Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Koj, Leon" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Nauka i wartości
    Science and Values
    Autorzy:
    Koj, Leon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/968243.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1994-06-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    In the article two questions are considered: does science study values, and is science valuable, or maby harmful. The anwser for the first question is positive: science must formulate normative statements, especially in methodology. The second problem is more complicated. The author points out that the anwser depends on the previously accepted hierarchy of values.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1994, 2, 2; 15-26
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Systemy i ich funkcjonowanie
    Systems and Their Functioning
    Autorzy:
    Koj, Leon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/968285.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1994-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1994, 2, 3-4; 19-35
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Teorie naukowe jako systemy dynamiczne
    Scientific Theories as Dynamic Systems
    Autorzy:
    Koj, Leon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965079.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1997-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    In the first part of the paper three concepts of system are introduced. The first is the following ordered set: S = , where S is a given system, C is the set of its parts, R1, ..., Rk are relations between these parts, Rk+1, ..., Rk+m are relations between parts of S and its environment U. This concept does not take into account the fact that real things change. Thus it is the concept of abstract system. The second concept takes changes of systems for granted. At every period i the system is slightly different. At the periods i Si is a set of sections of a real system: Si = , where {C}i is the set of sets of parts of S, {R1, ..., Rk}i and {Rk+1, ..., Rk+m}i are sets of relations. Different sections of a system are similar; the same holds for the relations and the subsequent environments. To describe the evolution of systems these similarity-relations have to be considered. Let the relations between the C's, the parts of the system, be symbolized as X, the similarity relations between the {R1, ..., Rk} pointed to by T, and the relations between the other sets of relations marked by Z. Let W be asigned to the relations between the succesive environments. SI is a system which lasts during the period I and changes in this time. The period I is in fact identical with i. The symbol SI was introduced to point to the relations S, T, Z, W, which were absent in the definition of Si. Now we have the following third concept of system: SI = . In the second part of the paper the relation X is analysed, when C consists of statements and S is a theory. The relation is to the effect that statements of later stages of a theory refer to n-tuples which exhibit more arguments that the relation spoken of at earlier stages of the theory.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1997, 5, 3; 29-43
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O metodę w filozofii
    On the Philosophical Method
    Autorzy:
    Koj, Leon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965472.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1999-03-01
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Opis:
    The paper contains introductory remarks and is conceived of as a part of a larger project. First of all decisions are made as to the choice of an adequate concept of philosophy (which does not exclude other concepts of this field of interest). Among others philosophy as a very general domain of considerations is contrasted to logic and mathematics. Methods for philosophy are described in the way the natural sciences do it: methods are schemes for repeatable actions which in similar circumstances result in similar or identical outcomes irrespective of the philosopher's (the performer's) views. Philosophers very often neglect repeatability and similarity of effects. Kazimierz Twardowski's method of the elimination of contradiction (cf. his paper „On the so-called relative truths”) is put forward as a paragon of further important methods of philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Filozofia Nauki; 1999, 7, 1-2; 7-30
    1230-6894
    2657-5868
    Pojawia się w:
    Filozofia Nauki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Sposoby uprawiania filozofii
    The ways of practising philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Koj, Leon
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015976.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2002
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    metodologia
    metafilozofia
    metoda
    methodology
    meta-philosophy
    method
    Opis:
    In the article the question is considered if in the domain of philosophy it is possible to use methods that meet the postulates of repeatability and inter-subjective accessibility. The author analyses the very idea of method, as it functions outside philosophical disciplines and he states that in the very domain of philosophy it is difficult to separate subjective theses put forward by philosophers from the very methods of philosophising. He is rather in favour of the conclusion that in philosophy formulating repeatable and inter-subjectively accessible methods is very difficult, but at the same time he stresses that such a possibility should not be given up.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 1; 345-359
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies