Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "tractatus" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 30
Tytuł:
How Could Boltzmann Have Inspired the Early Wittgenstein?
Autorzy:
Sady, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621448.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
Boltzmann
Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Tractatus logico-philosophicus
Opis:
In 1931, when writing about those who had inspired him, Wittgenstein singled out Boltzmann; nobody seems to know why, however. Most commentators have ignored this remark, while a few have tried to guess what the inspiration might have been by searching the popular and philosophical writings of Boltzmann. In this article, I hypothesize that Wittgenstein may have been inspired by Boltzmann’s scientific research program from his famous 1877 article. This hypothesis is not confirmed—or rejected—by any surviving documents. But to some extent (considering the role of Fleck’s creative misunderstandings) there are two explanations for the origins of the two strange theorems underlying the Tractatus’s ontology: (1) each situation can be the case or not the case while everything else remains the same; (2) the facts are not subject to the laws of nature. My hypothesis also makes it understandable why Wittgenstein developed his logical theory of probability. So, let’s keep it in mind.
Źródło:
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2021, 55; 67-76
1734-9923
2300-7621
Pojawia się w:
Analiza i Egzystencja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Truth-Bearers in Frege and the Tractatus
Autorzy:
Bronzo, Silver
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621589.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
Frege
Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
truth-bearers
propositions
thoughts
truth
Opis:
This paper argues that the Tractatus breaks deeply with Frege’s account of truth-bearers as mind-independent entities, and is closer to the act-theoretic approach recently defended, for example, by Scott Soames and Peter Hanks. For the Tractatus, the primary truth-bearers are facts-in-use, which essentially involve acts, as well as facts functioning as instruments of representation. The Tractarian account, it is further argued, can vindicate three platitudes that constitute the main motivation of Frege’s approach.
Źródło:
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2019, 47; 31-53
1734-9923
2300-7621
Pojawia się w:
Analiza i Egzystencja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Holism and Atomism in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Autorzy:
Bogucki, Krystian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Holism
Atomism
Meaning
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
Ludwig Wittgensteim
Atomizm
Znaczenie
Traktat logiczno-filozoficzny.
Opis:
The aim of my paper is to describe and evaluate different conceptions of holism in Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. I distinguish three readings of holistic elements in this work: i) Minimal Holism (E. Anscombe, M. Black, D. Pears); ii) Moderate Holism (J. Conant, C. Diamond, G. Ryle); and iii) Radical Holism (G. Bar-Elli, M. Kremer, P. Livingston). The conclusion is that the most viable option is the Moderate Holism since it embraces the logico-syntactial notion of use, rejects anachronistic interpretation of Tractatarian ontology and allows us to see that the holistic elements are complementary to the initial atomism of the work. Moreover, I point to the consequences of the topic for the overall reading of Wittgenstein’s early and late work.
W artykule omawiam trzy koncepcje tego, czym jest holizm w Traktacie logiczno-filozoficznym Ludwiga Wittgensteina. Trzy stanowiska, które wyróżniam są następujące: i) Holizm Minimalistyczny (E. Anscombe, M. Black, D. Pears); ii) Holizm Umiarkowany (J. Conant, C. Diamond, G. Ryle); iii) Holizm Radykalny (G. Bar-Elli, M. Kremer, P. Livingston). Wnioskiem z mojej pracy jest stwierdzenie, iż Holizm Umiarkowany stanowi najbardziej adekwatną koncepcję holistycznych elementów w dziele Wittgensteina. Sądzę tak, ponieważ pogląd ten pozwala nam dostrzec, że holizm i atomizm stanowią dwa komplementarne aspekty Traktatu, trafnie odrzuca anachronistyczną interpretację ontologii dzieła Wittgensteina oraz poprawnie charakteryzuje użycie jako pojęcie o charakterze logiczno-syntaktycznym. W zakończeniu artykułu wskazuję konsekwencje podejmowanego przeze mnie tematu na całościową interpretację zarówno wczesnych, jak i późnych prac Wittgensteina.
Źródło:
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2021, 55; 25-48
1734-9923
2300-7621
Pojawia się w:
Analiza i Egzystencja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The relation of ethics and logic to the world in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Autorzy:
Ryziński, Remigiusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2049796.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Tematy:
Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
the New Wittgensteineans
ethics
values
nonsense
Opis:
The paper addresses the question of the extent to which they are right that the Tractatus Logico-philosophicus is a self-destructive work that has only a therapeutic message and does not have a meaningful philosophical content. We have tried to argue against this view. We believe that Tractatus has a positive, albeit unspeakable, message, as well as that his statements are metaphilosophical sentences that are ultimately beneficial. Wittgenstein‘s therapy was not exclusively concerned, and the claims he postulated also had metaphilosophical value. However, it excludes metaphysics, in the sense of meta- metaphysics, they are opposed to metaphysics. Many types of statements, including ethics, cannot be meaningfully expressed, they can only be shown. We claim that Wittgenstein clearly separated what is shown and what is possible to say, as well as the fact that his life in the period of Tractatus writing and the years after it was a period in which he showed ethics by action. We acknowledge that the New Wittgensteinean have drawn attention to the intent to release the Tractatus. This is their merit, but we also recognize the importance of the content of the Tractatus.
Źródło:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2021, 2(41); 79-87
1898-8431
Pojawia się w:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niemożność życia: Tractatus logico-suicidalis Hermanna Burgera
The Inability to Live: Hermann Burger’s Tractatus Logico-Suicidalis
Die Unfähigkeit zu leben: Hermann Burgers Tractatus logico-suizidalis
Autorzy:
Sośnicka, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1879642.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
niemieckojęzyczna literatura szwajcarska
Hermann Burger
samobójstwo
autobiografia
German-Swiss literature
suicide
autobiography
Opis:
Artykuł szkicuje poetykę Hermanna Burgera (1942-1989), jednego z najbardziej oryginalnych i kontrowersyjnych pisarzy szwajcarskich, koncentruje się jednak przede wszystkim na jego szeroko dyskutowanym utworze Tractatus logico-suicidalis (1988), którym pisarz zapowiedział swoje samobójstwo, wywołując wśród krytyków powszechne oburzenie. Tractatus Burgera analizowany jest szczególnie w odniesieniu do eseju Jeana Améry’ego Podnieść na siebie rękę, ale uwzględniono także kontekst autobiograficzny tego — mimo wszystko — dogłębnie egzystencjalnego utworu.
This article briefly sketches the literary art of Hermann Burger (1942–1989), one of the most original and controversial German-Swiss writers. It then goes on to focus on his much-discussed Tractatus logico-suicidalis (1988) in which, a year in advance, the writer announced his suicide; this provoked extreme outrage amongst literary critics. Burger’s Tractatus is analysed with particular reference to Jean Améry’s essay Hand an sich legen but at the same time draws attention to the autobiographical background to this work which, in spite of everything, is intensely human.
Der Beitrag entwirft in Kürze die Poetik Hermann Burgers (1942–1989), eines der originalsten und kontroversesten Deutschschweizer Schriftsteller, und konzentriert sich auf seinen vieldiskutierten Tractatus logico-suicidalis (1988), mit dem der Schriftsteller ein Jahr zuvor seinen Selbstmord angekündigt hat, wodurch er unter Literaturkritikern für die größte Empörung sorgte. Burgers Tractatus wird insbesondere in Anknüpfung an Jean Amérys Essay Hand an sich legen analysiert, verwiesen wird jedoch zugleich auf den autobiografischen Hintergrund dieses — trotz allem — zutiefst existenziellen Werkes.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2016, 64, 5; 161-175
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ks. Grzegorz Mariusz Baran, Motyw synostwa Bożego w „In Johannis Evangelium tractatus” oraz „In Johannis Epistolam ad Parthos tractatus”, Tarnów 2010, Biblos, ss. 262.
Autorzy:
Longosz, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613529.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Opis:
nie dotyczy
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2011, 56; 644-652
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zagadnienie identyczności w "Traktacie" Wittgensteina
Wittgenstein Tractatus: An Issue of Identity
Autorzy:
Michalski, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965702.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-09-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:
The main goal of the paper is to present Wittgenstein’s standpoint towards the question of identity of simple things and identity sign. The starting point of the paper is the presentation of the difficulties which Russell and Frege faced while analysing „A is B„ type propositions. In the second part of the work the Wittgenstein’s thesis that identity is not a relation is examined. The thesis, which is in opposition to Frege and Russell views, within the Wittgenstein’s system, is a consequence of the ontological assumptions: atomic states of affairs (sachverhalt) are mutually independent; things are common to all possible worlds. In the next section some difficulties concerning the identity conditions on the base of Wittgenstein’s ontology, is discussed. Wittgenstein’s logical space comprises of such possible worlds that one object is able to have, within these worlds, exactly the same properties (Thesis 2.027), therefore criterion that objects are identical when they have the same properties does not apply. Furthermore within Wittgenstein’s space an object is able to change all its external properties, which means that the identity of an object cannot be determined by its external properties. However, since forms of things are ‘collective’, the internal properties do not determine the identity, as well. What does then? Wittgenstein’s argumentation supporting thesis that identity formulas are not propositions will be analysed next. The main point of the argumentation is that there is impossible to understand two names without knowing that they refer to the same thing. The last section of the article presents an idea to translate formulas including identity sign to formulas which do not comprise this sign but maintain the meaning of the ‘originals’, which is contained in Tractatus.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 2010, 18, 3; 43-54
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Krakowscy pobożni laicy czy begardzcy heretycy? Z badań nad czternastowiecznym Tractatus contra beghardos Henryka Harrera
Autorzy:
Gałuszka, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/560479.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
The Cracow’s pious laymen
beghards
Tractatus contra beghardos
Henryk Harrer
Krakowscy pobożni laicy
begardzi
Opis:
Tractatus contra beghardos written by a Chech Dominican Henryk Harrer is a masterpiece of exceptional value for both historians of the medieval heterodox movements as well as for scholars interested in the history of theology and law in the 14th century. The treaty was commissioned by Cracow Dominicans in the years 1328 to 1334. Commissioning the treaty to Henryk Harrer, a stranger expert from the Prague monastery of St. Clemens was dictated by a series of controversies among Cracow clergy around the judgement of conduct of a certain group of people whose religious practices and a way of life stood out from the rest of the congregation. Undertaking the task of writing the treaty Henryk Harrer based his work around three charges pressed against the suspected of heresy: breaking off the Church and establishing an illegal organization (singularitas vite); corrupted attitude towards recognized religious practices (contemptibilitas sacramenti eucharistiae); numerous flaws and perverse disposition (pertinax voluntas). Not only did Harrer decide to comment on all aspects of life of central figures of Contra beghardos but he also honestly mentioned all arguments he was not able to undermine. Despite these objective difficulties, the Czech Dominican was certain that the expertise he came up with was sufficient to link the lay movement with the sect of Beghard Heretics.The author of this study proved that, contrary to Harrer’s keen intention, his Tractatus contra beghardos does not unambiguously show heresy in the Cracow diocese. What is more, the reader, instead of indictment against the conduct of a group of laymen paradoxically received a confirmation of their innocence and orthodoxy. In the light of analysis of the text Contra beghardos, the claim that Beghard Heretics from Harrer’s work turn out to be pious layman, living in communion with the Church, seems to be fully substantiated. Of course their way of life and the practice of asceticism made them stand out from the other members of the congregation but were completely in line with the Church legislation. In this context, Harrer’s work is an original testimony of numerous misunderstandings about the Beghard movement and stormy times of forming a new kind of piety among lay members of Church.
Tractatus contra beghardos written by a Chech Dominican Henryk Harrer is a masterpiece of exceptional value for both historians of the medieval heterodox movements as well as for scholars interested in the history of theology and law in the 14th century. The treaty was commissioned by Cracow Dominicans in the years 1328 to 1334. Commissioning the treaty to Henryk Harrer, a stranger expert from the Prague monastery of St. Clemens was dictated by a series of controversies among Cracow clergy around the judgement of conduct of a certain group of people whose religious practices and a way of life stood out from the rest of the congregation. Undertaking the task of writing the treaty Henryk Harrer based his work around three charges pressed against the suspected of heresy: breaking off the Church and establishing an illegal organization (singularitas vite); corrupted attitude towards recognized religious practices (contemptibilitas sacramenti eucharistiae); numerous flaws and perverse disposition (pertinax voluntas). Not only did Harrer decide to comment on all aspects of life of central figures of Contra beghardos but he also honestly mentioned all arguments he was not able to undermine. Despite these objective difficulties, the Czech Dominican was certain that the expertise he came up with was sufficient to link the lay movement with the sect of Beghard Heretics.The author of this study proved that, contrary to Harrer’s keen intention, his Tractatus contra beghardos does not unambiguously show heresy in the Cracow diocese. What is more, the reader, instead of indictment against the conduct of a group of laymen paradoxically received a confirmation of their innocence and orthodoxy. In the light of analysis of the text Contra beghardos, the claim that Beghard Heretics from Harrer’s work turn out to be pious layman, living in communion with the Church, seems to be fully substantiated. Of course their way of life and the practice of asceticism made them stand out from the other members of the congregation but were completely in line with the Church legislation. In this context, Harrer’s work is an original testimony of numerous misunderstandings about the Beghard movement and stormy times of forming a new kind of piety among lay members of Church.
Źródło:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia; 2012, 18
0867-8294
Pojawia się w:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Chronology of Augustine’s "Tractatus in Iohannis Evangelium" 1–16 and "Enarrationes in Psalmos" 119–133 Revisited
Autorzy:
Andokova, Marcela
Horka, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/947694.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Augustine
liturgical time
liturgy
dies sanguinis
chronology
Tractatus in Iohannis Evangelium
Enarrationes in Psalmos
Augustyn
czas liturgiczny
liturgia
dzieła Augustyna
chronologia
Opis:
In the year 2002 Milewski published an article devoted to the current state of research concerning Augustine’s Commentary on the Gospel of John where, among other topics, he reports on the state of research in the chronology of this work by Augustine, and after a brief summary of the latest solutions proposed by prominent Augustinian scholars he concludes that the history of the Tractates’ composition calls for a careful appreciation of their development and appearance over the course of Augustine’s busy episcopate and in relation to his other pastoral endeavours. This study therefore serves as the point of departure for our present article in which we would like to contribute to the recently proposed solution to certain questions related to the chronology of the two series of Augustine’s homilies, i.e. Tractatus in Iohannis Evangelium 1-16 and Enarrationes in Psalmos 119-133, especially in those points where the present solutions appear to be rather vague. Hence, our analysis concerns primarily the division of Tractates 1-12 and 13-16 made by Le Landais, and consequently accepted by all later scholars. Moreover, it focuses on some key points of the chronology: the dating of Tractate 7 at a pagan festival, the so-called dies sanguinis, proposed by La Bonnardière, then the synchronization of Tractates 1-16 with the parallel series of Enarrationes in Psalmos 119-133, and, finally, the re-evaluation of the year of the delivery of both series of homilies, dated between the years 406/407 or 407/408. Our argumentation is based, first and foremost, on the principle similar topic means similar liturgical time thanks to which we can place Tractates 10-12 of the Commentary on John’s Gospel right before the beginning of the Lenten season. Consequently, it enables us to include Tractates 13-16 in Augustine’s preaching activity during the Lenten season until as late as the beginning of the Easter Octave. In addition, if we admit that Tractate 7 was not delivered on the so-called dies sanguinis feast related to the rites of Cybele and Attis but on the occassion of another unknown local festival of an aitiological myth in Hippo Regius, we do not need to place it on the 24th of March as La Bonnardière did. Finally, these findings help us outline the new synchronized chronology of the two series of Augustine’s exegetical homilies for both the years 406/407 and 407/408.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2019, 72; 149-170
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Podmiot jako wewnętrzny biegun symbolizmu. Antymentalistyczna wykładnia "Traktatu logiczno-filozoficznego"
Subject as the Inner Pole of the Symbol. Anti-mentalistic Interpretation of Wittgensteins Tractatus
Autorzy:
Gomułka, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1622050.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Tractatus logico-philosophicus
anti-realism
antimentalism
transcendental subject
symbolism
podmiot transcendentalny
antymentalizm
antyrealizm
symbolizm
Opis:
The purpose of this paper is to offer a radical anti-mentalistic interpretation of Wittgensteinʼs Tractatus. Contrary to mentalistic approaches postulating that thetask of projection must be performed by a subject (transcendental or psychological), the author claims – after Rhees, Diamond and McGinn – that the projection itselfis an intrinsic relation within the symbol. The main point of the paper is the thesis that the transcendenal subjectivity – or, as Wittgenstein calls it, the metaphysical subject – is the inner pole of the symbol, and since the meaning of the symbol isitʼs other inner pole (as anti-realist interpretations point out), the whole intentionalrelation of symbolizing is intrinsic to the symbolism.
Źródło:
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2016, 35; 69-86
1734-9923
2300-7621
Pojawia się w:
Analiza i Egzystencja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 30

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies