Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Limańska, Aleksandra" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Pozycja pokrzywdzonego w świetle nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania karnego z 19 lipca 2019 r.
    The Position of the Injured Party in the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure as Amended on 19 July 2019
    Autorzy:
    Limańska, Aleksandra
    Pustuła, Marta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782395.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    injured party
    criminal process
    motion to prosecute
    questioning
    minor
    subsidiary complaint
    auxiliary prosecution counsel
    order for payment
    injunctive judgment
    amendment
    Opis:
    This article addresses some amendments of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure in so far as they affect the position of the injured party. The Act of 19 July 2019 amending the Polish Code of Criminal Code provides for a number of changes relating to that participant of criminal proceedings. The paper deals with the extension of the time limit within which it is possible to withdraw a motion to prosecute, changes to the so-called subsidiary complaint, setting a deadline for questioning the injured under Articles 185a and 185c of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure or serving the injured party with an order to pay (injunctive judgment) alongside the instructions on how to appeal against the judgment and simultaneously file a statement that the injured will act in the capacity of a subsidiary prosecution counsel. The analysis is aimed to establish whether those changes have led to the strengthening or weakening of the position of the injured party.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2020, 30, 4; 127-148
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Brak obowiązku stawiennictwa oskarżyciela publicznego na rozprawie w kontekście podstawowych zasad procesu karnego
    The lack of the obligation of the public prosecutor to attend a trial in the context of the basic principles of a criminal lawsuit
    Autorzy:
    Limańska, Aleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035707.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-05-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Public prosecutor
    lawsuit-related principles
    trial
    judicial procedure
    contradictoriness
    investigation
    Opis:
    The principle of legalism places upon the public prosecutor the obligation o pressing charges to a court of law and then to support this claim in the course of the lawsuit. It seems obvious that in order to execute this duty in an appropriate manner, the public prosecutor should attend the trial and actively participate in it. However, in regulation Art. 46 §2 k.p.k., which was introduced by way of an amendment issued on 11 March 2016, the legislator stipulated a regulation which permits the public prosecutor not to appear during the trial, if the preliminary legal proceedings concluded in the form of investigation. Obviously, the task of this regulation is to accelerate the proceedings in cases of lesser calibre, which are cases in which an investigation is conducted. However, it is necessary to consider the aforementioned regulation in the context of the basic principles of a criminal lawsuit and the analysis of the consequences of such regulations. Therefore, in the first instance one made reference to the most important regulations contained in the basis acts of international law, i.e. the European Convention of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which emphasise above all the significance of independence and impartiality, as well as the principle of a quick and efficient operation of the procedure. It was also necessary to refer the substantive regulation to the principle of the contradictoriness of the criminal lawsuit, which stipulates inter alia the separation of lawsuit-related roles and the passivity of the court in reference to the initiative of the parties who argue their cases.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2018, 28, 2; 125-136
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies