Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Shusterman, Richard" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Wittgenstein i argumentacja krytyczna
Wittgenstein and Critical Reasoning
Autorzy:
Shusterman, Richard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391497.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
criticism
argumentation
deduction
induction
perception
persuasion
krytyka
argumentacja
dedukcja
indukcja
percepcja
perswazja
Opis:
In his paper Wittgenstein and Critical Reasoning, Richard Shusterman analyses the influence which Wittgensteinian aesthetics has had on contemporary criticism. Concentrating primarily on the second phase of Wittgenstein’s philosophy, Shusterman first demonstrates how the idea of language games and related concepts undermined both essentialist deductive and quasi-scientific inductive models of criticism. In place of these two approaches, Shusterman argues, Wittgensteinian aesthetics offers a new one, which he describes as perceptual-persuasive. In the next step, however, Shusterman observes that Wittgenstein’s followers often commit the very fallacy that Wittgenstein wanted to avoid, by imposing the perceptual persuasive model as the only valid solution for criticism. However, in order to be more in line with Wittgensteinian aesthetics, he argues, we should rather recognise the plurality of possibilities – perceptual-persuasive, deductive or inductive – whose choice depends on the language game currently played.
Źródło:
Przestrzenie Teorii; 2016, 25; 323-345
2450-5765
Pojawia się w:
Przestrzenie Teorii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O końcu i celu doświadczenia estetycznego
The End of Aesthetic Experience
Autorzy:
Shusterman, Richard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/466767.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Opis:
Wojciech Małecki's Polish translation of "The End of Aesthetic Experience" in "Performing Live. Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art" by Richard Shusterman (2000).
Źródło:
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura; 2006, 12
1508-6305
2544-3186
Pojawia się w:
ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spotkanie Gadamera z Derridą – spojrzenie pragmatysty
The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter: A Pragmatist Perspective
Autorzy:
Shusterman, Richard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391498.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
pragmatism
deconstruction
hermeneutics
interpretation
understanding
tradition
Derrida
Gadamer
pragmatyzm
dekonstrukcja
hermeneutyka
interpretacja
rozumienie
tradycja
Opis:
The paper offers a philosophical commentary on the widely discussed 1981 meeting of Derrida and Gadamer at Paris’ Goethe Institute. These two figures “virtually personify, in hermeneutics and deconstruction, the two major and rival ‘schools’ of contemporary continental philosophy associated with the primacy of interpretation.” Adopting a pragmatist perspective, the author discusses their approaches to the issue of interpretation – different and often seen as mutually exclusive. He claims that Derrida and Gadamer in fact have a great deal in common and tries to show that American pragmatism offers a mode of mediation, which allows us to grasp their mutual relations. The author concentrates on the three central issues that emerge from Derrida’s Three Questions to Hans-Georg Gadamer, namely the context of interpretation, consensual continuity versus rupture as the basis or precondition of interpretation, and the nature or possibility of perfect dialogical understanding.
Źródło:
Przestrzenie Teorii; 2016, 25; 311-321
2450-5765
Pojawia się w:
Przestrzenie Teorii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aesthetic Experience at the Borders of Art and Life: The Case of the Man in Gold
Autorzy:
Shusterman, Richard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1833790.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-10-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
Preview: Beyond Baumgarten, the modern field of aesthetics can be seen as an attempt to go beyond the limits of older philosophies of beauty, sublimity, and taste in order to engage a much wider domain of qualities and judgments relating to our pleasurable and meaningful experiences of art and nature. The defining strategy of Hegelian aesthetics (and other aesthetic idealisms) is to take the essence of aesthetics beyond the limits of nonconceptual sensuous experience and to celebrate instead the idea of art as purveying the very highest spiritual truths, albeit in a somewhat sensuous form. The progressive revolutions of artistic forms and styles that define twentieth-century art similarly reflect the same play of dynamic movement in which art and aesthetics advance by challenging and overcoming the determination of established boundaries posited by prior aesthetic theory and practice. The limit-defying trend in aesthetics is evident in the continuing unsuccessful attempts by analytic philosophy to provide a satisfactory definition of art that will perfectly define its extensional limits by either providing its core essence or some formula that will select (for now and for all times) all and only those objects that are genuine works of art. Like other Wittgensteinian and pragmatist-inspired philosophers, I have criticized such compartmentalizing definitions of art (which I call “wrapper theories”), not simply for their failures to provide perfect extensional coverage of all the diverse works of art, but also for these theories’ explanatory poverty in explaining art’s meanings, purposes, functions, and values. One of the problems with traditional definitions of art is that they attempt to define something that is not a natural kind but a historically constructed field composed of rather diverse practices (with their own independent, prior history). These diverse practices employ a variety of different media and issue in a variety of different works of art that appear to belong to different ontological categories.
Źródło:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2021, 5, 2; 103-111
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies