Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "classification of historic monuments and sites" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Klasyfikacja i kategoryzacja w systemie ochrony zabytków
Classification and categorization in the system of monument protection
Autorzy:
Szmygin, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113918.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
diversification of historic monuments and sites
heritage classification and categorisation
dywersyfikacja zabytków i miejsc
klasyfikacja i kategoryzacja dziedzictwa
Opis:
Contemporarily, historic monuments and sites are highly diverse and vast in number. This means that each asset and property has different value and, hence, different principles and forms of historic preservation need to be applied. Diversification of historic monuments and sites should be a part of the monument protection system and based on the widely accepted and followed methodology. No single methodology allowing for assessing the value of all historic monuments and sites has been developed yet. For this reason, diversification of historic monuments and sites is not applied in the international doctrinal documents. The most comprehensive method of assesing heritage value has been implemented into UNESCO’s World Heritage system. It consists on comparing assets within a certain reference group, yet it does not involve value gradation. Within the monument protection system, historic monuments and sites can be divided into two major groups, i.e. classes (in terms of the value of an asset or property) and categories (in terms of the specific features of an asset or property). In the Polish system of historic monuments and sites, application of categorisation (typology-based groups) is justified. However, for practical reasons (a risk of protection being depreciated and weakened), classes can be applied in limited scope (valuing groups).
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 121-132
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O początkach klasyfikacji zabytków. O wadach i zaletach polskich systemów wartościowania zabytków
On the beginning of the classification of monuments. On the advantages and disadvantages of Polish heritage valuation systems
Autorzy:
Lewicki, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113948.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
classification
historic monuments and sites in Poland
historic preservation
heritage management
klasyfikacja
zabytki i miejsca w Polsce
zachowanie historyczne
zarządzanie dziedzictwem
Opis:
This article discusses practices of classification of historic monuments and sites which have been adopted in Poland so far. The author of this article presents criteria pertaining to categorising and making inventory of historic monuments and sites developed in the first half of the twentieth century by Jan Zachwatowicz, Zdzisław Bieniecki, and Michał Witwicki. Furthermore, what is also presented is classification of materials that are relevant by their use or invention, classification of modernism monuments, and classification of historic monuments and sites which was carried out in the years 19590–1962, at the time when classes 0 and 1–4 were introduced. In future, historic monuments and sites should be classified by members of different expert teams cooperating with each other on different levels (regional and supralocal). The lists must be verified by academic authorities from various communities (art and architecture historians, conservators, etc.) and all works must be carried out in compliance with currently binding regulations. The criteria should be developed in accordance with the regulations set forth in the Polish Act on Protection and Guardianship of Monuments and Sites of 23 July 2003, unless major amendments are made to it. The author of this article suggests the following criteria, compliant with the legal regulations in force: – artistic merit (art. 3.1): the form of a property or a group of properties (quality and scope of their influence – European, supraregional, and local) – scientific and academic merit (art. 3.1): authenticity of the idea, material, function as well as construction, material, and innovation on local and supraregional scale. – historical merit (art. 3.1): the value and significance of the site, people and events - European, supraregional, and local scale It is necessary to define the significance and value of historic monuments and sites of European (supranational), regional, and local importance. Classification of both single historic monuments and sites and their groups should be clear, simple, and include the smallest possible number of valuing criteria. Furthermore, it should be compliant with Polish laws in force. When applied, the classification should result in factual selection of properties and sites - not on creating new groups of properties and sites of great historical importance and new categories of values being difficult to define. It is not possible to have standardised cirtieria matching all requirements and assigning high rank to each historic monument and site.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 91-108
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prace konserwatorskie, a klasyfikacja zabytków
Conservation works and the classification of monuments
Autorzy:
Korpała, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/114006.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
conservation works
classification of historic monuments and sites
prace konserwatorskie
klasyfikacja zabytków i miejsc
Opis:
Value assessment of historic monuments and sites and their classification are affected by conservation works and the impact they exert on elements of historical significance. Whether a historic monument or site can be still considered evidence of a past epoch depends on the scope of conservation works carried out in this asset. Works conducted in appropriate manner provide new information about the past. Additionally, a historic monument or site is attributed new values - not only aesthetic and functional but also the historical ones. This allows for changing their classification. Therefore, the role that the results of conservation works play in classification of historic monuments and sites has been particularly emphasised. The author of this article ponders upon whether layers of the previously carried out conservation works as well as their effects can be the reason for redoing value assessment and re-classifying a historic monument or site. These deliberations provided a basis for drawing conclusions and producing recommendations pertaining to the influence that conservation works and layers created as their result exert on the actions taken by historic preservation offices supervising these works. For this reason, the present classification should include the following: – increasing the importance of historic monuments and sites which have not been transformed at all or have been slightly modified This concerns historic monuments and sites which are typical of their epoch, e.g. tenement houses, palaces, industrial plants, etc. – valuable layers and elements created in the course of conservation works, which should be preserved and, prior to issuing permits by historic preservation office and launching conservation works, assessed in terms of their values. These elements should be preserved in order to place these assets under a different class, usually of a higher rank. Preserving elements created in the course of formerly conducted conservation works and resulting in forming multiple layers is compliant with the currently applied conservation theory, which no longer accepts purist methods as a way of preserving monuments and sites. Due to this, it is possible to preserve the evidence of conservation works and take care of historic monuments and sites in order to preserve them for future generations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 67-78
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy Wawel można nadbudować?Refleksje na temat klasyfikacji zabytków
Can Wawel be superstructed? Reflections on the classification of monuments
Autorzy:
Dąbrowski, Jacek
Jankowski, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/113914.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
historic monuments and sites
categorization
protection
zabytki i miejsca historyczne
kategoryzacja
ochrona
Opis:
None of the legal acts applied in the Polish monument protection system, ranging from the Regency Council Decree of 1918 to the Act of 2003, allows for transforming historic monuments and sites. This provision applies, paradoxically, unless a competent historic preservation officer approves such transformations. In other words, under the aforementioned acts, it is possible to make any modification to the existing historic monument or site, provided that a historic preservation officer issues an appropriate permit. Each of these legal acts provides framework for classifying historic monuments and sites, e.g. by introducing various forms of protection, classifying monuments and sites under various categories – immovable, movable, archaeological, etc. Therefore, classification is real. There are so many different historic monuments and sites falling under a great number of categories that it is impossible to provide them with real, even diversified protection. It is therefore necessary to implement such a classification of historic monuments and sites that would allow state and regional historic preservation officers and representatives of local government administration to carry out actions aimed at protecting properties and places of great historical significance. The recommended classification is a starting point for discussing methods, criteria, and rules governing classification of historic monuments and sites. Additionally, it will ensure appropriate protection.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 15-26
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Klasyfikacja zabytków w czeskim ustawodawstwie
Classification of monuments in Czech legislation
Autorzy:
Dąbkowska, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/114028.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
Czech legislation
historic preservation in Czechia
classification of historic monuments and sites in Czechia
ustawodawstwo czeskie
zachowanie historyczne w Czechach
klasyfikacja zabytków i miejsc w Czechach
Opis:
In Czechia, provisions of law pertaining to historic preservation were established in 1958, during Stalinism. The regulations were provided in Czechoslovakian Act on Cultural Monuments. It was superseded by the Act on State Care for Historic Monuments and Sites being currently in force, which was adopted in the former political system in 1987. Due to dynamic economic, political, and ownership-related transformations taking place at that time, it was necessary to amend it. Consequently, for several years, the legislators have been working on a new act referred to as “The Act on Protection of Resources of Historic Monuments and Sites.” This article pertains to legislative solutions and classification of historic monuments and sites in the light of the Act being developed. In this document, historic monuments and sites are not grouped into specific categories. Instead, they are all considered material elements of cultural heritage. On the other hand, assets of historical significance are classified into cultural monuments, monument ensembles, and national culture monuments and sites of the most outstanding significance. Additionally, two temporary forms of historic preservation have been developed: areas and reserves of historical significance. Archaeological monuments and properties considered as having outstanding historical values under certain international agreements are treated separately. This classification allows for assigning tasks to appropriate administrative bodies and, at the same time, encouraging institutions responsible for historic preservation of monuments and sites on the national level to become advisory bodies of regional administration institutions. What is worth mentioning in the field of historic preservation in Czechia are government’s attempts at making historic monuments and sites more available to citizens by introducing certain legal regulations, i.e. providing the government with pre-emptive right to purchase a property of historical significance from a private owner. This approach results in increasing government’s profits from tourism and culture-related products.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2016, 2; 7-13
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies