Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Andrzejuk, Artur" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 75
Tytuł:
Od Redakcji
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075571.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Opis:
Wprowadzenie do nowego Rocznika Tomistycznego - Od Redkacji
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 2, 9; 9
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recenzja: Anna Mandrela, Tomizm Garrigou-Lagrange’a wobec wizji filozoficznej Teilharda de Chardin, Kraków 2018, stron 249.
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075717.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Opis:
Książka Anny Mandreli dotyczy filozofii tomistycznej w wersji Reginalda Garrigou-Lagrange’a, skonfrontowanej z ujęciami Piotra Teilharda de Chardin. Z początku czytelnika może dziwić tak niezwykłe zestawienie całkowicie różnych postaci, jednak po bliższym przyjrzeniu się rozprawie trzeba uznać trafność tego wyboru, gdyż tomizm Garrigou-Lagrande’a był zdecydowane polemiczny. Artykuł jest naukową recenzją książki: Anna Mandrela, Tomizm Garrigou-Lagrange’a wobec wizji filozoficznej Teilharda de Chardin, Kraków 2018, stron 249.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 2, 9; 319-322
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Własności istnieniowe bytu w interpretacji tomizmu konsekwentnego
Existential Properties in the Interpretation of Consequent Thomism
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075810.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
transcendentalia
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
realność (res)
odrębność (aliquid)
jedność (unum)
prawda (verum)
dobro (bonum)
piękno (pulchrum)
transcendentals
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
reality (res)
separateness (aliquid)
unity (unum)
truth (verum)
good (bonum)
beauty (pulchrum)
Opis:
The problem of properties of being as being as such, has been undertaken in metaphysics almost from the beginning of its cultivation. The stages of this story are marked by figures such as Aristotle, Avicenna, Philip Chancellor, Albert the Great, and Thomas Aquinas, followed by Duns Scotus, Peter Olivi, Francis Suárez, Thomas Campanella and others. We are interested in the Thomistic theory of transcendentals, however, as far as Thomas Aquinas did not write a separate treatise on transcendentals, neither did he elaborate the entire concept in his writings, this theory is more the work of Thomists than Aquinas himself. Therefore, it seems reasonable to pay attention to his antagonists (like Duns Scotus) and followers (like Suarez) who have influenced the Thomist vision of the transcendentals. The philosophical theory of transcendentals, since they constitute the most important properties of being, depends directly on the concept of existence itself. Otherwise, it will be formulated in essentialist metaphysics (eg in traditional Thomism), differently in different versions of transcendentalizing Thomism, and still different in existential Thomism, where transcendentals are directly related to the existence of being. The basis of the transcendental accounts, at least in existential Thomism, are the statements of Aquinas himself, scattered throughout his various writings, although the starting point is usually the text from the Quaestione disputate de veritate, where Aquinas most broadly formulates the general concept of existential property. Starting from the Aristotelian definition of being, Thomas writes that certain concepts can be applied to being, but they do not add anything new to the concept, but point only to a modus entis. These modi entis are also referred to as modi essendi (“the mode of existence”) or even aliquid in ente (“something in being”). In the following passages Aquinas says that they are “interchangeable” with being. In this way, he wants to emphasize that we are dealing with various aspects of being as being, and not with additional, more detailed beings, qualifications. They can be certain “measures”, “ways” or “determinants” of being, or existence (modi entis or modi essendi) or “consequences”, “consequences” (consequentiae) in relation to themselves (in se) or in relation to to something else (ad aliud). Interesting are the views on the philosophy of cognition from the perspective of the transcendental property of truth (Tomasz Pawlikowski), on ethics from the perspective of transcendental good (Artur Andrzejuk), and on the aesthetics from the perspective of the property of beauty (Piotr Jaroszyński). Research on reality, separateness and unity seems to be more difficult, because in the history of philosophy no specific philosophical disciplines have been associated with them, but their problems are dispersed in various philosophical directions and also have a different (though sometimes fundamental) function in them. Tadeusz Klimski and Jan Kiełbasa’s works can be an example of dealing with such an issue.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 131-157
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józefa M. Bocheńskiego koncepcja historii filozofii
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966109.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
historia filozofii
filozofia starożytna
filozofia średniowieczna
filozofia nowożytna
filozofia współczesna
History of philosophy
classic philosophy
medieval philosophy
modern philosophy
contemporary philosophy
Opis:
The notion of history of philosophy is initiated by Bocheński by presentation of the notion of history itself which, according to him for the fact of treating the past („that what happened”), has two meanings: subject meaning (past events) and object meaning (historiosophy). Both of them can be further divided into two parts: history of facts and history of doctrines. History of philosophy is a typical history of doctrines. The second element of the name „history of philosophy”- which is philosophy-is etymologically linked to wisdom, present in numerous meanings: in antiquity its was simply a synonim of science. In the Middle Ages we observe division of human knowledge to revealed knowledge and natural knowledge, the latter one, in its aspect of exploring the ultimate principles and causes is called philosophy. In modern times philosophy was questioned at all or the entire science was included in its scope. For that reason Bocheński establishes the set of topics which are constantly present in the history of philosophy and which can be classified as strictly philosophical issues. They are: 1) the question of cognition (can we cognize truth?); 2) the question of science; 3) ontological issues (universalities, existence or non-existence of plurality); 4) questions of relation of science and psychic; 5) axiological issues (ethics, esthetics, philosophy of religion); 6) the question of absolute (God, eternal matter). Bocheński stresses that questions proper to philosophy can not be classified as one of the science and, what is more, contemporary methodology of science will rather not change this situation. Striking in that presentation is the lack of issues regarding philosophy of being (existence, essence, substance, accidental properties, relations, causes) with little exemption of philosophy of being inc-luded in the question of absolute. When it comes to division of history of philosophy, we may say that according to Bocheński it should follow analogically the traditional division of the European history such as classic, medieval, modern and contemporary times
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 433-451
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Egzystencjalna metafizyka bytu w traktacie "De ente et essentia" Tomasza z Akwinu
Existential metaphysics of being in Thomas’ Aquinas treatise "De ente et essentia"
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452381.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Byt jednostkowy
akt
akt istnienia
możność
istota
quidditas
subsystencja
forma
materia
Ipsum esse subsistens
individual being
act
act of existence
potency
essence
subsistence
form
matter
Ipsum esse subsistence
Opis:
Text De ente et essentia was written together with "De principis naturae" in Thomas’ first years of teaching activities and accounted philosophical “exercises” for the brothers at the convent of St. James in Paris. There is commonly noted, that Aquinas had already established the most important theses of his philosophy, the existential metaphysics of being above all, in which the act was the existence of this being, and the form with the matter constituted its essence. In this situation, the source of all existence, God appeared as only existence. Analysis of existential themes in "De ente et essentia" confirms these opinions. In later texts, especially in the "Summa Contra Gentiles", "Summa theologiae" and "Quaestiones disputatae", Thomas deepens his concepts; he introduces extended topic of transcendentals - property of being which manifest its existence. However, the bulk of his existential metaphysics of existence has been outlined already in "De ente et essentia", and it was never corrected in the basic theses.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2013, 2; 95-111.
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomizm fenomenologizujący Antoniego B. Stępnia. Recenzja: 1) A. B. Stępień, Studia i szkice filozoficzne, t. 1, do druku przygotował A. Gut, Lublin 1999; 2) A. B. Stępień, Studia i szkice filozoficzne, t. 2, do druku przygotował A. Gut, Lublin 2001; 3) A. B. Stępień, Studia i szkice filozoficzne, t. 3, do druku przygotował R. Kryński, Lublin 2015
Phenomenologising Thomism of Antoni B. Stepien. Review: 1) A. B. Stepien, Philosophical Studies and Sketches, ed. A. Gut, vol. 1, Lublin 1999; 2) A. B. Stepien, Philosophical Studies and Sketches, ed. A. Gut, vol. 2, Lublin 2001; 3) A. B. Stepien, Philosophical Studies and Sketches, ed. R. Kryński, Vol. 3, Lublin 2015
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452451.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 397-406
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tadeusza Klimskiego realistyczna interpretacja problemu jedności
Tadeusz Klimski’s realistic interpretation of the problem of unity
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452483.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
unity being
idealism
realism
monism
pluralism
thomism
metaphysics
Opis:
Tadeusz Klimski devoted to the problem of unity dissertation, entitled “One and being. Analysis of the realistic concepts (Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, modern Thomists)”, published in 1992. The paper characterises idealist philosophy in exposures and explanations of representatives of realism. It indicates the field of further considerations: Aristotle’s account which is determined by views of the pre–Socratics, and above all Plato, philosophical views of Thomas Aquinas, alluding to discussion with the Arabic philosophers, especially Avicenna, and often relating to the horizon designated by revelation and needs of interpreting it by theology, recognition of contemporary Thomists of various trends, the only realistic trend in contemporary philosophy. Even more interesting is placing the issues of unity in the problematic context. Tadeusz Klimski believed that the problematic field is twofold, and its starting point is epistemology: 1) platonic idealism, which leads (even if it is against Plato himself) to monism, where unity is seen as the first and fundamental philosophical problem — here unity is associated with the entire cosmos, today as well as in the in the materialistic or spiritualistic version. 2) Aristotelian realism leads to pluralism in the theory of being, in which philosophers–realists try to interpret the unity — unity here is associated with individual being. While formulating his standpoint, Tadeusz Klimski refers to Mieczyslaw Gogacz’s account, that unity is called the power of the act of existence to actualizing the real essence of being. Unity, therefore, is manifested in the whole being, but the act of existence is its source. This view is consistent Thomistic, specifying the relationship of unity with the existence of individual being. This view can be a good basis to consider the role of unity in cognition, the role of unity in action or various forms of social unity.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2013, 2; 19-27
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Istnienie pierwszym aktem bytu
Existence as the first act of being
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
esse
essentia
Aristotelianism
Thomism
Aristotle
Avicenna
Thomas Aquinas
Étienne Gilson
arystotelizm
tomizm
Arystoteles
Awicenna
Tomasz z Akwinu
Opis:
From the perspective of existential Thomism, and following Aristotle’s philosophy of being (metaphysics) as the nucleus and keystone of the whole philosophy, seeking there the most important claims of St. Thomas, the article asks the three following questions: 1) What is the novum of Thomistic metaphysics? 2) What was Thomas’ way of thinking that led him to formulate the thesis that existence is the act of being? 3) Would anyone else have discovered the uniqueness of existence if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? The answers to these questions were formulated in reference to Gilson’s views and his concept of the history of philosophy and to the study of the concept of being in the texts of Thomas Aquinas and the historical sources of that concept. 1) Thomas proposed a new understanding of the structure of being, in which existence is the act that makes essence real and constitutes being’s potency, together making a real individual being. Thus, Thomas formulated a new existential theory of being, overcoming the limitations of Aristotle’s theory, and consistently explaining the issue related to esse (a problem that Avicenna and his followers - Parisian theologians of the 13th century could not solve). 2) Thomas Aquinas - with the help of Avicenna’s metaphysics - outdistances Aristotle’s essentialism, perceiving being as composed of existence and essence. Then, examining thoroughly the proposition of the Arab philosopher, he sees there inconsistency of attributing the position of accident to existence. According to Avicenna the element of being considered as the cause of the reality of being became - at the same time, as the accident - an unimportant component of essence. That is why Thomas Aquinas recognized that existence is the act of everything that makes essence, which transcended Avicenna’s theory, and thus he formulated his own existential version of the metaphysics of being. 3) It seems that nobody else but Thomas Aquinas would have put up a thesis that existence is the first act of being. And what would have been if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? It is hard to say as we have no historical data to let us discuss it. Similarly, it is impossible to answer this question even assuming Gilson’s thesis that the detailed claims of a given philosophy are the conclusion of the set of principles adopted at the beginning because Thomas did not have such a set of principles as at the starting point he modified the principles of Aristotle and Avicenna. Would someone else have made the same modifications, thus creating a “Thomistic” set of principles? The history of philosophy analyzes the things that actually happened and left their mark; it has no interest in things that did not take place and leave any trace. This could be an area for historical and philosophical fantasy, if it ever exists, but we try to stay in the field of the history of philosophy.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 13-25
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recenzja: Arkadiusz Gudaniec, U podstaw jedności bytowej człowieka. Studium z metafizyki osoby, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu, Lublin 2016, stron 520
Review: Arkadiusz Gudaniec, U podstaw jedności bytowej człowieka. Studium z metafizyki osoby, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu, Lublin 2016, pp 520
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452493.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 261-265
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Problem źródeł Tomaszowej koncepcji esse jako aktu bytu
The Problem of Sources of Thomas’ Concept of esse as the Act of Being
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452508.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
esse
essentia
metafizyka egzystencjalna
Arystoteles
neoplatonizm
Boecjusz
Awicenna
Thomas Aquinas
existential metaphysics
Aristotle
Neoplatonism
Boethius
Avicenna
Opis:
While expressing his innovative theory of existence (esse) as an act of being in many his texts Thomas Aqunas recalls different historical sources to support his thesis: Aristotle’s views, Arabic philosophers’ depictions, mainly of Avicenna, Boethius’ distinction entia quo od entia quod and some theses of Liber de causis. In earlier subject literature, mainly Gilson’s influence (in Poland it was under Krąpiec’s influence) adopted a view about religious inspirations of Thomas’ thesis and that the only philosophical way to his thesis is an analysis of Avicenna’s depictions which are contained mainly in work De ente et essentia. Every other Thomas’recalls should be treated as some earlier ploy for a protection against possible reservations. The first statement which arises during the analysis of historical sources which Thomas refer to expressing his theory of existence (esse) as an act of being is ascertaining that reasoning is a crucial argument to accept esse as an act of being. It should be emphasized that in his theory of esse Thomas Aquinas does not refer to argument of Revelation. The result is that Thomas expressed this thesis only in a philosophical area within the analysis of structure of real being. The attitudes which are recalled sometimes are used by Thomas Aquinas as a background or context by which he states his view. Recalled statements sometimes are a reference to the authority. It seems that the erudition recalled by Thomas in a matter which is interesting for us appears in a different aspects. That is why it should be make a fuss of that the issue of existence (esse) did not appear with Thomas Aquinas’ metaphysics or Avicenna’s metaphysics. It seems that it was on the contrary: the issue of existence (esse) was worrying Plato and earlier philosophers, Aristotle, and Neoplatonists, Boethius and Arabic philosophers. So Thomas’ thesis about existence (esse) as an act of being is a result of the analysis of the issue which is existed in the history of philosophy
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 173-187
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław Gogacz
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452530.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 13-15
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka chronienia osób. Zarys problematyki
Ethics of person protection. An outline of problems
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452549.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
etyka
osoba
relacje osobowe
Mieczysław Gogacz
sumienie
kontemplacja
mądrość
metanoia
kultura
ethics
person
personal relations
conscience
contemplation
wisdom
culture
Opis:
Ethics of person protection has been based on theory of person and emerging from it concept of personal relations. Thus, it should be recognized as personalistic ethics, if we understand personalism as a theory based on an account of a person. Such an ethics is an example of inferring conclusions from Thomistic metaphysics of person and human being – thus, it is Thomistic ethics par excellence. There could be question posed, in what extent proposed by Mieczysław Gogacz and his followers version of Thomistic ethics refers to classical Aristotelian and Thomistic eudaimonism? It seems that the core of the proposition relies on inferring conclusions from Thomas’ theory of love, in which love is the source of every human acts, is the principle of habituation and virtues as well as the most desired interpersonal relation. All these aspects Aquinas poses in his modifications of the Greek eudaimonism. For Thomas, the only good which results in happiness relies on relations with person – God or people. Mieczysław Gogacz continues this thread, but he does not concentrate only on problems of aims and happiness, because protection of person is an proper aim for him and protection is accomplished within relating with person through faith, hope and mainly love, and results in human happiness. We could therefore say, that ethics of protection of person is a modification of Aristotle’s ethics inasmuch as Thomism is modification of his metaphysics: Thomas Aquinas pays attention on the basic role of love in ethics and life, Mieczysław Gogacz has established love the basic pivot of his ethical and pedagogical theories.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2014, 3; 23-41
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Od Redakcji
Editorial
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452569.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2012, 1; 9
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzna etyka z Summy teologii (jeszcze raz) po polsku [Recenzja przekładów W. Galewicza]
Philosophical Ethics in Summa theologiae (Once Again) in Polish. [Review of W. Galewicz Translations]
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452595.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 249-260
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 75

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies