Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Kościesza, Iwona" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Czy polski historyk przełomu XIX i XX wieku mógł być pozytywistą? O przypadku Władysława Smoleńskiego
Could a Polish Historian of the Turn of the 19th and 20th Centuries be a Positivist? On the Case of Władysław Smoleński
Autorzy:
Kościesza, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1934223.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
pozytywizm polski
warszawska szkoła historyczna
Władysław Smoleński
wzniosłość
historiografia polska przełomu XIX/XX wieku
Polish positivism
Warsaw historical school
sublimity
Polish historiography at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries
Opis:
Władysław Smoleński was one of the leading representatives of the Warsaw historical school. When one talks about the positivist Warsaw school, he usually means its affiliation with the current of Warsaw positivism, and not its relation to the philosophy of positivism, as Polish positivism was a trend with a much more ideological, and not philosophical basis. Still, academics tried to practically implement the postulates of the positivist methodology. For the intelligentsia of that time a critical attitude towards the Catholic Church was typical. The Church's significance in the history of Poland as well as the role of religion in the reality of those times were criticized. Writing his works on the Enlightenment he became part of the criticism directed towards the Catholic world view, but despite the clear anticlericalism, under the influence of his attitude towards Russia he was able to defend the Church. His brochure, in which he drew the reader's attention to the tragic fate of the Uniates, is a proof of this. The category of sublimity is useful in interpreting the historiography of that period, as it allows indicating the constant tension between the views of the past declared by the historians on the one hand, and what is hidden in various layers of their narrative on the other.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2010, 58, 2; 225-244
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czyn jako wyznacznik wielkości bohatera. O neoromantycznych ideałach polskiej historiografii
The Deed as a Determinant of the Hero’s Greatness. On the Neo-romantic Ideals of Polish Historiography
Autorzy:
Kościesza, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1945164.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
czyn
bohater narodowy
historiografia polska przełomu XIX/XX wieku
Szymon Askenazy
szkoła Szymona Askenazego
powstania narodowe
deed
national hero
Polish historiography of the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Szymon Askenazy’s school
national uprisings
Opis:
The writing of Szymon Askenazy and his disciples represents the independent line In historiography. Their works were written in the period when political life and thinking were intensive in the Polish territories. They had considerably affected the historical and political awareness of Polish society. The hero’s image created in the historians’ writings drew on to the romantic struggles for freedom. This image of the hero had a didactic dimension in accordance with the principle that “history is the teacher of life.” The deed was one of the basic elements and made up his image. He was often a sufficient factor that decided about the greatness of a hero. Despite the fact that historians glorified above all an armed deed, actions taken by the hero in the area of politics and education were also important. The main place in Askenazy’s school is occupied by the hero who with a weapon in his hands struggles for Poland’s independence, i.e., Prince Józef Poniatowski or Jan Henryk Dąbrowski. The moral authority who embodies the “national virtue” is Tadeusz Kościuszko. Another place is occupied by such persons as Prince Adam Czartoryski or Ksawery Drucki Lubecki. Following these heroes, historians show various forms of the service to our homeland. Their actions were made concrete by their deed. Its basic function in narration was to establish images about the hero. Such images functioned in the historical awareness of society.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2008, 56, 2; 209-227
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sublime (w) historii. Wzniosłość jako narzędzie i przedmiot badań
Sublime (in) history. The sublime as a tool and object of research
Autorzy:
Kościesza, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/478474.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Opis:
The relation between a historian and the past can be described in terms of nostalgia and searching, therefore the Sublime in history is connected with the longing for a presence that evokes fascination and fear at the same time. When analysing historical writing, one ought to take into account both the linguistic aspects of the sublime and the related philosophical and aesthetical reflection. As a result, this category, referred to as one of the so-called fundamental myths (after Jerzy Topolski), might lead to using this reflection on the sublime to better understand historiography as a record of experiencing the world. As an analysis category, it allows for showing that historians can experience the same events in various ways, and the differences are visible at the level of creating images of the past. The Sublime category is a form of the initial referencing of humans to the past, but it also one of the most important elements of criticism of traditional history. The ruminations on the sublime are connected with the interest of postmodernists in the style and rhetoric of historical narration that influences emotions. The rhetoric of the sublime is an immanent element of persuasion. It is mainly about convincing and persuading emotions. As a result, it is a significant element of historical narration. Transferring the sublime from the aesthetics dimension (which we perceive trans-historically) to the area of historiography resulted from, among others, noticing the rhetoric dimension of a historical work understood as a construction in which the dimension of human moral experiences is reflected. Rhetoric understood as a method of text construction that is at the same time a method of reality construction, plays an important role in historical writing. It formulates the bases in relation to history, it makes us aware that the historical perspective is not fixed. As a result, the sublime, transferred to the dimension of historiography, becomes an issue of historical optics. The construction of the works of historians can be analysed in terms of the construction of the sublime both in particular scenes and in the entire work. In historiography, especially in programme and scientistic historiography, the sublime usually is not an end in itself, but a means of reaching a goal. It is connected with
Źródło:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2012, 2(20); 115-137
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies