Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "succession to the throne" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
The Rights and the Proxies of the Monarch in Romania According to the Constitution of 1866
Autorzy:
Popenko, Yaroslav
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28842642.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-09-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
executive power
legislative power
principality
constitutional monarchy
national representation
Basic Law
parliament
succession to the throne
judicial power
Opis:
The article is devoted to the analysis and the characteristics of the rights and the proxies of the monarch in Romania according to the Constitution of 1866. The adoption of the first Basic Law was the fateful act in the history of the state-building processes of Romania and contributed to its development as the sovereign state. The Constitution had the contractual nature and established the compromise between the young bourgeoisie and the large landowners in the form of the constitutional monarchy. The king in Romania for a long time remained the person who was «above» of all the state and political leadership of the country. This status and the proxies of the monarch were delegated with the first Basic Law. The legal fixing of such legal status of the monarch at the level of the Constitution made it possible to establish full-fledged royal power, which was an extremely important state-political step for the development of Romania as the independent country. The constitutional foundations, the functions and the limitations of the institution of the monarchical power in the principality were fixed in the number of the articles of the Constitution of 1866. At the same time, the important state-constitutional aspect was the clear fixation that all proxies of the monarch could be done based on the interests of the Romanian nation. The Basic Law of 1866 established the proxies of the monarch such as in the legislative branch of power (the right of legislative initiative, the right of the interpretation of laws, Articles 32–34); executive power (had to implement it in the manner determined with the Constitution, Article 35) and partially in the justice system (the right to declare amnesty on the political issues, the right to postpone or to mitigate punishment in criminal cases, Article 93). For strengthening of the foundations of the statehood, the Constitution officially established the principle of the hereditary power of the monarch (Article 82). His person was declared inviolable. Herewith, the Romanian constitutionalists fixed that the monarch did not have any other proxies, except those granted to him with the Basic Law (Article 96). Adopted in 1866, the Basic Law approved legally the democratic aspirations of the Romanian nation. It defined directly the most important principles of the state functioning as the principle of the national sovereignty, the principle of the division of powers, the principle of representative government, the principle of hereditary monarchy, the principle of the responsibility of the state officials, the principle of the Rule of law, etc. The Basic Law definitely contributed to the gradual democratization of the state-governing and public structures, the formation of the concept of the civil personality and untouchability, foresaw the presence of the political and legal pluralism in the country, etc. Due to the introduction of the institution of the constitutional monarchy, that ruler in the person of Karl I could establish and hold the certain political balance in the country between the liberals and the conservatives, which opened the possibility to potentially strengthen the two-party system and laid the foundations of the civil society and the future constitutional life of Romania.
Źródło:
Copernicus Political and Legal Studies; 2023, 2, 3; 63-69
2720-6998
Pojawia się w:
Copernicus Political and Legal Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sprawa następstwa tronu po Bolesławie V Wstydliwym, księciu krakowskim i sandomierskim
Autorzy:
Supernak, Karolina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/560367.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Bolesław the Chaste
Leszek the Black
Lesser Poland
choice of the ruler
succession to the throne
Bolesław Wstydliwy
Leszek Czarny
Małopolska
elekcja władcy
następstwo tronu
Opis:
Bolesław the Chaste, the prince of Cracow did not have children, perhaps as a result of the weddings of chastity he made with his wife. In 1265, prince Bolesław, probably during the illness, adopted his relative – Leszek the Black – and made him the successor to the throne in Cracow. The second title of Leszek to the throne was the election of the mighty. During the Piast period, in the Cracow-Sandomierz Duchy, the ruling prince was elected. The first such elected ruler of Cracow, called princeps, was Kazimierz the Just and then his minor son Leszek the White. Successive monarchs were also elected by electionbut, the elections were maintained in the Piast dynasty and were usually only a confirmation of the election, as in the case of Leszek the Black. Bolesław selected Leszek among others because they had starded to cooperate with him during the war between Bohemia and Hungary. Leszek the Black as the heir of the Chaste married Gryfina, the niece of Kinga. It seems that the mighty have accepted the decision of Bolesław on the succession of the throne.
Bolesław Wstydliwy, książę krakowski był bezdzietny, być może w wyniku ślubów czystości, jakie złożył z żoną. W 1265 roku książę Bolesław w czasie swojej choroby adoptował swojego krewnego – Leszka Czarnego – i uczynił go następcą tronu w Krakowie. Drugim tytułem Leszka do tronu była elekcja możnych. W okresie piastowskim w księstwie krakowsko-sandomierskim wybierano księcia zwierzchniego. Pierwszym tak wybranym władcą krakowskim, zwanym princepsem, był Kazimierz Sprawiedliwy, a następnie jego nieletni syn Leszek Biały. Kolejni monarchowie byli również wybierani w drodze elekcji, lecz wybory utrzymywano w dynastii Piastów i były one z reguły jedynie potwierdzeniem elekcji, tak jak w przypadku Leszka Czarnego. Bolesław wybrał Leszka między innymi dlatego, że ten zdecydował się współpracować z nim w czasie wojny między Czechami a Węgrami. Leszek Czarny jako spadkobierca Wstydliwego poślubił Gryfinę, siostrzenicę Kingi. Wydaje się, że możni akceptowali decyzję Bolesława w sprawie następstwa tronu.
Źródło:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia; 2018, 24, 1
0867-8294
Pojawia się w:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Diuk, król i papież. Kilka uwag na temat sporu o legalność objęcia tronu Anglii przez Williama Bastarda w 1066 roku. Cz. I
The duke, the king and the pope. A few comments on the discussion concerning legitimacy of William the Bastard succession to the throne of England in the year 1066 (part I)
Autorzy:
Wierzbiński, Szymon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/596756.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Anglia
Normanowie
następstwo prawne
podbój
England
Normans
succession
conquest
Opis:
It is not a secret that the war between Harold II and William the Bastard, who eventually became William the Conquer, belongs to the most discussed topics. This statement applies especially to the English scholars, who treat the issue as one of the key events in the history of their nation. However, while reading the works of these excellent scientists, one can have the impression that the topic in question was utilized to strengthen the traditional, post-Wig historiosophy. According to its propagators Edward the Confessor neither designated William as his heir, nor did he have power to do so. In addition to that there is an opinion that the last Anglo-Saxon king chose Harold as future king on his death bed. In this part of the paper I raise a few arguments against the traditional interpretations of the sources. In my opinion the thing may well have been different, since Edward was brought up in Normandy and hade personal reasons to fight off Harold’s aspirations.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2014, XCI (91)/1; 203-216
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Diuk, król i papież. Kilka uwag na temat sporu o legalność objęcia tronu anglii przez Williama Bastarda w 1066 roku. Cz. II
The duke, the king and the pope. A few comments on the discussion concerning legitimacy of William the Bastard succession to the throne of England in the year 1066 (part II)
Autorzy:
Tulejski, Tomasz
Wierzbiński, Szymon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/596631.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Anglia
Normandia
papiestwo
pokuta
England
Normandy
papacy
penance
Opis:
It is not a secret that the war between Harold II and William the Bastard, who eventually became William the Conquer, belongs to the most discussed topics. This statement applies especially to the English scholars, who treat the issue as one of the key events in the history of their nation. However, while reading the works of these excellent scientists, one can have the impression that the topic in question was utilized to strengthen the traditional, post-Wig historiosophy. It is a very popular belief that papacy (in person of pope Alexander II) supported the Norman conquest of England in 1066. According to some of the Norman sources, William even received a papal banner which he took for his expedition. In opinion of many scholars, there are grounds to treat the invasion of Norman duke as a first crusade (mainly due to character of Alexander II support). However, both nations were Christian, so the assessment of the pope`s statement in modern history is explicit. In the second part of this paper, arguments will be given, that the Apostolic See didn`t support the Normans at the time of the conquest. The paper also examines the evolution of church` approach towards war in early middle ages.
Źródło:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne; 2014, XCI (91)/1; 217-227
0081-6841
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies