Autor: Sweeney, Richard J. - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Constitutional conflicts in the European Union: Court packing in Poland versus the United States.
Autorzy:: Sweeney, Richard J.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943183.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018-11-14
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Tematy:: Polska
constitutional law
constitutional court
constitutional rights
Supreme Court Compliance
judiciary
court packing
European Union
United States
Opis:: Court packing greatly threatens democracy. This paper examines, compares and draws conclusions from two attempts: The PiS government is near to packing Polish courts; President Roosevelt tried but failed to pack the U.S. Supreme Court in 1937. In most democracies a head of government with a legislative majority and strong party control can pack courts, giving complete control. The United States escaped; Roosevelt lacked complete party control. Poland is unlucky; PiS is strongly controlled. Peaceful domestic protest is necessary, but Poland’s hope is from EU-level institutional pressure, supported by major democracies, to reverse packing and prevent further seizure of power.
Źródło:: Economics and Business Review; 2018, 4(18), 4; 3-29
2392-1641
Pojawia się w:: Economics and Business Review
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Tariffs and welfare: A common, invalid anti-tariff argument
Autorzy:: Sweeney, Richard J.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2192159.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023-04-27
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Tematy:: tariffs
anti-tariff arguments
optimal tariff
free trade
use of tariff revenue
tariff warfare
Opis:: President Trump imposed tarisf in 2017 on several of China's exports, notably steel. Many papers opposed these tarisf by using a common, invalid argument: rather than arguing these tarisf reduced U.S. welfare, they argue U.S. consumers and businesses pay the tarisf, a diefrent, rhe torical issue. Their main evidence of harm is increases in imported goods' aeftr-tarif U.S. prices, especially relative to other goods' U.S. prices. In a standard, small general equilibrium model (two countries, two goods, two factors), this price evidence is wholly ambiguous-it is even consistent with the view that Trump's tarif was optimal, increasing U.S. welfare. Even sophisctiated papers are simi larly ambiguous. All fail because they neglect how government uses tarif revenue. Relying on fallacious arguments makes the free-trade position look weak and encourages protectionism.
Źródło:: Economics and Business Review; 2023, 9, 1; 5-25
2392-1641
Pojawia się w:: Economics and Business Review
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja