Warcisław II, clergy were of political significance. They served in administration and in an early chancellery service, as in the case of a group of clergy in the fortified church in Gdańsk. It is likely that one of local priests‑ Wacław/Unisław – was also probably related to an influential gentry family This was also probably the case with Luder, priest of St. Catharine’s Church in the city of Gdańsk. He was probably an agent mediating between the Duke and the middle class. Warcisław II had good relations with the middle class and its political influence was growing during his reign. In Słupsk, too, the clergy participated in changing political affiliations, but that is visible only later. Clergymen also supported other dukes; this was visible and of importance during the East‑Pomeranian civil war (1269–1271) between Warcisław II and Msciwoj II, which ended in the former’s exile. One historian believes that the priest Michael served in Salino in East‑Pomerania. Perhaps his presence in a privilege from 1268 had a political context – by that act Warcisław II could show his claims to Białogarda’s land. This had been mortgaged to the Teutonic Order by Duke Racibor. Otherwise, according to the opinion of Klemens Bruski, Michael could have served in another place – Słona near Kościerzyna.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza; 2020, 24; 229-264
2544-2562
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Data narodzin i pozycja późniejszego księcia gdańskiego Warcisława II do 1266 roku
Date of Birth and Position of the Later Duke of Gdańsk, Wartislaw II, until 1266
Autorzy:
Szuba, Mateusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694691.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-28
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
Opis:
The paper is dedicated to the date of birth of Wartislaw II, Duke of Gdańsk in the years 1266–1269/70, and his position in the country, as well as the Samborides dynasty before they came to power. Most historians place the birth of Wartislaw II around 1236. The above conclusion seems to be supported by the fact that the sources clearly ignore this Duke until 1248, but also after that. Achieving a certain level of maturity is confirmed only by the very probable participation of Wartislaw II in the battle of Nakło in 1256. It is possible that he was raised outside the capital Gdańsk, namely in Słupsk, as we know that he spent time there in his youth (in 1248 and 1253). It may have been related to the possibility raised in literature of Swietopelk preparing Wartislaw II to become his successor, in place of Mestwin II, taken hostage by the Teutonic Order. It is possible, moreover, that Wartislaw II was making preparations there to take rule over his own province, as modelled after North‑German solutions. The above conclusions seem to be confirmed by the fact that since his youngest years, Wartislaw II was treated in documents as equal with Mestwin II – as Swietopelk’s successor. It is evidenced by the titulature of both brothers and the presence of their names side by side in the documents. Such position entitled Wartislaw to take possession of his own province. Its acquisition in 1266 may have been confirmed by the separate treatment of Wartislaw II and Swietopelk in the Kamień pact from 1264. It is also possible that this document confirmed the fact that his father chose Wartislaw as the successor to the function of the princeps or just the ruler of Gdańsk. In light of other sources, however, it is more likely that Swietopelk did not make any final decisions in this regard and that Wartislaw was elected the ruler of Gdańsk in 1266 by the gentry.
Źródło:
Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza; 2017, 21; 200-217
2544-2562
Pojawia się w:
Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies