Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Clustering durum wheat genotypes in multi-environmental trials of rain-fed conditions
Autorzy:
Sabaghnia, Naser
Mohammadi, Mohtasham
Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2199707.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-08-20
Wydawca:
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin
Tematy:
GE interaction
genotypes grouping
Triticum durum
seed yield
Opis:
For durum wheat genotypes evaluation in multi-environmental trials (MET), measured seed yield is the combined result of effects of genotype (G), environment (E) and genotype by environment GE interaction. The GE interaction structure  can be identified if the data are stratified into homogeneous  subsets through cluster analysis. A combined analysis to assess GE interactions of 20 durum wheat genotypes across 14 environments was undertaken. The combined analysis of variance for E, G and GE interaction was significant, suggesting differential responses of the genotypes in various environments. Four cluster methods, which differ in the dissimilarity indices depending on the regression model or ANOVA model, were used. According to dendograms of regression methods there were 10 different genotypic groups based on G (intercept) and GE (line slope) sources and 3 different genotypic groups based on GE (line slope) sources. Also, the dendograms of ANOVA methods indicated 11 different genotypic groups based on G and GE sources and 13 different genotypic groups based on GE sources. The above mentioned genotypic groups were determined via F-test as an empirical stopping criterion for clustering. Due to the high values of regression’s determination coefficient which ranged from 92.6 to 99.4, using of the linear regression-based clustering was more practical. The genotypes clustering based on similarity of linear regression parameters or ANOVA model indicated that there were considerable variations among durum  wheat genotypes and there are different with each other in response to environmental changes. Such an outcome could be regularly applied in the future to clattering durum wheat genotypes and other crops based on regression or ANOVA models in the Middle East and other areas of the world .
Źródło:
Plant Breeding and Seed Science; 2012, 66; 119-138
1429-3862
2083-599X
Pojawia się w:
Plant Breeding and Seed Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction model for exploration of yield stability in some lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes
Autorzy:
Sabaghnia, Naser
Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah
Mohammadi, Mohtasham
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2199720.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-12-20
Wydawca:
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin
Tematy:
adaptation
AMMI stability parameters
genotype by environment (GE) interactions
Opis:
The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis has been indicated to be effective in interpreting complex genotype by environment (GE) interactions of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) multi- environmental trials. Eighteen improved lentil genotypes were grown in 12 semiarid environments in Iran from 2007 to 2009. Complex GE interactions are difficult to understand with ordinary analysis of variance (ANOVA) or conventional stability methods. Combined analysis of variance indicated the genotype by loca- tion interaction (GL) and three way interactions (GYL) were highly significant. FGH1 and FGH2 tests indicated the five  significant  components; FRatio  showed  three significant  components  and F-Gollob detected  seven significant components. The RMSPD (root mean square predicted difference) values of validation procedure indicated seven significant components. Using five components in AMMI  stability parameters (EVFI, SIP- CFI, AMGEFI and DFI) indicated that genotypes G5 and G6 were the most stable genotypes while consider- ing three components in of AMMI stability parameters (EVFII, SIPCFII, AMGEFII and DFII) showed that genotypes G8 and G18 were the most stable genotypes. Also genotypes G2, G5 and G18 were the most stable genotypes according to AMMI stability parameters which calculated from seven components  (EVFIII, SIP- CFIII, AMGEFIII and DFIII). Among these stable genotypes, only genotypes G2 (1365.63 kg × ha-1), G11 (1374.13 kg × ha-1) and G12 (1334.73 kg × ha-1) had high mean yield and so could be regarded as the most favorable genotype. These genotypes are therefore recommended for release as commercial cultivars
Źródło:
Plant Breeding and Seed Science; 2012, 67; 45-60
1429-3862
2083-599X
Pojawia się w:
Plant Breeding and Seed Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies