Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gniazdowski, Andrzej" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    Covalent binding of nitroacrine (ledakrin, C-283) to nucleic acids and proteins
    Wiązanie kowalencyjne nitrakryny (ledakrin, C-283) z kwasami nukleinowymi i białkami
    Autorzy:
    Czyż, Małgorzata
    Studzian, Kazimierz
    Wasilewski, Andrzej
    Poziomska, Aleksandra
    Wilmańska, Dorota
    Gniazdowski, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/944989.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1988
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Opis:
    W obecności związków sulfhydrylowych lek przeciwnowotworowy nitrakryna (Ledakrin, C-283) tworzy nieodwracalne kompleksy z DNA i RNA. Przedstawiono charakterystyką stabilności kompleksów w różnych warunkach.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Biochimica et Biophysica; 1988, 6
    0208-614X
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Biochimica et Biophysica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Fenomenologia jako filozofia mniejsza. Rozważania wokół sporów o metodę Husserla
    Autorzy:
    Płotka, Witold
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Krokos, Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/books/2116621.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri
    Opis:
    Phenomenology as a Minor Philosophy. Considering the Controversies over Husserl’s Method Phenomenology is first and foremost a method, i.e., an analytical device which serves to investigate into what and how is given. One can expect that as any reliable method it contains a set of clear rules how to implement the method to achieve the same result every time — despite particular time, place, and personal preferences of a philosopher. However, this is not the case. Of course, Edmund Husserl did present many examples of how to use his method, e.g., in the context of intentional consciousness, the world, and a community of subjects. He also devoted hundreds of pages of his works, research manuscripts and lecture notes to the problem of how to understand different steps of his method. Nonetheless, this impressive intellectual work seems to be pointless since, paradoxically, he was not clear enough in his descriptions. The main problem lies in the fact that Husserl did reinterpret his method many times to redefine and to establish new understanding of phenomenology itself. In result of these perennial changes and corrections, if one considers his discourse of the method as a whole, it seems to present a series of different, sometimes contradict formulations. Given this plura- lity of formulations and reformulations, it is not surprising that Husserl’s method became a cornerstone of many disputes on how to understand the method. In any case, our understanding of phenomenology as a method is rather a subject of interpretation, than a clear presentation. The book is an attempt to consider phenomenology as a method in the context of selected disputes of its understanding. Questions that I offer to ask are: how to understand a phenomenological method? What motivates a philosopher to use the method? How to understand concrete steps of this method? How, if at all, one can define its limits? What is its subject matter, and its purpose? Is it justified to speak of one, or rather many methods of phenomenology? If many, are different forms united? To put it bluntly, what is the essence of the method? All these questions define a framework for reflections presented in the book. Therefore, one can understand this work as a study rather in “phenomenology of phenomenology”, i.e., a subdiscipline of phenomenology which concerns the question of a method, its subject matter, structure, aims, and presuppositions, than as a systematic analysis of a given phenomenon. It can be also classified as a study in meta-pheno- menology. In any case, its main purpose is a presentation and a discussion of different understandings of Husserl’s method, also with regard to his students and commentators. I do not want to reconstruct in detail different so-called ways which lead to phenomenology. This problem was considered by other scholars. An ultimate aim of the book is a presentation of Husserl’s method as a specific philosophical way of thinking and analysis. I try to show that this method serves to describe systematically of what is given. My main thesis is that this critical though rigorous aspect of Husserl’s method expresses its understanding as a minor philosophy. An elucidation of phenomenology as a “minor philosophy” comes from Nicolas de Warren. For this reason, in the Chapter 1 I refer to his work to present a sketch of how to understand a minor philosophy, namely as a cri- tical method of thinking which is an attempt to think beyond narrow limits of natural thinking by defining new region of analysis, and by suspending any claims which unify a philosophical discourse. Then, I try to compare this understanding of a “minor philosophy” with a “major philosophy”. The latter I bind with the Cartesian motif of phenomenology. In my opinion, the Cartesian reading of Husserl has limited range of application since it reduces philosophy to a kind of foundationalism which aims to justify our knowledge adequately. This reading, however, reduces phenomenology to dogmatic thinking. In contrast, phenomenology as a minor philosophy is an attempt to overcome preliminary naivety. I consider the problem of relation of Husserl’s method to naivety also in the Chapter 2 where I refer to the controversy over the beginning of the method. In addition, I rise the question of motivations of reduction. I show here that reduction is completely unmotivated. But if within natural attitude one cannot find any motives to do reduction, one should understand reduction rather as an expression of philosopher’s free will. Here a philosopher wants to take responsibility for his philosophical thinking. By referring to the analogy between reduction and questioning, I aim at a description of reduction as a methodological step that has to be repeated again and again. In the Chapter 3 I consider the dispute on a unity of the method. It is clear that Husserl refers to two analytical approaches: static and genetic analysis. Inasmuch as the former serves as a tool to describe consciousness’s achievements, the latter can give explanations of the habitual backgro- und of the achievement. Both analytical attitudes are linked, and for this reason one can claim that Husserl understands experience as a complex process of sense-giving, the process which is essentially connected with a given situation that is constituted historically and in the intersubjective context. In the next chapter, given a description of subjectivity embedded in the world, I consider a controversy over the subject matter of Husserl’s method. If the world indeed co-constitutes subjective experience, how, if at all, the world can be a subject of a philosophical reflection? With this regard, I claim that reduction is justified only if it is global, so if it concerns the world as a whole. While considering the issue, I refer to Jan Patočka’s philosophy, and I try to show a liberating function of reduction. After all, reduction enables a phenomenologist to question the world by a problema- tization of the natural attitude. From this point of view, an ultimate subject matter of phenomenology understood as a minor philosophy is givennes of the world itself. In the Chapter 5 I ask the question of consequences of Husserl’s method. Here I refer to the realism-idealism controversy. I focus mainly on the dispute between Roman Ingarden and Husserl. I defend a thesis that phenomenology as a minor philosophy adopts an attitude of the ontological neutrality. To show this, I reinterpret a thought experiment of the annihilation of the world as presented in Ideas I. The main topics of the chapter I attempt to deepen in the next chapter by considering the question of the limits of Husserl’s method. Here I consider the question of a possibility of phenomenology of God, and the question of Husserl’s understanding of metaphysics. I try to show here that there is no necessary link between phenomenology and me- taphysics. If this is the case, there is neither a necessary link between a “mi- nor” and a “major philosophy”. In the Chapter 7 I try to describe a practice of the phenomenological movement which adopts postulates of the minor philosophy. In my opinion, such an application has practical meaning since Husserl’s method requires to take a responsibility for thinking.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Książka
    Tytuł:
    Radykalizm szlachecki. Próba konstrukcji pojęcia
    Gentry radicalism: An attempt at construction of the concept
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/15028152.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czasopisma i Monografie PAN
    Tematy:
    ideologia mieszczańska
    konserwatyzm
    marksizm
    nacjonalizm obywatelski
    nowoczesność
    radykalizm
    republikanizm szlachecki
    stan trzeci
    A. Walicki
    złota wolność
    civic nationalism
    conservatism
    gentry republicanism
    golden liberty
    Marxism
    middle‑class ideology
    modernity
    radicalism
    third estate
    Opis:
    Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie rezultatów badań z zakresu historii idei zarówno europejskiego republikanizmu, jak i radykalizmu politycznego. Punktem wyjścia podjętych analiz jest rekonstrukcja interpretacji historycznego sensu sarmackiego republikanizmu szlacheckiego wypracowanej przez jednego z głównych przedstawicieli Warszawskiej Szkoły Historii Idei – Andrzeja Walickiego. W nawiązaniu do tej interpretacji, argumentacja przedstawiona w artykule kieruje się przeciwko szeroko akceptowanej tezie o jednoznacznym konserwatyzmie tej formy republikanizmu. Drogą argumentacji jest wskazanie na wewnętrzną paradoksalność opisywanego zjawiska intelektualnego, będącego z perspektywy historii idei anty-absolutystyczną, obywatelską ideologią wolności politycznej. Tym, co stanowi w artykule przedmiot krytyki, jest podjęta przez Walickiego próba interpretacji republikanizmu szlacheckiego jako „zalążkowej” postaci nowoczesnego nacjonalizmu obywatelskiego. Argumentem przeciwko tej interpretacji jest stwierdzenie, iż jest ona oparta na normatywnym, a nie tylko opisowym podejściu do idei nowoczesności oraz ukrytej tezie na temat wewnętrznej logiki historii. W myśl głównej tezy artykułu, właściwszą drogą rozwiązania paradoksu związanego z interpretacją sarmackiego republikanizmu szlacheckiego jako „konserwatyzmu wolności” jest wpisanie tego zjawiska w europejską tradycję radykalizmu politycznego. Oryginalność przedstawionych tu badań z zakresu historii radykalizmu polega na wypracowaniu w ich ramach uogólnionego pojęcia „radykalizmu stanowego”. Celem tej konstrukcji pojęciowej jest umożliwienie zidentyfikowania idei samej nowoczesności jako integralnego elementu ideologii radykalizmu trzeciego stanu względnie radykalizmu klasy średniej. Zgodnie z przedstawioną w artykule interpretacją, sarmacki republikanizm szlachecki należałoby z kolei zidentyfikować tak samo, jak francuski „frondyzm” – jako swoisty radykalizm szlachecki, w którym można widzieć pewną sekularną religię polityczną.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria; 2021, 2; 175-194
    1230-1493
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Samofinansowanie przedsiębiorstw a ich przedsiębiorczość
    The Self-financing of Companies and Their Entrepreneurship
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21150670.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1988
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Opis:
    The paper presents an analysis of the state of enforcement of the principle of self-financing of companies (one of the 3 basic principles of the economic reform in Poland) and of its connection with the undertaking initiative of industrial companies. The analysis was made on the basis of materials published in 4 periodicals over the period of 3 years: 1982-1984. By "entrepreneurship is meant an undertaking initiative in the sphere of economy, mainly in the field of production, with the prospect of profit and of non-routine (and thereby risky) character. The state of enforcement of the reform legislation in the field of self-financing is far from satisfactory. Among the most popular practices is the so called "soft financing" expressed mainly in subsidizing and conceding tax (and other) exemptions without objective justification. This has certain negative effects in the sphere of economic behavior of companies, especially with regard to their entrepreneurship. Most generally, instead of undertaking profitable initiatives which could establish their position on the market the companies concentrate their efforts on the "game" with agencies of the Government in view of gaining profits without carrying out their proper activity. Thus make-believe entrepreneurship supersedes real initiative.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica; 1988, 16; 153-168
    0208-600X
    2353-4850
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    State at War: The Phenomenology of the Russian World by Max Scheler and Kurt Stavenhagen
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2197132.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-03-31
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Tematy:
    phenomenology
    two sides theory of the state
    legal positivism
    pure theory of law
    First World War
    Russian imperialism
    Ukrainian affair
    Opis:
    The aim of the paper is to reconstruct the theoretical background and practical meaning of the so called war writings which emerged within the phenomenological movement during the First World War. The author exemplifies it by researching the works of two German representatives of this movement, Max Scheler and Kurt Stavenhagen. He focuses on their application of the phenomenological method to the analysis of Russian national identity, and historical as well as cultural foundations of Russian state. The paper’s main thesis is that the politicization and militarization of phenomenology consisted in both “personalization” and “sociologization” of the phenomenological approach to the problem of the state. While interpreting Scheler’s personalism as an exemplification of the approach to the state as a problem of social ontology, the author reconstructs the theoretical conditions of analyzing the Russian imperial state in terms of the “world.” The focus of the paper is particularly on the phenomenology of, as Scheler put it, Russian collective personality and Russian national consciousness or “soul” as well as on the question of legitimacy of Ukrainian resistance against Russian imperialism.
    Źródło:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2022, 6, 4; 107-122
    2544-302X
    Pojawia się w:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Constitution of the State as a Problem of Phenomenology
    Konstytucja państwa jako problem fenomenologii
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28762698.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    fenomenologia
    ontologia
    filozofia polityczna
    dzieło literackie
    konstytucja państwa
    phenomenology
    ontology
    political philosophy
    literary work of art
    state constitution
    Opis:
    Roman Ingarden the early phenomenologist is regarded as a theorist in the area of aesthetics and ontology rather than being a political philosopher. The aim of the article is to reconstruct a non-existent philosophy of the state, one that could have been developed by Ingarden by taking as a starting point his ontological analysis of the structure of a literary work of art. In his book of 1931 Ingarden defined very broadly the literary work of art, including as its borderline cases among others scientific works, letters, memoirs etc. The thesis of the article is that state constitution may be also interpreted as a borderline case of that work. In reference to Ingarden’s analysis of stage play as the concretisation of a piece of drama, an attempt will be made to reconstruct in terms of his ontology the relation between the state constitution and the state itself. 
    Wczesny fenomenolog Roman Ingarden uważany jest raczej za teoretyka z dziedziny estetyki i ontologii niż filozofa politycznego. Celem artykułu jest rekonstrukcja nieistniejącej filozofii państwa, która mogłaby być rozwijana przez Ingardena, biorąc za punkt wyjścia jego analizy ontologiczne struktury dzieła literackiego. W swojej książce z 1931 roku Ingarden zdefiniował pojęcie dzieła literackiego bardzo szeroko, włączając do niego jako jego przypadki graniczne między innymi dzieła naukowe, listy itp. Tezą artykułu jest twierdzenie, że jako przypadek graniczny dzieła literackiego może być interpretowana również konstytucja państwa. W nawiązaniu do analiz Ingardena dotyczących spektaklu jako konkretyzacji sztuki teatralnej, w artykule podjęta zostanie próba rekonstrukcji w kategoriach jego ontologii relacji pomiędzy konstytucją państwa a samym państwem.  
    Źródło:
    Logos i Ethos; 2022, 60, 2; 237-256
    0867-8308
    Pojawia się w:
    Logos i Ethos
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Politics of Regression: The Idea of the Nation State in the Thought of Ernst Cassirer and Aurel Kolnai
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451509.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-11-08
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
    Tematy:
    political philosophy
    psychoanalysis
    phenomenology
    theory of symbolic forms
    neokantianism
    conservatism
    nation state
    myth
    communism
    Nazism
    Opis:
    The aim of this paper is to compare the approaches of Ernst Cassirer and Aurel Kolnai on the idea of the nation state in its most radical form, which consists of identifying national sovereignty with an unrestricted right of the nation to political, external, and internal self-determination. What the comparison attempted here focuses on, is the criticism on the conditions for the possibility of specific German nationalism, presented by Cassirer in his Myth of the State and by Kolnai in his War Against the West. According to the main thesis of this paper, insofar as both Cassirer and Kolnai recognized the role played in politics by emotions and considered political phenomena as being constituted by not only rational or at least calculable mechanisms, but also affective factors, like beliefs, religion, and myth, they tended to consider nationalism in terms of the politics of “regression,” understood, psychoanalytically, as a reversion of mental life, in some respects, to a former, or less developed, psychological state, characteristic of not only individual mental disorders, but also social psychosis. It will be argued, that Cassirer and Kolnai, not unlike the representatives of the Frankfurt School, considered the contemporary preponderance of mythical thought in political philosophy to be an expression of the dialectic, which consisted in “relapsing” of the Enlightenment into mythology. As a main motive for the comparison of their political philosophies, an assumption will be presented in the paper, that, while taking into account the contemporary tendency to oppose national sovereignty to the sovereignty of international law, the approach to the idea of nation state, as presented by Cassirer and Kolnai, seems to be by no means out of date.
    Źródło:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2018, 2, 3(5); 27-41
    2544-302X
    Pojawia się w:
    Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Twórczość techniczna robotników w przedsiębiorstwie
    Technical Creativeness of Workers on Enterprise
    Autorzy:
    Gniazdowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20688624.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1982
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Opis:
    The article discusses some aspects of participation of workers in creation and improvement of technologies. After presentation of basic terms and concepts connected with the subject (inventiveness, rationalization) in the introductory part of the article, and of statistical data illustrating the employees’ inventive movement in Poland with a special emphasis laid on workers, in the following paragraphs there are analyzed such problems as: 1) Opportunities for creative inventiveness Of workers in conditions of modern technology, and its most important forms; 2) social (noneconomic) functions of inventiveness of workers in the work establishment; 3) some problems of managing technical creativeness of workers.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica; 1982, 4; 61-72
    0208-600X
    2353-4850
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies