Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Podstawski, Michał" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    "Ściana jest niema, a drzwi przemawiają" (G. Simmel). Kilka uwag o topografii spotkania
    "The Wall is silent and the doors speak" (G. Simmel). Several remarks about the topography of the meeting
    Autorzy:
    Podstawski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/941606.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    philosophy of the meeting
    philosophy of the dialogue
    Derrida
    deconstruction
    phenomenology
    Opis:
    "Meeting" is one of these concepts, which in the most recent philosophy have received significant meaning. In some interpretations it is the instruction to "meet" – so to establish the unmediated relation with the Other – is the factor, which allows to break free from the pressure of the "Hegelian bite" and problems resulting from it. It turns out that the ennoblement of the subject made by the German idealism in fact limited the reality only to its exteriorisation – and thus put into question the possibility of reaching the reality, including the reality of other people. "Meeting" would be the bridge thanks to which this reach (again) becomes possible. However, it seems that speaking about the "meeting" we still too rarely think about the prerequisites, which must be met, so that the subject can open itself to accept the Other. This is an important analysis because, first of all, it allows to judge whether the whole project of the postphenomenological philosophy can be defended in the practical perspective, and secondly – it is a key indicator that allows the further development of the human thought. It turns out that for the elementary human experience the "meeting" is not an excess, and the opening to what is unusual is the natural element of the existence of human cultures. And this instruction should be used in today's philosophizing – in order to overcome the basic aporias of modernity with its edge.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica; 2013, 26
    0208-6107
    2353-9631
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    ‘Wybaczanie’ w filozofii spotkania Jacques’a Derridy, czyli o etyce jako funkcji języka
    ‘Forgiving’ in Derrida’s philosophy of meeting, or on ethics as an function of language
    Autorzy:
    Podstawski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/18673071.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Opis:
    Ethics, which became a central point of the late works by Jacques Derrida, is a peculiar project within works of this scholar. Even an observation that the ‘deconstruction’ was solely an initial epistemological procedure, whose aim was to force its way through tissue of appropriating discourses, in order to make it available for ethics to exist from the beginning, once again, does not exhaust the risen issue. Ethics, as interpreted by Derrida, is based on the categories of the philosophy of meeting – first of all in the Levinas’ version – but is in no way exhausted within its classical interpretations. A reason for such a situation is a high status given to a language by the author of the ‘Margins of Philosophy’. The philosophy of meeting, according to him, takes place in words, gestures and events, which dialoging is an introduction to construction of a fundamental ethic situation, i.e. the moment of meeting. One of such  keywords is ‘forgiving’ – that becomes not only a signal of openness to accept the other, but also a communicative slogan, creating a horizon of ethics. It turns out that an ability of ‘forgiving’ is a basic condition. Through meeting it we can give each other a hand, and overcome the surrounding walls and entanglements. This is the feature of ‘forgiving’, where Derrida sees a basic chance for survival of the most precious values of our culture.
    Źródło:
    Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris; 2013, 22, 3; 1-10
    1689-4286
    Pojawia się w:
    Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uciekinierzy z Aten. Rosyjska filozofia XIX i XX wieku wobec 'niepoznawalności Boga'
    Refugees From Athens. Russian philosophy of the turn of the XIX and XX century and the 'unknowableness of God'
    Autorzy:
    Podstawski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/945695.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    rosyjska filozofia XIX i XX w.
    „srebrny wiek”
    ruch chłystowski
    Opis:
    When we analyze the turn of the XXth and XIXth century in the Russian philosophy we often use the term „silver age” to emphasize its rapid development during that time. It is well know that the Orthodox Church with its principles remained independent from philosophy for a long time. It is only during the „silver age” that the efforts were taken to properly recognise the type of relations combining faith and science. However, it turned out that, regarding this matter, the experience of the East cannot be translated into the language of Western philosophy. This is why the greatest thinkers of this period, such as Pavel Florensky and Vladimir Solovyov, had to undertake a tremendous task of constructing the intellectual foundations for their spiritual tradition. When it comes to summarizing this era, Lev Shestov wrote that in the European philosophy one can distinguish between two currents of thoughts. The first is the rational one that originates from Athens and is characteristic to the philosophy of the West. The second one comes from Jerusalem and is based on the Revelation, specifically – the miracles. It is characteristic to the thinking of the East. The question is whether Shestov properly grasped the core of the problem, and whether it is the Orthodox Church that is in fact closer to the Ancient Greek understanding of the philosophical reality.
    Źródło:
    Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris; 2013, 20
    1689-4286
    Pojawia się w:
    Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies