Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Pojmanska, T" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 36
Tytuł:
Renicola lari – Nephromonorcha lari; which species name is correct?
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T.
Niewiadomska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6505.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Opis:
The authors present problems associated with the taxonomic position of the nominal species Renicola lari Timon-David, 1933.
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2015, 61, 2
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Alien species of parasites - some questions concerning terminology
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T.
Niewiadomska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6087.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
alien species
parasite
terminology
Bern Convention
colonization
new habitat
expansion
invasion
prevention
biodiversity
Opis:
The article deals with some terms proposed by the proper institutions of the Council of Europe for describing the phenomenon of invasion of living organisms into new habitats. As these terms were elaborated mainly from the point of view of free leaving creatures, the goal of the authors was to discuss the possibility to adapt them for parasites species. Several propositions of resolving some difficulties have been presented.
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2014, 60, 1
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
New trends in research on parasite host specificity: a survey of current parasitological literature
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T.
Niewiadomska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/5844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
new trend
research
parasite host
specificity index
current literature
parasitological literature
ecological aspect
geographic aspect
host specificity
methodology
terminology
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2012, 58, 2
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Polish collection of parasitic helminths (a report on realization of works concerning fusion of parasitic collections dispersed among different scientific institutions)
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T.
Salamatin, R.
Sulgostowska, T.
Cielecka, D.
Okulewicz, A.
Niewiadomska, K.
Grytner-Ziecina, B.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6241.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
Polish collection
parasitic helminth
parasite collection
scientific institution
museum collection
Polska
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2012, 58, 2
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple strategies of digenean trematodes to complete their life cycles
Autorzy:
Niewiadomska, K.
Pojmanska, T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/841119.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
multiple strategy
digenean trematode
trematode
life cycle
Digenea
life history
manipulation
host behaviour
mimicry
shared phenotype
host to host transfer
trophic transmission
miracidium
Cercaria
terrestrial life cycle
parasite
transmission
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2011, 57, 4
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Multiple strategies of digenean trematodes to complete their life cycles
Autorzy:
Niewiadomska, K.
Pojmanska, T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143248.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
multiple strategy
digenean trematode
trematode
life cycle
Digenea
life history
manipulation
host behaviour
mimicry
shared phenotype
host to host transfer
trophic transmission
miracidium
Cercaria
terrestrial life cycle
parasite
transmission
Opis:
This review aims to summarize our most recent knowledge of the unique mechanisms employed by digeneans to complete their complex life cycles. It is based on validated data from scientific literature and integrates both authors’ personal experiences. Several dynamic strategies utilized by digeneans are discussed in relation to their presence in three environments: aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial. The following topics are discussed: transmission from host to host, which involves transmission of free-living stage of miracidium and cercaria: in active transmission – specific responses to environmental signals showing the presence of potential hosts (several papers of Haas et al.); in passive transmission – trophic transmission and mimicry by way of resemblance to natural food of potential host; and finally, transmission of the parasitic larvae (metacercaria and mesocercaria) – trophic transmission, manipulation of host behavior, and incorporating the intermediate host into food web of definitive host. This review also highlights several types of behavioral manipulations, including compensatory processes (Poulin, Lefèvre et al., Thomas et al.), and other mechanisms of manipulation (de Jong-Bring et. al). State-dependent alternative cycles demonstrating the difference between the terms „life cycle” and „life history” (Poulin, Thomas et al.) and the concept of „shared phenotype” (Lefèvre et al.) are also discussed.
Źródło:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne; 2011, 57, 4; 233-241
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konferencja: V International Workshop on Cestode Systematics and Phylogeny
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/839952.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
Czechy
Budziejowice konferencja
systematyka
parazytologia
konferencje
filogeneza
tasiemce
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2005, 51, 3; 259-265
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Znaczenie teorii cerkomeru Janickiego dla rozwoju badan nad systematyka i ewolucja plazincow
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/837859.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
rozwoj nauki
cerkomer
ewolucja
systematyka
Janicki Konstanty
plazince
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2005, 51, 4; 345-358
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Znaczenie teorii cerkomeru Janickiego dla rozwoju badań nad systematyką i ewolucją płazińców
THE INFLUENCE OF JANICKI CERCOMER THEORY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLATYHELMINTHES SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION INVESTIGATIONS
Autorzy:
Pojmańska, T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2146410.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
rozwoj nauki
cerkomer
ewolucja
systematyka
Janicki Konstanty
plazince
Opis:
The aim of this article was to present the development of ideas about the provenience of parasitic helminths and the phylogenetical relationships within this taxon, since the publication of the "cercomer theory" just to nowadays. The following essentials of the Janicki theory are outlined: main differences between free-living Turbellaria and parasitic platyhelminths (ciliated epithelium in Turbellaria versus unciliated surface in the others); universality of the cercomer presence in Monogenea, Digenea and Cestoda; evolutionary changes in the morphology and function of the cercomer; homology of the caudal appendices of all parasitic helminths; the subsequent evolution of parasitic platyhelminthes from the ancestor to Monogena, Digenea and Cestoda; proposition to establish a new common taxon — Cercomerophora — for these three groups. In this background the evolution of evolutionary ideas is reviewed, divided into two periods: up to the eighties of the XX century, and up to date. The first period can be characterised by the criticism of some points of the "cercomer theory" and formulation of some new hypotheses; these are those of Fuhrmann, Bychovsky, Llewellyn, Price and Malmberg, which: questioned the homology of the cercarial tail with the caudal appendices of Monogenea and Cestoda; rejected Digenea from the common group; established the common taxon — Cercomeromorpha — comprising only Monogenea and Cestoda; opposed the idea of radial evolution of three main groups of Platyhelmithes (Turbellaria, Digenea and Cercomeromorpha) to the idea of subsequent evolution presented by Janicki. The differences between these last hypotheses are also underlined, arising mainly from the different ideas on the importance of particular features as the evolutionary indicators of affinities between and within the taxons. As to the hypotheses dealing with the evolution of particular groups of parasitic platyhelminths formulated at the same period, the publications of Freeman and Jarecka (Cestoda), Heynemann, Ginetsinskaja, Pearson, Cable, Rhode and Gibson (Trematoda), Bychovsky, Lambert and Malmberg (Monogenea) are referred, with special emphasises on the differences in the ideas presented by their authors. In the second period two points are underlined: a dynamic development of new techniques and methods (including molecular investigations) allowing to gather more and more different data on the parasites, and, as a consequence of this phenomenon, a new approach to the evolutionary problems — the birth of numeric and phylogenetic systematics. In this period "the cercomer theory", as well as supporting the group Cercomeromorphae generally are not accepted (exception: Brooks et al.). In contrast, the new taxon — Neodermata has been created by Ehlers. The importance of this publication for further evolutionary study is stressed. In this background some publications are quoted, especially those, presenting the results of searching for monophyletic groups and joining them in hieratic kladograms (Brooks and al., Rohde at al., Littlewood at al., and the others). It is stated, that in spite of some differences in the kladograms builded by various authors (resulting mainly from the set of features being analysed) the monophyly of big taxons of Neodermata (Trematoda, Monogenea, Cestoda) is fairly well documented. In conclusion several points connected with the "cercomer theory" are emphasized. It is now obvious, that the base of this theory — homology of caudal appendices of Janicki’s Cercomerophora has to be rejected, as well as his concept of subsequent evolution of Platyhelminthes. But the base of his joining of Monogena, Trematoda (in his theory — Digenea) and Cestoda in one group (lack of cilia on the body surface), opposite to the Turbellaria (ciliary ephitelium) is maintained by the creation of Neodermata, undoubtedly documented better and in a different way. Also his idea (after many years of rejecting) on close affinity of Digenea and Cestoda seems to have returned due to the study of Lockyer at al., who write: "Among the Neodermata, the Cercomeromorphae (Cestoda + Monogenea) was not supported, whereas Cestoda + Trematoda was supported".
Źródło:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne; 2005, 51, 4; 345-358
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jak zrozumieć gatunek pasożyta w dobie badań molekularnych?
A concept of parasite species in the age of molecular studies.
Autorzy:
Niewiadomska, K.
Pojmańska, T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2146439.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
parazytologia
gatunki
pasozyty
badania molekularne
Opis:
The problem of species recognition in relation to parasite organisms is discussed, based on literature data. Taking into account that over 20 species concepts have hitherto been formulated, the choice of characters, which should define a species differs from author to author. Lately the differences in some gene fragments are regarded as one of most important feature for species differentiation. On this basis some lineages, genotypes or strains have been differentiated within some species, but in most cases the respective authors did not decide to elevate these units to the species level. The present paper focuses on the studies on species representing three genera (Taenia, Echinococcus, Trichinella) as they show, especially the complex studies on the species within the genus Trichinella, how big material is necessary to formulate any proper conclusion and, on the other hand, that the differences in the DNA sequences cannot be the only characters defining species; some other features (morphological, biological, behavioral) should not be considered redundant.
Źródło:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne; 2004, 50, 2; 109-115
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy fauna pasozytnicza Polski jest dobrze poznana?
Autorzy:
Pojmanska, T
Niewiadomska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/841058.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
faunistyka
ptaki
owadozerne
pasozyty zwierzat
drapiezne
parzystokopytne
ssaki
Polska
nieparzystokopytne
plazy
gady
zywiciele
zajeczaki
parazytologia
nietoperze
walenie
gryzonie
Opis:
Is the parasite fauna of Poland weil recognized? The studies of parasite fauna have in Poland a long tradition. Generally the helmint fauna of all groups of vertebrates was more or less examined and as much as over 100 species of Monogenea, almost 400 Digenea, over 250 Cestoda, about 500 Nematoda and 32 Acanthocephala have been recorded. The best recognized are the helminths of fish (especially those of Cyprinidae, Esocidae, Percidae and Salmonidae), frogs examined in various regions of Poland, some birds (especially connected with water environment: Anseriformes, Ciconiformes, Podicipediformes), most of insectivores (although examined only in few localities), European bisons, deers, foxes and wild boars (all under permanent monitoring), as weil as domestic animals (cattle, horses, sheeps) and pets. Such groups like some amphibians, reptiles, bats, carniwores, some birds (especially Passeriformes, Charadriiformes, falcons and eagles) need further exploration, as some host species were not the subject of parasitological investigation. In some cases it will be rather difficult goal, as most of these animals are under strict preservation, and only dead (naturally or accidentally) specimens can be autopsied.
Źródło:
Annals of Parasitology; 2003, 49, 4; 333-345
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Parasitology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy fauna pasożytnicza Polski jest dobrze poznana?
Autorzy:
Pojmańska, T.
Niewiadomska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2147661.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Parazytologiczne
Tematy:
faunistyka
ptaki
owadozerne
pasozyty zwierzat
drapiezne
parzystokopytne
ssaki
Polska
nieparzystokopytne
plazy
gady
zywiciele
zajeczaki
parazytologia
nietoperze
walenie
gryzonie
Opis:
Is the parasite fauna of Poland weil recognized? The studies of parasite fauna have in Poland a long tradition. Generally the helmint fauna of all groups of vertebrates was more or less examined and as much as over 100 species of Monogenea, almost 400 Digenea, over 250 Cestoda, about 500 Nematoda and 32 Acanthocephala have been recorded. The best recognized are the helminths of fish (especially those of Cyprinidae, Esocidae, Percidae and Salmonidae), frogs examined in various regions of Poland, some birds (especially connected with water environment: Anseriformes, Ciconiformes, Podicipediformes), most of insectivores (although examined only in few localities), European bisons, deers, foxes and wild boars (all under permanent monitoring), as weil as domestic animals (cattle, horses, sheeps) and pets. Such groups like some amphibians, reptiles, bats, carniwores, some birds (especially Passeriformes, Charadriiformes, falcons and eagles) need further exploration, as some host species were not the subject of parasitological investigation. In some cases it will be rather difficult goal, as most of these animals are under strict preservation, and only dead (naturally or accidentally) specimens can be autopsied.
Źródło:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne; 2003, 49, 4; 333-345
0043-5163
Pojawia się w:
Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 36

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies