Autor: Pietras SJ, Henryk - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Baptysteria rzymskie w Liber Pontificalis. Część II: Baptysterium w Bazylice św. Piotra
Roman baptisteries in Liber Pontificalis. Part II: The baptistery in St. Peter’s Basilica
Autorzy:: Pietras SJ, Henryk
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/595663.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Opolski. Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego
Opis:: This article about the baptistery in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome is — to a certain extent — the continuation of the paper written by Monika Ożog about the Lateran baptistery. The source upon which this text is based is also Liber Pontificalis. We do not have the data about the founder of the analysed baptistery. Two inscriptions attributed to Damasus and known from the Mediaeval copies refer to it. What is also problematic is its exact localisation. There are some hypotheses holding that it was located behind the basilica complex as well as those, according to which it was situated inside the basilica, in its northern transept.
Źródło:: Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego; 2014, 34; 313-320
0137-3420
Pojawia się w:: Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: POCZĄTEK „KONTROWERSJI ARIAŃSKIEJ”
Autorzy:: Pietras SJ, Henryk
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640786.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2006
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Opis:: THE BEGINNING OF THE „ARIAN CONTROVERSY”We know today that the so called „Arian controversy” began with a certain theological dispute; the dispute was initiated by bishop Alexander and presbyter Arius. The argument concerned the interpretation of a certain fragment of the Holy Scripture. It is not known when exactly the dispute took place, but in all likelihood, it occurred at the beginning of the twenties of the IV century. In the article, the author analyzes the three texts which are fundamental to the above controversy, namely: Arius’ Letter to Alexander in which he presents his own credo, Alexander’s Letter to All the Bishops, from which we learn about the condemnation of Arius and his followers by the synod which had gathered specially for this end in Alexandria, and finally Arius’ Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia. In his letter, Arius appeals to his followers for support in his dispute with the bishop. In the article, the author draws our attention to the fact that the above controversy could not have been the real reason for calling the Nicene Council as Emperor Constantine tended to ignore its significance which is best borne out by his letter to Alexander and Arius sent in the autumn of A.D. 324 and delivered in person by bishop Hosius of Cordoba. When the emperor had learnt about the fiasco of Hosius’ mission, it was already too late to invite the bishops to Nice for July 325, as they would not have received the invitation in time to be able to travel to Nice and attend the Council.
Źródło:: Studia Religiologica; 2006, 39
0137-2432
2084-4077
Pojawia się w:: Studia Religiologica
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Pietras SJ, Henryk" wg kryterium: Autor

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język