Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Lewandowski-Malec, Paweł" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Mandat poselski na gruncie ustawodawstwa Sejmu Czteroletniego
    Autorzy:
    Lewandowski-Malec, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/923548.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    parlament
    seat in parlament
    four-years-parlament
    representation
    free seat in parlament
    imperative seat in parlament
    Opis:
    The paper discusses the nature and the specificacy of the Polish deputy’s mandate as viewed in the light of the Polish Four-Year Seym’s legislation, and above all in the light of the statute on "Sejmiks" and also in the light of Constitution of 3 May 1791. The paper tries to answer whether – on the basis of the aforementioned provisions – the discussed mandate was open or imperative. In order to arrive at the correct answer the author outlines the scope of the analyzed problem. Thus he studies the relationship between the deputies and their electorate, the circles of the former and the latter, the methods applied for the election of deputies and the question of the possible instruction imposed on the deputies and the binding force of the instruction. He also discusses the reporting to which the deputies were obligated upon returning from the session. In the area of these questions the author tries to confront the regulations contained in the statute on the Sejmiks and those provided by the Constitution of 3 May. On the basis of the analysis made by him the author arrives at the conclusion that – in the light of the Four-Year Seym legisilation – the mandate was open. This meant that the concept of imperative mandate was rejected. The paper tries to sum up what previously was established in the research on the problem. In addition the author explores the extent to which the idea of legal accountability of deputies to their electorate might have affected the nature of the deputy’s mandate.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 2012, 5, 2
    2084-4115
    2084-4131
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kompetencje organów Sejmu i Senatu związane z ochroną powagi izb
    The competences of the organs of the Sejm and the Senate related to the protection of the dignity of the chambers
    Autorzy:
    Malec-Lewandowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143117.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    parliament
    competence
    protection
    dignity
    Opis:
    The article concerns the competences of the organs of the Sejm and the Senate related to protecting the dignity of the chambers. These competences were established as a part of a reaction to the course of the so-called “Sejm crisis”, consisting in the occupation, initially, of the Sejm’s rostrum and then the Sejm’s Meeting Room by MPs from opposition parties at the turn of 2016 and 2017. Using the dogmatic method, the publication aims to define the essence of competences, their applicable and planned regulations, and to evaluate these regulations and formulate possible de lege ferenda postulates on the basis of this evaluation. The main thesis of the article includes a negative evaluation of the applicable regulations of competences due to their contradiction with certain provisions of the Constitution, in particular with Art. 2 of the Constitution, i.e. within the framework of the principle of a democratic state ruled by law established in this provision and the resulting, inter alia, principles of decent legislation, including the principle of the specificity of law, as well as Art. 54 sec. 1 in connection with Art. 31 sec. 3 of the Constitution (i.e. the freedom of expression), Art. 11 of the Constitution (i.e. the freedom to establish and freedom of activity of political parties within the scope of the purpose of their activity, which is to influence on state policy by democratic methods) and Art. 32 of the Constitution (i.e. the principle of equality of political parties resulting from the principle of political pluralism). In this context, the most important is the risk of the so-called “chilling effect”. The publication also includes a positive evaluation of a few of the planned regulations of competences, which may allow for the elimination of the above contradictions or ensure a more complete implementation of the objective of competences, including guaranteeing the dignity of the chambers.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2021, 4 (36); 33-58
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wykluczenie posła z posiedzenia Sejmu (art. 175 ust. 5 Regulaminu Sejmu) w świetle prac Komisji Regulaminowej i Spraw Poselskich
    Exclusion of a Member of Parliament from the Sejm sitting (Article 175 clause 5 of the Sejm rules) in the light of the work of the Rules and Deputies’ Affairs Committee
    Autorzy:
    Malec-Lewandowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/924064.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-04
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    exclusion
    Marshal
    deputy
    parliament
    committee
    wykluczenie
    Marszałek
    poseł
    parlament
    komisja
    Opis:
    This article provides an assessment of the correctness of the opinions formulated by the Rules and Deputies’ Aff airs Committee about deputies’ appeals to the Presidium of the Sejm against the Marshal of the Sejm’s decisions on their exclusions from the sittings of the Sejm. The assessment has been formulated on the basis of an analysis of the legitimacy of the arguments raised in the course of fi ve sittings of the Committee. These arguments are related to problems associated with the classifi cation of certain deputies’ behaviours as (i) ‘preventing conducting of the sitting’, which is the premise of deputies’ exclusion from the sitting of the Sejm, (ii) the correctness of application by the Marshal of the Sejm of the procedure leading to such exclusion and (iii) its consequences. The assessment of the correctness of the abovementioned arguments and its presentation is preceded by the description of the event occurred during the sitting of the Sejm and a reference to the content of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. The fi rst conclusion drawn based on the analysis of the above is that the opinions issued by the Committee are correct. Another assessment concerned the legitimacy of the postulate formulated during one of the sittings of the Committee to change the body competent to recognise deputies’ appeals against the Marshal of the Sejm’s decisions on their exclusions from the sittings of the Sejm and move such competence should from the Sejm’s Presidium to the Sejm itself. The assessment of the legitimacy of that postulate has been based on the assessment of the legitimacy of the argument for such a solution, raised during the sitting in question of the Committee. The other conclusion drawn is that this postulate was legitimate.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2016, 4 (16); 143-169
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prawdziwość zarzutu na gruncie karnoprawnej regulacji przestępstwa zniesławienia
    The Truth in Legal Regulation of Defamation Crime
    Autorzy:
    Malec-Lewandowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518657.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
    Opis:
    The article relates to a concept of truth in the light of the legal regulation of defamation crime (Articles 212 and 213 of the Criminal Code). The author describes two issues: firstly the problem of distinguishing by Polish courts facts from opinions from the point of view of the concept of truth in defamation trials, and secondly the problem of criminal liability for true statements on the basis of the defamation crime regulation. In his deliberations the author uses judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, decisions of Polish courts as well as main thesis of the criminal law doctrine and some opinions present in the public debate about the legitimacy of defamation crime. The author comes to the following conclusions. As far as the first issue is concerned, the author takes the view that Polish courts, in defamation trials, do not distinguish facts (which truthfulness can be proved) from opinions (which truthfulness cannot be proved) and as for all statements they require to prove their truthfulness. As far as the second issue is concerned, the author takes the view that on the basis of the defamation crime regulation, it is possible to make someone criminally liable for true statements, which is harmful and should be changed.
    Źródło:
    Forum Prawnicze; 2012, 5 (13); 36-51
    2081-688X
    Pojawia się w:
    Forum Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 6 października 2015 r. (sygn. akt SK 54/13)
    Comment on the Judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 6 October 2015, SK 54/13
    Autorzy:
    Malec-Lewandowski, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518805.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
    Opis:
    The case note is on the judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 6 October 2015, SK 54/13, in which that Court ruled that art. 196 of the Criminal Code, to the extent it penalizes insulting the religious feelings of others through public insulting of religious objects of worship, is consistent with art. 54.1 in conjunction with art. 31.3 of the Constitution, which enshrine freedom of expression. The note attempts a wide analysis of the problem of compatibility of imprisonment for offending religious feelings with freedom of expression in terms of proportionality in the strict sense. That problem has been definitively settled by the Constitutional Court in that judgment, however with limited reasoning. The author argues for the incompatibility (in the strict sense), and therefore unconstitutionality of imprisonment for offending religious feelings. That position is confirmed particularly in well-established case law of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to standards of freedom of expression (art. 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) in view of the criminalization and especially punishment through imprisonment for insulting and defamation, which can appropriately be applied to the crime referred to in art. 196 of the Criminal Code.
    Źródło:
    Forum Prawnicze; 2016, 3 (35); 75-84
    2081-688X
    Pojawia się w:
    Forum Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies