Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "dignity" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 562
Tytuł:
Godność człowieka a prawa człowieka
Human Dignity and Human Rights
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1873047.pdf
Data publikacji:
1980
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The author narrows down his subject to consider whether the idea of human dignity as found in the documents of the United Nations Organization is inspired by the Christian doctrine. The article also sets out to clarify the relation between natural law and human rights. Human rights are all those rights that follow directly from human dignity; they are for that reason universal, inviolable and inalienable; they are adequate to human dignity and they protect it. Dignity is indicated to be the source of human rights by the entire philosophical tradition regarding natural law as developed within the doctrine of the Church, and also by the documents of the United Nations Organization, in particular the Pacts of Human Rights. Human rights can appear in the form of non-positivized natural law or in the form of positive law, laid down in state or international documents. The author shows the terms „human nature” and „human dignity” to be synonymous. Pacem in terris employs them interchangeably, and the United Nations documents use the term „human dignity”. Much attention is devoted to human dignity in the Scripture, ancient philosophy, patristics, the philosophy of the Middle Ages (Thomas Aquinas), the Renaissance (Picco della Mirandola), the Enlightenment (I. Kant), and in modern thought (J. Messner). Human dignity is considered from theological and philosophical viewpoints. From the point of view of theology it is defined in terms of man’s creation in the image of God and of his adoption as a son of God by grace. From the philosophical, viewpoint, it is defined in terms of reason, conscience and freedom. Dignity is a value that is innate, permanent, inalienable, universal and dynamic, proper only to man. Since human rights follow directly from human dignity, they share its attributes. The contemporary ideas of human dignity and human rights are inspired by the Christian doctrine, as has also been pointed \it by non-Christian thinkers, e.g. E. Bloch and L. Kolakowski. In the author’s opinion, the connection between the idea of human dignity as found in the United Nations documents and the Christian doctrine is manifested by the fact that both make use of the same elements to define human dignity within the natural order. Man, man’s dignity, is the central value for Christianity. Pope John Paul II writes in Redemptor hominis: „In reality, the name for that deep amazement at man’s worth and dignity is the Gospel, that is to say: the Good News’\ That deep amazement, he says, „is also called Christianity”.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1980, 8; 19-48
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godność osoby ludzkiej jako wartość absolutna
Dignity of the Human Person as an Absolute Value
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1861513.pdf
Data publikacji:
1993
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The author analyzes the relations between various values and he establishes their ultimate criterion and hierarchy. He is of opinion that an incorrectly established criterion of values and an incorrectly constructed and accepted hierarchy of them leads to what Carl Schmitt called − in reference to Nikolai Hartman − the tyranny of value (die Tyrannai der Werte). The author critically appraises the views of those who maintain that there is a conflict, a dilemma or tension between freedom and equality (justice). He shows that the dilemma is not immanent in the mentioned values but in the incorrect conception of freedom as presented by the liberals on the one hand, and in the erroneous (objective) conception of equality as explicated by the Marxists. In fact the dilemma occurs between those philosophical-social trends. Secondly, the dilemma always appears where these values are confronted with each other in the wrong way and separated from other values − especially from the truth about dignity of the human person. And thirdly, in all the views in which it is admitted that there is a conflict between freedom and equality there is a „methodological” error. It consists in the fact that the conflict of interests of individuals or social groups is reduced to tensions between humanistic values − freedom and equality. Egoistic interests are sought to be hidden behind the screen of the values. Freedom without equality (justice) and the truth about dignity of the human person becomes freedom of élites whereas it is a tyrannizing value for most other classes. The situation is analogous in the case of equality without freedom and the truth dignity of the person. The author shows that dignity of the person is the central, absolute value, as the person is related to the Absolute; it is created in God's image and is redeemed by Christ (supernatural dignity). The author also writes about natural dignity to which the mind, conscience and freedom point. All other values, even objective and universal ones − moral norms and human rights − have an adpersonal (relative) character. Accepting freedom or equality as an absolute value without the truth about dignity of the human person lies at the foundations of all forms of totalitarian systems. According to the author dignity of the human person creates an obligation. He formulates the rule: persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam. He shows that dignity of the human person integrates nations as well as the international system of human rights. In the introduction to the United Nations Chart belief in dignity and value of the human person is expressed. In the introductions to both Human Rights Pacts (1966) it is recognized that human rights follow from the inborn dignity of the human person. The notion of dignity of the human person is also found in the constitutions of many countries, e.g. of West Germany (1949). In West German commentaries it is said that dignity of the human person (Art. 1 p. 1) is the highest value (der oberste Wert), it is the norm of norms (Norm der Normen). Dignity of the human person should be − as it not always is − the criterion of all programs and social economic and political systems.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1993, 21, 1; 261-271
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godność osoby ludzkiej czy prawo naturalne podstawą praw osoby ludzkiej w ujęciu Jacquesa Maritaina
The Dignity of the Human Person or Natural Law as the Basis of the Rights of the Human Person According to Jacques Maritain
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1860754.pdf
Data publikacji:
1997
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
It is true that Maritain writes that natural law (la loi naturelle) is the foundation of human rights, yet he proves that rights are natural rights in the strict sense of the term, whereas others are necessarily bound with it, and yet others are bound only in a contingent manner. The French philosopher considered natural law at two levels: ontological and cognitive. The human being possesses, likewise all other living creatures, a unique structure and goals, a normal way of its functioning (normalité de son foncionnement) - law. The goals are as follows: maintenance of existence and development. For man this law bears a moral character, for man is person, i.e. a rational, free being that has conscience, and he is the master of his own acts. Maritain calls this right a non-written law (la loi non écrite). Now in the ontic fabric of man reside goods which are his due: existence (life) and freedom. Apart from these goods he is entitled to the rights: to life and freedom. In this ontic fabric resides a natural inclination to maintain life, to give life, and to develop. One may maintain one’s existence and reach integral development by acquiring other goods and fulfilling good deeds (working). He, too, has the duty to do good, without which he will fail to maintain his existence and will not reach his goal. Following St Thomas, Maritain lays down the first principle of natural law: do good and avoid evil acts. In this principle reside the most fundamental rights and duties of the human person. It is characteristic of its interpretation that it puts rights before duties. Either of them has a personal and social aspect. The foundation of natural law is the dignity of the human person. Dignity is a metaphysical absolute value, residing in the ontic fabric of person. The core of dignity is in the soul of man, who was created in the likeness of God (imago Dei). Maritain writes: „The dignity of the human person is a word which denotes nothing, if it does not mean that the person of his or her own natury possesses [...] rights”. To know natural law - its gnoseological aspect - is a different problem. It is known spontaneously, in a nonreflective manner, and progressively as regards the degree of civilizational development of mankind, which is pinpointed by ethnology and history of societies. It was exposed to the hazard of errors just as in all other affairs, due to the fact that human reason is imperfect. However, the sound line of moral experience of the binding power of natural law was still developed and will further be developed. Following St Thomas, Maritain lists natural law, the law of nations (ius gentium), the positive revealed Divine law and (established) human law. He incorporates natural law known by way of reflection, and not spontaneously by inclination, within ius gentium and calls it the common law of civilisation (la loi commune de la civilisation). Now ius gentium is linked with natural law in a necessary manner, whereas human law is linked with it only conditionally and contingently. The author of paper proposes to call human law the law of culture. Following the above division, Maritain gives three groups of human rights: rights which belong to natural law, to ius gentium and to positive law. The rights of the human person which belong to natural law and ius gentium are inalienable, unforfeitable - absolute, yet in the aspect of their being granted to human beings. In the aspect, however, of their application they do not have the character of absolute rights, for the human person is a little god. Maritain has also given a different division of human rights: the rights of the human person as such (droits de la personne humaine comme telle), the rights of the civil person (droits de la personne civique), and the rights of the social person, in particular the working person (droits de la personne sociale, et plus particulièrement de la personne ouwrière). Speaking about the rights of the social person, he lists the rights of the people fulfilling some social, economic and cultural functions: producers, consumers, technicians, creators of culture and science. There is still a debate about the right to work, and some Catholic authors negate it, yet Maritain recognizes this right as a basic right and ranks it first among the rights of the person-labourer. He predicted that along with the progress of economic organization a new right to the title of labour (au titre de travail) would be read out, a right which he also called the title of labour (le titre de travail). Not only does the title of possessing property entitle one to manage enterprise, but also to have the title of labour. He pointed to the necessity to take up reform of capitalism and to shape a new socio-economic order. This order should be an order of the aristocracy of labour, that is such in which social, economic and political life will be run by people who are best in their job. To put this regime into effect requires a „moral revolution”.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1997, 25, 1; 33-61
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stereotip Poljaka v russkoj literature XIX–XX vv.
THE STEREOTYPE OF A POLE IN THE RUSSIAN LITERATURĘ OF THE 19TH AND 20TH CENTURIES
Autorzy:
Levkievskaja, Elena E.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/611285.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
the stereotype of a Pole in Russian literature
the image of a Polish “master”
Pan-Slavism
the change of perspective
dignity
humanism
resistance against oppression
stereotyp Polaka w literaturze rosyjskiej
obraz polskiego „pana”
panslawizm
zmiana perspektywy
godność
człowieczeństwo
opór wobec przemocy
Opis:
Stosunek Rosji do Polski można – zdaniem autorki – określić słowami Katullusa: „nienawidzę i kocham”. Nienawiść miała źródło w politycznej walce dwóch państw, której pamięć po stronie rosyjskiej sięga XVI- i XVII-wiecznych wojen, kiedy to utrwalił się obraz polskiego „pana”, butnego, chełpliwego i fałszywego, Polaka-wroga. W XVIII i XIX wieku rosyjska poezja patriotyczna opiewała zwycięstwa Rosjan nad Polakami, zwłaszcza w roku 1795 i 1831. Wytykana Polakom duma, buntowniczość, niestałość, obcość wśród swoich (tj. Słowian) miały podstawę polityczną, bo kłóciły się z ideami państwowego rosyjskiego panslawizmu, a także teologiczną (w duchu prawosławnym), bo pozostawały w sprzeczności z ideałem pokornego chrześcijanina. W XX wieku następuje zmiana perspektywy i przewartościowanie tradycyjnych charakterystyk. „Polska duma” zaczyna być postrzegana jako wyraz poczucia godności, nieodłącznego od człowieczeństwa (tak w wierszach Maryny Cwietajewej), a polska buntowniczość i niepokorność – jako zdolność do sprzeciwu i nieugiętego oporu wobec przemocy (wiersze Dawida Samojłowa). Nie zmieniły się przypisywane Polakom cechy, zmieniła się ich ewaluacja.
It is claimed that the relationship of Russia towards Poland may be described with Catullus’s words: „I hate and love”. The hatred derives from the political struggle between the two countries, the memories of which on the Russian side go back to the wars of the 16th and 17th centuries, when the image of a Pole-enemy, a Polish arrogant, boastful and double-faced „master” took shape. In the 18th and 19th centuries, Russian patriotic poetry extolled the praises of Russian victories over Polish forces, especially those from 1795 and 1831. The reproach to the Polish pride, rebelliousness, instability, and alienation from their kin (i.e. Slavs) was based on political and theological premises, the former because these characteristics stood in opposition to the ideas of the Russian panslavism, the latter because they did not mat.ch the ideal of a humble Christian. In the 20th century there comes a change of perspective and re-evaluation of traditional characteristics: „Polish pride” begins to be seen as a manifestation of dignity, inextricably linked with human nature(in the poems of Marina Tsvetayeva), whereas Polish rebelliousness and reluctance to submission as the ability to adamantly resist force (in the poems of David Samoylov). What changed were not the characteristics themselves but their valuation.
Źródło:
Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury; 2002, 14; 93-104
0860-8032
Pojawia się w:
Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rebuilding A Nations Dignity
Autorzy:
Ignatius, David.
Powiązania:
Washington Post 2003, 20 marzec, s. A29
Data publikacji:
2003
Opis:
Problemy powstałe w związku z odbudową poczucia godności narodowej. Wojna w Iraku stawia przed USA i sojusznikami nowe wyzwania w tym zakresie.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawa i godność człowieka we współczesnej bioetyce
The Human Rights and The Human Dignity in The Contemporary Bioethics
Autorzy:
Bołoz, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1817724.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
Bioetyka
prawa człowieka
godność człowieka
Bioethics
human rights
dignity of man
human dignity
Opis:
In contemporary bioethics dominate two trends dealing with two basic ethical solutions. First of them is utilitarianism concerning utility as a criterion of judging between what is right and what is wrong. The second trend applies to human rights and human dignity, which are to be obeyed without any exceptions. Utilitarianism protects the strong and prosperous people in society and excludes those who are weak and not capable of independent life. The concept of human dignity protects each and every human being including the weakest ones. It is therefore characterized by real humanitarianism. In addition, it has one more outstanding virtue; in the contemporary world, it is the most widespread and understandable ethical code. It enables people of different civilizations to communicate with understandable ethical language. In the world constantly undergoing global processes, it is of great value. Although there are a number of discussions concerning the way of understanding human dignity and human rights, their universal and ethical meaning; there are certain international acts of law concerning biomedicine that support the concept of human dignity as the most adequate concept for contemporary bioethics. As an example, the European Convention on Bioethics can be taken. The article includes the most significant topics concerning understanding, history, and application of law and human dignity in bioethics.
Źródło:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae; 2004, 2, 1; 189-212
1733-1218
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aksjologiczne podstawy integralnej ochrony środowiska przyrodniczego i ludzkiego
Axiological principles of integrated protection of human and natural environments
Autorzy:
Bołoz, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1817667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
kryzys ekologiczny
antropocentryzm
biocentryzm
chrześcijaństwo
umiarkowany antropocentryzm
prawa człowieka
godność osoby
ecological crisis
anthropocentrism
biocentrism
Christianity
moderate anthropocenrics
human rights
human dignity
Opis:
OW ciągu ostatnich dekad jesteśmy świadkami znaczącej zmiany w mentalności ludzi i ich stosunku do środowiska naturalnego i jego ochrony. Zmianie tej towarzyszą różne zasady aksjologiczne, wśród których można wyróżnić: 1) koncepcję antropocentryczną, która w centrum stawia człowieka i przyznaje mu uprzywilejowane miejsce wśród innych gatunków; 2) koncepcję anty-antropocentryczną, która akcentuje równość gatunków i domaga się odwrócenia orientacji humanistycznej ugruntowanej przez europejskie oświecenie; 3) koncepcję umiarkowanie antropocentryczną, która podkreśla ludzką troskę i odpowiedzialność wobec ekosystemu. Ponieważ zaburzenia równowagi ekologicznej jest skutkiem działania człowieka i znakiem kryzysu kulturowego, konieczne jest uświadomienie sobie potrzeby ochrony środowiska naturalnego. Głosił to papież Jan Paweł II, odwołując się do ekologii integralnej, która łączy ochronę środowiska naturalnego i troskę o jakość duchowego życia człowieka. Ekologia integralna stawia dwa wymagania: 1) wszystkie działania na rzecz ochrony środowiska powinny być rozumiane jako środki umocnienia szacunku dla godności człowieka; 2) należy porzucić to wszystko, co niszczy środowisko naturalne i zagraża człowiekowi.
Over the last few decades, we have witnessed a significant change in human mentality and attitudes towards the natural environment and its protection. This change is accompanied by different axiological principles within which we can distinguish: 1) the anthropocentric concept which places man in the centre and grants him a privileged place amongst other species; 2) the anti-anthropocentric concept which stresses the equality of all species and demands a reversal in humanistic orientation consolidated by the European Enlightenment; 3) the moderate anthropocentric concept which underlines human’s caring and a responsible role towards the ecosystem. As disturbances of ecological balance are the result of human actions and the sign of the cultural crisis, the necessity to protect the natural environment should be realised. John Paul II was a supporter of the above. He referred to the integrated ecology, which combines the protection of the natural environment with the concern of the quality of human spirituality. Integrated ecology poses two demands: 1) all actions towards environmental protection should be understood as means of confirming the respect of human personal dignity; 2) those actions which harm the natural environment and threaten man should be given up.
Źródło:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae; 2006, 4, 1; 113-120
1733-1218
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ciało - źródło grzechu czy powód do chwały w świetle poglądów Tertuliana
Body - source of sin or cause to glory according to Tertullian
Autorzy:
Filipowicz, Adam M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1817951.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
ciało ludzkie
Tertulian
godność ciała
human body
dignity of human body
Opis:
The article considers human body in teaching of Tertullian, one of the famous early Christian writers and an important apologist of Christianity. It consists of five parts: 1. Introduction; 2. Despise body in ancient philosophical thought; 3. Dignity of body according to Tertullian; 4. Human body and responsibility for evil and sin; 5. Summary.
Źródło:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae; 2006, 4, 1; 217-239
1733-1218
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godność osoby ludzkiej i obiektywne normy moralne jako reguły w działalności gospodarczej
Dignity of the human person and objective moral norms as rules in economy
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852622.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
osoba ludzka
godność
normy moralne
prawa człowieka
wartości uniwersalne
wartość pracy ludzkiej
bezrobocie
human person
dignity
moral norms
human rights
universal values
value of human work
unemployment
Opis:
The author subjects to revision the economic liberalism supporters’ views, according to which there is no room for universal moral norms in the area of economy. The conception of homo economicus accepted in economy and the exclusive rule of profit are a manifestation of reductionism. The conviction that the free competition – free market – acts mechanically and impersonally and solves all economic-social problems in the best way is basically incorrect. In free competition there are positive and negative elements. Free competition – “yes, but what kind?” In the article a possibly complete picture of man is shown. Man is a reasonable creature, he is internally free and able to recognize good and evil (owing to his conscience) and owing to this he is the most perfect being in the created world. In his nature, man is a social being (ens sociale); a spiritual-bodily unity; he is not completely actualized but he is open to development; he is a religious and working creature (laborem exercens, homo economicus); he is able to do good, devote oneself to others, to build just – albeit not ideal –systems: legal, cultural, social and economic. But man is also able to do evil: to kill others, to steal, to lie, to wage wars, to commit acts of terrorism and of genocide, to build concentration camps, to manipulate the needs and mentality of whole societies and to enslave others by means of mass media – that is to form a one-dimension man. In the theological-biblical language this is called sinfulness of the human nature. And finally, man is capable of – as H. Marcuse writes – “scientific idiotism”. The highest value is the inborn, n a t u r a l, dignity of the human person, which is pointed to by his mind, inner freedom and conscience. Man is created in God’s image (imago Dei). Christ’s incarnation and redemption of man show his s u p e r n a t u r a l dignity. This is theological-biblical justification. Also philosophical (rational) justification is given. The former one is binding for believers, and the latter is for unbelievers. In the Catholic social teaching both justifications are given. The ontic structure of the human person in itself gives rise to obligations, it is the highest norm. It is defined in the following form: the human person should be respected for himself, because he is a person, and not for any other reason (persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam). The very human person, his dignity, is the fundamental norm of morality that is searched for. The Decalogue, objective and universal moral norms as principles show how to respect and protect the human person. It is not recognizing and complying with moral norms and human rights for themselves that is meant here – art for the art’s sake (pure formalism) – but protection of one’s own dignity and the dignity of every other person. Both moral norms as principles and human rights have been discovered slowly, step by step, but regressions also occur; this especially happened in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st century. Human persons are the subjects of all communities – the family, the nation, the universal human society (familiae humanae), production and service institutions. The communities do not exist by themselves, but human persons are their foundation. Human persons, and not various systems, are the subject of any activity, for the systems are not persons or super-persons – Super Ego. Hence the thesis put forward by some economists that the system is ruled by an invisible hand is absurd. In human rights three elements are distinguished: their source, contents and protection. These constitute an integral whole. However, identifying a part with the whole (pars pro toto) is a logical mistake. The debate about man’s right to work can be solved after removing this logical mistake and introducing a new term: “the right for work”; showing that work is one of man’s fundamental needs, that it is a universal phenomenon, has a multi-aspectual dimension of values. Work is an anthropological (personal), moral, social, cultural, historical and economic value. Together with the multidimensional value of work the multidimensional evil of unemployment can be seen. There have been various economic models, even in capitalism. After the fall of socialism the thesis is proclaimed that capitalism is the only alternative (logical quantifier). Recognizing the priority of the real capital over work treated as a tool and commodity bought in the so-called work market is the essential feature of capitalism. John Paul II perceives numerous positive elements in capitalism, but he also sees a few negative ones: “We have found out that the thesis saying that after the defeat of real socialism capitalism remains the only model (logical quantifier) of economic organization is unacceptable.” He does not suggest another model, but generally he states that it is “… a society in which there are: freedom of work, enterprise and participation” that is meant here. He adds: “Economy that does not take into consideration the ethical dimension and does not attempt to serve the good of man – each man and the whole man – in fact does not even deserve the name of «economy» understood as reasonable and benevolent management of material resources”. Although he sees positive elements in the process of globalization, he puts forward an imperative demand to base it on the principle of the dignity of the human person and his rights, and the good of the whole human family (familiae humanae). In the area of economy “ … in the field of economy nobody may insult the human dignity without a punishment, which dignity God himself respects greatly” (Leo XIII).
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 19-53
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Brak wiary a wykluczenie godności sakramentalnej małżeństwa
The lack of faith and the exclusion of the sacramental dignity of marriage
Autorzy:
Leszczyński, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
wykluczenie
wykluczenie godności sakramentalnej małżeństwa
Opis:
The Code of Canon Law of 1983 classifies the reasons for marriage invalidity in three different categories: diriment impediments, defects in matrimonial consent and lack or defect of canon form. Among different defects in matrimonial consent, in its can. 1101 § 2, the Code of Canon Law enumerates simulations. Simulation signifies that a person contracting marriage expresses marital agreement merely on the surface, excluding in reality, through a positive act of will, the marriage itself, some essential elements of or an essential property of marriage. The grounds for excluding the sacramental dignity constitute a novum as compared to the Code of Canon Law of 1917. The present article attempts to look at the relation between the lack of faith and the exclusion of marriage sacramental dignity, with the consideration of marriage invalidity.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2007, 16; 151-164
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Cis Oceanum et Ultra or about the dignity of the university and the scholar. Ernst Kantorowicz and his work
Autorzy:
Strzelczyk, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/703230.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Ernst Kantorowicz
middle ages
political theology
scholars’ exodus from Nazi-Germany
Opis:
Ernst (-Hartwig) Kantorowicz, born in Poznań (then Germany) in 1895, died in Princeton in 1963, is one of the most distinguished and influential historians (mediaevalists) of the 20th century. A descendent of an affluent Jewish-German (totally naturalized) family, after the rebirth of the Polish state in 1918 moved together with the family to Germany, took part in the World War I, struggled against the Polish insurgents and against the communists in Berlin and Munich, studied a.o. in Heidelberg, where he joined the famous Stefan George circle. After publishing the monograph on Emperor Frederick the Second (1927-1931) he have been callingas professor in Frankfurt a.M., as consequence to the decisions of the Nazi-government he retired in 1933/1934 and eventually in 1938 emigrated to Great Britain and finally to the USA, where (first in Berkeley Ca., then in Princeton) he lived and worked until his death. Besides his fundamental monographs and studies on the medieval political liturgy (Laudes regiae 1946) and the political theology (The Kings’ Two Bodies 1957), his life was characterized by an extraordinary stable opinion and the determination to defend it, as was proved first in 1933 in Nazi- Germany and the second time in Berkeley in 1949 (during the s.c. Loyalty Oath Controversion). This article is an abbreviated and partially changed version of the introduction to the Polish translation of the main work by Kantorowicz (The King’s Two Bodies), to appear in this year.
Źródło:
Nauka; 2007, 2
1231-8515
Pojawia się w:
Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Balancing Human Dignity, Life and Security. On Dogmatic Structures of Fundamental Rights in Times of Terrorism
Autorzy:
Grawert, Rolf
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/506125.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2008, 2; 59-71
1733-2680
2451-0610
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 562

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies