Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "historiography of the People’s Republic of Poland" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Wdzięczność i ostrzeżenie? Rozważanie metodologiczne o nowej próbie bilansu historiografii PRL
    Gratitude and Warning? Methodological Considerations on a New Attempt to Balance the Historiography of the People’s Republic of Poland
    Autorzy:
    Bugajewski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2044023.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-03-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Opis:
    W niniejszym artykule podejmuję próbę lektury nowej monografii dotyczącej historiografii w okresie PRL napisanej przez Rafała Stobieckiego. Kluczowymi pojęciami książki są – w mojej opinii – wdzięczność i ostrzeżenie, wypowiadane łącznie. Autor pracuje w oparciu o szerokie rozumienie zakresu badań historii historiografii. Autor obejmuje interpretacją nie tylko (1) „badania nad infrastrukturą nauki historycznej”, do których zalicza instytucjonalnego wymiaru środowiska historyków, lecz również (2) przemiany założeń metodologicznych, na których były oparte badania historyczne w okresie PRL oraz (3) zasadnicze cechy reprezentacji przeszłości wypracowanych przez historiografię PRL-u. Autor książki kładzie nacisk na ostrzeżenie, wskazując na potrzebę oceny postaw historyków. Ja jednak skupiam uwagę na wdzięczności, bo w jej świetle można ukazać dokonania naszych poprzedników i ich zwycięstwa nad figurami próbującymi ich podporządkować.
    In this article, I attempt to read a new monograph on historiography in the communist period, written by Rafał Stobiecki. The key concepts of the book are - in my opinion - gratitude and warning, spoken together. The author works on the basis of a broad understanding of the scope of research in the history of historiography. The author interprets not only (1) “research on the infrastructure of historical science”, which includes the institutional dimension of the historians’ milieu, but also (2) changes in the methodological assumptions on which historical research was based during the Polish People’s Republic and (3) the essential features of the representation of the past developed by the historiography of the People’s Republic of Poland. The author of the book emphasizes the warning, pointing to the need to evaluate the attitudes of historians. However, I focus my attention on gratitude, because it shows the achievements of our predecessors and their victories over the figures trying to subjugate them.
    Źródło:
    Porównania; 2021, 29, 2; 469-482
    1733-165X
    Pojawia się w:
    Porównania
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wokół pamięci Baonu AK „Zośka” i jego żołnierzy w Polsce Ludowej (1945–1989) – wprowadzenie do badań
    Around the memory of the AK Battalion “Zośka” and its soldiers in the People’s Republic of Poland (1945–1989)
    Autorzy:
    Rutkowski, Tadeusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/478389.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    II wojna światowa
    Armia Krajowa
    Szare Szeregi
    batalion „Zośka”
    pamięć w Polsce Ludowej
    historiografia Polski Ludowej
    Second World War
    Szare Szeregi (Grey Ranks)
    “Zośka” battalion
    remembrance in the People’s Republic of Poland
    historiography of the People’s Republic of Poland
    Opis:
    The subject of the article is the analysis of the process of creation of the remembrance of the battles and soldiers of the scout battalion “Zośka” of Armia Krajowa in the social space and the People’s Republic of Poland historiography. This process was commenced during the war, when a group of “Zośka” soldiers undertook actions aimed at preserving the documentation of the battalion. After the intrusion of the Red Army, the soldiers of the battalion mainly conspired against the Communist government and managed to create a headquarters for the battalion on the Powązki military cometary, which along with other headquarters became a place of remembrance for the Uprising and the insurgents. Simultaneously, the first publications were released concerning the “Zośka” battles, including the issue of the book entitled “Kamienie na szaniec” by Aleksander Kamiński, published during the underground movement. The ongoing Stalinisation of Poland interrupted the possibility to commemorate the “Zośka” battalion, the soldiers of which were subjected to repression and persecution. After 1959, fundamental works were published concerning the A. Kamiński’s battalion “Zośka” and “Parasol” and the “Pamiętniki żołnierzy baonu ’Zośka’”, which created a basis for the cultivation of remembrance of the battalion in the public space, as well as outside Warsaw. Despite limitation created by the government, in particular considering the commemoration tablets, historical publications, the remembrance of “Zośka” was cultivated especially among some scout groups. An important moment here was naming the Scouting Organisation of Warsaw Mokotów after the Grey Ranks (Szare Szeregi) and organisation by it the “Arsenał” Treck since 1972. In 1966 a group of the battalion soldiers was created within the Union of Fighters for Freedom and Democracy (ZBoWiD), it gradually became possible to commemorate the military actions of the battalion, although in a wider range it only became possible in the 70s and especially in the 80s. However, the People’s Republic of Poland government tried to limit commemorating the battalion in the public space. The role of remembrance of the “Zośka” battalion in shaping the historical awareness of the Communist Poland is extremely important due to the its range and the moral values it conveyed. Today it is rather underestimated.
    Źródło:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2017, 30; 296-318
    1427-7476
    Pojawia się w:
    Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Scholarly Careers of Polish Women Historians in the Era of the People’s Republic of Poland (Selected Universities)
    Autorzy:
    Kolbuszewska, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20312080.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czasopisma i Monografie PAN
    Tematy:
    history of historiography
    history of science
    women in science
    academic careers
    prosopography
    the Polish People’s Republic
    Opis:
    This article offers a survey of the careers of 54 Polish female historians who received the habilitacja degree in 1945–1989 at seven Polish universities – four of those were founded soon after the Second World War (University of Łódź, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, University of Wrocław, Maria Skłodowska‑Curie University in Lublin), while three had been established earlier (University of Warsaw, Jagiellonian University in Kraków and the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań). Analysis of personal files and various biographical materials has led the author to a number of conclusions about female historians’ academic careers. The careers reflected the discipline’s development, both in terms of the expansion of its field of inquiry, as well its methodological diversity and the conditions in which it operated. Career paths followed by women were not much different from those followed by men. Neither advancement requirements, nor employment policy at the schools of higher learning were discriminatory towards any of the sexes. However, as far as the female career advancement is concerned, there were some differences between the old and new universities: it was easier for women to obtain managerial positions at the latter.
    Źródło:
    Historyka studia metodologiczne; 2021, 51, Spec. iss.; 283-297
    0073-277X
    Pojawia się w:
    Historyka studia metodologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Discrimination of Władysław Konopczyński in the People’s Republic of Poland
    Autorzy:
    Biliński, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/601493.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
    Tematy:
    history of historiography
    Stalinism in Poland
    relations between the academia and totalitarian rule
    Opis:
    This article discusses the relation of the eminent Polish historian Władysław Konopczyński (1880–1952) to the newly established communist rule. As president of the Commission of History of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, the editor-in-chief of the Polish Biographical Dictionary, and one of the few internationally known Polish historians who survived the war, the old Konopczyński enjoyed much prestige among his colleagues and in the Polish academia in general. For this and the other reasons indicated in the paper, the communist authorities choose him as the symbol of the ‘bourgeois’ scholarship and decided to discredit him and get rid of his person. The paper presents the ways in which the government exercised pressure on the scholar and his colleagues, causing Konopczyński’s resignation from all his posts, and depriving him the opportunities to teach and publish. Finally, the moral and practical results of this campaign on the historian’s collaborators and colleagues are analysed.
    Źródło:
    Acta Poloniae Historica; 2016, 114
    0001-6829
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Poloniae Historica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Między Polską Piastów i Polską Jagiellonów a Rzeczpospolitą Obojga Narodów. Refleksje „anarchologiczne” i ich miejsce w rozwoju myśli historycznej Pawła Jasienicy
    Between the Piast Poland, Jagiellonian Poland, and The Commonwealth of Both Nations. ‘Anarchological’ reflections and their place in the development of Paweł Jasienica’s historical thought
    Autorzy:
    Mękarski, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089403.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    Jasienica Pawel
    Piast Poland
    Jagiellonian Poland
    anarchy
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    historiography of the Polish People’s Republic
    Marxism
    Jasienica Paweł
    Polska piastowska
    Polska jagiellońska
    anarchia
    Rzeczpospolita polsko-litewska
    historiografia PRL
    marksizm
    Opis:
    In March 1962, Paweł Jasienica, known chiefly for his books on the history of Poland, published an article entitled ‘Polska anarchia’ (‘Polish anarchy’). The article, which appeared in the weekly Przegląd Kulturalny, sparked off a heated debate on the sources of the anarchy into which the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth began to descend in the latter half of the seventeenth century. Among those who contributed to the debate were some of the leading historians of the day. Encouraged by the response to his article, Jasienica decided to expand it into a full-length book (completed in the spring of 1963). The author first presents the views expounded in the article from Przegląd Kulturalny, and then he reconstructs the debate and examines how Jasienica referred to it in his work on the anarchy. Since Jasienica’s account of the anarchy covers the period with which he was also concerned in Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów (published in English as The Commonwealth of Both Nations) - the third part of his series on the history of Poland for which he is most acclaimed - the author also attempts to compare the interpretations advanced in one work with those advanced in the other. As regards the anarchy, Jasienica traced its origin back to the reign of the last two kings of the Jagiellonian dynasty . In compliance with their commitment to securing the support of the great magnates on whom they chose to base their power, Sigismund I the Old (1467-1548) and Sigismund II Augustus (1520-1572) refused to endorse political arrangements advocated by the representatives of the Lower House of Parliament. The failure to reform the country along the lines suggested by the latter group led, in the long term, to political chaos. Unlike Jasienica, according to whom the Commonwealth degenerated into anarchy because of the errors committed almost exclusively by the rulers, the academic historians, whose views were inspired by Marxism, linked the state’s political impotence with the policy pursued by the whole nobility as a class. However, as the author shows, in Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów Jasienica radically changed his views. In his later work, all responsibility for the future anarchy was shifted onto Sigismund III Vasa (1566-1632) and his Catholic fanaticism. In revising his interpretation of what is known as the nobles’ anarchy, Jasienica drew, at least to some extent, on works by Jarema Maciszewski and Władysław Czapliński, historians who also represented the official historiography of the Polish People’s Republic.
    Źródło:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki; 2022, 67, 1; 43--68
    0023-589X
    2657-4020
    Pojawia się w:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies