Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gensler, Marek" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Antoni Andrzejowy – pierwszy szkotysta
Antonius Andreae – the First Scotist
Autorzy:
Gensler, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013137.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
szkotyzm
filozofia XIV wieku
scholastyka
Scotism
14th century philosophy
Scholasticism
Opis:
Antonius Andreae (ca 1280 – ca 1333) is an important figure in the early development of Scotist school but also an obscure one, known mostly for his professed fidelity to the doctrine of his Parisian teacher, John Duns Scotus. The analysis of his surviving texts reveals (scant) information that allows for establishing a chronology of his most important works: De tribus principiis naturae, the commentary on the Metaphysics, the commentary on the Ars Vetus, and the Abbreviatio operis oxoniensis Scoti, as well as a (partial) reconstruction of his academic life after the return to his native Aragon from Paris. It also shows Antonius as a fierce opponent of Peter Auriol, whose views he finds to be especially repugnant to the teaching of Scotus.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2008, 56, 2; 59-69
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Satyra na leniwych teologów, czyli o pewnych lekcjach z filozofii nieodrobionych od sześciuset lat
Autorzy:
Gensler, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/602167.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Opis:
Satire against Slothful Theologians, or Certain Philosophy Lessons Unlearned for 600 YearsThe participants of world outlook disputes in Poland often agree as regards one thing: the progress made by modernization is simultaneously the progress of Dechristianization, while all other issues vanish in the turmoil produced by the absence of a joint language that would make it possible to comprehend the arguments of the other side. The fault for this state of affairs lies with theologians who do not want to or cannot communicate in the language of nominalism, universally accepted by the exact sciences and a considerable part of philosophy. This is strange considering that in its past theology was capable of rapidly adopting and adroitly applying assorted philosophical languages, including that of nominalism, to whose origin and early development theologians contributed significantly during the Middle Ages. An analysis of relations between mediaeval Christianity and nominalism demonstrates how, after initial failures caused by attachment to Platonic and Aristotelian realism, theologians learned how to benefit from the new language; it also shows what was the reason why nominalism was abandoned and why no attempts were made at regaining it despite the actual or possible profits of its use.
Źródło:
Kwartalnik Historyczny; 2015, 122, 4
0023-5903
Pojawia się w:
Kwartalnik Historyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Habitus or the Possibility of Science of the Contingent
Autorzy:
Gensler, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/600442.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Aristotelianism
history of science
change
Arystotelizm
historia nauki
zmiana
Opis:
Numer został przygotowany przy wsparciu Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (1222/P-DUN/2015).
Most of sciences can be traced back to Aristotle. This is because in opposition to Plato he was able to find a way in which one could give a scientific form to reflection concerning contingent facts of every-day life. Knowledge of the contingent was made possible thanks to the Aristotelian concepts of category and state (habitus). It is the latter concept that was especially important for forming knowledge about change. Aristotle and his medieval followers apply it in analyses of various processes, from local motion to changes in temperaments, to formation of virtues.
Źródło:
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris; 2015, 31 (4)
1689-4286
Pojawia się w:
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szkotyzm w Polsce
Scotism in Poland
Autorzy:
Gensler, Marek
Jung-Palczewska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/941641.pdf
Data publikacji:
1998
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Opis:
During the 15th century the Cracow University had become a major intellectual centre in central Europe. It was especially important in educating lawyers and administrators for the Polish-Lithuanian state as well as the higher clergy: as a result, special stress was put on legal and theological studies. The faculty of Liberal Arts (Philosophy), though less prized, also took part in the intellectual life of the Latin Europe, becoming home to representatives of most philosophical schools of the late Middle Ages. Scotism was one of the last medieval schools to arrive in Cracow. It was introduces there by Michael Twaróg of Biestrzyków, who studied the doctrines of scotism in logic and metaphysics. His main source was not Duns Scotus, however, but his pupils and followers, notably Antonius Andreae, whose "Quaestiones super XII libros Metaphysicae" was a book widely read in Cracow since 1489. Antonius' solutions on the division of sciences, the subject-matter of metaphysics, the concept of being, etc. were accepted also by Nicholas of Michałowice, Martin Kulap of Tarnowiec, John of Głogów, and John of Stobnica. Some of them tried to combine some scotist ideas with philosophical views of other schools. In logic, the solutions associated with scotism started appearing in Cracow s little earlier – in 1470s – but their influence was weaker than in metaphysics. Again, they were mostly coming from the works of Scotus's followers of the 14th and early 15th century. The group of Cracow logicians influences by scotist opinions included John of Głogów, Michael of Wrocław, Nicholas of Giełczewo and Michael od Biestrzyków, who tried to combine the views of Scotus with those of Peter of Spain in his commentary on "Parva naturalia". Philosophy of nature was the discipline in which the influence of scotism was felt last and least. It is found mostly in the works of John of Stobnica – especially in his commentary on "Parvulus philosophiae naturalis" (1498) – and Simon of Leśniewo, John's pupil, who wrote glossa to the commentary.
Źródło:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica; 1998, 12
0208-6107
2353-9631
Pojawia się w:
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies