Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Świniarski, Janusz" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-25 z 107
Tytuł:
Filary i sfery bezpieczeństwa transregionalnego Polski w ujęciu filozoficznym
The pillars and spheres of poland’s transregional security: A philosophical approach
Autorzy:
Świniarski, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/955787.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Akademia im. Jakuba z Paradyża w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim
Tematy:
bezpieczeństwo
filozofia bezpieczeństwa
demografia
gospodarka
kultura
cywilizacja
system polityczny
system prawny
system demokratyczny
model deliberatywny
wojna
pokój
przemoc
niestosowanie przemocy
security
philosophy of security
demographics
economy
culture
civilization
political system
legal system
democratic system
deliberative model
war
peace
violence
nonviolence
Opis:
After a philosophical presentation of security as a property of being, its origin, structure, functioning and future, as stemming from the Initial Conditions of the Universe (mass, energy, space, and time), from the primary identified by Aristotle (material, effective, formal and teleological), and from the elements of the system distinguished by social cybernetics (sociomass, socioenergy, sociostructure and socioculture),the author attempts to argue that the pillars of a holistically analyzed security are: (1) Procreation and Education; (2) Affluence and Welfare; (3) Law and System; (4) Freedom, Equality, Fraternity and Responsibility. At the same time, the author asserts, invoking Aristotle, that the methods and ways of shaping those pillars and thus security are: necessary things (war and work) and beneficial things (peace and rest). The author tries to analyze those things and the holistically understood pillars of subjective security by differentiating such fundamental spheres of subjective security as the demographic, economic, political-social and cultural-civilizational spheres. Relations between subjective security (its pillars) and objective security (its spheres, tools and instruments), are presented as atendency that appears in the research of the so-called Kopenhagen School with the intent to deepen (subjective) security, expand (objective) security and thicken security (preferences for certain subjective-objective relations). Accepting the division of security into, on the one hand, positive security identified rather with the so-called nonmilitary security, following Johan Galtung (security through work, peace and renouncement of violence), and, on the other hand, negative security often identified with military security (security through war, destruction and violence), the author focuses on relatively evaluated security (in relation to somebody or something). This relative evaluation of security is analyzed in the perspective of the deepening and thickening of the transregional security of Poland, after several critical remarks about the understanding of such security and the so-called regional and transregional security complexes. The author assumes that, among the pillars, elements, sectors and complexes of security, the most dynamic and binding seems to be the demographic and economic sphere, whereas the political (legal-systemic) sphere and the cultural sphere belong, in comparison, to the more static (less dynamic) ones. Invoking J.J. Rousseau’s distinctionspertaining to this sphere (among others, the distinction between small, medium-size and big states), the author hypothetically concludes that Poland already was a big and monarchic state at the time of the First Commonwealth, a medium-size state at the time of the Second Republic and maybe also the Third Republic, and that Poland has a future as a small state composed of city-states (as anticipated by A. Toffler) of a democratic and perhaps a deliberative model (promoted by, among other, J. Habermas) – a structure of citizens competently communicated with each other, more democratic than any structure known from today, and also assisted by Artificial Intelligence.
Źródło:
Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa; 2019, 7; 163-194
2543-6961
Pojawia się w:
Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzne umocowanie zasady "odpowiedzialności za ochronę" ("R2P") w kształtowaniu współczesnego bezpieczeństwa
Autorzy:
Świniarski, Janusz.
Powiązania:
Studia Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego 2013, nr 4, s. 11-46
Data publikacji:
2013
Tematy:
Bezpieczeństwo
Odpowiedzialność moralna
Odpowiedzialność za ochronę
Filozofia wojny i pokoju
Artykuł z czasopisma naukowego
Opis:
Bibliografia na stronach 43-46.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ zmieniającej się przestrzeni społeczno-kulturowej na aksjologię sił zbrojnych
Changing the Influence of Socio-Cultural Space in the Armed Forces Axiology
Autorzy:
Świniarski, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/418391.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Akademia Marynarki Wojennej. Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych
Tematy:
civilization of knowledge and information
cognitive civilization
the civilization of killing
war
antiwar
"operations other than war"
responsibility that protect ("r2p")
military ethics
ethics warrior
Opis:
The author indication of the impact of the changing socio-cultural space for axiology forces begin by recalling the selected and most synthetic characteristics. Summons characteristics Alvin Toffler, Michael Hempoliński and John G. Bloch and design philosophy of Immanuel Kant as the basis for the so-called theory of "democratic peace". They all involve some degree with the demands of changes in the axiology of the armed forces of universal disarmament to reduce the mass killing, including the armed forces. Recalling further recognition of military sociology which states, that modern armies of Western civilization and the liberal-democratic socio-cultural space noticeable is the transition from the army as an institution for the Army as an organization is trying to point out the differences between the types of axiological functioning of the armed forces. Based on the above, the conclusion suggests and recommends a new paradigm of the warrior ethic, "the intellectual in uniform and without", in the civilizations of cognitive functioning and acting under the responsibility to protect ("R2P") from genocide, ethnic cleansing and war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
Źródło:
Colloquium; 2014, 6, 1; 7-28
2081-3813
2658-0365
Pojawia się w:
Colloquium
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Philosophy and Social Sciences in a Securitological Perspective
Autorzy:
Świniarski, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22358874.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-09-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
knowledge
science
philosophy
intuition
scientific philosophy
philosophy of social sciences
First Causes according to the Big Bang Theory
the first four causes
the four elements of the social system
Opis:
The inspiration of this text is the belief of the Pythagoreans that the roots and source of complete knowledge is the quadruple expressed in the “arch-four”, also called as tetractys. Hence the hypothesis considered in this paper is: the basis of the philosophy of social sciences is entangled in these four valours, manifested in what is “general and necessary” (scientific) in social life, the first and universal as to the “principles and causes” of this life (theoretically philosophical) and “which can be different in it” (practically philosophical) and “intuitive”. The quadruple appears with different clarity in the history of human thought, which seeks clarification and understanding of the things being cognised, including such a thing as society. It is exposed in the oath of the Pythagoreans, the writings of Plato and Aristotle, who applied these four valours, among other things, in distinguishing the four types of knowledge and learning about the first four causes and principles. This fourfold division seems to be experiencing a renaissance in contemporary theological-cognitive holism and can be treated as an expressive, a “hard core”, and the basis of research not only of social but mainly of global society as a social system. This entanglement of the foundations of the philosophy of the social sciences leads to the suggestion of defining this philosophy as the knowledge of social being composed of “what is general and necessary” (scientific), genetically first, universal (theoretically philosophical) and “being able to be different” (philosophically practical) and intuitive.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2023, 3(53); 55-77
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-25 z 107

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies