Wszystkie pola: jednostki taksonomiczne - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Regionalizacja fizycznogeograficzna – przeszłość czy przyszłość geografii fizycznej?
Physical-geographical regionalization – past or future of physical geography?
Autorzy:: Maciejowski, W.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/87166.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2009
Wydawca:: Polska Asocjacja Ekologii Krajobrazu
Tematy:: geografia fizyczna
regionalizacja fizycznogeograficzna
jednostki taksonomiczne
regiony fizyczno-geograficzne
Źródło:: Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu; 2009, 23
1899-3850
Pojawia się w:: Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Rodzina i rodzaj – biologiczne jednostki taksonomiczne w Słowniku języka polskiego pod redakcją Mieczysława Szymczaka
Family and Genus – Biological Taxonomical Units in Słownik języka polskiego (“The Dictionary of the Polish Language”) edited by Mieczysław Szymczak
Autorzy:: Chodera, Janina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375394.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2010-01-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Opis:: The article opens with the presentation of the principles of formulation of Latin names of families and genera in the systematics of Carolus Linnaeus as well as the presentation of the presumptions adopted in the Polish terminology with reference to word-formation of the discussed taxonomical units (categories). Next, a detailed analysis has been presented of the structure of definitions referring to the designation family in the Dictionary of the Polish Language edited by Mieczysław Szymczak. Additionally, a peculiar approach of linguists to genus, as a taxonomical unit, has been presented, resulting from lack of understanding of its place and position in the systematics. Finally, proposals were presented of the principles of elaboration of the definitions of family and genus in the descriptive dictionary of Polish.
Źródło:: Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza; 2010, 16; 43-54
1233-8672
2450-4939
Pojawia się w:: Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Kłopotliwe derenie - Cornus alba L. i C. sericea L. (Cornaceae). Dwa gatunki czy jeden?
Troublesome dogwoods - Cornus alba L. and C. sericea L. (Cornaceae). Two species or one?
Autorzy:: Zielinski, J.
Tomaszewski, T.
Gawlak, M.
Orlova, L.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/888524.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Dendrologiczne
Tematy:: dendrologia
deren
deren bialy
deren rozlogowy
Cornus
Cornus alba
Cornus sericea
zroznicowanie morfologiczne
cechy morfologiczne
cechy mikromorfologiczne
pestki
ksztalt
grubosc
liscie
epiderma
kutykula
woski kutykularne
charakterystyka porownawcza
cechy taksonomiczne
taksonomia roslin
jednostki taksonomiczne
gatunki
podgatunki
zmiany w taksonomii
Opis:: The history of taxonomy and problems with identification of two very similar and closely related dogwoods Cornus alba and C. sericea are discussed. They were described by Linnaeus on the basis of flowering cultivated specimens of unknown origin. When characterizing their fruits, Linnaeus got the information from the older, “pre-Linnean”, literature and wrote that they were white in C. alba (Linné 1767) and black in C. sericea (Linné 1771). It was soon pointed out that both taxa had white fruits, however, their specific identity has not been questioned for a long time. Cornus alba and C. sericea are considered to be geographically isolated – the former is recorded from Siberia and NE Europe, while the latter from North America, but both dogwoods are often cultivated and naturalize in many places outside their natural ranges. In European dendrological literature, in which both plants are usually mentioned, there are permanent controversies concerning the differences between them. Attempts are still made to distinguish them, mainly on the basis of their stones and leaf shapes. Narrow stones and abruptly narrowed leaf apex have been attributed to C. alba, while broad stones have been said to be characteristic to C. sericea. Our analysis reveals that shapes of stones of discussed taxa are very variable and their ranges of variability overlap to a considerable extent. The similar kind of variability can be observed in the shape of leaves of both dogwoods. In C. alba leaf blades are most often broadly elliptic and abruptly narrowed, while in C. sericea they are most often broadly ovate and gradually narrowed at the apex. It must be said that there are also numerous exceptions to the above scheme. The filigree pattern of cuticle and the wax crystals on the abaxial leaf surface are sometimes useful for distinguishing C. alba and C. sericea. Unfortunately both features are also variable as those characterized above. Taking into consideration the great similarity of discussed dogwoods and difficulties with their identification, in our opinion the broad species concept of C. alba (including C. sericea) is most reliable and practical. However, as it appears from presented results, both taxa are not fully identical, so the rank of subspecies proposed by Wangerin (1910) – C. alba L. subsp. alba and C. alba subsp. stolonifera (Michx.) Wangerin, seems to be most appropriate in their case. It facilitates identification of wild plants of C. alba s.l. both in flowers and fruit as well as in the vegetative state. It also helps avoid controversy with the classification of cultivars of uncertain origin.
Źródło:: Rocznik Polskiego Towarzystwa Dendrologicznego; 2014, 62
2080-4164
2300-8326
Pojawia się w:: Rocznik Polskiego Towarzystwa Dendrologicznego
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "jednostki taksonomiczne" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język