Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Klyta, Wojciech" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Prawo właściwe dla skutków przelewu wierzytelności w stosunku do osób trzecich. Uwagi z perspektywy międzynarodowego prawa upadłościowego
The law applicable concerning the third-party effects of the assignment of a claim. Few observations from the perspective of insolvency law
Autorzy:
Klyta, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
assignment
Rome Regulation
Insolvency Regulation
property
center of main interest of the debtor
rights in rem
detrimental acts
location of the claim
Opis:
The claims are rights in personam but the assignment of claims has a hybrid nature. Abolishing the “nomina ossibus inhaerent” rule has increased commercial significance of the assignment of claims. However, the contemporary legal situationleaves parties with great legal uncertainty, as to the question under which circumstances does the cross - borders assignment is valid. A recent judgment of the CJEU of 9 October 2019 (C - 548/18) in case BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg has augmented this uncertainty. The Luxemburg Court ruled that: “Article 14 of the Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 (‘Rome I’) must be interpreted as not designating, directly or by analogy, the applicable law concerning the third-party effects of the assignment of a claim in the event of multiple assignments of the claim by the same creditor to successive assignees”. In this situation, one would highly welcome an attempt to establish a new set of conflict of laws rules relating to the law applicable to third - parties effects of the assignment of claims. This attempt has recently been made by the European Commission in its Report “on the question of the effectiveness of an assignment or subrogation of a claim against third parties and the priority of the assigned or subrogated claim over the right of another person”, dated 29 September 2016. In the present article, the author reviews the most important propositions formulated in the conflicts’ doctrine through the “lens” of the international insolvency law. Multiply provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast) - despite many judgments of the CJEU in this area - also lack certainty. Insolvency is a foreseeable risk, but without clear rules concerning the third parties’ effects of the assignment of claims, it may become unenforceable for the creditors of the assignor.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 24; 47-75
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kolejny przejaw fenomenu kodyfikacji prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego w Ameryce Łacińskiej – urugwajska Ustawa Ogólna o Prawie Prywatnym Międzynarodowym n°19.920 z 17 listopada 2020 r. Zagadnienia wybrane
Further Manifestation of the Phenomenon of Codifying PIL in Latin America — Uruguayan General Act on PIL n° 19.920 of the 17th of November 2020. Selected Problems
Autorzy:
Twardoch, Paulina
Klyta, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20754037.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
new Uruguayan act on private international law
matrimonial property relations
succession
legal entities
comparative perspective
Opis:
The article deals with the new Uruguayan act on private international law, i.e. the General Act on Private International Law n° 19.920 of the 17th of November 2020. The authors aim to analyse and assess its solutions, especially in the areas of matrimonial property relations, succession and legal entities, taking into account historical and comparative perspectives. The study presents the origins of the Act, its structure, main characteristics and ideas, and essential novelties introduced thereby. As for matrimonial property relations and succession, the authors focus on the question of the applicable law, while as for legal entities, also on the notion of the recognition of their legal personality. Within the comparative remarks, new Uruguayan provisions are explained against the background of Argentinian, Brazilian, Chilean, Colombian, Cuban, Dominican, Panamanian, Paraguayan, Peruvian and Venezuelan rules, as well as international multilateral conventions and European Union regulations.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 79-113
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies