Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "state prosecution" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Podjęcie przez Marszałka Sejmu interwencji w ramach realizacji funkcji kontrolnych Sejmu
    Intervention by the Marshal of the Sejm within the framework of the implementation of the control functions of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Gierach, Ewelina
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215810.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    parliamentary oversight
    Marshal of the Sejm
    state prosecution
    Opis:
    In the light of the binding provisions of law, the General Prosecutor is included in the subject matter of the oversight function of the Sejm. The statutory request for information and explanations may been perceived as the main instrument of parliamentary oversight serving to obtain information on specific proceedings conducted by the state prosecution.. The Marshal of the Sejm may refer a matter to the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, since the subject matter of activity of this committee includes matters related to the activities of the state prosecution, in order to obtain relevant information and express an opinion.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 55-60
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wykładnia art. 14 ust. 3 ustawy o sejmowej komisji śledczej oraz art. 15 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania karnego
    Interpretation of Article 14 para. 3 of the Act on the Sejm Investigative Committees and Article 15 para. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206773.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    investigative Committee
    Code of Criminal Procedure
    state prosecution
    Central Anticorruption Bureau
    komisja śledcza
    Kodeks postępowania karnego
    prokuratura
    Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne
    Opis:
    The author analyses the above-mentioned provisions, discussing the problem of a potential disclosure of documents and other materials collected by an investigative committee to authorities conducting criminal proceedings. In case of a convergence between the investigation conducted by the Central Anticorruption Bureau (CAB) and the matter examined by the investigative committee there are no formal obstacles to the realisation of a request for on submission of materials concerning the work of the committee to the CAB.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 1(61); 50-57
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    To Question the Existence of Authorities to Prosecute Crimes and Represent the State in the Medieval Kingdom of Hungary
    Autorzy:
    Považan, Michal
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/926197.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    prosecution, Kingdom of Hungary, Middle Ages, crimen publicum, criminal law, trial
    Opis:
    Nowadays, the office of public prosecutor is the commonly accepted legal institution in the Western legal culture. Its existence is understood as something taken for granted. This was different in the Middle Ages. At first, the criminal trial proceedings were not distinguished from the civil ones, and therefore they were conducted on the basis of the same fundamental principles. There was no public authority engaged in instituting the criminal trial. The latter had to be instituted by private individuals who were the injured parties. This had an impact on the forming of the concept of crime which was not viewed as an offence against the society or the State but against the injured individual. The paper is concerned with the medieval Kingdom of Hungary and discusses the development of State structures, criminal substitutive law and the criminal procedure.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 2012, 5, 1; 1-12
    2084-4115
    2084-4131
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ściganie sprawców kłamstwa katyńskiego w III Rzeszy
    Prosecution of the Perpetrators of the Katyń Massacre Lie in the Third Reich
    Autorzy:
    Graczyk, Konrad
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782660.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Katyń, crime, criminal speech, criticism of the state, actions against the military,
    Katyń Massacre Lie, propaganda
    Opis:
    This article addresses the criminal liability of German citizens for the so-called Katyń Massacre Lie during the Third Reich. Its source materials are the records of three cases discovered in German archives. Questioning the official (and actual) German propaganda’s version about the massacre of Polish prisoners of war by the Soviets or negating its perpetration by the Soviets while attributing it to the Germans was subject to prosecution as criminal speech against the state. This paper brings to attention the circumstances under which such an act was committed, the statements said by the perpetrators, and a legal qualification which was grounds for indictment and conviction.
    Źródło:
    Z Dziejów Prawa; 2018, 11, 2; 139-148
    1898-6986
    2353-9879
    Pojawia się w:
    Z Dziejów Prawa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ściganie zbrodni narodowosocjalistycznych w NRD na przykładzie działalności Ministerstwa Bezpieczeństwa Państwowego. Opis przypadków
    Prosecution of national-socialist crimes in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) on the example of the activity of the Ministry for State Security. Case description
    Autorzy:
    Leide, Henry
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477970.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Opis:
    The daily “Neues Deutschland” of 29 November 2002 quoted the following statement of the Dutch scientist Christiaan Frederik Rüter: “One must accept the fact that the prosecution of National Socialist crimes in Eastern Germany – contrary to Western Germany – resulted not only from political calculations, but also from a real, sincere need”. Rüter was the judge of the National Court in Amsterdam, and until 2003 was active as Professor of procedural and penal law at the Amsterdam university. He conducted the project The Judiciary and National Socialist Crimes. As part of the project, materials from penal processes that took place in both parts of Germany after 1945 were analysed, documented and published. The works on this project were commenced in the 1960s. The quotation reveals a unilateral, uncritical and non-diversifying evaluation of the activi-ty of the GDR in this area. This approach is also palpable in the introduction and comments to the collection of Eastern German court decisions in cases of National Socialist murders (see: DDR-Justiz und NS-Verbrechen. Sammlungostdeutscher Strafurteile wegen nationalsozialistischer Tötungsverbrechen. Verfahrensregister und Dokumentenband, ed. C.F. Rüter, D. de Mildt, München 2002). Historian Falco Werkentin criticised focusing on court decisions and ignoring the “conditions in which they were produced” under the SED dictatorship. He drew attention to the trials against “Nazi and war criminals” that were pending before the Penal Chamber in Waldheim in spring 1950. These processes resulted in the sentencing of approx. 3,400 persons for allegedly or actually committed crimes, but the judgements were passed in violation of the elementary principles of the rule of law. Werkentin underlined: “In the proceedings held in the 1970s and 1980s, offences were not fabricated any more. In those years, one should adopt a critical approach to those cases that were not brought to accusation. This also con- cerns […] the FRG in this whole period” (See: F. Werkentin, DDR-Justiz und NS-Verbrechen. Notwendige Hinweise zu einer Dokumentation [in:] Deutschland Archiv (DA) 3/2005, p. 506−515). Rüter did not comment on these arguments in the article in which he compared the number of convictions between Eastern and Western Germany solely on the basis of the sentences. As a result, he ascribed more convictions to the GDR and its judicial system. He also concluded that cases were conducted faster in the GDR. Rüter also stated that there is no evidence supporting the thesis that the Stasi protected Nazi perpetrators prior to prosecution and used them whenever an opportunity occurred to infringe on the international image of the FRG (See: C.F. Rüter, Das Gleiche. Aber anders. Die Strafverfolgung von NS-Verbrechen im deutsch-deutschen Vergleich [in:] DA 2/2010, p. 213−222). In the book titled Zbrodniarze nazistowscy i Stasi. Tajna polityka wobec przeszłości (Nazi and Stasi Criminals. The Covert Policy on the Past), I made it evident that this was not the case. Somewhat as a confirmation of my arguments, the prosecutor’s office of the central unit in North Rhine-Westphalia that is responsible for prosecuting National Socialist mass crimes commenced proceedings against an SS-man suspected of participating in the massacre in the French locality of Oradour-sur-Glane. The Security Service had held information about that person’s possible participation in the crime since 1980, however, in consultation with the judiciary, it resigned from launching penal proceedings. The above article is a polemic with the theses of R. Rüter.
    Źródło:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2012, 2(20); 437-451
    1427-7476
    Pojawia się w:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies