Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "księstwo opolskie" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Rozwój struktur organizacyjnych Kościoła w księstwie opolskim w XIV wieku.
Autorzy:
Kloch, Bogdan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
księstwo opolskie
kościoły parafialne
organizacja diecezjalna
archiprezbiterat
Opis:
The primary framework of the organization of archpresbyteraters in the Duchy of Opole was formed at the cusp of the 13th and 14th centuries and was based on the organization whose roots could be traced back to the first half of the 13th century (the structure of  archdeaconry). It was favoured by the general conditions of developing the initial parish network, which included primarily churches that later on became centres of archpresbyterates, and of the newly-forming rural communes. The basis of this development was created by the local actions, settlement transformations as well as the increase of the prestige of the Church and the strengthening of its role in the life of an individual. The fast expansion of the parish network can be dated back to the cusp of the 13th and 14th centuries. Territorial divisions and separation of new  duchies was probably sped up by these processes. However, rather incomplete sources, dispersion of the records and their infrequency create an image that is  difficult to be unambiguously verified. Nevertheless, most of the records suggest that the 14thcentury should be recognized as the time when parish relationships were established. They shifted from quick development on the cusp of the 13th and 14th centuries to stabilization that underwent only minor transformations at the end of the century.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2013, 13; 129-141
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Miejsce książąt opolskich w polityce Kazimierza Wielkiego względem Śląska.
Autorzy:
Nowakowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436123.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Śląsk
księstwo opolskie
Polska
Jan I Luksemburski
Kazimierz Wielki
Opis:
The article analyzes consecutive diplomatic and military steeeps  undertaken by Casimir the Great towards Silesia. It analyzes the attitude towards the dukes of Opole, who did not ocuppy any particular place in that policy, against the background of the whole Silesian policy of the king. A few stages can be distinguished in the king’s policy towards Silesia. Initially, the priority of his restitution programme was to restore supremacy over Gdansk Pomerania. Because of that, he tried to obtain a favourable disposition of the Luxembourgs. Thus, he either did not engage into the matters of Silesia or, as the ally of  Luxembourgs, acted from the position of power towards the dukes (1343). In this situation, prolonging the conflict with Teutonic Knights seems to have been a mistake, as it cost Casimir his influences in Silesia which were dating back to the times of  Wladyslaw the Elbow-high. It also did not bring him any major successes in the settlements with Luxembourgs which was clearly shown by the war with dukes of Glogau that took place in 1343. During the war Casimir restored supremacy over Wschowa for the price of evident deterioration of his relationships with the Luxembourgs. There are no traces that would suggest that at that time he kept in contact with the dukes, either old allays of his father (for example, Wladyslaw of Bytom) or his relative Bolek II the Small of Świdnica. All the more, he did not show any interest in the matters of the Duchy of Opole. The dukes of Silesia could start perceiving king Casimir as their ally against the Bohemian expansion in 1345. In the war with the Luxembourgs, the king did not attack the dukes of Silesia, except for those of Glogau. He established contacts with some of the dukes. Known is the agreement between Wladyslaw of Bytom and Casimir the Great that was made on 15th hFebruary 1346 in Bytom. The duke promised that he would not allow John of Bohemia and his sons or Nicholas, Duke of Opava to enter his city until permanent peace was established. Wladyslaw’s act can be evaluated as an attempt of peace mediation that did not transform into a longer cooperation with the king of Poland. The conclusion of a treaty in 1348 meant returning to the previous direction – consequent alliance with Charles IV. Casismir tried to use it again against the Teutonic Order and Brandenburg, howeever to no effect. His engagement into matters at Russia also contributed to his passivity towards Silesia. The last phase took place in the 1360s, starting from 1364 when Casimir tried to resituate forrmer treatiees based on papacy. The Polish policy towards Silesia had been already changed by the marriage with Hedwig of Sagan,  although its main reason was the king’s desire for a descendant and successor. Successes in Hungary also contributed to that change. Angevins managed to keep and expand influences in Silesia, especially among the dukes of Bytom and Opole. Apart from that, Casimir the Great was influenced by the example of the success of Charles IV who, thanks to marriage with Anna, not only obtained a favourable disposition of his former enemy, Bolko of Świdnica, but also the whole kingdom (although only after the death of the widow). Since the marriage with Hedwig, which did not bring Casimir such spectacular benefits, dukes of Silesia began to appear around the king. It seems that he realized too ;ate that strenghening bonds with the dukes of Silesia and as a result undermining  the influences of Luxembourgs was the only way to recover Silesia.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2013, 13; 43-67
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
W historiograficznym cieniu? Czternastowieczni Piastowie z linii opolskiej między Krakowem a Pragą.
Autorzy:
Czechowicz, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436119.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Śląsk
księstwo opolskie
Polska
The Chronicle of the Polish Dukes
heraldyka
sfragistyka
Opis:
Piotr of Byczyna wrote in his work Cronica principum  poloniae (dated at end of the 14th century) about the impossibility of  information about Piasts of Opole. The medieval Silesian historiography did not devote them much attention. However, it does not have to mean that they were of low historic importance. It is suggested by the analysis of creations such as the duke’s mausoleum in St. Anna’s chapel in the church of Franciscans in Opole. The tombs from the years 1379–1382, by presenting three generations of local dukes are a manifestation of documenting, in the form of monuments, the revindication policy whose aim was to unite the once magnificent Duchy of Opole that had been dispatched since the end of the 13th century. Self-awareness and political ambitions of the dukes of Opole can be supported by not only spectacular and well-known doings of Vladislaus II of Opole (+1410) but also, among others, by the attitude of Bolko I of Niemodlin, who in the years 1358–1359 advised emperor Charles VI on the appropriate way of proceeding in his court dispute with the bishop of Wroclaw. Other manifestations of the dukes’ power include a crown that appeared on the seals of the rulers from Opole, and a peculiar similarity between the seal of duchess Euphemia of Niemodlin and the seal of Louis I of Brzeg and – at the same time – the Wroclaw starost seal of Charles IV with the bust of the emperor. Dukes of Opole not only manifested their aspirations for the Polish crown but also, in the person of Henry of Niemodlin, discreetly accentuated their claims to Wroclaw (Henry was a son of Euphemia, who was a daughter of the last Piast of Wrocalw, Henry IV). Their testimony is not only Henry’s document that founded the collegiate church in Głogowek, but also the form of the church that referred to the collegiate of the Holy Cross in Wroclaw. Piasts of Opole, due to their careers on the Bohemian court (for example, Bolko II of Niemodlin was a court judge in Prague) and the debt that Wenceslaus IV, king of Germany and Bohemia owed them for over 20 years, remained in close relation with the sovereign. They showed it, among others, by ornamenting the colbers of the collators’ lodge in the parish church in Kropkowice with the effigies of Wenceslaus IV and his wife. This servility distinguished the Piasts of Opole from the attitude of their relatives from Legnica and Brzeg – the employers of Piotr from Byczyna. Louis I of Brzeg, his son and nephews, in the era of the beer war or  the war of priests (1380–1383) almost  copostopenly competed with the  the Bohemian sovereign. The difference in the attitude towards  Wenceslaus could be the reason why Piotr of Byczyna not only did find any information about the Piasts of Opole but deliberately did not provide too much of it, or at least not in a seperate chapter. Fragments of information scattered throughout the voluminous chronicle caused that the Piasts of Opole underwent a historiohraphic degradation.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2013, 13; 68-77
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies